Title of Invention

A DIAGONISTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MONITORING AN EXHAUST SYSTEM

Abstract The invention relates to a diagnostic system for an exhaust system having a catalyst and a post-catalyst oxygen sensor, comprising: a first diagnostic module that monitors the post-catalyst oxygen sensor during a first period, that estimates a total integrated area based on a signal from the post-catalyst oxygen sensor, that compares the total integrated area to a threshold integrated area, and that determines a pass/fail status of the post-catalyst oxygen sensor based on the comparison, wherein the first diagnostic module generates a pass status signal when the total integrated area is less than the threshold integrated area and generates a fail status signal when the total integrated area is greater than the threshold integrated area; and a second diagnostic module that monitors the catalyst during a second period, and that determines a pass/fail status of the catalyst based on the monitoring during the second period, wherein the first period includes the second period, and wherein the second period starts after the first period starts.
Full Text FIELD The present invention relates to methods and systems for
diagnosing a fault of a catalyst and a post-catalyst oxygen sensor in a vehicle.
BACKGROUND During the combustion process, gasoline is oxidized and
hydrogen (H) and carbon (C) combine with air. Various chemical compounds are
formed including carbon dioxide (CO2), water (H2O), carbon monoxide (CO),
nitrogen oxides (NOx), unburned hydrocarbons (HC), sulfur oxides (SOx), and
other compounds.
. Automobile exhaust systems include a catalytic converter that
reduces exhaust emissions by chemically converting the exhaust gas into carbon
dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N), and water (H2O). Exhaust gas oxygen sensors
generate signals indicating the oxygen content of the exhaust gas. An inlet or
pre-catalyst oxygen sensor monitors the oxygen level associated with an inlet
exhaust stream of the catalytic converter. This inlet O2 sensor is also the primary
feedback mechanism that maintains the air-to-fuel (A/F) ratio of the engine at the
chemically correct or stoichiometric A/F ratio that is needed to support the
catalytic conversion processes. An outlet or post-catalyst oxygen sensor
monitors the oxygen level associated with an outlet exhaust stream of the

catalytic converter. The post-02 sensor signal is used for secondary A/F ratio
control.
System diagnostics monitor the function of the oxygen sensors
and the catalytic converter to ensure proper operation. Traditionally, diagnostics
employ separate intrusive tests that evaluate the operation of the sensors and
the catalytic converter. During the intrusive tests, the A/F ratio is manipulated
and the sensor response is monitored. However, multiple intrusive tests may
increase exhaust emissions and/or cause engine instability and reduced
driveability that may be noticeable by a vehicle operator. Further, traditional
diagnostics are more complex and computationally intense than desired.
SUMMARY Accordingly, a diagnostic system for an exhaust system
including a catalyst and a post-catalyst oxygen sensor is provided. The system
generally includes a fuel control module that commands fuel to transition from a
rich condition to a lean condition and that commands fuel to transition from the
lean condition to the rich condition. A first diagnostic module monitors the post-
catalyst oxygen sensor during the transition from the rich condition to the lean
condition. A second diagnostic module monitors the catalyst during the transition
from the lean condition to the rich condition.
In other features, a method of monitoring an exhaust system
that includes a catalyst and a post-catalyst oxygen sensor is provided. The
method generally includes: commanding fuel to transition from a rich condition to

a lean condition; monitoring the post-catalyst oxygen sensor during the transition
from the rich condition to the lean condition; commanding fuel to transition from
the lean condition to the rich condition; and monitoring the catalyst during the
transition from the lean condition to the rich condition.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the
description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and
specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not
intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE/DRAWINGS
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only
and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
Figure 1 is a functional block diagram of a vehicle that includes
a diagnostic system according to various aspects of the present disclosure.
Figure 2 is a graph illustrating an exemplary signal generated by
a post-catalyst oxygen sensor.
Figure 3 is a dataflow diagram illustrating an exemplary
diagnostic system according to various aspects of the present disclosure.
Figure 4 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary diagnostic
method according to various aspects of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION the following description is merely exemplary in nature and is
not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. It should be
understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals
indicate like or corresponding parts and features. As used herein, the term
module refers to an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic
circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that executes one
or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or
other suitable components that provide the described functionality.
Referring now to Figure 1, a vehicle 10 includes an engine
system 12, a fuel system 13, an exhaust system 14, and a control module 16.
The engine system 12 includes a throttle 17, a throttle position sensor (TPS) 18, a mass air flow (MAF) sensor 20, an intake manifold 22 and an engine 24. The
exhaust system 14 includes an exhaust manifold 26, a catalyst 28, a pre-catalyst
or inlet oxygen sensor 30, hereinafter referred to as pre-02 sensor 30, and a
post-catalyst or outlet oxygen sensor 32, herein after referred to as post-02
sensor 32.
Air is drawn into the engine 24 through the throttle 17 and the
intake manifold 22, and is mixed with fuel from the fuel system 13 inside the
engine 24. The throttle position sensor 18 communicates a throttle position
signal to the control module 16. The MAF sensor 20 communicates a MAF
signal to the control module 16. The air and fuel mixture is combusted within
cylinders (not shown) to generate drive torque. The gases produced via

combustion exit the engine 24 through the exhaust manifold 26. The exhaust
gases are treated within the catalyst 28.
The pre-02 sensor 30 and the post-02 sensor 32 generate
respective voltage signals that are communicated to the control module 16. The
pre-02 and post-02 sensor signals indicate the oxygen content of the exhaust
entering and exiting the catalyst 28, respectively. Based thereon, the control
module 16 communicates with the fuel system 13 to regulate fuel flow to the
engine 24. In this manner, the control module 16 regulates the air-to-fuel ratio of
the engine 24 to be at or near a desired value (e.g., a stoichiometric value). The
control module 16 diagnoses components of the exhaust system 14 based on
one or both of the pre-02 and post-02 sensor signals. In particular, the control
module 16 diagnoses the post-02 sensor 32 and the catalyst 28 based on the .
post-02 sensor signal and/or the pre-02 sensor signal.
Referring now to Figure 2, the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) is
typically a narrow range "switching" sensor. The voltage output signal is
generated by the sensor 32 (Figure 1) based on the oxygen content of the
exhaust gases passing thereby. High amounts of oxygen content indicate that
the air-to-fuel ratio is lean or less than the desired value. In contrast, low
amounts of oxygen content indicate that the air-to-fuel ratio is rich or greater than
the desired value. Figure 2 illustrates an exemplary oxygen sensor signal 40 that
is generated by the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) while the control module 16
(Figure 1) is diagnosing the components of the exhaust system 14 (Figure 1).

In general, an oxygen sensor signal generated by a healthy or
operating sensor varies based on the oxygen content of the exhaust gas. A
common characteristic of a malfunctioning oxygen sensor is a lazy or sluggish
response. For example, with a malfunctioning oxygen sensor, an increased
amount of time is required for the signal to transition from high to low (e.g., rich to
lean) and/or low to high (e.g., lean to rich). Therefore, the control module 16
(Figure 1) diagnoses the oxygen sensor during a first rich to lean transition as
shown at 42, during a second lean to rich transition as shown at 44, or during
both the first rich to lean transition 42 and the second lean to rich transition 44.
The oxygen sensor signal 40 can also be used to diagnose the
catalyst 28. For example, the post-02 sensor signal 40 and/or the pre-02 sensor
signal (not shown) can be monitored during the second lean to rich transition as
shown at 46 to estimate an oxygen storage capacity of the catalyst 28. The
control module 16 (Figure 1) performs the estimation after a fuel cutoff period as
shown at 47, so that the catalyst 28 can be saturated with oxygen.
Referring now to Figure 3, a dataflow diagram illustrates various
embodiments of the diagnostic system that may be embedded within the control
module 16. Various embodiments of diagnostic systems according to the
present disclosure may include any number of sub-modules embedded within the
control module 16. As can be appreciated, the sub-modules shown may be
combined and/or further partitioned to similarly diagnose components of the
exhaust system 14 (Figure 1). Inputs to the system may be sensed from the
vehicle 10 (Figure 1), received from other control modules (not shown) within the

vehicle 10 (Figure 1), and/or determined by other sub-modules (not shown)
within the control module 16. In various embodiments, the control module 16 of
Figure 3 includes a fuel control module 50, an oxygen sensor diagnostic module
52, and a catalyst diagnostic module 54.
The fuel control module 50 regulates the air-to-fuel ratio of the
engine 24 (Figure 1) by generating a fuel control signal 56 to the fuel system 13
(Figure 1). The fuel control module 50 controls the air-to-fuel ratio such that the
diagnosing of both the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) and the catalyst 28 (Figure
1) can be performed during a single intrusive operation. By combining the fuel
control for diagnosing both the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) and the catalyst 28
(Figure 1), the number of intrusive operations as well as the amount of time spent
in the intrusive operation is reduced thus, improving emissions as well as fuel
economy.
In various embodiments, the fuel control module 50 determines
if a non-intrusive operation is desired or if an intrusive operation can be
performed based on, for example, engine operating parameters 58. For
example, a non-intrusive operation is desired when the driver performs a
deceleration fuel cut-off maneuver, such as coasting down a hill. During the
deceleration fuel cut-off (DFCO) mode, the fuel control module 50 commands the
fuel control signal 56 such the oxygen sensor signal 40 (Figure 2) transitions
from rich to lean. This allows the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) to be diagnosed.
The fuel control module 50 then, if desirable, commands the fuel
control signal 56 such that the lean condition is maintained for a time period

sufficient to allow the catalyst 28 (Figure 1) to become saturated with oxygen.
Thereafter, the fuel control module 50 commands the fuel control signal 56 such
that the air-to-fuel ratio and thus, the oxygen sensor signal 40 (Figure 1)
transitions from lean to rich. This allows the catalyst 28 (Figure 1) and the post-
02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) to be diagnosed. The fuel control module 50 generates
a control status 60 indicating the state of operation of the fuel control. In various
embodiments, the control status 60 is an enumeration with values indicating at
least one of 'rich to lean transition' and 'lean to rich transition.'
The oxygen sensor diagnostic module 52 receives as input the
post-02 sensor signal 40 and the control status 60. The oxygen sensor
diagnostic module 52 monitors the performance of the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure
1) by calculating an integrated area (IA) above or below the sensor's voltage
signal during the transition from rich to lean and/or the transition from lean to rich.
As the signal transition speed decreases, the IA increases. The IA is compared
to a threshold IA (IATHR) to determine whether the signal has so deteriorated that
the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) should be serviced or replaced. Based on the
comparison, the oxygen sensor diagnostic module 52 sets a post-02 (P02) fault
status 62. For example, if the IA is greater than the IATHR, the P02 fault status
62 is set to TRUE' or Test Fail.' If the IA is less than or equal to the IATHR, the
fault status is set to 'FALSE' or Test Pass.' In various embodiments, a separate
P02 fault status 62 can be implemented for the rich to lean transition and the
lean to rich transition.

With reference to Figures 2 and 3, the IA is calculated between
first and second voltages V1 and V2, respectively. V1 and V2 are selected based
on preliminary data analysis of the lean (e.g., during DFCO) and rich transitions
for a plurality of combinations of the post-catalyst oxygen sensor and catalyst
states. For example, the preliminary data includes data collected using a good
(i.e., appropriately functioning) post-catalyst oxygen sensor combined with a
good catalyst, a good post-catalyst oxygen sensor combined with a bad catalyst
(i.e., not appropriately functioning), a bad post-catalyst oxygen sensor combined
with a bad catalyst, and a bad post-catalyst oxygen sensor combined with a good
catalyst. The voltages that are the most sensitive to failure of the post-catalyst
oxygen sensor and at the same time is the least sensitive to the catalyst state are
selected. The voltages are selected separately for the first rich to lean transition
42 and for the second lean to rich transition 44. An exemplary method and
system for computing an IA is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No.
11/671,916 and incorporated herein by reference.
Referring back to Figure 3, the catalyst diagnostic module 54
receives as input the post-02 sensor signal 40, the pre-02 sensor signal 64, the
MAF signal 66, and the control status 60. When the control status 60 indicates a
lean to rich transition, the catalyst diagnostic module 54 computes an oxygen
storage capacity (OSC) of the catalyst 28 (Figure 1) over a target time period.
The OSC is computed based on the MAF signal 66 and the oxygen sensor
signals 40 and 64. An exemplary method and system for computing an OSC of

the catalyst is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 6,874,313 and incorporated herein by
reference.
The catalyst diagnostic module 54 compares the OSC to a
threshold OSC (OSCTHR) to diagnose a conversion capability of the catalyst 28
(Figure 1). Based on the conversion capability, the catalyst diagnostic module 54
sets a catalyst fault status 68. For example, if the computed OSC is greater than
the OSCTHR, the catalyst fault status 68 is set to 'FALSE' or Test Pass.' If the
computed OSC is less than or equal to the OSCTHR, the catalyst fault status 68 is
set to TRUE'or Test Fail.'
Referring now to Figure 4, a flowchart illustrates a diagnostic
method that can be performed by the diagnostic system of Figure 3 in
accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. As can be
appreciated, the order of execution of the steps of the diagnostic method can
vary without altering the spirit of the method. The method may be performed
periodically during vehicle operation, scheduled to run based on certain events
(e.g., once per key cycle), or based on an initiated command.
The method may begin at 100. At 110, it is determined whether
the exhaust system diagnostic can be enabled. For example, if a non-intrusive
fuel transition is to occur (e.g., DFCO), the diagnostic can be enabled. It is
appreciated, however, that the diagnostic can be enabled any time deemed
appropriate and can be enabled using an intrusive fuel transition. Once the
diagnostic can be enabled at 110, fuel is commanded lean via the fuel control
signal 56 at 120 and the IA is computed at 130 and evaluated at 140. If the IA is

greater than a predetermined IA threshold at 140, the P02 fault status 62 is set
to Test Pass' at 150. Otherwise, if the IA is less than or equal to the
predetermined IA threshold at 140, the P02 fault status 62 is set to Test Fail' at
160 and the method may end at 280.
Once the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) has passed the
diagnosing at 150, a time period is evaluated at 170. If a predetermined time
period for operating in the lean condition has elapsed at 170, fuel is commanded
rich via the fuel control signal 56 at 180 and the OSC is computed at 190 and
evaluated at 200. If the OSC is greater than a predetermined OSC threshold at
200, the catalyst fault status 68 is set to Test Pass' at 210. Otherwise, if the
OSC is less than or equal to the predetermined OSC threshold at 200, the
catalyst fault status 68 is set to Test Fail' at 220.
Once the catalyst 28 (Figure 1) is diagnosed at 210 or 220, the
post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) can optionally be evaluated during the lean to rich
transition. The IA is computed 230 and evaluated at 240. If the IA is less than a
predetermined IA threshold at 240, the P02 fault status 62 is set to Test Pass' at
260. Otherwise, if the IA is greater than a predetermined IA threshold at 240, the
P02 fault status 62 is set to Test Fail' at 270. Thereafter, the method may end
at 280.
As can be appreciated, once the fault status 62 or 68 for either
the catalyst 28 (Figure 1) or the post-02 sensor 32 (Figure 1) is set to Test Fail,'
additional steps can be performed to notify other systems and users of the
failure. In various embodiments, a diagnostic code is set based on the fault

status 62 or 68. The diagnostic code can be retrieved by a service tool or
transmitted to a remote location via a telematics system. In various other
embodiments, an indicator lamp is illuminated based on the fault status 62 or 68.
In various other embodiments, an audio warning signal is generated based on
the fault status 62 or 68.
Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing
description that the broad teachings of the present disclosure can be
implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure has been
described in connection with particular examples thereof, the true scope of the
disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become
apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, specification,
and the following claims.

WE CLAIM
1. A diagnostic system for an exhaust system having a catalyst and a post-
catalyst oxygen sensor, comprising:
a first diagnostic module that monitors the post-catalyst oxygen sensor
during a first period, that estimates a total integrated area based on a
signal from the post-catalyst oxygen sensor, that compares the total
integrated area to a threshold integrated area, and that determines a
pass/fail status of the post-catalyst oxygen sensor based on the
comparison,
wherein the first diagnostic module generates a pass status signal when
the total integrated area is less than the threshold integrated area and
generates a fail status signal when the total integrated area is greater
than the threshold integrated area; and
a second diagnostic module that monitors the catalyst during a second
period, and that determines a pass/fail status of the catalyst based on the
monitoring during the second period, wherein the first period includes the
second period, and wherein the second period starts after the first period
starts.
2. The diagnostic system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second
diagnostic module determines the pass/fail status of the catalyst by
estimating an oxygen storage capacity of the catalyst.

3. The diagnostic system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the second
diagnostic module compares the oxygen storage capacity to a threshold
oxygen storage capacity and generates a pass status signal when the
oxygen storage capacity is greater than the threshold oxygen storage
capacity.
4. The diagnostic system as claimed in claim 3 wherein the second
diagnostic module generates a fail status signal when the oxygen storage
capacity is less than the threshold oxygen storage capacity.
5. The diagnostic system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first period
starts when a first rich air/fuel (A/F) ratio is commanded and ends when
transitions from the first rich A/F ratio to a lean A/F ratio and from the
lean A/F ratio to a second rich A/F ratio are completed.
6. The diagnostic system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the second period
starts when the first rich A/F ratio is achieved and ends when the
transitions are completed.
7. The diagnostic system as claimed in claim 6, wherein the commanding of
the first rich A/F ratio and the transitions are forced during an active
diagnostic operation.
8. A method of monitoring an exhaust system that includes a catalyst and a
post-catalyst oxygen sensor, comprising:
monitoring the post-catalyst oxygen sensor during a first period;

estimating a total integrated area based on a signal from the post-catalyst
oxygen sensor;
comparing the total integrated area to a threshold integrated area;
determining a pass/fail status of the post-catalyst oxygen sensor based on
the comparison;
generating a pass status signal when the total integrated area is less than
the threshold integrated area;
generating a fail status signal when the total integrated area is greater
than the threshold integrated area;
monitoring the catalyst during a second period, wherein the first period
includes the second period, and wherein the second period starts after the
first period starts; and
determining a pass/fail status of the catalyst based on the monitoring
during the second period.
9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the determining the pass/fail
status of the catalyst comprises determining the pass/fail status of the
catalyst by estimating an oxygen storage capacity of the catalyst.
10.The method as claimed in claim 9, comprising:
comparing the oxygen storage capacity to a threshold oxygen storage
capacity; and

generating a pass status signal when the oxygen storage capacity is
greater than the threshold oxygen storage capacity.
11.The method as claimed in claim 10, comprising generating a fail status
signal when the oxygen storage capacity is less than the threshold oxygen
storage capacity.
12.The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the first period starts when a
first rich air/fuel (A/F) ratio is commanded and ends when transitions from
the first rich A/F ratio to a lean A/F ratio and from the lean A/F ratio to a
second rich A/F ratio are completed.
13.The method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the second period starts
when the first rich A/F ratio is achieved and ends when the transitions are
completed.
14. The method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the commanding of the first
rich A/F ratio and the transitions are forced during an active diagnostic
operation.


ABSTRACT

TITLE: A DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MONITORING
OF MONITORING AN EXHAUST SYSTEM

The invention relates to a diagnostic system for an exhaust system having a
catalyst and a post-catalyst oxygen sensor, comprising: a first diagnostic module
that monitors the post-catalyst oxygen sensor during a first period, that
estimates a total integrated area based on a signal from the post-catalyst oxygen
sensor, that compares the total integrated area to a threshold integrated area,
and that determines a pass/fail status of the post-catalyst oxygen sensor based
on the comparison, wherein the first diagnostic module generates a pass status
signal when the total integrated area is less than the threshold integrated area
and generates a fail status signal when the total integrated area is greater than
the threshold integrated area; and a second diagnostic module that monitors the
catalyst during a second period, and that determines a pass/fail status of the
catalyst based on the monitoring during the second period, wherein the first
period includes the second period, and wherein the second period starts after the
first period starts.

Documents:

00851-kol-2008-abstract.pdf

00851-kol-2008-claims.pdf

00851-kol-2008-correspondence others.pdf

00851-kol-2008-description complete.pdf

00851-kol-2008-drawings.pdf

00851-kol-2008-form 1.pdf

00851-kol-2008-form 2.pdf

00851-kol-2008-form 3.pdf

00851-kol-2008-form 5.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-ABSTRACT.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-AMANDED CLAIMS.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-FORM-1.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-FORM-2.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-FORM-3.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-OTHERS.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(10-02-2012)-PETITION UNDER RULE 137.pdf

851-KOL-2008-(18-01-2012)-EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECIEVED.TIF

851-KOL-2008-(18-01-2012)-PA.pdf

851-KOL-2008-ASSIGNMENT-1.1.pdf

851-KOL-2008-ASSIGNMENT.pdf

851-KOL-2008-CORRESPONDENCE 1.1.pdf

851-KOL-2008-CORRESPONDENCE-1.2.pdf

851-KOL-2008-EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

851-KOL-2008-FORM 18.pdf

851-KOL-2008-FORM 3.pdf

851-KOL-2008-FORM 5.pdf

851-KOL-2008-GPA.pdf

851-KOL-2008-GRANTED-ABSTRACT.pdf

851-KOL-2008-GRANTED-CLAIMS.pdf

851-KOL-2008-GRANTED-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf

851-KOL-2008-GRANTED-DRAWINGS.pdf

851-KOL-2008-GRANTED-FORM 1.pdf

851-KOL-2008-GRANTED-FORM 2.pdf

851-KOL-2008-GRANTED-SPECIFICATION.pdf

851-KOL-2008-OTHERS.pdf

851-KOL-2008-PRIORITY DOCUMENT.pdf

851-KOL-2008-REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

abstract-00851-kol-2008.jpg


Patent Number 253300
Indian Patent Application Number 851/KOL/2008
PG Journal Number 28/2012
Publication Date 13-Jul-2012
Grant Date 11-Jul-2012
Date of Filing 08-May-2008
Name of Patentee GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Applicant Address 300 GM RENAISSANCE CENTER, DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48265-3000, USA. A US COMPANY
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 ROBERT J. GENSLAK 50523 ABBEY DRIVE NEW BALTIMORE, MICHIGAN 48047
2 JUSTIN F. ADAMS 206 MAPLE YPSILANTI, MICHIGAN 48198
3 JEFFRY A. HELMICK 97 DUNLAP CIRCLE OXFORD, MICHIGAN 48371
4 EDWARD STUTEVILLE 16267 HILLTOP DR. LINDEN, MICHIGAN 48451
5 WESLEY W. WALD 322 PINE VALLEY CT. LINDEN, MICHIGAN 48451
6 VIDYAPRIYA SRINIVASAN 1253 BUCKBOARD CIRCLE SOUTH LYON, MICHIGAN 48178
7 IGOR ANILOVICH 105 CHESTNUT RIDGE WALLED LAKE, MICHIGAN 48390
PCT International Classification Number F01N 3/20
PCT International Application Number N/A
PCT International Filing date
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 11/811,451 2007-06-08 U.S.A.