Title of Invention

"A RAPID METHOD FOR HEAT MEDIATED ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY"

Abstract This invention relates to a rapid and efficient method for carrying out enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of minute quantities of biomolecules such as antigen, antibody etc. This invention particularly relates to heat-mediated immobilization of antigen or antibody on to the activated surface followed by performing subsequent steps of ELUSA by controlled temperature. The invented procedure has reduced the total time required for EL1SA to around 3 h. The invented ELISA procedure is rapid, economical, reproducible and simple. The invented procedure is usefull for carrying out ELISA required in clinical diagnostics, molecular biology, agriculture, food technology, environmental science etc. The invented ELISA method is simple, time saving and obviates the time consuming procedure. This method has the potential for automation.
Full Text RAPID HEAT - MEDIATED METHOD FOR ENZYME - LINKED
IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY PROCEDURE
Field of the invention
The present invention relates to a rapid and efficient method for carrying out
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of minute quantities of
biomolecules such as antigen, antibody etc. This invention particularly relates to heatmediated
immobilization of antigen or antibody on to the activated surface followed
by performing subsequent steps of ELISA by controlled temperature. The invented
procedure has reduced the total time required for ELISA to around 3 h. The invented
ELISA procedure is rapid, economical, reproducible and simple.
The invented procedure is useful for carrying out ELISA required in clinical
diagnostics, molecular biology, agriculture, food technology, environmental science
etc. The invented ELISA method is simple, time saving and obviates the time
consuming procedure. This method has the potential for automation.
Background of the invention
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a very sensitive technique
used for detection of certain antigens and antibodies. ELISA has become a useful tool
in diagnosis of diseases in both animals and plants. ELISA can also be used for
screening of monoclonal antibodies during the course of their production (Douillard,
J.Y. and Hoffman, T., 1983), pesticide residue detection in crop produce (Van Emon,
J.M. and Lopez-Avila. V., 1992) and environmental samples like soil and water
(Ghassempour et al. 2002), detection of apoptosis in tissue culture etc. (Salgame, P. et
al. 1996).
Conventional ELISA procedures carried out by immobilizing antigen or
antibody on a polystyrene microtiter plate through adsorption have following
drawbacks: (i) ELISA values in different wells and plates are usually inconsistent
(Kricka et al., 1980; Hermann and Collins, 1976); (ii) long incubation times is
required; (iii) during washing some biomolecules may detach leading to
nonreproducible results (Engvall and Perlmann, 1971); and (iv) usually gives lower
sensitivity (Kemeny, 1997). On the other hand, covalent binding is more sensitive
(Deshpande, 1996), minimizes nonspecific binding and eliminates the above
shortcomings (Douglas and Monteith, 1994). Covalent binding of immunogens to
grafted plastic surfaces has been reported (Larsson, P.H. et al, 1987).
Aleixo et al. (1985), actived an inert polystyrene surface by nitrating the
aromatic ring of the polystyrene followed by the reduction of the nitro group to an
amino group. The amino polystyrene was further activated by chemical reactions such
as diazotization and the resulting activated surface was used to immobilize antigen
covalently.
Despite this, the conventional ELISA method requires very long time varying
from several hours to 2 days for completion. This is the main drawback of different
ELISA methods, based either on adsorption or on covalent binding. In case of
medical urgency, precious time is lost in diagnosis before the patient could be given
medication. In agriculture, ELISA is useful for detecting pesticide residues in crop
produce (Van Emon, J.M. and Lopez-Avila, V., 1992) and environmental samples
(Ghassempour et al. 2002).
Bora et al. (2002) have reported a rapid and simple method for a double-antibody
sandwich (DAS) ELISA and a direct antigen coating (DAC) ELISA by
covalently immobilizing antigen or antibody onto the activated polystyrene surface
which was developed by Nahar et al. (2001) by a rapid and simple method using 1-
fluoro-2-nitro-4-azidobenzene (FNAB). Detection of antibodies at lower
concentrations was also done successfully using the activated surface. The ELISA
value obtained in eight hours by this method was found to be similar with the values
obtained in the conventional ELISA method carried out in fifteen hours. Although this
method had reduced, the time to about eight hours still there is a need to shorten the
ELISA procedure keeping in mind its enormous application in diagnostics.
The applicants in the present invention have shortened the ELISA procedure
by carrying the ELISA procedure on a photoactivated polymer surface at elevated
temperature. More particularly, it was carried out on a photoactivated polycarbonate
and polystyrene plates at a temperature ranging from 30-70°C. Although microwavemediated
rapid ELISA on an activated surface is available (P. Nahar et al. A rapid
method for enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay.
US Patent No. 6,498,016 (2002); PCT Application No. WO 02/14868 A), the
technique is highly sensitive and slight change in energy and or time (even in seconds)
can spoil the ELISA experiment. The procedure also needs microwave oven or
microwave apparatus for carrying out ELISA.
No literature is available for ELISA on a photoactivated surface at elevated
temperature (at higher temperature than conventional ELISA usually carried out at
37°C) by conventional heating such as heating in electric oven, incubator, water bath,
thermocycler etc.
The main advantage of the present invention is that a slight change in energy
or time will not spoil the ELISA experiment in contrast to microwave- mediated
ELISA.
The disadvantages of the prior art methods are given in the Table I below
(Table Removed) Objects of the invention
The main object of the present invention is to provide a heat-mediated ELISA
procedure on an activated surface in short time.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a rapid technique, which
can be carried out at high temperature using any temperature source.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a rapid technique, which
has the potential for automation.
Summary of the invention
With a view to achieve the objectives and overcoming the disadvantage of
known ELISA method, a rapid and efficient method is provided for heat-mediated
ELISA (HELISA) which comprises the steps of (i) covalent immobilization of the
antigen or antibody on to the activated solid surface by heat, (ii) blocking the free
surface with blocking agent by controlled heat, (iii) binding of antibody or antigen by
controlled heat (iv) binding of conjugate by controlled heat, (v) adding dye-substrate
to the wells and (vi) recording the absorbance value.
Heat-mediated ELISA (HELISA) procedure is carried out on an activated
surface in less than 3 h and with the same efficacy as in the conventional ELISA
carried out at 37°C, in about 15 h. To overcome the problem of detachment of the
solid phase prepared by adsorbtion, the applicants activate the surface of the wells of a
PCR plate prior to use.
The activated surface immobilizes the antigen through a covalent bond by
controlled temperature. This covalently immobilized antigen is stable enough to
repeated but brief heat exposure; which were needed for performing the
subsequent steps of ELISA. Subsequent steps of biomolecule binding in the ELISA
procedure are through non covalent binding which are susceptible to heat energy.
These problems are overcome by controlling time and temperature in each step.
Novelty of the present invention is that the ELISA is carried out on an
activated surface capable of forming covalent linkage with the biomolecule.
In the invented procedure, all steps of ELISA such as antigen binding,
blocking, antibody and conjugate binding are carried out by thermal activation in a
thermocycler and only enzyme-substrate reaction is performed out side thermocycler
at room temperature.
The invented procedure of ELISA is rapid with comparable or even better
ELISA value than the conventional method.
Another novelty of the present invention is that the invented ELISA procedure
can be fully or partially automated with the use of a specially designed device.
Another novelty of the present invention is that the invented procedure can be
used for other immunoaisays like radio immunoassay, radio-immunosorbent test,
radio allergosorbent test, biotin- avidin /streptavidin immunoassay, irnmnunoblotting,
immunostaining etc. apart from different types of ELISA such as direct ELISA,
indirect ELISA. sandwich ELISA and like.
Detailed description of the invention
The present invention provides a simple approach for enzyme- linked
immunosorbent assay technique on an activated polycarbonate or polystyrene surface
by heat exposure. Activated surface immobilizes antigen through covalent bonding by
thermochemical reaction. This covalently immobilized antigen is stable enough to
withstand repeated heat exposure, which are needed for performing the subsequent
steps of ELISA. ELISA is a multistep and delicate process where improper condition
in any step may hamper the whole result.
In the invented procedure, the first step of ELISA was performed by covalent
immobilization of the goat anti-human IgG onto the activated polycarbonate PCR
plate by thermal incubation for 1 h in different temperatures. The optimum
temperature for antigen immobilization was found as 50°C. In experiments carried out
on binding of goat anti-human IgG for the same duration in same incubation
temperature on untreated surface showed lower ELISA value (Table 1).
Immobilization of the Goat anti-human IgG onto the activated polycarbonate
PCR plate by thermal incubation at 50°C was detectable even in 20 min, which
increases with the increase in time of incubation. At 60 min, the antigen binding
becomes more or less same as 40 min thermal incubation. Hence, optimum time for
antigen immobilization was taken as 40 min (Table 2).
In the second step of HELISA, blocking was carried out with 2% BSA in 1 h
at different temperatures in the thermocycler. The optimum temperature for blocking
was 40°C. Further, increase in incubation temperature showed non-specific blinding
(Table 3)
The optimum time for blocking at 40°C with 2% BSA was found to be 40 min.
Further, decrease in incubation time showed inadequate blocking (Table 4).
In the third step of HELISA, antibody binding to the immobilized antigen was
carried out in 1 h at different temperatures. Human IgG was found to optimally bind
to the solid phase at 50°C (Table 5).
The optimum time for antibody binding to the immobilized antigen at 50°C
was found to be 45 min (Table 6).
In the fourth step of HELISA, conjugate binding was carried out in 1 h at
different temperatures. Excellent result was obtained at 50°C of incubation (Table 7).
The optimization of conjugate binding time was found in the thermocycler at
50°C by incubating at different duration of time. The best result was obtained in 40
min (Table 8).
In all the experiments, lower ELISA values were obtained when they were
carried out on untreated surface.
The applicants have also compared ELISA on activated polycarbonate and
polystyrene plates at 37°C. Thus, when ELISA steps such as antigen binding,
blocking, antibody binding and antibody-conjugate binding were carried out in 45
min. 1 h, 3 h and 3 h respectively the ELISA values on both the surfaces were found
similar (Table 9).
The applicants also compared ELISA values, obtained on activated
polycarbonate and polystyrene plates by carrying out ELISA steps at 37°C with
HELISA timings such as in 40 min, 40 min, 45 min and 40 min respectively. In both
the plates, the results were much lower than conventional ELISA or HELISA (Table
9). It showed that the temperature is responsible for enhanched ELISA.
In another experiment HELISA steps (50°C, 40 min; 40°C, 40 min; 50°C, 45
min and 50°C, 40 min) were carried out on both the activated plates. For PCR
polycarbonate plate thermocycler was used for high temperature incubation and for
polystyrene microtiter plate, ordinary incubator was used, as normal polystyrene
ELISA plates cannot fit into conventional thermocycler. However, incubator
temperature for HELISA on polystyrene plate was kept 2°C higher than the
thermocycler temperature in each step of ELISA. In incubator a little higher
temperature is required as heat transfer is little slow here than in the thermocycler.
HELISA can also be carried out on polystyrene plate in an incubator without
increasing its temperature but increasing 5 min for each step of ELISA to compensate
delay in heat transfer in incubator. In all cases, surfaces without activation showed
much lower absorbance value. Results obtained in both these plates were very similar
which suggests that heat mediated ELISA (HELISA) can be carried out on activated
polystyrene microtiter plate also.
IgE was also detected with same efficacy as IgG by the invented method. The
standard curve prepared for quantitative assay of human IgE (Table 10 A) and the
amount of IgE present in patient sera (Table 10 B) by HELISA (in 2 h 50 min) and
ELISA (in 7 h 50 min) methods showed comparable results (Table 10). Thus, the
invented method can reduce assay time to 2 h 50 min from 7 h 50 min without
compromising the ELISA value.
The invented HELISA procedure is also very sensitive as seen from Table 11,
where it detected IgE in 1/8 dilution of patient sera. Thus, the present invention is
rapid, sensitive and simple and can be carried out in any normal laboratory set up.
The total time required for HELISA is less than 3 h. However, time required in
each step may vary depending on the biomolecules where excellent results can be
obtained by minor modification of reaction conditions that is minor alteration in
duration and temperature of incubation. Instead of thermocycler HELISA can also be
carried out in an incubator maintaining the temperature of 52°C for antigen binding,
antibody binding and conjugate binding, and 42 °C for blocking for a time period of
40, 45. 40 and 40 min respectively.
Accordingly, the present invention pro immunoscrbent assay characterized in usirs. ; activated solid support wherein the
said method comprises:
(a) providing an activated solid support,
(b) loading a biomolecule selected from an antigen or antibody by dissolving the said
biomolecule in a coating buffer into the activated well of the said solid support
and heating the said well at a temperature ranging from 40- 80°C for a period
ranging from 1 0 - 7 0 min followed by washing the well thoroughly with an
appropriate washing buffer,
(c) blocking the well having an immobilized biomolecule as obtained from step (b) as
above by loading blocking solution into the said well and heating the said well at
a temperature ranging from 40- 70 °C for a period ranging from 10- 60 min and
washing the said well with an appropriate washing buffer,
(d) loading the corresponding antibody or antigen dissolved in a buffer into the well
immobilized with antigen or antibody as obtained from step (c) as above
followed by heating the said well at a temperature ranging from 40- 80°C for a
period ranging from 10- 70 min followed by washing with washing buffer,
(e) loading an appropriate enzyme- conjugate dissolved in a suitable buffer into the
above said well obtained from step (d) and heating the said well at a temperature
ranging from 40- 80 °C for a period ranging from 20- 70 min followed by washing
with a washing buffer,
(f) adding a substrate-dye-buffer to the above well as obtained from step (e) as above
and keeping it for a period ranging from 4 to 10 min in dark followed by addition
of stop solution and measuring optical density of the solution by
spectrophotometer at a suitable wavelength.
In an embodiment of the present invention the solid support used is selected
from the group consisting of materials such as polycarbonate, polystyrene,
polypropylene, polyethylene, glass, cellulose, nitrocellulose, silicagel, polyvinyl
chloride and like.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the preferred solid supports used
are polycarbonate and polystyrene.
In yet another embodiment the solid support is selected from any shape, form
and size such as PCR plates, ELISA plate, microwell plate, sheets, test particles such
as beads and microspheres, test tubes, test sticks, test strips, well or module.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the activated solid support used for
immobilizing biomolecules is selected from any solid support capable of binding
ligand molecules particularly by covalent binding.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the activated solid support
may have active functional group for covalent binding which is selected from halide,
aldehyde, acetyl, epoxide. succinamide, isothiocyanate, acylazide and like.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention the active functional group
may be present in the support itself or can be introduced by conventional chemical or
photochemical or other methods known to prior art.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention the functional group is
introduced on to the solid support by photochemical reaction using a photoactive
compound which is selected from 4-azido-l-fluoro-2-nitrobenzene (l-fluoro-2-nitro-
4-azidobenzene), N-hydroxysulfo-succinimidyl 4-azidobenzoate, N-hydroxysulfosuccinimidyl
4-azidosalicyclic acid, quinone or its derivatives, and like.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, polycarbonate and
polystyrene surface are activated by coating 4-azido-l-fluoro-2-nitrobenzene and
exposing the coated support to UV radiation at 365 nm.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the light source for
photochemical reaction is selected from UV lamp, laser beam, bright sunlight or like.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, time for photoreaction for
activation of solid support is selected from 10 seconds to 10 hours.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, incubation is performed in an
apparatus selected from laboratory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) thermocycler,
specially designed thermocycler, incubator, water bath or any apparatus or chamber in
which heat is generated and like.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, the first step of ELISA,
is carried out by covalent binding of antigen or antibody onto the activated plate by
heating at a temperature ranging from 40-80°C for a period ranging from 10-70 min.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention the second step of
ELISA, that is the blocking step is carried out by heating at a temperature ranging
from 40-70°C for a period ranging from 10-60 min.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention the third step of ELISA,
that is corresponding antibody or antigen binding is carried out by heating at a
temperature ranging from 40-80°C for a period ranging from 10-70 min.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, the fourth step of ELISA
that is enzyme-conjugate binding is carried out by heating at a temperature ranging
from 40-80°C for a period ranging from 10-70 min.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention the total time for antigen
binding, blocking, antibody binding and conjugate binding is ranging from 2-4 h
wherein the total time for conventional ELISA method usually ranges from 8 h to 24
In another embodiment to the present invention, the antigen can be dissolved
in a coating buffer such as carbonate buffer, phosphate buffer and like of suitable
composition having a pH, in the range of from 6.5 to 11 with molarity ranging from
0.005 M to 0.1 M and should be compatible with the antigen.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, washing buffer used is a
mixture of phosphate buffer having a pH, in the range of from 6.5 to 11, with molarity
ranging from 0.005 M to 0.1 M and tween 20 in the range of between 0.05% to 3%.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, blocking reagent is
selected from bovine serum albumin, skimmed milk powder, and gelatin and like.
In another embodiment to the present invention biomolecule is selected from
antigen or antibody. Antigen may be any biomolecule, microorganism, etc that elicits
or has the potential to elicit an immune response.
In another embodiment to the present invention conjugate is selected from
biomolecule having antibody or antigen conjugated with an enzyme selected from
horseradish peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase. In yet another preferred embodiment
of this invention, enzyme may be replaced by a label selected from chromophore,
fluorophore and like which facilitates its assay. In yet another preferred embodiment
of this invention, the invented procedure can be used for other immunoassays like
radio immunoassay, radio-immunosorbent test, radio allergosorbent test, biotinavidin/
streptavidin immunoassay, immnunoblotting, immunostaining etc. apart from
different types of ELISA such as direct ELISA, indirect ELISA, sandwich ELISA and
like.
In yet another preferred embodiment of this invention, the invented procedure
can be automated or semiautomated. An apparatus may be made to fit microtiter
ELISA plates for heat-mediated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (HELISA)
comprising a reaction chamber consisting of rapid heating system for temperature
ranging from 40-70°C and a cooling system such as exhaust fan for carrying out the
steps of antigen binding, blocking, antibody binding and antibody enzyme conjugate
binding.
In the invented procedure, inert solid surface such as polycarbonate PCR plate
(usally used for polymerase chain reaction) and 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate
were activated by a photochemical reaction carried out in dry condition using FNAB.
The solid support was activated by exposing the FNAB coated support to UV
radiation or bright sunlight. This activated support was used for heat- mediated ELISA
(HELISA) and for control ELISA to detect antibodies, to example goat anti-human
IgG and goat anti-human IgE.
Thermal reaction was performed inside a thermocycler (Perkin Elmer, Gene
Amp PCR System 2400) or in a BOD incubator.
Carbonate buffer, pH 9.6, 0.1 M was used as coating buffer.
Phosphate buffer saline (PBS), pH 7.2. 0.01 M was used as antibody dilution
buffer.
Phosphate buffer saline (PBS), pH 7.2, 0.01 M together with 0.1% tween 20
was used as washing buffer in all the experiments unless mentioned otherwise.
Blocking solution was made by dissolving 2% BSA in 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.2. Substrate
solution was prepared by adding 0.067% of o-phenylenediamine and 0.043% of I^Ch
in 0.1 M phosphate citrate buffer, pH 4.5). Normal goat sera were taken as negative
control sera (-ve sera). 100 ul of diluted (1:300) -ve sera was used for each well.
Horse radish peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Sigma
as lyophilized powder.
After reconstitution, the optimum dilution was found to be 1: 5000 as
determined by checkerboard titration, which was used in the experiments.
In all the ELISA experiments, absorbance values are expressed as mean of
three replicates.
ELISA is a 5-step procedure, nairu•'" antigen binding, blocking, antibody
binding, conjugate binding and color de nent. Each step of HELISA was
optimized by carrying out the subsequent steps by conventional ELISA procedure.
Conventional ELISA was carried out by coating the wells with antigen overnight at
4°C. (45 min at 37°C for activated wells), blocking in 1 h at 37°C followed by
antibody and conjugate binding at 37°C for 3 h each and color development that is
enzyme-substrate reaction at room temperature for 5 min followed by reading
absorbance.
(Table Removed)This invention is further explained with the help of the following examples
and should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention.
Example 1 - Activation of polycarbonate and polystyrene surfaces
Wells of a PCR plate (polycarbonate plate, Greiner, Germany) were loaded
with 6.0 umol of 1 -fiouro-2-nitro-4-azidobenzene (FNAB), dissolved in 50 ul of
methanol per well and dried completely in the dark. FNAB coated wells were then
irradiated for 7.5 min with UV irradiation of 365 nm wavelength in a UV Stratalinker
2400 (Stratagene®, USA) or kept under bright sunlight for 15 min. Wells of
polystyrene microtiter plate were activated similarly using 10 umol of FNAB,
dissolved in 50 ul methanol dried and irradiated for 10 min at 365 nm or sunlight for
15 min.
The wells were then washed several times with methanol to remove the
unbound linker and dried at room temperature. These activated wells were used for
immobilization of antigen or antibody in the invented procedure.
Example 2: Determination of goat anti-human IgG concentration for the
preparation of solid phase on activated polycarbonate surface
A double dilution series (2000 - 0.061 g/ml) of goat anti-human IgG
(dissolved 0.1 M carbonate/ bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6) was loaded in triplicate wells
(90 ul/well for each dilution) of an activated and untreated polycarbonate plates. The
plates were then incubated at 50°C for 1 h in a thermocycler. The plates were then
washed for six times with washing buffer (0.05% Tween 20 with 0.01 M PBS) and
blocking step was done with with 2% BSA solution (100 ul/well) at 37°C in 1 h. After
washing, each well was loaded with 90 ul of a 250 ng/ml of a human IgG solution
(dissolved in 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4) and the plates were incubated at 37° for 3 h. The
plates were again washed for six times and each well was loaded with 90 ul of a
1/5000 (v/v), goat anti-human IgG-peroxidase conjugate solution (dissolved in 0.01 M
PBS, pH 7.4) and incubated at 37°C for 3 h. After washing, 90 ul of substrate-dye
solution (0.4 mg o-phenylenediamine hydrochloride and 2 ul H2O2 in 10 ml of 0.2 M
:itrate buffer, pH 5) was loaded into each well. Colour development was stopped after
5 min by adding 10 ul of 5% H2 864. The solutions were transferred into wells of a
polystyrene microtitre plate and absorbance was recorded at 490 nm.
Example 3: Optimization of temperature for immobilization of goat anti-human
IgG on the activated and untreated polycarbonate plates (Table 1)
Triplicate wells of eight activated polycarbonate plates, were loaded with goat
anti-human IgG solution (90 ul/well of a 250 ng/ml solution) and incubated for 60
min at 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65 and 70°C respectively in a thermocycler. Goat antihuman
IgG was also similarly immobilized in untreated polycarbonate plates. The
remaining steps of ELISA were then carried out with these solid phases by
conventional ELISA method as described in example 2.
Example 4: Optimization of goat anti-human IgG incubation time for the
preparation of solid phase (Table 2)
Triplicate wells of six activated and six untreated polycarbonate plates were
loaded with 90 ul/well of goat anti-human IgG (250 ng/ml) and plates were incubated
at 50°C for 10 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min respectively in a thermocycler. Remaining
steps of ELISA were carried out with these solid phases by conventional ELISA
method described in example 2.
Example 5: Studies on the incubation temperature of blocking step (Table 3)
Goat-anti human IgG was immobilized as described above on the triplicate
wells of six activated plates at 50°C in 40 min incubation. After washing, the wells
were loaded with 100 ul of a 2% (w/v) BSA solution. The plates were then incubated
for 1 h at 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 and 65°C respectively. Incubation of human IgG and
second antibody-enzyme conjugate were done at 37°C for 3 h each. Control
experiments with untreated plates were carried for each corresponding temperature
similarly.
Example 6: Optimization of incubation time for blocking step (Table 4)
Goat-anti human IgG was immobilized as described in example 5 on the
triplicate wells of six activated plates. After washing, the wells were loaded with 100
ul of a 2% (w/v) BSA solution. The plates were then incubated at 40°C for 10, 20, 30,
40, 50 and 60 min respectively. Human IgG and second antibody-enzyme conjugate
were incubated at 37°C for 3 h each. Control experiments with untreated plates were
carried for each corresponding time.
Example 7: Optimum dose of human IgG required for the assay
The solid phases were prepared by immobilizing goat anti-human IgG (250
ng/ml) in activated and untreated wells of a polycarbonate plate at 50°C for 40 min.
Washing and blocking (40°C, 40 min) was done as described previously. The wells
were then loaded with a two fold dilution series (1000-0.122 ng/mlj of a human IgG
solution and incubated for 3 h at 37°C. The remaining steps of ELISA was carried as
previously described.
Example 8: Determination of optimum temperature for the binding of human
IgG
with the solid phase (Table 5)
The solid phase was prepared on an activated polycarbonate plate as described
in example 5. Blocking was done under optimal conditions (40°C, 40 min) as above.
After washing, 90 ul of a human IgG (from a solution of 125 ng/ml) was incubated
with the solid phase for 60 min at 40°C. The plate was washed and a 90 ul of 1/5000
dilution of goat anti-human IgG peroxidase conjugate was incubated for 3 h at 37°C.
The absorbance was recorded as described. Similarly, five more experiments were
done by incrementing the temperature of incubation of human IgG by 5°C up to 65 °C.
Control experiments were carried out with untreated polycarbonate plates for
corresponding temperature.
Example 9: Binding of human IgG onto the solid phase in different incubation
time (Table 6)
90 ul of human IgG solution (from a solution of 125 ng/ml) was incubated at
50°C for 15 min with solid phase prepared as in example 8. The washed wells were
then incubated with a 1/5000 dilution of goat anti-human IgG- peroxidase at 37°C for
3 h and assayed as previously described. Four more experiments were carried out by
incubating human IgG for 30, 45, 60 and 90 min respectively. Control experiments
were carried out with untreated polycarbonate surface under similar conditions.
Example 10: Optimum temperature for binding of goat anti-human IgG
peroxidase conjugate with human IgG bou solid phase (Table 7)
Preparation of solid phase and blocking were carried out as in example 8.
Incubation of human IgG was carried out at 50°C for 45 min.as above. 1/5000 v/v
dilution of goat anti-human IgG-peroxidase (90 ul/well) was then incubated for 60
min at 40°C. After washing, absorbance was recorded as above. Five more
experiments were done similarly at different incubation temperatures (45, 50. 55, 60
and 65°C) of second antibody-enzyme conjugate. Control experiments were carried
out with untreated surface under similar conditions.
Example 11: Optimization of incubation time for binding of goat anti-human
IgG peroxidase conjugate to solid phase-bound human IgG (Table 8)
Immobilization of goat anti-human IgG, blocking and human IgG were
incubated as in example 10. Second antibody-enzyme conjugate (1/5000. v/v) was
incubated at 50°C for 10 min and assayed. Five more experiments were carried out by
incubating the conjugate at 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min respectively. Control
experiments were carried out in corresponding time with untreated surface.
Example 12: Comparative studies of HELISA and conventional ELISA on
polycarbonate and polystyrene surfaces for the detection of human IgG (Table 9)
In polycarbonate (PC 1) and polystyrene (PS 1) plates. ELISAs were
performed by immobilizing goat anti-human IgG in 45 min at 37°C, blocking in 1 h at
37°C. human IgG binding in 3 h at 37°C and conjugate binding in 3 h at 37°C. In plate
PC 2 and PS 2 ELISAs were performed by immobilizing goat anti-human IgG in 40
min, blocking in 40 min, binding human IgG in 45 min and conjugate binding in 40
min at 37°C. In plate PC 3 HELISA was performed by immobilizing goat anti-human
IgG in 40 min at 50°C, blocking in 40 min at 40°C, binding human IgG in 45 min at
50°C and conjugate binding in 40 min at 50°C. HELISA on PS 3 plate were carried
out in an incubator similarly as in PC 3 except that the temperature of the incubator in
each step was 2°C higher then PC 3 experiment carried out in a thermocycler. All
these experiments were carried out with activated and untreated plates.
Example 13: Quantitative determination of IgE in patient sera by HELISA and
conventional ELISA procedures (Table 10)
A. Preparation of standard curves by HELISA and conventional ELISA
procedures (Table 10 A)
In HELISA procedure, goat anti-human IgE (0.75 ul of a 1 fig/ml solution) was
immoDilized into activated polycarbonate wells in 40 min at 50°C. The plate was
washed for six times with washing buffer (50 mM tris, 0.14 NaCl, pH 8.0 and 0.05%
tween 20). Blocking was done with 2% BSA by incubating the plate at 40°C for 40
min. The wells were then loaded with 0.75 1 of IgE standards (Bethyl Laboratories
Inc.. USA) in a double dilution series (1000, 500. 250, 125. 62.5. 31.25 and 15.34
ng/ml) and incubated for 45 min at 50°C. After washing, the wells were loaded with
0.75 |al of goat anti-human IgE peroxidase solution and incubated for 40 min at 50°C.
Plate was again washed and assayed for enzyme.
The conventional ELISA was carried out by immobilizing the capture antibody
(goat anti-human IgE) on activated surface by incubating 45 min. at 37°C or overnight
at 4°C. Blocking was done in 1 h at 37°C. The standard IgE, and conjugate were
incubated for 3 h each at 37°C.
B. Determination of IgE in patient's sera (Table 10 B)
HELISA and conventional ELISA were carried out similarly except that 1/4
(v/v. diluted) patient's sera were used instead of IgE standard for determining IgE in
patient's sera.
Example 14: Sensitivity of the solid phase in detecting IgE in patients sera (Table
H)
The capture antibody was immobized in 40 min at 50°C in both untreated and
activated polycarbonate wells. After blocking in 40 min at 40°C, the wells were
loaded with human blood sera in different dilutions (1/4, 1/8, 1/16 and 1/32) and
incubated for 45 min at 50°C. Conjugate incubation was at 50°C in 40 min. Colour
development was at ambient temperature for 5 min. Absorbance recorded as described
earliar.
Table 1. Detection of human IgG in by carrying out first step by HELISA and
remaining steps by ELISA procedures.
HELISA: Step-1. Immobilization of anti-human IgG on activated and untreated wells
by thermal incubation for 1 h in different temperatures as in the table.
ELISA: (Step 2 to 5- Conventional procedure) blocking- 1 h, 37°C; antibody
incubation- 37°C, 3 h and conjugate binding- 37°C, 3 h. Color development- 5 min,
room temperature.
(Table Removed)Table 2. Detection of human IgG by carrying out first step by HELISA and remaining
steps by ELISA procedures.
HELISA: Step-1. Immobilization of anti-human IgG by thermal incubation at 50°C in
different time as in the table.
ELISA: (Step 2 to 5- Conventional procedure) blocking- 1 h, 37°C; antibody
incubation- 37°C, 3 h and conjugate binding- 37°C, 3 h. Color development- 5 min,
room temperature
(Table Removed)
(Table Removed)Table 10: Quantitative assay of human IgE antibodies: Comparision of HELISA and
ELISA procedures on activated polycarbonate plates.
HELISA: Step-1. Goat anti-human IgE binding- 50°C, 40 min. Step-2. Blocking-
40°C, 40 min. Step-3. Standard (Table 10 A) and patient's (Table 10 B) sera
incubation - 50°C, 45 min. Step-4. Conjugate binding- 50°C, 40 min. Step - 5. Color
development- 5 min at room temperature.
ELISA: Step-1. Goat anti-human IgG binding- 37°C, 45 min.; Step-2. Blocking-
37°C, Ih; Step-3. Standard (Table 10 A) and patient's sera ((Table 10 B) incubation -
37°C, 3 h; Step-4. Conjugate binding- 37°C, 3 h. Step - 5. Color development- 5 min
at room temperature.
Table 11: Comparison of sensitivity of the activated and untreated polycarbonate
plate towards the detection of IgE in diluted sera.
Step-1. Goat anti-human IgE binding- 50°C, 40 min. Step-2. Blocking- 40°C, 40 min.
Step-3. Patient's sera incubation- 50°C, 45 min. Step-4. Conjugate binding- 50°C, 40
min. Step - 5. Color development- 5 min at room temperature.
(Table Removed)Advantages
Conventional methods of ELISA usually take 8-15 h for completion, which is
the major drawback for a procedure used worldwide in different fields apart from
clinical diagnostics. In case of medical urg , precious time is lost in diagnosis
before the patient could be given medication. Therefore, a rapid ELISA procedure
invented herein (HELISA) will be beneficial and useful for diagnosis of diseases,
biomedical research and other related fields. Main advantages of the invented ELISA
procedure are:
1. The invented procedure is rapid than the conventional method of ELISA.
2. The total time required in the invented method is less than 3 h. Thus, it obviates
the time consuming procedure.
3. The invented procedure is sensitive and requires minute quantities of precious
antigen or antibody.
4. The procedure is simple and does not require any additional expertise or reagent to
do it.
5. The invented procedure is cost effective and does not require any additional
equipment except a heating apparatus, which is common in most of the
laboratories.
6. The invented procedure is reproducible which is an important criterion for ELISA.
7. The procedure gives minimal or negligible non-specific binding.
8. The procedure has the potential for automation, which can minimize human error.
References.
1. Douillard, J.Y. and Hoffman, T. (1983) Methods in Enzymology 92,168-74.
2. Van Emon, J.M. and Lopez-Avila, V. (1992) Analytical Chemistry 64, 79 A-88A.
3. Ghassempour, A. Mohammadkhah, A., Najafi, F. and Rajabdeh, M. (2002) Anal.
Sci. 8, 779-83.
4. Salgame, P., Varadhachary, A.S, Primiano, L.L., Finke, J.E., Muller, S. and
Monestier, M. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 25,680-1.
5. Kricka, L.J.. Carter, T.J., Burt, S.M., Kennedy, J.H., Holder, R.L. and Halliday,
M.I.. 1980. din. Chem. 26, 741-4.
6. Hermann, J.E. and Collins, M.F. (1976) J. Immunol. Methods 10, 363-6.
7. Engvall, E. and Perlmann, P. (1971) Immunochemistry 8, 871 -4.
8. Kemeny, D.M., 1997. In: Johnstone, A.P., Turner, M.W. (Eds.), Immunochemistry
I: A Practical Approach. IRL Press at Oxford Univ. Press, New York, and pp.-
147-175.
9. L,-hpande, S.S. (1996) Enzyme Lamunoassays from Concept to ; roduct
Development. Chapman & Hall, New York.
10. Douglas, A.S. and Monteith, C.A. (1994) Clin. Chem. 40, 1833-37.
ll.Larsson. P.H., Johansson, S.G.O., Hult, A. and Gothe, S. (1987) J. Immunol.
Methods 98, 129-35.
12. Aleixo, J.A.G., Swaminathan, B., Minnich, S.A. and Wallshein. V.A. (1985) J.
Immunoassay 6, 391-401.
13. Bora, U., Chugh, L. and Nahar, P. (2002). J. Immunol. Methods 268, 171-8.
14. Nahar, P., Wall, N.M. and Gandhi, R.P. (2001) Anal. Biochem. 294, 148-53.
Other References
Patent Documents
1. P.Nahar. A method for photochemical activation of polymer surface and
immobilization of biomolecules onto the activated surface. US patent filed June,
2002, NF 304/02
2. P. Nahar, U. Bora and G.L. Sharma. (2002) A rapid method for enzyme- linked
immunosorbent assay. US patent no. 6,498,016
3. P. Nahar, U. Bora and G.L. Sharma. A rapid method for enzyme- linked
immunosorbent assay. PCT patent no. WO 02/14868 Al



We claim:
1. A rapid method for heat mediated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay characterized in
using an activated solid support wherein the said method comprises:
[a] providing an activated solid support with at least one activated well,
[b] loading an antigen or antibody by dissolving it in a coating buffer of the kind such as herein described and into the activated well of the solid support and heating the said well at a temperature ranging from 40 - 80 degree C for a period ranging from 10-70 min followed by washing the well thoroughly with a known washing buffer,
[c] blocking the well containing the immobilized antigen or antibody as obtained in step (b) by loading a blocking agent into the well and heating the said well at a temperature ranging from 40 - 70 degree C for a period ranging from 10-60 min and washing the said well with a known washing buffer,
[d] loading an antibody or antigen corresponding to the immobilized antigen or antibody obtained in step (c) followed by heating the well at a temperature ranging from 40 - 80 degree C for a period ranging from 10 - 70 min followed by washing with washing buffer,
[e] loading an appropriate enzyme-conjugate dissolved in a suitable buffer into the well obtained in step (d) and heating the well at a temperature ranging from 40 -80 degree C for a period ranging from 20-70 min followed by washing with a washing buffer,
[f] adding a substrate-dye-buffer to the well obtained in step (e) and keeping it for a period ranging from 4 to 10 min in dark followed by addition of stop solution.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the solid support used is made of a material selected from the group consisting of polycarbonate, polystyrene, polypropylene, polyethylene, glass, cellulose, nitrocellulose, silicagel and polyvinyl chloride.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the solid support used is made of polycarbonate or polystyrene.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein heating is carried out in an apparatus selected from laboratory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) thermocycler, specially designed thermocycler, incubator and water bath.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the total time for antigen binding, blocking, antibody binding and conjugate binding is in the range of 2-6 h.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein step (b) the buffer in which the antigen or antibody is dissolved is selected from the group consisting of carbonate buffer and phosphate buffer.
7. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step (b) the buffer in which the antigen is dissolved has a pH in the range of from 6.5 to 11 with molarity ranging from 0.005 M to 0.1 M.
8. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the washing buffer used in step (b) comprises a mixture of phosphate buffer having a pH in the range of from 6.5 to 11, with molarity ranging from 0.005 M to 0.1 M and Tween 20 in the range of between 0.05% to 3%.
9. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the blocking agent is selected from the group consisting of bovine serum albumin, skimmed milk powder and gelatin.
10. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the conjugate in the enzyme conjugate of step(e) is selected from horseradish peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase.

Documents:

1459-del-2003-abstract-(02-12-2008).pdf

1459-del-2003-abstract.pdf

1459-del-2003-claims-(02-12-2008).pdf

1459-DEL-2003-Claims-(16-01-2009).pdf

1459-del-2003-claims.pdf

1459-del-2003-complete specification (granted).pdf

1459-del-2003-correspondence-others-(02-12-2008).pdf

1459-DEL-2003-Correspondence-Others-(16-01-2009).pdf

1459-del-2003-correspondence-others.pdf

1459-del-2003-correspondence-po.pdf

1459-del-2003-description (complete).pdf

1459-del-2003-form-1-(02-12-2008).pdf

1459-DEL-2003-Form-1-(16-01-2009).pdf

1459-del-2003-form-1.pdf

1459-del-2003-form-18.pdf

1459-del-2003-form-2-(02-12-2008).pdf

1459-del-2003-form-2.pdf

1459-del-2003-form-3-(02-12-2008).pdf

1459-del-2003-form-3.pdf

1459-del-2003-petition-137-(02-12-2008).pdf


Patent Number 228031
Indian Patent Application Number 1459/DEL/2003
PG Journal Number 07/2009
Publication Date 13-Feb-2009
Grant Date 27-Jan-2009
Date of Filing 24-Nov-2003
Name of Patentee COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH
Applicant Address RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI-110001, INDIA.
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 PRADIP NAHAR INSTITUTE OF GENOMICS AND INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, MALL ROAD DELHI-110007, INDIA
2 UTPAL BORA INSTITUTE OF GENOMICS AND INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, MALL ROAD DELHI-110007, INDIA
PCT International Classification Number G01N 33/00
PCT International Application Number N/A
PCT International Filing date
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 US 10/396104 2003-03-25 U.S.A.