| Full Text |
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
PROCESS AND REAGENT FOR SEPARATING FINELY DIVIDED TITANIFERROUS
IMPURITIES FROM KAOLIN
Field of Invention
This invention relates to a process and reagent for treating commercially important mineral orebodies, such as Kaolin clay, to brighten them by removing colored impurities, and more particularly, to a hydroxamate-based reagent and processes which utilize the reagent in order to improve the separation efficiency of the colored impurities from kaolin clay in beneficiation processes such as selective flocculation or flotation.
Background of the Invention
Kaolin crude originates from sedimentary deposits found in such locations as the state of Georgia in the United States and Brazil. Kaolin, containing largely the mineral kaolinite, is very widely used in paper coating and filling. In the United States, kaolin pigment production was1 nearly 7.5 million tons in 2003 generating an estimated revenue close to $1.6 billion. Upgrading the kaolin purity so that it can be used for producing premium brightness products is of particular importance. The paper market trend is moving towards producing thinner paper grades with the same properties of a thicker paper in terms of opacity and print fidelity resulting in two grades of kaolin which are growing at a fast rate. The two grades are (1) narrow particle engineered grade kaolin and (2) glossing grade kaolin both of which require premium brightness (90-91 GE Brightness). In order to achieve this high level of brightness it is necessary to remove colored impurity minerals such as titanium and iron based impurities from the kaolin.
There are several beneficiation techniques that are employed in the industry to remove the impurities, such as size classification methods, magnetic separation, flotation and selective flocculation. These beneficiation techniques, regarded as wet processes, remove colored . titanium and iron based impurities As a first step, kaolin crude is initially dispersed in water, degritted (process in which coarse particles and impurities greater than 37-44 micron are
removed) and then the resulting slurry is subjected to beneficiation.
Titanium and iron impurities such as rutile, anatase, hematite and pyrite can sometimes possess weak magnetic susceptibility. In such cases High Intensity Magnetic Separation (HIMS) process can be used to remove the magnetic impurity particles. However, the method is not efficient enough to capture submicron sized magnetic particles and therefore limits the capability of magnetic separation in producing high brightness kaolin.
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
Froth flotation is another process for removing colored titaniferrous impurities. Here the discoloring impurities are selectively hydrophobized by the addition of a collector. Examples of such collectors include fatty acids such as tall oil fatty acid, alky! sulfonates, alkyl hydroxamate (AHX) and mixtures thereof. After the addition of the collector, the slurry is conditioned or mixed , prior to flotation. After conditioning the hydrophobized particles are levitated to the surface the air/water interface - by means of air bubbles that are injected at the bottom of the flotation cell. U.S. Patents that describe removing colored impurities by flotation include U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,979,282; 3,450,257; 4,472,271; 4,492,628; 4,629,556; 5,522,986; 5,685,899; and 5,810,998. A variation of froth flotation using carrier particles such as calcium carbonate is described in U.S Patent No. 2,990,958.
U.S. Patent No. 4, 871, 466 describes a method of producing alkyl hydroxamic acid collectors and U.S. Patent Nos. 4,629,556 and 6,378,703 each describe a froth flotation method for beneficiating kaolin using alkyl hydroxamic acids.
Selective flocculation is another well known beneficiation process. Normally, the flocculant ts initially adsorbed onto and bridges between mineral particles of similar composition thus binding the particles together. The bonded particle aggregates then form larger aggregates or flocs which settle out of the suspending medium by gravity. Flocculants can be natural products such as starch, guar gum and alginates or synthetic polymers such as polyacrylamides, polyacrylates and polyethylene oxides. Selective flocculation is an effective process for recovering fine to ultrafine minerals that respond poorly to conventional beneficiation processes such as flotation and magnetic separation. The successful use of selective flocculation on mixtures of fine mineral particles such as kaolin clays, iron-bearing minerals, phosphates, potash, copper ores and coal is known in the industry.
Selective flocculation involving the activation of the impurity with polyvalent cations, as described in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,371,988; 3,701,417; 3,837,482 and 3,862,027), conditioning with ammonium salt, as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,604,369) or with fatty acid and polyvalent cations (U.S. Patent No. 5,535,890) and then selectively flocculating the impurities with charged anionic water soluble polymers, usually polyacrylamides.
Specifically, U.S. Patent No. 5,535,890 describes a selective flocculation process for purifying
the kaolin clay containing a colored impurity which involves selective flocculation of the colored
impurity as a dense dun colored thick mass separated as a lower layer and a white layer of purified kaolin that is low in colored impurities. The reagents used include typical dispersants
2
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
such as sodium silicate, sodium polyacrylate, sodium hexameta phosphate, divalent metal ions, fatty acid and high molecular weight anionic polymer. The process suffers from low recoveries or yields.
US. Patent Nos. 6,390,301 and 6,041,939 each describe a similar process for beneficiating kaolin by a selective flocculation process employing an alkyl hydroxamic acid and flocculating agent.
U. S. Patent No. 6,200,377 describes an improved process for the beneficiatton of kaolin crude that contains minerals that chelate with hydroxamates. The use of a silicon containing compound in combination with hydroxamate results in a more effective separation of minerals that chelate with hydroxamate. Also described is the addition of a silicon-containing compound to increase the interaction of the hydroxamates with the chelatable minerals, which results in a more effective beneficiation. Selective flocculation has also been used to beneficiate other mixtures of mineral particles. Iron-
bearing ores, specifically taconite, are commercially processed using selective flocculation. The
iron ore is ground and then dispersed with caustic and sodium silicate. The dispersed ground ore
is then selectively flocculated with a corn starch flocculant to separate hematite, an iron oxide mineral:
Phosphate minerals are beneficiated using selective flocculation to separate them from the associated clays, as described in U.S. Patent No. 2,660,303. Potash is also beneficiated by selective flocculation using a anionic polyacrylamide flocculant and/or ethoxylated alkylamic alkylguanidtne complex Another selective flocculation process to beneficiate alkaline carbonate minerals, phosphate minerals, zeolites and bauxites is described by U S. Patent No. 5,535,890 In this process, fatty acids and polyvalent cations are used to recondition the mineral suspension. Another beneficiation process involves leaching the kaolin clay with iron-reducing reagents such as zinc or sodium hydrosulfite. This leaching method is however, limited to removing iron contaminants only. Other known leaching reagents and/or processes are not currently economical for removing titanium impurities
Due to the limitations of these various beneficiation processes to separate certain minerals from mixtures of minerals, such as the discoloring impurities in kaolin clays, there is a need in the industry for a process that is more effective and efficient.
3
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
Summary of the Invention
It is therefore an objective of this invention to provide improved novel reagents and mineral beneficiating processes using those novel reagents in order to achieve higher beneficiation efficiencies. It is also expected that certain types of kaolin crude sources that are currently not , treatable with the existing reagents and processes may be treated with the subject novel reagents.
The invention is directed to novel mineral beneficiating reagents comprising an alkyl hydroxamic acid or salt thereof and a nonionic surfactant. The novel reagents provide for improved selectively in removing impurities from mineral substrates.
Specifically, this invention provides mixtures of alkyl hydroxamate (hydroxamic acid and/or salts thereof) and neutral nonionic surfactants that preferentially and more effectively activates or adsorbs onto the colored impurities thereby increasing the separation efficiency. These are subsequently either separated by flotation using air or nitrogen in a conventional or column type float cell or are flocculated by a high molecular weight organic flocculant such as anionic polyacrylamide or hydroxamated polyacrylamide in a hydroseparator or thickener type device.
The present invention provides an improved process for the beneficiation of hydroxamate-chelatable minerals such as those containing titanium, copper, iron, tin, manganese, yttrium, cerium, lanthanum, niobium, calcium or tantalum.
In that capacity, the invention is directed to a method of beneficiating mineral substrates by using a reagent comprised of an alkyl hydroxamic acid or salt thereof and a nonionic surfactant and an organic flocculant to separate unwanted impurities by a process of selective flocculation or froth flotation.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The reagent according to the present invention comprises a mixture of alkyl hydroxamic acid or a
salt thereof and a nonionic surfactant. The alkyl hydroxamic acid or a salt thereof is represented by the formula:
R-C(=O)N(R")-OM,
4
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
wherein R is linear or branched C2-C18 alkyl, linear or branched C2-C18 alkenyl, C6-C20 aryl or substituted aryl, C7-C26 aralkyl or substituted aralkyl; R" is H, C1-C12 alkyl or aralkyl; M is hydrogen, an alkali metal, or an ammonium cation represented by N+(A,B,C,D) wherein each of A,B,C,D, respectively, are H or C1-C6 alkyl or benzy! radicals. In a preferred embodiment, R = linear or branched C8-C10 alkyl, R" = H; and each of A,B,C and D are H.
The alkyl hydroxamate acid or hydroxamic salt (AHX) can be manufactured in accordance with any known process in the art, an example of which is described in U.S Patent No. 4,871,466, hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.
The nonionic surfactant can be any nonionic surfactant. A listing of commercially available
nonionic surfactants can be found in McCutcheon's Emulsifiers and Detergents International Vol. (2003). Preferred nonionic surfactants include ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated acids, esters, ethoxylated amines, ethoxylated (alkyl) phenols, polyethylene oxide copolymers, and alcanolamides and mixtures thereof. Preferred examples of ethoxylated alcohols suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, ethoxylated C9-C20 linear alcohols. Preferred examples of ethoxylated acids include, but are not limited to, ethoxylates of C8-C20 aliphatic acids. Preferred examples of ethoxylated (alkyl) phenols include but are not limited to, ethoxylated (alkyl) phenols having the formula R-Ph-O(CH2)CH2O)xH, where R = H, or C1-C15, x = 1-20, especially preferred ethoxylated alkyl phenols include those where R = C9. Ethoxylated nonylphenol is an example of such a preferred ethoxylated alky! phenol. Preferred examples of esters useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to, esters derived from linear or branched jrnono or polyhydric alcohols with aliphatic or aromatic acids, examples of which include C10-C20 alkyl esters of glyco! or glycerol and C10-C20 ally! esters of sorbitan or sorbitol, eg. sorbitan monooleate. Optionally, the esters can be ethoxylated, eg. ethoxylated sorbitan monosterate.. Preferred examples of ethoxylated amines include, but are not limited to,
ethoxylated C10-C20 aliphatic amines and preferred alcanolamides include, but are not limited to,
diethanolamides of C8-C20 aliphatic acids.
The ratio of non-ionic surfactant to hydroxamate in the reagent of the present invention is from
about 1:100 to about 100:1 and preferably from about 1:20 to about 1:1.
The mineral beneficiating reagent according to the present invention can further comprise a long chain fatty acid, such as tall oil fatty acid or natural or synthetic sulfonate. In reagents that further comprise a long chain fatty acid, the ratio of hydroxamic acid or salt thereof to long chain fatty acid is preferably from about 1:10 to about 10:1 and more preferably from about 2:1 to about 1:2. The novel mineral processing beneficiating reagents according to the present invention can be manufactured by mixing the alkyl hydroxamate acid or hydroxamic salt with the nonionic
5
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
surfactant in any suitable vessel until a uniformly blended product is obtained. The mixing
temperature is determined by the dissolution efficiency of the mixing procedure. Often mixing
may be accomplished at 25°C, although warming may be necessary to accelerate dissolution where the melting point of the surfactant is higher than 25°C. The weight ratio of non-ionic surfactant to hydroxamate or hydroxamic salt in the reagent of the present invention is from about 1:100 to about 100:1 and preferably from about 1:20 to about 20:1.
Mineral Beneficiation
The present invention is further directed to a method for the selective separation of impurities from a finely divided mixture of mineral particles, such as for example kaolin clay. The method comprises the sequential steps of conditioning an aqueous slurry of the mixture of mineral particles by adding to it in an amount that is from about 0.1 to about 10 pounds per ton of mixture, a reagent comprising an alkyl hydroxamic acid or salt thereof and nonionic surfactant. In the reagent the ratio of non-ionic suiiactant to hydroxamic acid or salt thereof is preferably from about l:100 to about 100:1. The conditioned slurry is then subjected to a mineral beneficiation process wherein the impurities are separated from the finely divided mixture.
Selective Flocculation
In a preferred embodiment, the invention is directed to an improved method of using selective flocculation to beneficiate a mineral orebody. The orebody can be any orebody from which hydroxamate chelatable impurities such as iron or titanium oxides must be removed Examples of such orebodies include, but are not limited to, typical kaolin crude obtained from the eastern Georgia clay belt may contain about 3.0% or more of TiO2 impurities by weight. The orebody is firstly crushed and dispersed in water in the presence of a dispersing agent such as sodium silicate, sodium hexametaphosphate and/or organic dispersants like polyacrylate and combinations thereof at a dosage of between 1-10 lbs per ton. The preferred dispersant here is sodium silicate. A pH modifier may be added to achieve a pH is the range of 5-12, preferably 8-10.5. An inorganic salt may also be added as a processing aid. Examples of such inorganic salts
include, but are not limited to, calcium chloride, sodium chloride and ammonium chloride.
Blunging is carried out at 40-70% solids, preferably 50-65% solids using high energy devices
which are well known in the industry. An improved reagent in accordance with the present invention containing alkyl hydroxamate (AHX) and a nonionic surfactant is added during the blunging stage in order to ensure complete adsorption onto impurity particles. Complete
adsorption /activation of the alkylhydroxmate reagent is ensured by conditioning using a high
speed energy disperser and increasing the temperature of the slurry. The conditioned slurry is
6
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
subjected to the specific beneficiation process as outlined below. In a particularly preferred
embodiment, the dose of the reagent in the present invention ranges from about 0.1 to about 10
lbs per ton and preferably from about 1 to about 5 lbs per ton and most preferably from about 2
to about 5 pounds per ton of dispersed mineral orebody. :
Flotation Process
The separation of impurities by flotation can be carried out by procedures well known to those skilled in the art such as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,629,556. In a further preferred embodiment, the reagent according to the present invention is added at any stage prior to or during the flotation stage. The dose of reagent added ranges from about 0.1 to about 20 lbs per ton and preferably about 1 to about 5.0 lbs per ton and most preferably from about 2 to about 4
pounds per ton of kaolin or mineral mixture.
Surprisingly the combination of alkyl hydroxamic acid or hydroxamic salt reagent and nonionic surfactant increases the activation of the impurity minerals, thus resulting in improved separation efficiency as is shown in the examples below.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples that are illustrative of certain embodiments.
Examples Example A Preparation of the Hydroxamate/Nonionic surfactant mixtures
Twenty two and one half (22.5) parts of hydroxamic acid prepared as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,871,466 is placed in a suitable glass container equipped with a stir bar and magnetic stirring mechanism. 2.5 parts of the nonionic surfactant as shown in Table I is then added and stirred until a uniform clear solution is obtained. A typical product contains 29.6 percent by weight hydroxamic acid.
Examples 1-10 Selective flocculation
A sample of typical kaolin crude, feed to an existing commercial selective flocculation plant located in the eastern part of the state of Georgia clay belt is used in these examples. The feed
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
material is composed of various blended run of mine ores
The ore feed used in these examples contains about 2.5% TiO2 by weight and has a particle size distribution representing about 90% finer than 2 microns. The as received material contains 19.2% moisture. Reagent additions reported in these examples are based on dry weight basis unless otherwise indicated.
The entire sample is crushed and homogenized using a laboratory hammer mill with % inch discharge grate. The crushed ore is mixed thoroughly by coning and quartering and followed by splitting into representative test charges using rotary splitter. Test charges are adjusted to 300g dry basis based on the original moisture content of the kaolin clay sample.
For each'itest, a randomly selected test charge is agitated (or blunged) in a Waring blender at a nominal 60% solid content. In the following examples, Na silicate dispersant at 1.0 kg/t dosage and 0.25 kg/t of NaOH to obtain slurry pH of about 8.5 to 9.0 is used. Blunging time is fixed at 6 minutes.
In the following examples, the blunged clay slurry is conditioned at the same blunging solids
(60% solids) with the reagents as prepared in Example A above, for an additional 10 minutes at
the highest speed settings of the Waring blender (around 10,000 rpm). The dosage of this
reagent is 3.0 lbs/ton. The pH of the conditioning slurry is maintained between 8.5 and 9.0.
Caustic solution (10% by weight) is used to adjust the slurry pH into the aforementioned range
when necessary. The temperature of the slurry after conditioning is in the range Of 40-70 degrees
C.
After the conditioning step, the kaolin clay slurry is diluted to 25% solids and transferred to a 2 liter beaker for sedimentation. The pulp is agitated mildly at a low rpm (200-400) mixing speed. An appropriate amount (10-20 grams per ton) of high molecular weight polyacrylamide flocculant , (0.025% solution strength) is introduced into the mixing slurry in a controlled manner to allow hydrophobic colored impurity minerals to be flocculated selectively and settle to the bottom of the beaker as a distinct separate phase.
Settling time is fixed at 30 minutes allowing the majority of the colored impurity minerals to settle. After settling, the remaining upgraded kaolin clay suspended in slurry is siphoned out and separated from the settled colored impurity mass. The product slurry is weighed, sampled for percent solids determination and to calculate product yield. Product slurries are further sampled for TiO2 and Fe2O3 assays to determine purity. Table I shows the results of using a nonionic
8
WO 2005/113687
PCT/US2005/014473
surfactant (Ethox, Ethox Chemicals, Greenville, South Carolina; Tergitol, Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Michigan; Neodol, Shell Oil Corp., Houston, Texas; Surfonic, Huntsman Polymers Corp., ' Salt Lake City, Utah; Genepol, Stepan Corp., Northfield, Illinois) in combination with an alkyl hydroxamic acid on the removal efficiency of TiO2 impurity.
Table
Beneficiation bv Selective fiocculation
'I
Test
Surfactant
Surfactant
Surfactant
% Yield
% TiO2
Name
Compostion
HLB
Control
No surfactant added
61.9
1.118
Example |I
Ethox ML-5
Ethoxylated Fatty Acid MW-400
56.4
0415
Example 2
Ethox ML-9
Ethoxylated Fatty Acid
57.1
0.509
Example 3
EthoxML-14
Ethoxylated Fatty Acid
57.0
0.375
Example 4
Tergitol 15-S-3
Ethoxylated Secondary C11-C15 Alcohol
8 30
58.1
0.420
Example 5
Tergitol 15-S-9
Ethoxylated Secondary C11-C15 Alcohol
13.10
57.8
0.399
Example 6
Neodo! 23-3
Ethoxylated Primary C12-C13 Alcohol
7.90
59.7
0.462
Example 7
Neodol 91-6
Ethoxylated Primary C9-C11 Alcohol
12.50
55.0
0.375
Example 8
Surfonic N-95
Ethoxylated NonylPhenoi
12 90
56 3
0.465
Example 9
Genapol-26-L-1
Ethoxylated Linear alcohol
3.70
60 0
0.550
Example 10
Surfonic L-24-7
Ethoxylated Linear alcohol
51.4
0 534
Examples 11
-12 Beneficiation bv flotation
A sample; of typical kaolin crude, feed to an existing commercial selective flocculation plant located in the eastern Georgia clay belt is used in these examples. The feed material is composed of various runs of mine ore.
The ore feed used in these examples contains about 2.5% TiO2 by weight and has a particle size distribution representing about 90% finer than 2 microns. The as received material contains 19.2% moisture. Reagent additions are reported in these examples based on dry weight basis unless otherwise indicated
The entire sample is crushed and homogenized using a laboratory hammer mill with % inch discharge grate The crushed ore is mixed thoroughly by coning and quartering and followed by splitting into representative test charges using rotary splitter. Test charges are adjusted to 300g dry basis based on the original moisture content of the kaolin clay sample.
For each test, a randomly selected test charge is blunged in a Waring blender at nominal 60%
solids. In these examples, Na silicate dispersant was used at 1.0 kg/t dosage and 0.25 kg/t of caustic to obtain slurry pH of about 8.5 to 9.0 is used. Blunging time is fixed at 6 minutes.
9
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
The purpose of the blunging process is to disperse the kaolin clay and colored impurity minerals. Efficient dispersion is requirement for the following conditioning step. The subject, reagents according to the present invention are normally more effective in imparting hydrophobic surface coverage to colored impurity minerals selectively when they are contacted with fully dispersed clay slurries. The colored impurity minerals are then floated away selectively from the hydrophilic kaolin clay values in the subsequent froth flotation separation step.
In the following examples, the blunged clay slurry is conditioned at the same blunging solids (60% solids) with the reagent of the present invention for an additional 10 minutes at the highest speed settings of the Waring blender. The dosage for the reagent is 3.0 lbs/ton. The pH of the conditioning slurry is maintained between 8.5 and 9.0. Caustic solution (10% by weight) is used to adjust the slurry pH in aforementioned range when necessary.
After the conditioning step, the kaolin clay slurry is diluted to 25% solids and transferred to a Denver flotation ceil for flotation separation. Air is introduced into the flotation slurry in a controlled manner to collect hydrophobic colored impurity minerals and separate (float off) them into the froth fraction.
Flotation time is carried out till completion (to a point where most of the colored impurity minerals are removed and froth is diminished to a level that it can not be removed effectively). It takes norma!!y20 to 30 minutes to reach completion in the following examples.
After flotation, the remaining upgraded kaolin clay slurry in the flotation cell is weighed, sampled for percent solids determination to calculate product yield. Product slurries are further sampled in order to determine TiO2 and Fe2O3 assays.
Product TiO2 and Fe2O3 assays and product weight yield are used to compare the efficacy of the reagents in the following examples.
The same test procedure is used in the following three examples.
Example No.
Reagent
Product
Product
Product
Yield
Assay
%
TiO2
%
Fe2O3
%
Control B
No surfactant added
46.4
0.827
1.055
12
Ethox ML 5
62.8
0.448
1.156
13
Ethox ML 5
53.0
0.341
1 106
10
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
What is claimed
1. A mineral beneficiating reagent comprising an alkyl hydroxamic acid or salt thereof and a
nonionic surfactant.
2. The mineral beneficiating reagent according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of non-ionic
surfactant to hydroxamic acid or salt thereof is from about 1:100 to about 100:1.
3. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 2 wherein the ratio of non-
ionic surfactant to hydroxamic acid or salt thereof is from about 1:20 to about 1:1.
4. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 1, wherein said alkyl
hydroxamic acid or a salt thereof is represented by the formula:
R-C(=O)N(R")-OM
wherein R is linear or branched C2-C18 alkyl, linear or branched C2-C18 alkenyl, C6-C20 aryl or substituted aryl, C7-C26 aralkyl or substituted aralkyl; R" is H, C1-C12 alkyl or aralkyl; M is hydrogen, an alkali metal, or an ammonium cation represented by N+(A,B,C,D) wherein each of A,B,C,D, respectively, are H or C1-C6 alkyl or benzyl radicals.
5. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 4, wherein R = linear or
branched C8-C10 alkyl, R" = H; and each of A,B,C and D are H.
6. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 2, wherein the nonionic
surfactant is selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated alcohols, esters, ethoxylated acids,
ethoxylated (alkyl) phenols, alcanolamides, polyethylene oxide copolymers and mixtures thereof.
7. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 6, wherein the nonionic
surfactant is an ethoxylated alcohol.
8. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 7, wherein the ethoxylated
alcohols are selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated C9-C20 linear alcohols.
9. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 8, wherein the ethoxylated
C9-C20 linear alcohol has a hydrophllic lyophilic balance from about 3 to about 14.
11
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/034473
10. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 8, wherein the nonionic
surfactant is an ethoxyiated acid
11. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 10, wherein the ethoxyiated
acids are selected from the group consisting of ethoxylates of C8-C20 saturated and unsaturated
aliphatic acids.
12. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 6, wherein the nonionic
surfactant is ethoxyiated (alkyl) phenols.
13. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 12, wherein the ethoxyiated
(alkyl) phenols are selected from the group consisting of ethoxyiated (alkyl) phenols having the
formula R-Ph-O(CH2CH2O)XH, where R = H, or C1-C15, x = 1-20.
14. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 13, wherein the ethoxyiated
(alkyl) phenol is nonylphenol.
15. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 6, wherein the nonionic
surfactant is an ester and is optionally -ethoxylated.
16. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 15, wherein the ester is
derived from linear or branched mono or polyhydric alcohols with saturated or unsaturated
aliphatic or aromatic acids.
17 The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 16, wherein the ester is
selected from the group consisting of C10-C20 alkyl esters of glyco!, C10-C20 alkyl esters of.
glycerol, C10-C20 esters of sorbitan or sorbitol, ethoxylates thereof and mixtures thereof.
18 The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 1, further comprising a long
chain fatty acid or natural or synthetic sulfonate.
19. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 18, wherein the ratio of
hydroxamic acid or salt thereof to long chain fatty acid or natural or synthetic suifonate is from
about 1:10 to about 10:1.
20. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 19, wherein the ratio
hydroxamic acid or salt thereof to long chain fatty acid is from about 2:1 to about 1:2.
12
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
21. The mineral beneficiating reagent in accordance with claim 20, wherein the long chain
fatty acid is tall oil fatty acid.
22. A method for the selective separation of impurities from a finely divided mixture of mineral
particles comprising the sequential steps of:
conditioning an aqueous slurry of the mixture of mineral particles by adding to it in an amount that is from about 0.1 to about 10 pounds per ton of mixture, a reagent comprising an alkyl hydroxamic acid or salt thereof and nonionic surfactant wherein the ratio of non-ionic surfactant to hydroxamic acid or salt thereof in the reagent is from about 1:100 to about 100:1, to create a conditioned slurry; and
subjecting the conditioned slurry to a mineral beneficiation process wherein the impurities are separated from the finely divided mixture.
23. The method according to claim 22, wherein the mineral beneficiation process is a froth
flotation process or a selective flocculation process.
24 The method according to claim 23, wherein said alkyl hydroxamic acid or a salt thereof is represented by the formula:
R-C(=O)N(R")~OM,
wherein R is linear or branched C2-C18 alkyl, linear or branched C2-C18 alkenyl, C6-C20 aryl or substituted aryl, C7-C26 aralkyl or substituted aralkyl; R" is H, C1-C12 alkyl or aralkyl; M is hydrogen, an alkali metal, or an ammonium cation represented by N+(A,B,C,D) wherein each of
A.B.C'D, respectively, are H or C1-C6 alkyl or benzyl radicals.
i
25. The method according to claim 24, wherein said nonionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated alcohols, esters, ethoxylated acids, ethoxylated (alkyl) phenols, alcanolamides, polyethylene oxide copolymers and mixtures thereof
26 A method for the selective separation of impurities from kaolin clay comprising the sequential steps of.
conditioning an aqueous slurry of the kaolin clay by adding to it in an amount that is from about 0.1 to about 10 pounds per ton of kaolin clay, a reagent comprising an alkyl hydroxamic acid or salt thereof and nonionic surfactant wherein the ratio of non-ionic surfactant to hydroxamic acid or salt thereof in the reagent is from about 1:100 to about 100:1, to create a
13
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US 2005/0144 73
conditioned slurry; and
subjecting the conditioned slurry "to a mineral beneficiation process to separate the impurities from the kaolin clay.
27. The method according to claim 26, wherein the mineral beneficiation process is a froth
flotation process or a selective flocculation process.
28. The method in accordance with claim 26, wherein the amount of reagent added to the
kaolin clay is from about 2 to about 5 pounds per ton of kaolin.
29. The method in accordance with claim 27 wherein the ratio of non-ionic surfactant to
hydroxamic acid or salt thereof in the reagent is from about 1:20 to about 1:1.
30. The method in accordance with claim 29, wherein the alkyl hydroxamic acid or a salt
thereof is represented by the formula:
R-C(=O)N(Rn)-OM,
wherein R is linear or branched C2-C18 alkyl, linear or branched C2-C18 alkenyl, C6-C20 aryl or substituted aryl, C7-C26 aralkyl or substituted aralkyl; R" is H, C1-C12 alkyl or aralkyl; M is hydrogen, an alkali metal, or an ammonium cation represented by N+(A,B,C,D) wherein each of A.B.C.D, respectively, are H or C1-C6 alkyl or benzyl radicals.
31. The method in accordance with claim 30, wherein R = linear or branched C8-C10 alkyl;
R" = H; and each of A,B,C and D are H.
32. The method in accordance with claim 26, wherein the nonionic surfactant is selected from
the group consisting of ethoxylated alcohols, esters, ethoxylated acids, ethoxylated (alkyl)
phenols, alcanolamides, polyethylene oxide copolymers and mixtures thereof.
33. The method in accordance with claim 32, wherein the nonionic surfactant is an
ethoxylated alcohol.
34. The method in accordance with claim 33, wherein the ethoxylated alcohols are selected
from the group consisting of ethoxylated C9-C20 linear alcohols.
14
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
35. The method in accordance with claim 32, wherein the nonionic surfactant has a
hydrophilic lyophilic balance from about 3 to about 14.
36. The method in accordance with claim 32, wherein the nonionic surfactant is an
ethoxylated acid.
37. The method in accordance with claim 36, wherein the ethoxylated acid is selected from
the group consisting of ethoxylates of C8-C20 aliphatic acids.
38 The method in accordance with claim 32, wherein the nonionic surfactant is ethoxylated
(alkyI) phenol.
39 the method in accordance with claim 32, wherein the ethoxylated
selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated (alkyl) phenols having the formula R-Ph-
O(CH2CH2O)XH, where R = H, or C1-C15, x = 1-20.
40. The method in accordance with claim 39, wherein the ethoxylated (alkyl) phenol is nonylphenol.
41 The method in accordance with claim 32, wherein the nonionic surfactant is an ester.
42 The method in accordance with claim 41, wherein the ester is derived from linear or
branched mono or polyhydric alcohols with aliphatic or aromatic acids, and is optionally
ethoxylated
43 The method in accordance with claim 32, wherein the ester is selected from the group
consisting of a C10-C20 alkyl esters of glycol, a C10-C20 alkyl esters of glycerol, sorbitan,
sorbitol esters and mixtures thereof.
44. The method in accordance with claim 26, wherein the reagent further comprises a long
chain fatty acid or natural or synthetic sulfonate.
45 The method in accordance with claim 44, wherein the ratio of hydroxamic acid or salt thereof to long chain fatty acid or natural or synthetic sulfonate in the reagent is from about 1:10 to about 10:1.
15
WO 2005/113687 PCT/US2005/014473
46. The method in accordance with claim 45, wherein the ratio of hydroxamic acid or salt
thereof to long chain fatty acid or natural or synthetic sulfonate in the reagent is from about 2:1 to
about 1:2.
47. The method in accordance with claim 46, wherein the long chain fatty acid is tall oil fatty
16
acid.
|