Title of Invention

RESULFURIZED FREE CUTTING STEEL AND RESULFURIZED AND LEADED FREE CUTTING STEEL

Abstract A low carbon free cutting steel can be obtained by allowing the steel to contain 0.02 to 0.15 mass % of C, 0.05 to 1.8 mass % of Mn, 0.20 to 0.49 mass % of S, more than 0.01 mass % and not more than 0.03 mass % of O, 0.3 to 2.3% of Cr, and the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, the Cr/S ratio falling within a range of between 2 and 6.
Full Text TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a resulfurized free cutting steel and
resulfurized and leaded free cutting steel, particularly, to a low carbon free
cutting steel to which lead is not added or in which the lead addition amount is
markedly decreased from the conventional level of 0.15 to 0.35 mass %, which is
adapted for use as a substitute steel for the
conventional low carbon resulfurized and leaded free
cutting steel, to a low carbon resulfurized and leaded
free cutting steel superior in machinability to the
conventional low carbon resulfurized and leaded steel.
and to a resulfurized or resulfurized and leaded free
cutting steel having an oxygen concentration lower than
that in the prior art, low in the surface flaw, and
excellent in machinability.
[Background Art]
A low carbon resulfurized and leaded free cutting
steel, in which lead (Pb) and sulfur (S) are added as
the free cutting elements to a low carbon steel for
imparting a free-cutting capability to the steel, is
known as a low carbon free cutting steel. However,
there is a requirement for suppressing the use of Pb,

which is used as one of the free cutting elements, in
view of the earth environmental problem.
Such being the situation, Japanese Patent
Disclosure (Kokai) No. 9-25539 (hereinafter referred to
as "prior art 1") discloses a free cutting microalloyed
steel without quenching and tempering to which Pb is
not added. In this case, Nd is added to the steel for
promoting the finely dispersed precipitation of MnS.
Japanese Patent Disclosure No. 2000-160284 (hereinafter
referred to as "prior art 2") also discloses a free
cutting steel to which Pb is not added. In this case, a
large amount of S is added to the steel so as to
increase the amount of the sulfide, and the form of the
sulfide is controlled by oxygen. Further, Japanese
Patent Publication (Kokoku) No. 2-6824 (hereinafter
referred to as "prior art 3") discloses a free cutting
steel, in which Cr having a reactivity with S to form a
compound higher than that of Mn is added to the steel
so as to form CrS in place of MnS, thereby improving
the free-cutting capability.
However, prior art 1 is directed to a microalloyed
steel containing 0.2 to 0.6% of C without quenching and
tempering. In addition, a special element of Nd is used
in prior art. It follows that it is impossible to
comply sufficiently with the requirement for the cost
reduction. Also, a large amount of S is added to the
steel in prior art 2, with the result that the hot

ductility of the steel tends to be lowered. Further,
prior art 3 necessitates the addition of a large amount
reaching 3.5 to 5.9% of costly Cr, resulting in failure
to comply sufficiently with the requirement for the
cost reduction. In addition, formation of a large
amount of CrS as in prior art 3 is disadvantageous
because the difficulty accompanying the smelting of the
material is increased by the presence of a large amount
of CrS.
There is a strong requirement for the further
improvement in the machinability of the low carbon
resulfurized and leaded free cutting steel in view of
the reduction in the machining cost.
In compliance with the requirement, Japanese
Patent Disclosure No. 1-32302 (hereinafter referred to
as "prior art 4") discloses a free cutting steel, in
which a relatively large amount of S is added to the
steel so as to increase the amount of the sulfide, and
the form of the sulfide is controlled by Te, and the
oxygen amount is suppressed to 0.0030% or less so as to
decrease the number of alumina clusters, thereby
improving the machinability of the free cutting steel.
Also, Japanese Patent Disclosure No. 1-309946
(hereinafter referred to as "prior art 5") discloses a
free cutting steel, in which a relatively large amount
of S is added to the steel so as to increase the amount
of the sulfide, and a free cutting element of Pb is

added to the steel so as to improve the machinability
of the free cutting steel. Prior art 5 also teaches
that the oxygen amount is suppressed to 0.008% or less
for preventing the streak flaw caused by the gigantic
oxide.
In each of prior arts 4 and 5, however, the form
of the sulfide which effective for improving the
machinability of the free cutting steel cannot be
controlled sufficiently because the oxygen content of
the steel is low, with the result that an elongated
sulfide comes to be present in the steel. It follows
that the free cutting steel is incapable of producing a
sufficient effect of improving the machinability of the
free cutting steel. Also, as described previously, the
free cutting steel of prior art 2 is excellent in
machinability because the form of a large amount of the
sulfide is controlled by oxygen. However, the hot
ductility of the free cutting steel tends to be lowered
because a large amount of S is added to the steel.
On the other hand, the resulfurized and
resulfurized and leaded free cutting steels contain in
general a large amount of oxygen in order to control
the form of the sulfide which is effective for
improving the machinability of the free cutting steel.
However, since all the oxygen does not dissolve in the
sulfide, it is unavoidable for a gigantic oxide to be
formed so as to cause the streak flaw, thereby giving

rise to a serious defect in the processed article.
In prior art 5, the oxygen content of steel is
suppressed to 0.008% or less in order to avoid
generation of the streak flaw. In prior art 2, the
required amount of oxygen is decreased by increasing
the addition amount of S. Further, in prior art 1, the
required amount of oxygen is decreased by using Nd as a
free cutting element.
In prior art 5, however, the oxygen amount is
simply decreased, though the oxygen amount is limited
to 0.008% or less. Therefore, the form of the sulfide
cannot be sufficiently controlled, as desired, with the
result that an elongated sulfide comes to be present in
the steel. It follows that the free cutting steel
disclosed in prior art 5 cannot be said to be
satisfactory in terms of the machinability. Also,
concerning the free cutting steel disclosed in prior
art 2, the reduction in the hot ductility caused by S
is worried about as pointed out previously. Further, in
prior art 1, as described above, there is a problem
that it is difficult to reduce the cost.
[Disclosure of the Invention]
A first object of the present invention is to
provide a low carbon free cutting steel to which lead
is not added or in which the lead addition amount is
markedly lowered from the level in the conventional low
carbon resulfurized and leaded free cutting steel, the

low carbon free cutting steel being allowed to exhibit
a machinability fully comparable to or higher than that
in the conventional low carbon resulfurized and leaded
free cutting steel without obstructing the cost
reduction and without lowering the hot ductility.
A second object of the present invention is to
provide a low carbon resulfurized and leaded free
cutting steel exhibiting a machinability superior to
that in the prior art without increasing the lead and
sulfur contents from the conventional levels.
Further, a third object of the present invention
is to provide a resulfurized or resulfurized and leaded

free cutting steel exhibiting a machinability superior
to that of the conventional steel in spite of the
oxygen content lower than that in the conventional
steel containing substantially the same amounts of
sulfur and lead without obstructing the cost reduction
and without lowering the hot ductility, and having a
small surface flaw formed in the rolling step, which is
derived from the blow-hole generated in the casting
step as a result of achieving a low oxygen content.
According to a first aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a resulfurized free cutting
steel containing 0.02 to 0.15 mass % of C, 0.05 to 1.8
mass % of Mn, 0.20 to 0.49 mass % of S, more than 0.01
mass % and not more than 0.03 mass % of 0, 0.3 to 2.3
mass % of Cr, and the balance consisting of Fe and

inevitable impurities, the Cr/S ratio falling within a
range of between 2 and 6.
According to a second aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a resulfurized and leaded free
cutting steel excellent in machinability, containing 0.02 to
0.15 mass % of C, 0.05 to 1.00 mass % of Mn, 0.20 to 0.49 mass
% of S, more than 0.008 mass % and not more than 0.030 mass %
of 0, 0.04 to 0.35 mass % of Pb, 0.3 to 2.3% of Cr, and
the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities,
the Cr/S ratio falling within a range of between 2 and
6.
According to a third aspect of the present

invention, there is provided a resulfurized or
resulfurized and leaded free cutting steel small in
surface flaw and excellent in machinability, said free
cutting steel containing 0.16 to 0.49 mass % of S and
0.002 to 0.010 mass % of 0, wherein the sulfide having
an aspect ratio not larger than 5 occupies at least 80%
of the sulfides having the major axis of at least 10 µm.
Further, according to a fourth aspect of the
present invention, there is provided a resulfurized or
resulfurized and leaded free cutting steel small in
surface flaw and excellent in machinability, containing
0.02 to 0.15 mass % of C, 0.05 to 1.8 mass % of Mn,
0.16 to 0.49 mass % of S, 0.002 to 0.010 mass % of 0,
0.3 to 2.3% of Cr, and the balance consisting of Fe and

inevitable impurities, the Cr/S ratio falling within a
range of between 2 and 6.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a drawing for explaining an aspect
ratio; and
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship in tool
life between turning and drilling.
[Best Mode for Working the Invention]
The present invention will now be described in
detail.
1. First Free cutting steel;
A first free cutting steel is provided by the low
carbon free cutting steel according to the first aspect
of the present invention, containing 0.02 to 0.15
mass % of C, 0.05 to 1.8 mass % of Mn, 0.20 to 0.49
mass % of S, more than 0.01 mass % and not more than
0.03 mass % of 0, 0.3 to 2.3% of Cr, and the balance
consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, the Cr/S
ratio falling within a range of between 2 and 6.
It is possible for the first free cutting steel of
the present invention to further contain not more than
0.1 mass % of Si, 0.01 to 0.12 mass % of P, and not
more than 0.01 mass % of Al.
It is also possible for the first free cutting
steel of the present invention to further contain at
least one element selected from the group consisting of
0.0001 to 0.0005 mass % of Ca, 0.01 to 0.03 mass % of

Pb, 0.02 to 0.30 mass % of Se, 0.1 to 0.15 mass % of Te,
0.02 to 0.20 mass % of Bi, 0.003 to 0.020 mass % of Sn,
0.004 to 0.010 mass % of B, 0.005 to 0.015 mass % of N,
0.05 to 0.50 mass % of Cu, 0.003 to 0.090 mass % of Ti,
0.005 to 0.200 mass % of V, 0.005 to 0.090 mass % of Zr,
and 0.0005 to 0.0080 mass % of Mg.
In the free cutting steel of the composition
described above, it is desirable for the sulfide having
the major axis of at least 10 µm to occupy at least 90%
of all the sulfides. It is also desirable for sulfide
having an aspect ratio not larger than 5 to occupy at
least 80% of the sulfides having the major axis at
least 10 µm. Further, it is desirable for the
particular free cutting steel to have a ferrite-
pearlite micro structure with a prior austenite grain
diameter exceeding the grain size number 7.
As a result of an extensive research conducted in
an effort to achieve the first object described above,
the present inventors have found that:
(i) It is possible to obtain a suitable amount of
a sulfide containing both Cr and Mn by the addition of
suitable amounts of Cr, Mn and S and by optimizing the
Cr/S ratio. Since the sulfide containing both Cr and Mn
suppresses the elongation in the hot working step, it
is possible to allow the sulfide to be large and to be
formed like a spindle.
(ii) In view of the idea known to the art that,

where the S amount is the same, the machinability of
the free cutting steel is improved with increase in the
size of the sulfide and with change in the form of the
sulfide toward the spindle shape, it is considered
reasonable to understand that a large and spindle-
shaped sulfide is formed by the addition of suitable
amounts of Cr, Mn and S and by the optimization of the
Cr/S ratio, thereby improving the machinability of the
free cutting steel including the chip disposability and
the surface roughness.
(iii) It is known to the art that the
machinability is improved with increase in the S amount.
However, there is an upper limit in the S amount
because of the problem in terms of the anisotropy in
the hot workability or the mechanical properties. On
the other hand, if a large and spindle-shaped sulfide
is formed by the addition of suitable amounts of Cr, Mn
and S and by the optimization of the Cr/S ration as
described above, it is possible to elevate the upper
limit of the S amount. As a result, the machinability
of the free cutting steel including the chip
disposability and the surface roughness can be markedly
improved, even if Pb is not added or even if the Pb
amount is markedly lowered from the level in the prior
art.
It is possible for the first free cutting steel
described above, which has been obtained on the basis

of the ideas given above, to exhibit a machinability
fully comparable to or higher than that exhibited by
the conventional low carbon resulfurized and leaded
free cutting steel without obstruction the cost
reduction and without lowering the hot ductility, even
if lead is not added to the free cutting steel or even
if the lead addition amount is markedly lowered from
the level in the conventional low carbon resulfurized
and leaded free cutting steel.
The reasons for defining the composition of the
first free cutting steel as described above will now be
described.
(a) C: 0.02 to 0.15 mass %
Carbon, which seriously affects the strength and
the machinability of the steel, is an important element.
However, if the C content is lower than 0.02 mass %, it
is impossible to obtain a sufficient strength of the
steel. On the other hand, if the C content exceeds 0.15
mass %, the strength of the steel is rendered
excessively high so as to deteriorate the machinability
of the steel. Such being the situation, the C content
is defined in the present invention to fall within a
range of between 0.02 mass % and 0.15 mass %.
Preferably, the C content should fall within a range of
between 0.02 mass % and 0.10 mass %.
(b) Mn: 0.05 to 1.8 mass %
Manganese is a sulfide formation element that is

important for improving the machinability of the steel.
However, if the Mn content is lower than 0.05 mass %,
the amount of the sulfide formed is excessively small,
resulting in failure to obtain a sufficient
machinability. On the other hand, if the Mn content
exceeds 1.8 mass %, the formed sulfide is much
elongated, with the result that the machinability of
steel is lowered. Such being the situation, the Mn
content is defined in the present invention to fall
within a range of between 0.05 and 1.8 mass %.
Preferably, the Mn content should be not lower than
0.22 mass % and lower than 0.60 mass %.
(c) S: 0.20 to 0.49 mass %
Sulfur is a sulfide formation element which forms
a sulfide effective for improving the machinability of
the steel. However, if the S content is lower than 0.20
mass %, the amount of the sulfide formed is excessively
small, resulting in failure to obtain a sufficient
effect for improving the machinability of the steel. On
the other hand, if the S content exceeds 0.49 mass %,
the hot workability and the ductility of the steel are
markedly lowered. Such being the situation, the S
content of steel is defined in the present invention to
fall within a range of between 0.20 and 0.49 mass %.
(d) 0: higher than 0.01 mass % and not higher
than 0.03 mass %
Oxygen is an element effective for suppressing the

elongation of the sulfide in the hot working step such
as a rolling step. Therefore, oxygen is an element
important for improving the machinability of the steel
by suppressing the elongation of the sulfide. However,
if the O content is not higher than 0.01 mass %, it is
difficult to obtain a sufficient effect of suppressing
the elongation of the sulfide. Since the elongated
sulfide remains in the steel, it is impossible to
obtain a sufficient effect of improving the
machinability of the steel. On the other hand, even if
the O addition amount exceeds 0.03 mass %, the effect
of suppressing the elongation of the sulfide is
saturated. It follows that the addition of an
excessively large amount of O is disadvantageous in
economy. In addition, a casting defect such a blow-hole
is generated. Under the circumstances, the O content is
defined in the present invention to exceed 0.01 mass %
and to be not higher than 0.03 mass %.
(e) Cr: 0.3 to 2.3 mass %
Chromium is an element effective for suppressing
the elongation of the sulfide in the hot working step
such as a rolling step. Therefore, Cr is an element
important for improving the machinability of the steel
by suppressing the elongation of the sulfide. However,
if the Cr content is lower than 0.3 mass %, it is
difficult to obtain a sufficient effect of suppressing
the elongation of the sulfide. Since the elongated

sulfide remains in the steel, it is impossible to
obtain a sufficient effect of improving the
machinability of the steel. On the other hand, even if
the Cr addition amount exceeds 2.3 mass %, the effect
of suppressing the elongation of the sulfide is
saturated. It follows that the addition of an
excessively large amount of Cr is disadvantageous in
economy. Under the circumstances, the Cr content is
defined in the present invention to fall within a range
of between 0.3 mass % and 2.3 mass %. Preferably, the
Cr content should fall within a range of between 0.3
mass % and 1.5 mass %.
(f) Cr/S ratio: 2 to 6
The Cr/S ratio is an important index seriously
affecting the degree of elongation of the sulfide in
the hot working step such as a rolling step. It is
possible to obtain a sulfide having a desired degree of
elongation, which permits improving the machinability
of the steel, by defining the Cr/S ratio appropriately.
If the Cr/S ratio is smaller than 2, the sulfide
elongated by the formation of MnS is rendered prominent
so as to deteriorate the machinability of the steel. On
the other hand, if the Cr/S ratio exceeds 6, the effect
of suppressing the elongation of the sulfide is
saturated. Such being the situation, the Cr/S ratio is
defined in the present invention to fall within a range
of between 2 and 6. Preferably, the Cr/S ratio should

fall within a range of between 2 and 4.
The conditions given above are absolutely
necessary for the first free cutting steel of the
present invention. The other conditions of the first
free cutting steel are as follows:
(g) Si: 0.1 mass % or less
Silicon is a deoxidizing element. Since the oxide
of Si acts as a nucleus of the sulfide formation, Si
promotes the sulfide formation so as to pulverize
finely the sulfide, with the result that the tool life
is shortened. Such being the situation, where it is
desired to further prolong the tool life, it is
desirable to define the Si content not to exceed 0.1
mass %. More desirably, the Si content of the steel
should not exceed 0.03 mass %.
(h) P: 0.01 to 0.12 mass %
Phosphorus is an element effective for suppressing
the formation of the built-up edge in the cutting
process step so as to lower the finish surface
roughness. However, if the P content is lower than 0.01
mass %, it is difficult to obtain a sufficient effect.
On the other hand, if the P content exceeds 0.12 mass %,
the effect noted above is saturated. Also, the hot
workability and the ductility of the steel are markedly
lowered. Such being the situation, the P content is
defined in the present invention to fall within a range
of between 0.01 mass % and 0.12 mass %. Preferably, the

P content should fall within a range of between 0.01
mass % and 0.09 mass %.
(i) Al: 0.01 mass % or less
Aluminum is a deoxidizing element like Si. Since
the oxide of Al acts as a nucleus of the sulfide
formation, Al promotes the sulfide formation so as to
pulverize finely the sulfide, with the result that the
tool life is shortened. Such being the situation, where
it is desired to further prolong the tool life, it is
desirable to define the Al content not to exceed 0.01
mass %. More desirably, the Al content of the steel
should not exceed 0.003 mass %.
(j) At least one of:
Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0005 mass %;
Pb: 0.01 to 0.03 mass %;
Se: 0.02 to 0.30 mass %;
Te: 0.1 to 0.15 mass %;
Bi: 0.02 to 0.20 mass %;
Sn: 0.003 to 0.020 mass %;
B: 0.004 to 0.010 mass %;
N: 0.005 to 0.015 mass %;
Cu: 0.05 to 0.50 mass %;
Ti: 0.003 to 0.090 mass %;
V: 0.005 to 0.200 mass %;
Zr: 0.005 to 0.090 mass %;
Mg: 0.0005 to 0.0080 mass %.
Any of Ca, Pb, Se, Te, Bi, Sn, B, N, Cu, Ti, V, Zr

and Mg is used in the case where it is important to
improve the machinability of the steel. However, if the
addition amount of each of these elements is smaller
than the lower limit noted above, the effect of
improving the machinability of the steel cannot be
obtained. On the other hand, where the addition amount
of each of these elements exceeds the upper limit noted
above, the effect of improving the machinability of the
steel is saturated. Also, the addition of an
excessively large amount of each of these elements is
disadvantageous in economy. Under the circumstances, in
the case of adding these elements, these elements
should be added such that Ca falls within a range of
between 0.0001 and 0.0005 mass %, Pb falls within a
range of between 0.01 and 0.03 mass %, Se falls within
a range of between 0.02 and 0.30 mass %, Te falls
within a range of between 0.1 and 0.15 mass %, Bi falls
within a range of between 0.02 and 0.20 mass %, Sn
falls within a range of between 0.003 and 0.020 mass %,
B falls within a range of between 0.004 and 0.010
mass %, N falls within a range of between 0.005 and
0.015 mass %, Cu falls within a range of between 0.05
and 0.50 mass %, Ti falls within a range of between
0.003 and 0.090 mass %, V falls within a range of
between 0.005 and 0.200 mass %, Zr falls within a range
of between 0.005 and 0.090 mass %, and Mg falls within
a range of between 0.0005 and 0.0080 mass %.

(k) Micro structure
It is desirable for the micro structure of the
first free cutting steel to be a ferrite pearlite-based
structure. Concerning the machinability of the steel,
it is advantageous for the prior austenite grain size
to be large. However, a satisfactory machinability can
be maintained even in the case of fine grains. In view
of the mechanical properties of the article, it is
desirable for the grains to be fine such that the grain
size exceeds the grain size number 7 (grain size
measured by the method of measuring austenite grain
size specified in JIS (Japanese Industrial Standards) G
0551).
(1) Size of Sulfide
Concerning the machinability of the steel, it is
advantageous for the sulfide to grow into a large body.
To be more specific, it is desirable for the major axis
of the sulfide to be at least 10 µm. It is also
desirable for the sulfide having the major axis of at
least 10 µm to occupy at least 90% of all the sulfides.
(m) Aspect Ratio of Sulfide
The aspect ratio of the sulfide is represented by
L/d, where "L" denotes the major axis and "d" denotes
the minor axis of the sulfide, as shown in FIG. 1.
Concerning the machinability of the steel, it is
advantageous for the sulfide to be formed like a
spindle. Therefore, it is desirable for the sulfide to

have an aspect ratio not larger than 5. It is also
desirable for the sulfide having an aspect ratio not
larger than 5 to occupy at least 80% of the sulfide
having the major axis of at least 10 µm.
2. Second Free cutting steel
A second free cutting steel is provided by the low
carbon free cutting steel according to the second
aspect of the present invention, containing 0.02 to
0.15 mass % of C, 0.05 to 1.00 mass % of Mn, 0.20 to
0.49 mass % of S, more than 0.008 mass % and not more
than 0.030 mass% of 0, 0.04 to 0.35 mass % of Pb, 0.3
to 2.3% of Cr, and the balance consisting of Fe and
inevitable impurities, the Cr/S ratio falling within a
range of between 2 and 6.
It is possible for the second free cutting steel
of the present invention to further contain not more
than 0.1 mass % of Si, 0.01 to 0.12 mass % of P, and
not more than 0.01 mass % of Al.
It is also possible for the second free cutting
steel of the present invention to further contain at
least one element selected from the group consisting of
0.0001 to 0.0005 mass % of Ca, 0.02 to 0.30 mass % of
Se, 0.1 to 0.15 mass % of Te, 0.02 to 0.20 mass % of Bi,
0.003 to 0.020 mass % of Sn, 0.004 to 0.010 mass % of B,
0.005 to 0.015 mass % of N, 0.05 to 0.50 mass % of Cu,
0.003 to 0.090 mass % of Ti, 0.005 to 0.200 mass % of V,
0.005 to 0.090 mass % of Zr, and 0.0005 to 0.0080

mass % of Mg.
As a result of an extensive research conducted in
an effort to achieve the second object described above,
the present inventors have found that:
(i) As described above, it is possible to obtain
a suitable amount of a sulfide containing both Cr and
Mn by the addition of suitable amounts of Cr, Mn and S
and by optimizing the Cr/S ratio. Since the sulfide
containing both Cr and Mn suppresses the elongation in
the hot working step, it is possible to improve the
machinability of the steel including the chip
disposability and the surface roughness by allowing the
sulfide to be large and to be formed like a spindle.
(ii) If a large and spindle-shaped sulfide is
formed by the addition of suitable amounts of Cr, Mn
and S and by the optimization of the Cr/S ratio as
described above, it is possible to elevate the upper
limit of the S amount. As a result, it is possible to
improve the machinability of the free cutting steel
including the chip disposability and the surface
roughness.
(iii) The effects described above are combined
with the effect produced by the free cutting element of
Pb so as to improve markedly the machinability of the
free cutting steel including the chip disposability and
the surface roughness.
The second free cutting steel of the present

invention, which has been achieved on the basis of the
ideas given above, exhibits a machinability superior to
that exhibited in the past without increasing the lead
amount and the sulfur amount from the levels in the
prior art.
The reasons for defining the composition of the
second free cutting steel as described above will now
be described.
(a) C: 0.02 to 0.15 mass %
If the C content is lower than 0.02 mass %, it is
impossible to obtain a sufficient strength of the steel,
as described previously in conjunction with the first
free cutting steel. On the other hand, if the C content
exceeds 0.15 mass %, the strength of the steel is
rendered excessively high so as to deteriorate the
machinability of the steel. Such being the situation,
the C content is defined in the present invention to
fall within a range of between 0.02 mass % and 0.15
mass %. Preferably, the C content should fall within a
range of between 0.02 mass % and 0.10 mass %.
(b) Mn: 0.05 to 1.00 mass %
Manganese is an element important for improving
the machinability of the steel. However, if the Mn
content is lower than 0.05 mass %, the amount of the
sulfide formed is excessively small, resulting in
failure to obtain a sufficient machinability. On the
other hand, if the Mn content exceeds 1.00 mass %, the

formed sulfide is much elongated, with the result that
the machinability of steel is lowered. Such being the
situation, the Mn content is defined in the present
invention to fall within a range of between 0.05 and
1.00 mass %. Preferably, the Mn content should be not
lower than 0.22 mass % and lower than 0.60 mass %.
(c) S: 0.20 to 0.49 mass %
If the S content is lower than 0.20 mass %, the
amount of the sulfide formed is excessively small,
resulting in failure to obtain a sufficient effect for
improving the machinability of the steel, as described
previously in conjunction with the first free cutting
steel of the present invention. On the other hand, if
the S content exceeds 0.49 mass %, the hot workability
and the ductility of the steel are markedly lowered.
Such being the situation, the S content of the steel is
defined in the present invention to fall within a range
of between 0.20 and 0.49 mass %.
(d) O: higher than 0.008 mass % and not higher
than 0.03 mass %
Oxygen is an element effective for suppressing the
elongation of the sulfide in the hot working step such
as a rolling step. Therefore, oxygen is an element
important for improving the machinability of the steel
by suppressing the elongation of the sulfide. However,
if the O content is not higher than 0.008 mass %, it is
difficult to obtain a sufficient effect of suppressing

the elongation of the sulfide. Since the elongated
sulfide remains in the steel, it is impossible to
obtain a sufficient effect of improving the
machinability of the steel. On the other hand, even if
the 0 addition amount exceeds 0.030 mass %, the effect
of suppressing the elongation of the sulfide is
saturated. It follows that the addition of an
excessively large amount of O is disadvantageous in
economy. In addition, a casting defect such a blow-hole
is generated. Under the circumstances, the O content is
defined in the present invention to exceed 0.008 mass %
and to be not higher than 0.03 mass %.
(e) Pb: 0.04 to 0.35 mass %
Lead is an element important for improving the
machinability of the steel. However, if the Pb content
of the steel is lower than 0.04 mass %, it is
impossible to obtain a sufficient effect of improving
the machinability of the steel. On the other hand, even
if Pb is added in a large amount exceeding 0.35 mass %,
the effect of improving the machinability of the steel
is saturated. Also, the hot workability of the steel is
markedly lowered. Such being the situation, the Pb
content of the steel is defined in the present
invention to fall within a range of between 0.04 mass %
and 0.35 mass %.
(f) Cr: 0.3 to 2.3 mass %
If the Cr content is lower than 0.3 mass %, it is

difficult to obtain a sufficient effect of suppressing
the elongation of the sulfide, as described previously
in conjunction with the first free-cutting steel of the
present invention. Since the elongated sulfide remains
in the steel, it is impossible to obtain a sufficient
effect of improving the machinability of the steel. On
the other hand, even if the Cr addition amount exceeds
2.3 mass %, the effect of suppressing the elongation of
the sulfide is saturated. It follows that the addition
of an excessively large amount of Cr is disadvantageous
in economy. Under the circumstances, the Cr content is
defined in the present invention to fall within a range
of between 0.3 mass % and 2.3 mass %. Preferably, the
Cr content should fall within a range of between 0.3
mass % and 1.4 mass %.
(g) Cr/S ratio: 2 to 6
The Cr/S ratio is important in the second free
cutting steel as in the first free cutting steel. If
the Cr/S ratio is smaller than 2, the sulfide elongated
by the formation of MnS is rendered prominent so as to
deteriorate the machinability of the steel. On the
other hand, if the Cr/S ratio exceeds 6, the effect of
suppressing the elongation of the sulfide is saturated.
Such being the situation, the Cr/S ratio is defined in
the present invention to fall within a range of between
2 and 6. Preferably, the Cr/S ratio should fall within
a range of between 2 and 4.

The conditions given above are absolutely
necessary for the second free cutting steel of the
present invention. The other conditions of the second
free cutting steel are as follows:
(h) Si: 0.1 mass % or less
As described previously, Si shortens the tool life.
Such being the situation, where it is desired to
further prolong the tool life, it is desirable to
define the Si content not to exceed 0.1 mass % as in
the first free cutting steel of the present invention.
More desirably, the Si content of the steel should not
exceed 0.03 mass %.
(i) P: 0.01 to 0.12 mass %
If the P content is lower than 0.01 mass %, it is
difficult to obtain a sufficient effect of suppressing
the finish surface roughness of the steel, as in the
first free cutting steel. On the other hand, if the P
content exceeds 0.12 mass %, the effect noted above is
saturated. Also, the hot workability and the ductility
of the steel are markedly lowered. Such being the
situation, the P content is defined in the present
invention to fall within a range of between 0.01 mass %
and 0.12 mass %. Preferably, the P content should fall
within a range of between 0.01 mass % and 0.09 mass %.
(j) Al: 0.01 mass % or less
Aluminum shortens the tool life as described
previously in conjunction with the first free cutting

steel. Therefore, where it is desired to further
prolong the tool life, it is desirable to define the Al
content not to exceed 0.01 mass %. More desirably, the
Al content of the steel should not exceed 0.003 mass %.
(k) At least one of:
Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0005 mass %;
Se: 0.02 to 0.30 mass %;
Te: 0.1 to 0.15 mass %;
Bi: 0.02 to 0.20 mass %;
Sn: 0.003 to 0.020 mass %;
B: 0.004 to 0.010 mass %;
N: 0.005 to 0.015 mass %;
Cu: 0.05 to 0.50 mass %;
Ti: 0.003 to 0.090 mass %;
V: 0.005 to 0.200 mass %;
Zr: 0.005 to 0.090 mass %;
Mg: 0.0005 to 0.0080 mass %.
Any of Ca, Se, Te, Bi, Sn, B, N, Cu, Ti, V, Zr and
Mg is used in the case where it is important to improve
the machinability of the steel. However, if the
addition amount of each of these elements is smaller
than the lower limit noted above, the effect of
improving the machinability of the steel cannot be
obtained. On the other hand, where the addition amount
of each of these elements exceeds the upper limit noted
above, the effect of improving the machinability of the
steel is saturated. Also, the addition of an

excessively large amount of each of these elements is
disadvantageous in economy. Under the circumstances, in
the case of adding these elements, these elements
should be added such that Ca falls within a range of
between 0.0001 and 0.0005 mass %, Se falls within a
range of between 0.02 and 0.30 mass %, Te falls within
a range of between 0.1 and 0.15 mass %, Bi falls within
a range of between 0.02 and 0.20 mass %, Sn falls
within a range of between 0.003 and 0.020 mass %, B
falls within a range of between 0.004 and 0.010 mass %,
N falls within a range of between 0.005 and 0.015
mass %, Cu falls within a range of between 0.05 and
0.50 mass %, Ti falls within a range of between 0.003
and 0.090 mass %, V falls within a range of between
0.005 and 0.200 mass %, Zr falls within a range of
between 0.005 and 0.090 mass %, and Mg falls within a
range of between 0.0005 and 0.0080 mass %.
(1) Micro structure
It is desirable for the micro structure of the
second free cutting steel to be a ferrite • pearlite-
based structure like the micro structure of the first
free cutting steel described previously. Concerning the
machinability of the steel, it is advantageous for the
prior austenite grain size to be large. However, a
satisfactory machinability can be maintained even in
the case of fine grains. In view of the mechanical
properties of the article, it is desirable for the

grains to be fine such that the grain size exceeds the
grain size number 7.
3. Third free cutting steel
The third free cutting steel of the present
invention is a resulfurized or resulfurized and leaded
free cutting steel small according to the third aspect
of the present invention, the free cutting steel
containing 0.16 to 0.49 mass % of S and 0.002 to 0.010%
of O. In the third free cutting steel of the present
invention, the sulfide having an aspect ratio not
larger than 5 occupies at least 80% of the sulfides
having the major axis of at least 10 Mm.
The specific free cutting steel, which permits
realizing the particular sulfide and which defines the
carbon content affecting the machinability of the free
cutting steel, contains 0.02 to 0.15 mass % of C, 0.05
to 1.8 mass % of Mn, 0.16 to 0.49 mass % of S, 0.002 to
0.010 mass % of 0, 0.3 to 2.3% of Cr, and the balance
consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, the Cr/S
ratio falling within a range of between 2 and 6.
It is possible for the third free cutting steel of
the present invention to further contain not more than
0.1 mass % of Si, 0.04 to 0.12 mass % of P, and not
more than 0.01 mass % of Al.
It is also possible for the third free cutting
steel of the present invention to further contain at
least one element selected from the group consisting of

0.0001 to 0.0090 mass % of Ca, 0.01 to 0.40 mass % of
Pb, 0.02 to 0.30 mass % of Se, 0.03 to 0.15 mass % of
Te, 0.02 to 0.20 mass % of Bi, 0.003 to 0.020 mass % of
Sn, 0.004 to 0.010 mass % of B, 0.005 to 0.015 mass %
of N, 0.05 to 0.50 mass % of Cu, 0.003 to 0.090 mass %
of Ti, 0.005 to 0.200 mass % of V, 0.005 to 0.090
mass % of Zr, and 0.0005 to 0.0080 mass % of Mg.
As a result of an extensive research conducted in
an effort to achieve the third object described above,
the present inventors have found that:
(i) It is possible to allow the free cutting
steel to exhibit the machinability including the chip
disposability and the surface roughness, which is fully
comparable to or higher than that of the conventional
steel, by allowing the sulfide having an aspect ratio
not larger than 5 to occupy at least 80% of the
sulfides having the major axis not smaller than 10 µm
and by allowing the sulfide to be large and to be
formed like a spindle, even if the oxygen content of
the steel is decreased from the level in the
conventional steel.
(ii) As described previously, it is possible to
obtain a suitable amount of a sulfide containing both
Cr and Mn by the addition of suitable amounts of Cr, Mn
and S and by optimizing the Cr/S ratio. Since the
sulfide containing both Cr and Mn suppresses the
elongation in the hot working step, it is possible to

obtain the sulfide that is large and formed like a
spindle, as described in item (i) above.
(iii) Since it is possible to decrease the oxygen
content of the steel from the level in the conventional
steel, it is possible to decrease the blow-hole
generated in the casting step, compared with the
conventional steel. Since the decrease of the blow-hole
permits suppressing the generation of the surface flaw
in the rolling step derived from the blow-hole, the
surface flaw of the rolled can be decreased.
(iv) It is known to the art that the
machinability is improved with increase in the S amount
However, there is an upper limit in the S amount
because of the problem in terms of the anisotropy in
the hot workability or the mechanical properties. On
the other hand, if a large and spindle-shaped sulfide
is formed as described above, it is possible to elevate
the upper limit of the S amount. As a result, the
machinability of the free cutting steel including the
chip disposability and the surface roughness can be
markedly improved.
It is possible for the third free cutting steel
described above, which has been obtained on the basis
of the ideas given above, to exhibit a machinability
fully comparable to or higher than that exhibited by
the conventional steel containing substantially the
same amounts of sulfur and lead without obstructing the

cost reduction and without lowering the hot ductility
in spite of the oxygen content lower than that in the
conventional steel. Also, since it is possible to lower
the oxygen concentration, it is possible to suppress
the surface flaw in the rolling step, which is derived
from the blow-hole generated in the casting step.
The reasons for defining the composition of the
third free cutting steel as described above will now be
described.
(a) S: 0.16 to 0.49 mass %
Sulfur is a sulfide formation element which forms
a sulfide effective for improving the machinability of
the steel. However, if the S content is lower than 0.16
mass %, the amount of the sulfide formed is excessively
small, resulting in failure to obtain a sufficient
effect for improving the machinability of the steel. On
the other hand, if the S content exceeds 0.49 mass %,
the hot workability and the ductility of the steel are
markedly lowered. Such being the situation, the S
content of steel is defined in the present invention to
fall within a range of between 0.16 and 0.49 mass %.
(b) O: 0.002 to 0.010 mass %
Oxygen is an element effective for suppressing the
elongation of the sulfide in the hot working step such
as a rolling step. Therefore, oxygen is an element
important for improving the machinability of the steel
by suppressing the elongation of the sulfide. However,

if the 0 content is not higher than 0.002 mass %, it is
difficult to obtain a sufficient effect of suppressing
the elongation of the sulfide. Since the elongated
sulfide remains in the steel, it is impossible to
obtain a sufficient effect of improving the
machinability of the steel. On the other hand, O
permits generating the blow-hole in the casting step,
and the surface flaw is derived from the blow-hole.
Therefore, an excessively high O content is harmful. If
the O content exceeds 0.010 mass %, a large number of
blow-holes are generated and, thus, the surface flaw
tends to be increased in the rolling step. In addition,
the improvement in the effect of suppressing the
elongation of the sulfide is small. Under the
circumstances, the O content is defined in the present
invention to fall within a range of between 0.002
mass % and 0.010 mass %.
(c) For sulfide having an aspect ratio of 5 or
less to occupy at least 80% of sulfides having major
axis of 10 µm or more:
Concerning the machinability of the steel, it is
advantageous for the sulfide to be large and to be
formed like a spindle. Therefore, it is necessary for
the sulfide having an aspect ratio of 5 or less to
occupy at least 80% of the sulfides having the major
axis of 10 µm or more.
(d) C: 0.02 to 0.15 mass %

If the C content is lower than 0.02 mass %, it is
impossible to obtain a sufficient strength of the steel,
as in the first free cutting steel. On the other hand,
if the C content exceeds 0.15 mass %, the strength of
the steel is rendered excessively high so as to
deteriorate the machinability of the steel. Such being
the situation, the C content is defined in the present
invention to fall within a range of between 0.02 mass %
and 0.15 mass %. Preferably, the C content should fall
within a range of between 0.02 mass % and 0.10 mass %.
(e) Mn: 0.05 to 1.8 mass %
If the Mn content is lower than 0.05 mass %, the
amount of the sulfide formed is excessively small,
resulting in failure to obtain a sufficient
machinability, as in the first free cutting steel
described previously. On the other hand, if the Mn
content exceeds 1.8 mass %, the formed sulfide is much
elongated, with the result that the machinability of
the steel is lowered. Such being the situation, the Mn
content is defined in the present invention to fall
within a range of between 0.05 and 1.8 mass %.
Preferably, the Mn content should be not lower than
0.22 mass % and lower than 0.60 mass %.
(f) Cr: 0.3 to 2.3 mass %
If the Cr content is lower than 0.3 mass %, it is
difficult to obtain a sufficient effect of suppressing
the elongation of the sulfide, as in the first free

cutting steel described previously. Since the elongated
sulfide remains in the steel, it is impossible to
obtain a sufficient effect of improving the
machinability of the steel. On the other hand, even if
the Cr addition amount exceeds 2.3 mass %, the effect
of suppressing the elongation of the sulfide is
saturated. It follows that the addition of an
excessively large amount of Cr is disadvantageous in
economy. Under the circumstances, the Cr content is
defined in the present invention to fall within a range
of between 0.3 mass % and 2.3 mass %. Preferably, the
Cr content should fall within a range of between 0.3
mass % and 1.5 mass %.
(g) Cr/S ratio: 2 to 6
The Cr/S ratio is important in the third free
cutting steel as in the first and second free cutting
steels. If the Cr/S ratio is smaller than 2, the
sulfide elongated by the formation of MnS is rendered
prominent so as to deteriorate the machinability of the
steel. On the other hand, if the Cr/S ratio exceeds 6,
the effect of suppressing the elongation of the sulfide
is saturated. Such being the situation, the Cr/S ratio
is defined in the present invention to fall within a
range of between 2 and 6. Preferably, the Cr/S ratio
should fall within a range of between 2 and 4.
The other conditions of the third free cutting
steel are as follows:

(h) Si: 0.1 mass % or less
As described above, Si shortens the tool life.
Therefore, where it is desired to further prolong the
tool life, it is desirable to define the Si content not
to exceed 0.1 mass %. More desirably, the Si content of
the steel should not exceed 0.03 mass %.
(i) P: 0.04 to 0.12 mass %
If the P content is lower than 0.04 mass %, it is
difficult to produce effectively the effect of
suppressing the formation of the built-up edge in the
cutting process step, resulting in failure to obtain a
sufficient effect of lowering the finish surface
roughness. On the other hand, if the P content exceeds
0.12 mass %, the effect noted above is saturated. Also,
the hot workability and the ductility of the steel are
markedly lowered. Such being the situation, the P
content is defined in the present invention to fall
within a range of between 0.04 mass % and 0.12 mass %.
(j) Al: 0.01 mass % or less
Since Al deteriorates the tool life as described
previously it is desirable to define the Al content not
to exceed 0.01 mass %, where it is desired to further
prolong the tool life. More desirably, the Al content
of the steel should not exceed 0.003 mass %.
(k) At least one of:
Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0090 mass %;
Pb: 0.01 to 0.40 mass %;

Se: 0.02 to 0.30 mass %;
Te: 0.03 to 0.15 mass %;
Bi: 0.02 to 0.20 mass %;
Sn: 0.003 to 0.020 mass %;
B: 0.004 to 0.010 mass %;
N: 0.005 to 0.015 mass %;
Cu: 0.05 to 0.50 mass %;
Ti: 0.003 to 0.090 mass %;
V: 0.005 to 0.200 mass %;
Zr: 0.005 to 0.090 mass %;
Mg: 0.0005 to 0.0080 mass %.
Any of Ca, Pb, Se, Te, Bi, Sn, B, N, Cu, Ti, V, Zr
and Mg is used in the case where it is important to
improve the machinability of the steel. However, if the
addition amount of each of these elements is smaller
than the lower limit noted above, the effect of
improving the machinability of the steel cannot be
obtained. On the other hand, where the addition amount
of each of these elements exceeds the upper limit noted
above, the effect of improving the machinability of the
steel is saturated. Also, the addition of an
excessively large amount of each of these elements is
disadvantageous in economy. Under the circumstances, in
the case of adding these elements, these elements
should be added such that Ca falls within a range of
between 0.0001 and 0.0090 mass %, Pb falls within a
range of between 0.01 and 0.40 mass %, Se falls within

a range of between 0.02 and 0.30 mass %, Te falls
within a range of between 0.03 and 0.15 mass %, Bi
falls within a range of between 0.02 and 0.20 mass %,
Sn falls within a range of between 0.003 and 0.020
mass %, B falls within a range of between 0.004 and
0.010 mass %, N falls within a range of between 0.005
and 0.015 mass %, Cu falls within a range of between
0.05 and 0.50 mass %, Ti falls within a range of
between 0.003 and 0.090 mass %, V falls within a range
of between 0.005 and 0.200 mass %, Zr falls within a
range of between 0.005 and 0.090 mass %, and Mg falls
within a range of between 0.0005 and 0.0080 mass %.
(1) Micro structure
It is desirable for the micro structure of the
third free cutting steel to be a ferrite • pearlite-based
structure like the first and second free cutting steels.
Concerning the machinability of the steel, it is
advantageous for the prior austenite grain size to be
large. However, a satisfactory machinability can be
maintained even in the case of fine grains. In view of
the mechanical properties of the article, it is
desirable for the grains to be fine such that the grain
size exceeds the grain size number 7.
Incidentally, the manufacturing method of each of
the first to third free cutting steels of the present
invention is not particularly limited. It is possible
to carry out the casting and the hot rolling under the

ordinary conditions. The subsequent heat treatment is
not particularly limited, either. For example, it is
possible to employ the ordinary normalizing.
(Examples)
Some Examples of the present invention will now be
described.
First Example:
The first Example is directed to Examples of the
first free cutting steel.
Prepared were steel samples Nos. 1 to 6 each
having a chemical composition falling within the range
of the first free cutting steel of the present
invention (hereinafter referred to as Examples of the
present invention), as shown in Table 1, steel samples
Nos. 7 to 11 each having a chemical composition failing
to fall within the range of the first free cutting
steel of the present invention (hereinafter referred to
as Comparative Examples), and a steel sample No. 12
used as a reference Example and directed to a low
carbon resulfurized and leaded free cutting steel. Each
of these steel samples was smelted and then casted into
an ingot having a cross sectional area of 400 mm x 300
mm, followed by subjecting the ingot to a hot rolling
so as to obtain an 80 mm diameter steel rod. Further,
the steel rod thus obtained was subjected to a
normalizing treatment such that the steel rod was
heated at 9250C for one hour, followed by cooling the

heated steel rod to room temperature by means of the
air cooling.
The form of the sulfide of each steel rod thus
manufactured was measured. Also, a test for the
machinability was applied to the steel rod thus
manufactured.
For measuring the form of the sulfide, the major
axis L (length in the rolling direction) and the minor
axis d (thickness or length in a direction
perpendicular to the rolling direction) were measured
by an image analyzing apparatus in respect of all the
sulfides present in a region of 5.5 mm x 11 mm in the
central portion of steel rod. Also, obtained was a
ratio of the sulfides having the major axis not smaller
than 10 µm and a ratio of the sulfides having an aspect
ratio L/d not larger than 5 to all the sulfides having
the major axis not smaller than 10 µm. Further, a
machinability test was conducted under the conditions
shown in Table 2.






Table 3 shows the results. Also, FIG. 2 is a
graph showing the relationship between the life of the
turning tool (SKH4), which is taken up as a typical
characteristic value, and the life of the drilling tool.
As apparent from Table 3, it was confirmed that
any of samples Nos. 1 to 6 of the present invention had
been satisfactory in various characteristics, compared
with the low carbon resulfurized and leaded free
cutting steel for sample No. 12 (Reference Example).
On the other hand, the Mn content exceeded the
upper limit specified in the present invention in
sample No. 7 for the Comparative Example. The Cr
content was lower than the lower limit specified in the
present invention in sample No. 9 for the Comparative
Example. The 0 content was insufficient in sample No.
10 for the Comparative Example. Further, the Cr/S ratio
was lower than the lower limit specified in the present
invention in sample No. 11 for the Comparative Example.
As a result, the aspect ratio of the sulfide was
rendered large in each of these steel samples of the
Comparative Example and, thus, these steel samples were
rendered inferior to the steel samples of the present
invention in the machinability. On the other hand, the
S content of the steel sample No. 8 for the Comparative
Example was lower than the lower limit specified in the
present invention. Therefore, the steel sample No. 8
noted above was insufficient in the total amount of the

sulfide effective for improving the machinability of
the steel, with the result that the steel sample No. 8
was inferior in the machinability of the steel to the
steel samples of the present invention.




Second Example:
The second Example is directed to the second free
cutting steel of the present invention.
Cast under the conditions equal to those for the
first Example were steel samples Nos. 21 to 26 for the
present invention each having the chemical composition
falling within the range specified for the second free
cutting steel of the present invention as shown in
Table 4, steel samples Nos. 27 to 31 for the
Comparative Example each having a chemical composition
failing to fall within the range specified for the
second free cutting steel of the present invention, and
a steel sample No. 32 for the reference Example
directed to a low carbon resulfurized and leaded free
cutting steel. The cast steel samples were subjected to
a hot rolling and, then, to a normalizing under the
conditions equal to those for the first Example.
The form of the sulfide was measured and a
machinability test was applied as in the first Example
in respect of each of the steel rod samples thus
manufactured and having the compositions as shown in




Table 5 shows the results of the test. As
apparent from Table 5, it was confirmed that any of the
steel samples Nos. 21 to 26 for the present invention
had satisfactory characteristics, compared with the
steel sample No. 32 for the reference Example directed
to a low carbon resulfurized and leaded free cutting
steel.
On the other hand, the Mn content of the steel
sample No. 27 for the Comparative Example exceeded the
upper limit specified in the present invention. The Cr
content of the steel sample No. 29 for the Comparative
Example was lower than the lower limit specified in the
present invention. The Cr/S ratio in the steel sample
No. 30 for the Comparative Example was lower than the
lower limit specified in the present invention. Further,
the O content of the steel sample No. 31 for the
Comparative Example was insufficient. As a result, the
aspect ratio of the sulfide was rendered large in each
of these steel samples for the Comparative Example and,
thus, the machinability of each of these steel samples
for the Comparative Example was found to be inferior to
that of any of the steel samples for the present
invention. Further, the S content of the steel sample
No. 28 for the Comparative Example was lower than the
lower limit specified in the present invention. As a
result, the total amount of the sulfides effective for
improving the machinability of the steel was

insufficient and, thus, the steel sample No. 28 was
inferior in the machinability to any of the steel
samples for the present invention.




Third Example;
The third Example is directed to the third free
cutting steel of the present invention.
Cast under the conditions equal to those for the
first Example were steel samples Nos. 41 to 46 for the
present invention each having the chemical composition
falling within the range specified for the third free
cutting steel of the present invention as shown in
Table 6, steel samples Nos. 47 to 51 for the
Comparative Example each having a chemical composition
failing to fall within the range specified for the
third free cutting steel of the present invention, and
a steel sample No. 52 for the reference Example
directed to JIS SUM23L. The cast steel samples were
subjected to a hot rolling and, then, to a normalizing
under the conditions equal to those for the first
Example.
The form of the sulfide was measured and a
machinability test was applied as in the first Example
in respect of each of the steel rod samples thus
manufactured and having the compositions as shown in




Table 7 shows the results of the test. As
apparent from Table 7, each of steel samples Nos. 41 to
44 included in the steel samples of the present
invention was found to have satisfactory
characteristics, compared with the steel sample No. 52
for the reference Example directed to JIS SUM23L. Also,
the steel sample No. 45 for the present invention,
which is equal in the S content to and a half in the 0
content of the steel sample No. 52 for the reference
Example directed to JIS SUM23L, was found to be
substantially equal in the machinability to the steel
sample No. 52 (JIS SUM23L). In addition, a surface flaw
was scarcely found in the steel sample No. 45 for the
present invention. Further, the steel sample No. 46 for
the present invention, which had a S content equal to
that of the steel sample No. 52 for the reference
Example directed to JIS SUM23L and had an 0 content
lower than that of the steel sample NO. 52 noted above
and higher than that of the steel sample NO. 45 for the
present invention, was found to be satisfactory in the
machinability, compared with the steel sample No. 52.
On the other hand, the Mn content of the steel
sample No. 47 for the Comparative Example exceeded the
upper limited specified in the present invention. The
Cr content of the steel sample No. 49 for the
Comparative Example was lower than the lower limit
specified in the present invention. Further, the Cr/S

ratio of the steel sample 51 for the Comparative
Example was lower than the lower limit specified in the
present invention. As a result, the sulfide in each of
these steel samples for the Comparative Examples had a
large aspect ratio and, thus, each of these steel
samples was found to be inferior in machinability to
any of the steel samples of the present invention.
Further, the S content of the steel sample No. 48 for
the Comparative Example was lower than the lower limit
specified in the present invention. Therefore, the
steel sample No. 48 for the Comparative Example was
insufficient in the total amount of the sulfides
effective for improving the machinability of the steel
and, thus, was also inferior in the machinability to
any of the steel samples of the present invention.
Still further, the O content of the steel sample No. 50
for the Comparative Example was lower than the lower
limit specified in the present invention and, thus, the
steel sample No. 50 was inferior in the machinability
to any of the steel samples of the present invention.




WE CLAIM:
1. A low carbon free cutting steel containing 0.02 to 0.15 mass % of C, 0.05 to
1.8 mass % of Mn, 0.20 to 0.49 mass % of S, more than 0.01 mass % and not more
than 0.03 mass % of 0,0.3 to 2.3 mass % of Cr, not more than 0.1 mass % of Si, 0.01
to 0.12 mass % of P, and not more than 0.01 mass % of Al, and the balance
consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, the Cr/S ratio falling within a range of
between 2 and 6,
wherein the sulfides having the major axis of at least 10 µm occupy at least 90% of all
the sulfides and the sulfides having an aspect ratio not larger than 5 occupies at least
80% of the sulfides having the major axis of at least 10 µm.
2. The low carbon free cutting steel as claimed in claim 1, containing at least
one element selected from the group consisting of 0.0001 to 0.0005 mass % of Ca,
0.01 to 0.03 mass % of Pb, 0.02 to 0.30 mass % of Se, 0.1 to 0.15 mass % of Te, 0.02
to 0.20 mass % of Bi, 0.003 to 0.020 mass % of Sn, 0.004 to 0.010 mass % of B,
0.005 to 0.015 mass % of N, 0.05 to 0.50 mass % of Cu, 0.003 to 0.090 mass % of Ti,
0.005 to 0.200 mass % of v, 0.005 to 0.090 mass % of Zr, and 0.0005 to 0.0080
mass % of Mg.
3. The low carbon free cutting steel as claimed in any one of claims 1 and 2,
wherein the free cutting steel has a ferrite-pearlite structure, and the prior austenite

grain size exceeds the grain size number 7 measured by the austenite grain size
measuring method specified in JIS G 0551.


A low carbon free cutting steel can be obtained by
allowing the steel to contain 0.02 to 0.15 mass % of C,
0.05 to 1.8 mass % of Mn, 0.20 to 0.49 mass % of S,
more than 0.01 mass % and not more than 0.03 mass % of
O, 0.3 to 2.3% of Cr, and the balance consisting of Fe
and inevitable impurities, the Cr/S ratio falling
within a range of between 2 and 6.

Documents:

636-KOLNP-2004-(29-05-2012)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-ASSIGNMENT .pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-CORRESPONDENCE 1.1.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-FORM 18.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-FORM 3.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-FORM 5.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-GPA.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-GRANTED-ABSTRACT.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-GRANTED-CLAIMS.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-GRANTED-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-GRANTED-DRAWINGS.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-GRANTED-FORM 1.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-GRANTED-SPECIFICATION.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-OTHERS.pdf

636-KOLNP-2004-REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf


Patent Number 252760
Indian Patent Application Number 636/KOLNP/2004
PG Journal Number 22/2012
Publication Date 01-Jun-2012
Grant Date 30-May-2012
Date of Filing 17-May-2004
Name of Patentee ISHIDA KIYOHITA
Applicant Address 3-5-20, KAMISUGI, AOBA-KU, SENDAI-SHI, MIYAGI 980-0011, JAPAN
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 MURAKAMI TOSHIYUKI C/O. NKK BARS & SHAPES CO. LTD., 12-8, SHINKAWA 2-CHOME, CHUO-KU, TOKYO 104-0033, JAPAN
2 SHIRAGA TESSUO C/O. NKK BARS & SHAPES CO. LTD., 12-8, SHINKAWA 2-CHOME, CHUO-KU, TOKYO 104-0033, JAPAN
3 ISHIDA KIYOHITO 3-5-20, KAMISUGI, AOBA-KU, SENDAI-SHI, MIYAGI 980-0011, JAPAN
4 OIKAWA KATSUNARI 4-1-34, NISHIFUNABASAMA, SHIBATA-MACHI, SHIBATA-GUN, MIYAGI 989-1622, JAPAN
PCT International Classification Number C22C38/00
PCT International Application Number PCT/JP2002/12559
PCT International Filing date 2002-11-29
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 2002-185496 2002-06-26 Japan
2 2001-366695 2001-11-30 Japan
3 2002-185494 2002-06-26 Japan
4 2002-185495 2002-06-26 Japan