Title of Invention

A WIND POWER INSTALLATION AND A METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME

Abstract when planning ana setting up wind power installations the visual detractions to be expected on the part of the wind power installation on the environment play an increasingly important part in approval and acceptance. If for example a wind power installation is placed in the proximity of a residence, it is possible, when the sun is in unfavourable positions, that the wind power installation or the rotor thereof is between the sun and the residence. If the sunshine is not affected by cloud, the rotating rotor constantly throws a (strobing) shadow on to the property. The shadow casting caused by the wind power installation on the adjoining properties is often perceived by the residents as being very troublesome. Even if the wind power installation satisfies the legal approval requirements there is however not always any guarantee that the undesired shadow casting effect is prevented. The object of the present invention is to provide a wind power installation by means of which shadow casting regulation is improved. That is achieved by a method of operating a wind power installation wherein a first light intensity is detected in a region of direct light irradiation and a second light intensity is detected in a shadowed region, and wherein the wind power installation is shut down if the difference between the first light intensity and the second light intensity is greater than a predetermined value.
Full Text A Wind Power Installation And A Method of Controlling The Same
When planning and setting up wind power installations the visual
detractions to be expected on the part of the wind power installation on the
environment play an increasingly important part in approval and
acceptance. If for example a wind power installation is placed in the
proximity of a residence, it is possible, when the sun is in unfavourable
positions, that the wind power installation or the rotor thereof is between
the sun and the residence. If the sunshine is not affected by cloud, the
rotating rotor constantly throws a (strobing) shadow on to the property.
The shadow casting caused by the wind power installation on the adjoining
properties is often perceived by the residents as being very troublesome.
Even if the wind power installation satisfies the legal approval requirements
there is however not always any guarantee that the undesired shadow
casting effect is prevented.
DE 199 29 970 Al discloses a shadow casting regulating system in
which the intensity of light is detected in order to derive therefrom whether
a shadow can occur at all.
It will be noted however that an adequate level of light intensity is
only one of the prerequisites for a shadow to occur. A further prerequisite is
for example clear air. Under hazy visual conditions, the light is diffuse so
that only slight or no shadowing occurs, in spite of the high level of light-
intensity. Control of a wind power installation, which is based on the
intensity of the light, can result in a shutdown although there is no shadow.
The object of the present invention is to provide a wind power
installation, by means of which that disadvantage is overcome.

Accordingly, the present invention provides a wind power installation
comprising a data processing apparatus which controls the wind power
installation and in which are stored the positions of the sun or values
representative in that respect, in respect of which shutdown of the installation
can take place, characterized in that the wind power installation is coupled to at
least three light sensors which are arranged uniformly spaced around the wind
power installation and by means of which the respectively current intensity of
light and shadow or the intensity of light and shadow ascertained over a certain
time is measured, and that the data determined by the light sensors are
processed by the data processing apparatus and shutdown of the wind power
installation is effected if the difference between light and shadow is above a
predetermined value when a predetermined position of the sun is assumed.
Preferably, beyond the stored positions of the sun, fresh positions of the sun for
further immission points can be stored, which is effected by means of suitable
programming.
There is also provided a method of controlling a wind power installation,
comprising the steps of controlling the wind power installation by a data
processing apparatus, storing predetermined positions of the sun or values
representative of the predetermined positions of the sun in respect of which a
shutdown of the wind power installation can take place, wherein at least three
light sensors are arranged uniformly spaced around the wind power installation,
measuring the respective current light intensity in a light receiving region and in a
shadowed region or the respective light intensities in said regions ascertained
over a certain time by means of the at least three light sensors, processing the
data determined by the light sensors, and shutting down the wind power
installation if the difference between the light intensity in said regions is above a
predetermined value when a predetermined position of the sun is assumed.
Preferably, the method shuts down the wind power installation only at a
predetermined position of the sun. Preferably, the wind power installation is at
least temporarily shut down at a predetermined position of the sun.

According to the invention that object is attained by a method of
operating a wind power installation as set forth in claim 1. Advantageous
developments are described in the appendant claims.
The invention is based on the realisation that shadow casting can
occur only at a given position of the sun and with given light conditions or
cloud cover if there is direct solar irradiation with a high level of light
intensity. As however the cloud cover cannot be detected directly, but
nonetheless can result in diffuse light in which no significant shadow
occurs, a difference in brightness between light and shadow, which can be
easily detected, is used. If the difference stays below a predetermined
value, accordingly no clearly perceptible shadow occurs and therefore there
is no need for the wind power installation to be shut down.
On the other hand, a disturbing shadow can occur even with a
comparatively low level of light intensity. That can again be easily
ascertained by detecting the difference in brightness between light and
shadow.
As is known, the position of the sun is dependent on the time of the
year and the time of day and can be ascertained by means of measurement
or calculation programs for any relevant immission point (that is the
location [region] at which shadow casting can occur). The basis for shadow-
based shutdown of a wind power installation is accordingly the calculated
times in which shadow casting can occur in respect of a neighbouring
resident (at the immission point) because of the position of the sun and the
geographical arrangement of the installation. In parallel with the
predetermined times in respect of the position of the sun, the difference
between light and shadow is ascertained by way of light sensors and thus
the plausibility of shadow casting occurring is checked. It is only if a
shadow occurs during the predetermined times in respect of the position of
the sun, at which a shadow can be cast at the immission point, that
shadow-based shutdown of the wind power installation occurs.
In the case of the wind power installation according to the invention,
shadow-based shutdown can be implemented by way of an input/display
device (LC display). For that purpose the settings or values of the current

levels of light intensity and the shutdown difference between light and
shadow can be read off. In addition, it is possible to see from the display
the status that the shutdown has at the current time, that is to say whether
it is switched on or off or is active or inactive. Input of the shutdown times
can be predetermined or loaded, in a separate menu.
In the mode 'shadow-based shutdown', the parameters current first
light intensity (with direct light incidence) (value in %), current second light
intensity (in a shadowed region) (value in %), shutdown difference (value
in %), shadow shutdown (on/off) or shadow shutdown (active/inactive) are
displayed. In that respect the shutdown difference is a value of the
difference between the first light intensity (direct light irradiation) and the
second light intensity (shadowed) at which the wind power installation is to
be shut down. If for example a wind power installation is very close to an
immission point, the shadow which is cast can be disturbing even when the
sky is slightly overcast. Therefore in that case (the wind power installation
is very close to the immission point in question), the installation should
receive a lower value for the shutdown difference, than for the situation
where the immission point is further away from the wind power installation.
In regard to the levels of light intensity, a low percentage value signifies a
low level of light intensity (for example when the sky is overcast) and a
high percentage value signifies a strong light intensity, for example direct
sun irradiation, which indicates that the solar irradiation is not disturbed by
cloud cover or mist. Shadow shutdown (on/off) indicates whether that is at
all activated. Shadow shutdown (active/inactive) specifies whether the
installation is shutdown at present because of a shadow being cast.
If, for the difference, a value above the shutdown difference is
ascertained and if at the same time there is coincidence in the inputted
time window, which takes account of the solar irradiation or the position of
the sun, the wind power installation stops automatically if shadow-based
shutdown is switched to 'on'. While the installation is stopped because of a
shadow being cast, a corresponding status message appears in the main
menu of the display device.

The value of the shutdown difference can be altered by way of
suitable inputs. As the shadow of the rotor blades becomes weaker with
increasing distance in relation to the immission point and at some point
loses significance entirely, the cast shadow still has an unfavourable effect
with increasing distance only when a greater difference is involved. The
shutdown difference must be set in accordance with local factors because
the shutdown difference also depends on the geographical factors on the
spot.
The light conditions are also continually further measured after the
installation stops. The wind power installation automatically starts again if
the shutdown difference falls below its specified value for a duration of
more than 2 minutes, preferably 10 minutes, or the shadow has moved (by
virtue of a change in the position of the sun or because of the sun's path),
to such an extent that there are no longer any adverse effects due to
shadow casting at the im mission point.
The times for the occurrence of shadow casting are edited for input
by way of a menu. In that respect the values are composed of a beginning
and an end date and a start and a stop time. Inputted values can be
altered, expanded or erased at any time, which can be effected by means
of manual input or by reading in a suitable program.
The times in respect of the position of the sun are inputted in the
format of Winter time. Leap years are also taken into account in the
programming.
The times for shadow-based shutdown can always be called up at the
current time or afterwards by way of remote monitoring so that it is
possible to provide proof in regard to compliance.
A wind power installation for carrying out the foregoing method
includes a data processing apparatus in which the positions of the sun or
data representing same are stored. The wind power installation further
includes a plurality of and preferably three light sensors. Those sensors are
arranged in uniformly spaced relationship around the installation.
With three sensors, there is thus a spacing of 120° between the
respective sensors if they are arranged on a notional circle around the wind

power installation. When using three sensors, one is always subjected to
direct light incidence and at least one further sensor is arranged in a
shadowed region. It is therefore always possible to ascertain the difference
in light intensity.
The invention is described in greater detail hereinafter by means of
an embodiment by way of example.
Figure 1 shows a side view of a wind power installation according to
the invention,
Figure 2 shows a simplified plan view on to a cross-section through
the pylon above the light sensors,
Figure 3 shows a side view illustrating the shadow casting effect at
two different positions of the sun, and
Figure 4 shows a plan view of the shadow casting effect also at two
different positions of the sun.
Figure 1 shows a simplified side view of a wind power installation 1.
That wind power installation 1 includes a pylon 10, at the head of
which is arranged a pod 12 with rotor blades 14. Arranged at a
predetermined height on the pylon 10 are sensors 16 which detect the light
intensity. Arranging the sensors 16 at a predetermined height substantially
prevents them from being the subject of malicious damage or manipulation.
In that respect the height can be so selected that the sensors 16 can
be reached at reasonable cost in order for example to be able to clean them
or also replace them. It will be appreciated that it is also possible to provide
heating for the sensors 16 in order to prevent or eliminate icing thereof.
As an alternative to mounting the sensors 16 on the pylon 10 of the
wind power installation 1 it will be appreciated that the sensors 16 can also
be mounted on separate masts (not shown) or other suitable devices.
Figure 2 is a simplified view in cross-section through the pylon 10 of
the wind power installation 1 above the sensors 16. It can be seen from
this Figure that in this case three sensors 16 are preferably disposed at
uniform spacings at the outer periphery of the pylon 10. The spacing
between the sensors is therefore 120°.

By virtue of the round cross-section of the pylon 10, one half of the
peripheral surface of the pylon 10, that is to say a region of 180°, is always
exposed to the direct incidence of light. Accordingly the other half of the
peripheral surface (again 180°) will be in shadow. The use of at least three
sensors therefore means that at least one is certain to be exposed to direct
incidence of light and at least one is in shadow.
Accordingly, at any desired moment in time, the light intensity when
direct light irradiation is involved and the light intensity in shadow can be
detected, and the difference thereof can be ascertained. That difference can
be determined by the control system of the installation and used
straightaway for control according to the invention of the wind power
installation.
Figure 3 shows a wind power installation, for example of type E-40
from Enercon, which is at a given distance E from a house 2. That house 2
can also be referred to as the immission point A.
When the sun rises in the morning and also throughout the day in
the Winter time, the sun only rises to a low height - always as viewed from
the immission point A - so that when the sun is in position I the angle of
incidence is pi.
If the sun rises higher - position II of the sun - that involves a
different angle of incidence βII of the rays of the sun. Those angles of
incidence βI and βII (it is possible to envisage any other angles of
incidence) of the rays of the sun also establish when in general a shadow
can be cast directly at the immission point A.
The scenario illustrated in Figure 3 is shown once again in Figure 4,
from another perspective. When the sun is in the south east (once again
considered from the immission point), the rays of the sun impinge on the
wind power installation at an angle βI - in relation to the west-east axis - .
As soon as the sun has travelled further in the direction of south, the
rays of the sun are incident on the wind power installation 1 at another
angle βII.
It is only when the position of the sun which is a function of the
geographical location on the Earth and the angles of incidence α and β

provides that the shadow of the wind power installation is incident on the
immission point A, that the wind power installation is shut down if the
difference between light and shadow is above a predetermined value,
namely the shutdown difference. The shutdown difference depends not only
on the light incidence but also the distance in relation to the immission
point. If a wind power installation is very close to the immission point in
question, the cast shadow which occurs can be troublesome even with a
slightly overcast sky. In such a situation therefore the wind power
installation should acquire a lower value for the shutdown difference than
for the situation where the immission point is further away from the wind
power installation.
If the difference is below the shutdown difference, the wind power
installation - irrespective of the position of the sun - is not shut down and
can still generate electrical energy. Such a situation occurs in particular
when the sky is heavily clouded.
The further away that a wind power installation is from the immission
point, the correspondingly shorter are the times within which in general a
shadow casting effect can occur at the immission point.
The difference can be measured directly at the immission point A or
at the wind power installation. As the immission point and the wind power
installation are relatively close together, the light intensity values measured
at the wind power installation are also valid for the immission point A.
The difference itself can be measured for example with a plurality of
light sensors whose values are processed by a data processing apparatus
associated with the wind power installation. The positions of the sun at
which shadow casting can occur at the immission point are also
programmed in that data processing apparatus. It will be easily appreciated
that those 'shadow-casting' positions of the sun are different for each wind
power installation and therefore the data processing apparatus has stored,
for each wind power installation, a different position of the sun at which a
shadow can be cast.
It will be appreciated that it is also possible that, in the case of a
wind farm arranged in the proximity of an immission point, where a shadow

casting effect is to be avoided, this can be controlled by a central data
processing apparatus which switches off a respective individual wind power
installation of a wind farm when that installation causes a shadow to be
cast at the immission point.
If a shadow is cast, the wind power installation is not shut down
immediately but only when the shadow has been cast over a certain period
of time, for example between 5 and 10 minutes.
If a shadow is no longer being cast, for example because clouds have
come between the sun and the wind power installation, it is also possible to
provide that the system does not switch on the wind power installation
again immediately, but waits for a certain time, for example between 5 and
10 minutes, and provides for switching on the wind power installation and
for causing it to run again, only when the difference was below the
shutdown difference within that period of time.
It is also possible to program further positions of the sun for the wind
power installation if that is necessary, besides shutdown positions of the
sun which have already been programmed.

I CLAIM :
1. A wind power installation comprising a data processing apparatus which
controls the wind power installation and in which are stored the positions of the
sun or values representative in that respect, in respect of which shutdown of the
installation can take place,
characterized in that the wind power installation is coupled to at least
three light sensors which are arranged uniformly spaced around the wind power
installation and by means of which the respectively current intensity of light and
shadow or the intensity of light and shadow ascertained over a certain time is
measured, and that the data determined by the light sensors are processed by
the data processing apparatus and shutdown of the wind power installation is
effected if the difference between light and shadow is above a predetermined
value when a predetermined position of the sun is assumed.
2. A wind power installation as claimed in claim 1 wherein, beyond the stored
positions of the sun, fresh positions of the sun for further immission points can
be stored, which is effected by means of suitable programming.
3. A wind farm having a plurality of wind power installations as claimed in
one of the preceding claims.
4. A method of controlling a wind power installation, comprising the steps of:
controlling the wind power installation by a data processing apparatus,
storing predetermined positions of the sun or values representative of the
predetermined positions of the sun in respect of which a shutdown of the wind
power installation can take place,
wherein at least three light sensors are arranged uniformly spaced around
the wind power installation,
measuring the respective current light intensity in a light receiving region
and in a shadowed region or the respective light intensities in said regions
ascertained over a certain time by means of the at least three light sensors,

processing the data determined by the light sensors, and
shutting down the wind power installation if the difference between the
light intensity in said regions is above a predetermined value when a
predetermined position of the sun is assumed.
5. A method as claimed in claim 4 which shuts down the wind power
installation only at a predetermined position of the sun.
6. A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the wind power installation is at
least temporarily shut down at a predetermined position of the sun.

when planning ana setting up wind power installations the visual
detractions to be expected on the part of the wind power installation on the
environment play an increasingly important part in approval and
acceptance. If for example a wind power installation is placed in the
proximity of a residence, it is possible, when the sun is in unfavourable
positions, that the wind power installation or the rotor thereof is between
the sun and the residence. If the sunshine is not affected by cloud, the
rotating rotor constantly throws a (strobing) shadow on to the property.
The shadow casting caused by the wind power installation on the adjoining
properties is often perceived by the residents as being very troublesome.
Even if the wind power installation satisfies the legal approval requirements
there is however not always any guarantee that the undesired shadow
casting effect is prevented.
The object of the present invention is to provide a wind power
installation by means of which shadow casting regulation is improved.
That is achieved by a method of operating a wind power installation
wherein a first light intensity is detected in a region of direct light
irradiation and a second light intensity is detected in a shadowed region,
and wherein the wind power installation is shut down if the difference
between the first light intensity and the second light intensity is greater
than a predetermined value.

Documents:

1998-KOLNP-2005-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

1998-KOLNP-2005-FORM 27.pdf

1998-KOLNP-2005-FORM-27.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-abstract.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-claims.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-correspondence.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-description (complete).pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-drawings.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-examination report.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-form 1.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-form 18.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-form 3.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-form 5.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-priority document.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-reply to examination report.pdf

1998-kolnp-2005-granted-specification.pdf


Patent Number 227763
Indian Patent Application Number 1998/KOLNP/2005
PG Journal Number 04/2009
Publication Date 23-Jan-2009
Grant Date 20-Jan-2009
Date of Filing 07-Oct-2005
Name of Patentee WOBBEN, ALOYS
Applicant Address ARGESTRASSE 19, 26607 AURICH
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 WOBBEN, ALOYS ARGESTRASSE 19, 26607 AURICH
PCT International Classification Number F03D 11/00, 7/02
PCT International Application Number PCT/EP2004/003394
PCT International Filing date 2004-03-31
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 103 18 695.6 2003-04-24 Germany