Title of Invention

INDUCTANCE ARRANGEMENT

Abstract An inductance arrangement is directed to inductors, chokes and transformers with a very high power density. Chokes comprise a magnetic circuit and an electrical circuit, the latter usually comprising a copper winding. The inductance arrangement improves cooling of the magnetic circuit, efficiency of the induction arrangement and reduces the consumption of material for the windings for a lower weight and a reduced structural size. Individual plate packs in the induction arrangement are displaced relative to each other to increase the surface area at both sides of the iron core. Displacement of the plates of the limbs allows for effective cooling passages or ducts between the core and the surrounding winding. PRICE: THIRTY RUPEES
Full Text



Inductance arrangement
The invention concerns an inductance arrangement or the construction of inductors, chol Chol Such a choke usually comprises two magnetically conductive limbs which are each enclosed by a respective copper winding and which are magnetically coupled together by yokes, wherein depending on the respective situation of use involved an air gap can be provided between a limb and a yoke. In this respect the inductance of such a choke can be calculated as follows:
(Equation 1)

wherein: AFe denotes the iron cross-section, IFe denotes the length of the iron path, N denotes the number of turns, uo denotes relative permeability and ue denotes effective permeability.
Magnetic induction accordingly can be calculated in accordance with the following formula:
(Equation 2)
Magnetic induction is the determining factor in regard to the design of inductive components or transformers. An increase in inductance of the induction B always also means a higher power density.
The iron losses Pv,Fe within the magnetic circuit (core) are dependent in a wide range at low frequency in quadratic relationship on the inductance B. This is shown in Figure 2. With even greater driving of the dynamo plate the iron losses rise very steeply, for which reason that range should generally be avoided. Conventional types of chokes however do not entail the possibility of dissipating high power losses as the iron limbs are insulated from the ambient atmosphere by the coil body, that is to say the copper winding. In this case there is practically no possible way of heat dissipation by radiation (winding over core) or heat dissipation by conduction (air gap). Therefore only a small amount of power loss can be removed from the magnetic circuit.
The object of the present invention is to improve the cooling of the magnetic circuit, to improve the efficiency of the induction arrangement described in the opening part of this specification and to markedly reduce the consumption of material for the windings so that with the same amount of power it is possible to achieve a lower weight and a reduced structural size for the induction arrangement.

In accordance with the invention it is proposed that individual plate packs in the induction arrangement are displaced relative to each other. That drastically increases the surface area at both sides of the iron core. That increase in the cooling area can be easily achieved, by a factor of between five and fifteen. Displacement of the plates of the limbs give rise to highly effective cooling passages or ducts between the core and the surrounding winding.
An increase in the induction B by about 10% also permits a number of turns which is 10% higher. That means however that the inductance ncreases by about 121% as - see formula 1 - that increases in proportion :o the square of the number of turns.
It is particularly effective if the mutually displaced plates or nutually displaced plate packs are oriented displaced through 90° with espect to the longitudinal direction of a yoke. In that way the surface can be adjusted to a desired size by virtue of the displacement of the plates without in that case the winding of the adjacent magnetic circuits lecoming closer.

Accordingly the present invention provides an induction arrangement, comprising a magnetic circuit having a surface area and having at least two limbs connected by at least one yoke, an electrical circuit having at least one metal winding, and the limbs being formed by a plurality of laminated plates each having a surface area, the laminated plates being displaced relative to each other to expose at least a portion of the surface area of more than one of the laminated plates and said laminated plates of at least one of said limbs being oriented along planes, which are oriented perpendicular to a plane formed by the said at least one limb and said at least one yoke and further being oriented parallel to a rotation axis of said metal winding.
The invention is described in greater detail hereinafter by means of an embodiment illustrated in the drawings, in which :
Figure 1 shows the principle of a magnetic choke.
Figure 2 is a representation of the dependency of the iron losses on induction.
Figure 3 is a plan view of an induction arrangement according to the invention, and
Figure 4 shows comparative views of the iron losses in dependence on induction in the case of conventional chokes and chokes according to the invention.
Figure 1 shows the structure in principle of an induction arrangement by
means of the example of a choke 1. In the illustrated example it comprises a
magnetic circuit 8, two electrical circuits 2 and, depending on the respective
situation of use involved the magnetic circuit

also has an air gap 3. The magnetic circuit in turn comprises four elements, namely two yokes 5 and two limbs 4.
The electrical circuits 2 usually comprise a copper winding or another metal winding.
Depending on the area of use involved the limbs and yokes may comprise laminated dynamo plates 7 when dealing with lower and medium' frequencies, while for higher frequencies they preferably also comprise ferrite or iron powder.
As can be seen from Figure 2 in the case of conventional inductors the iron losses Pv,Fe within the magnetic circuit, that is to say the iron losses of the dynamo sheets, are dependent in a relatively large range at low frequency in quadratic relationship on the induction B.
With an even higher level of actuation (with a still greater level of induction) of the magnetic circuit or the dynamo plates, the iron losses rise very steeply, and for that reason this range should be avoided as far as possible.
In the case of chokes of conventional type the magnetic circuits are not only formed from dynamo plates, but those dynamo plates also form a compact rectangular or square core. That core in turn is surrounded by a closely adjoining electrical circuit, that is to say the copper winding, so that the magnetic core or the limb surrounded by the magnetic circuit are insulated from the ambient atmosphere and are therefore not in a position of adequately removing the heat which is generated. Even if the parts of the limbs, which do not have a winding therearound, are cooled by special means, there is not an adequate possible way of removing the heat which is produced in the limbs by way of heat dissipation by radiation or heat dissipation by conduction. Thus, in spite of considerable structural sizes, only relatively low levels of power loss can be removed from the limbs or the magnetic circuit.
Figure 3 shows an induction arrangement according to the invention by reference to the example of a choke. It will be seen in this respect that

the limbs 4 surrounded by the copper winding 2 connprise a plurality of plates 7 which are displaced relative to each other. In addition the limb plates 7 are oriented displaced through 90° relative to the longitudinal direction of a yoke 5 so that the displacement of the limbs relative to each other means that the original spacing between adjacent limbs is retained. The surface area of the limbs 4 at the sides is drastically increased by virtue of the displacement of the plate packs 7 which can be between about 2 and 10 mm in thickness. The increase in surface area and thus the cooling area by a factor of between five and fifteen can be easily achieved. As the limbs 4 are still surrounded by the copper winding 2, that affords highly effective cooling passages or ducts which, as in the case of a conventional cooling body, are capable of removing the heat which occurs in the limbs due to losses.
The highly intensive cooling of the limbs means that the induction B can be increased without In that case the limb temperatures going into critical ranges. An increase in the induction B by for example 10% also permits a 10% higher number of turns (see equation 2).
As can be seen from equation 1, the number of turns is quadratically involved in the level of the Inductance L so that an increase ;n induction B by 10% is equal to a rise in inductance L to 121%.
As the intensive cooling of the plates provides that they can be better utilised, that means that at the same time the limbs can also be smaller so that their weight is reduced. A reduction in the size of the limbs also at the same time means a reduction in the copper winding lengths, and therefore also represents a considerably lower level of consumption of copper.
That means that the efficiency of the inductance arrangement is considerably improved.
It was found that, by virtue of the steps according to the invention, with the choke power remaining the same, the structural size could be reduced by between about 30 and 50% in comparison with conventional

chokes and weight could be reduced by more than 40% in comparison with conventional chokes.
Figure 4 shows the comparison of the required amount of iron (weight) of the iron core of a choke. The volume of iron required Fevoi (weight) is plotted on the Y-axis. The X-axis shows the relative magnetic induction B, wherein Bst is the induction B in a conventional design (standard) and BN is the induction with the novel cooling action. The broken-line part B1 of the curve applies in regard to a conventional design while the solid-line part B2 applies with the novel cooling action.
The iron losses which respectively occur are constant for the curve shown. With the new cooling procedure, more losses can be removed per unit of surface area. Thus, as the curve shows, the choke can be of a substantially smaller structure.
It is to be noted in this respect that the steps according to the invention mean that the chokes can be acted upon by a much higher level of induction, in which respect iron losses per kilogram of iron still remain markedly lower than in the case of conventional chokes. That means that the range of critical iron losses is achieved with the choke according to the invention at a substantially higher level of induction B, while the choke according to the invention is of a considerably smaller structural size than conventional chokes.


WE CLAIM :
1. An induction arrangement, comprising a) a magnetic circuit having a surface area and having at least two limbs connected by at least one yoke, b) an electrical circuit having at least one metal winding, and c) the limbs being formed by a plurality of laminated plates each having a surface area, the laminated plates being displaced relative to each other to expose at least a portion of the surface area of more than one of the laminated plates and said laminated plates of at least one of said limbs being oriented along planes, which are oriented perpendicular to a plane formed by the said at least one limb and said at least one yoke and further being oriented parallel to a rotation axis of said metal winding.
2. The induction arrangement according to claim 1, wherein one or more cooling passages are provided between at least one of said limbs and the electrical circuit.
3. A transformer or choke having an induction arrangement according to claim 1 or 2, wherein at least two electrical circuits are coupled together by the magnetic circuit.
4. An induction arrangement comprising: a) a magnetic circuit having a surface area and having at least two limbs connected by at least one yoke, b) an electrical circuit having at least one metal winding, and c) the limbs being formed by a plurality of plate packs of laminated plates, the plate packs each having a surface area, the plate packs displaced relative to

each other to expose at least a portion of the surface area of more than one of the plate packs and said laminated plates of at least one of said limbs being oriented along planes, which are oriented perpendicular to a plane formed by the said at least one limb and said at least one yoke and further being oriented parallel to a rotation axis of said metal winding.
5. The induction arrangement according to claim 4, wherein one or more
cooling passages are provided between at least one of said limbs and the
electrical circuit.
6. A transformer or choke having an induction arrangement according to
claim 4 or 5, wherein at least two electrical circuits are coupled together
by the magnetic circuit.
7. An induction arrangement substantially as herein described with
reference to the accompanying drawings.


Documents:

in-pct-2001-0091-che abstract.jpg

in-pct-2001-0091-che abstract.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che claims.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che correspondence-others.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che correspondence-po.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che description(complete).pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che drawings.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che form-1.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che form-19.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che form-26.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che form-3.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che form-5.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che other.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che others.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che pct search report.pdf

in-pct-2001-0091-che pct.pdf

in-pct-2001-91-che correspondence others 08-03-2011.pdf

in-pct-2001-91-che form-13 08-03-2011.pdf

IN-PCT-2001-91-CHE CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 01-02-2010.pdf


Patent Number 220385
Indian Patent Application Number IN/PCT/2001/91/CHE
PG Journal Number 30/2008
Publication Date 25-Jul-2008
Grant Date 28-May-2008
Date of Filing 19-Jan-2001
Name of Patentee ALOYS WOBBEN
Applicant Address
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 ALOYS WOBBEN
PCT International Classification Number H01F27/08
PCT International Application Number PCT/EP2000/001582
PCT International Filing date 2000-02-25
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 199 20 268.0-34 1999-05-03 Germany