Title of Invention

PROCESS FOR THE CATALYTIC COATING OF CERAMIC HONEYCOMB BODIES

Abstract The invention relates to a process for coating ceramic honeycomb bodies with a coating suspension containing, in a carrier liquid, catalyst components as solids and/or in dissolved form. The honeycomb bodies have parallel flow channels running through them. The walls of the flow channels generally have an open pore structure. To coat the channel walls and in particular also the interior surfaces of the pores with the coating suspension, it is proposed that the flow channels be temporarily alternately closed and the coating suspension be forced through the open pore structure of the channel walls. The coating is subsequently dried and calcined. To close the flow channels, it is possible to use thermally or chemically decomposable or soluble compositions which are decomposed or dissolved either during calcination or by means of a subsequent chemical treatment. The coated honeycomb bodies are preferably used for the purification of exhaust gases from automobiles.
Full Text Process for the catalytic coating of ceramic honeycomb bodies
Description
The invention relates to a process for coating ceramic honeycomb bodies with a coating
suspension containing, in a carrier liquid, catalyst components as solids and/or in
5 dissolved form. The coated honeycomb bodies are preferably used for the purification
of exhaust gases from automobiles.
Catalysts applied in the form of a coating to honeycomb bodies have been used for
decades for the purification of exhaust gases from automobiles. The honeycomb bodies
have parallel flow channels for the exhaust gases running through them. Ceramic
10 honeycomb bodies are produced from highly refractory materials. The majority are
made of cordierite, a magnesium-aluminium silicate. Further ceramic materials
customarily used are silicon carbide, aluminium oxide, zirconium oxide, zirconium
mullite, mullite, silicon nitride, barium titanate and titanium oxide. The honeycomb
bodies are produced from these materials by extrusion and generally have an open pore
15 structure.
The flow channels run through the honeycomb bodies from an entry end face to the exit
end face. The channels generally have a square cross section and are arranged in a
closely spaced grid over the cross section of the honeycomb bodies. The number of flow
channels per unit cross-sectional area is referred to as the cell density and can be from
20 10 to 200 cm-2
The catalytic coating of the honeycomb bodies is a dispersion coating which is applied
to the honeycomb bodies using a usually aqueous suspension of the catalyst
components. This coating will hereinafter also be referred to as a washcoat.
The catalyst components contain, for example, finely divided support materials having a
25 high specific surface area to which the catalytically active components, usually the
noble metals of the platinum group platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium and
ruthenium have been applied. The solids in the catalyst suspension are generally
homogenized by wet milling before application to the honeycomb bodies. After milling,
the solids of the suspension have an average particle size d50 in the range from 3 to
30 5 µm.
Examples of support materials are simple and mixed oxides, e.g. active aluminium

oxide, zirconium oxide, tin oxide, cerium oxide or other rare earth oxides, silicon oxide,
titanium oxide, and silicates such as aluminium silicate or titanates such as barium or
aluminium titanate and zeolites. The various phases of active aluminium oxide of the
transition series, which can be stabilized by doping with silicon oxide and lanthanum
5 oxide or else by zirconium oxide and cerium oxide, have been found to be particularly
useful as heat-resistant support materials.
If reference is made in the following to coating of the honeycomb bodies with a
catalytically active layer, what is meant is the coating of the channel walls of the flow
channels. Coating of the outer wall of the honeycomb body is undesirable. The amount
10 of coating applied is generally based on the external volume of the honeycomb body in
gram per litre. A person skilled in the art will be sufficiently familiar with customary
methods of carrying out such coatings.
To meet the necessary requirements, the coating has to have a concentration which
depends on the particular task. In general, the concentration has to be greater the more
15 active and more ageing resistant the coating is to be. In practice, from 10 to 300 g/1 are
required, depending on the application. However, the maximum achievable
concentration can for various reasons be below the catalytically required concentration.
Thus, the adhesion of the coating decreases with increasing concentration and thus layer
thickness. Furthermore, high layer thicknesses reduce the hydraulic diameter of the flow
20 channels and thus increase the exhaust gas counterpressure (back pressure) of the
catalyst.
There are applications, for example the oxidation of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide
in diesel exhaust gas ("diesel oxidation catalyst"), in which only a relatively low mass
of catalyst in the range from 100 to 200 g per litre of honeycomb body volume is
25 necessary for the reaction. A further increase in the mass of catalyst while maintaining
the total noble metal content is in this case not associated with an activity advantage. In
the case of other catalytic reactions, for example the storage and reduction of nitrogen
oxides ("nitrogen oxide storage catalyst") or the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen
oxides by means of ammonia ("SCR catalyst"), on the other hand, an increase in the
30 mass of active material is desirable but is possible only within limits because of the
abovementioned problems with the adhesion of the coating and the back pressure of the
finished catalyst.
To reduce the high back pressure, US 5,334,570 proposes relocating the catalytic
coating into the pores of ceramic honeycomb bodies. The ceramic honeycomb bodies

used in this patent had an open porosity of from 30 to 45% and an average pore
diameter of from 3 to 10 µm. For this reason, catalyst materials which have colloidal
particle diameters in the range from 0.001 to 0.1 µm, preferably from 0.001 to 0.05 µm,
and penetrate into the pores of the honeycomb bodies when the honeycomb bodies are
5 brought into contact with a corresponding colloidal coating dispersion were used for
catalytic coating. According to the patent, the honeycomb bodies were dipped into the
coating dispersion in order to contact them with the coating dispersion. In this way,
from 90 to 95% of the colloidal washcoat particles could be deposited in the pores of
the honeycomb bodies, so that the cross section of the flow channels was barely reduced
10 by the coating and the back pressure was therefore increased only insignificantly.
Ceramic honeycomb bodies having a significantly increased porosity of from about 60
to 65% and average pore diameters of from 10 to 20 µm have been developed in recent
years. The objective here was to make the channel walls permeable to the catalyst
particles so that the particles can deposit not only as a layer on the channel surface but
15 also in the pore system of the wall. It is therefore possible to achieve lower layer
thicknesses for a comparable mass of catalyst or, conversely, higher loading
concentrations at equal catalyst layer thickness [Tao et al., SAE 2004-01-1293].
To coat honeycomb bodies, the catalytically active, water-insoluble, pulverulent
components are usually suspended in water or an organic liquid, milled and the
20 substrate is subsequently coated by dipping into the suspension, by pouring the
suspension over it or by sucking in or pumping in the suspension.
If the above-described, newly developed porous honeycomb bodies are used here, part
of the catalytically active substances actually penetrates into the pore system of the
honeycomb body and deposits there. However, the processes described do not allow the
25 pores of the honeycomb body to be filled completely and thus be optimally utilized.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for coating porous
honeycomb bodies which allows both the geometric surfaces of the flow channels and
the pores of the channel walls to be coated in a defined manner with a catalyst. The
objective is to increase the amount of catalytically active components in the walls of the
30 honeycomb bodies for optimizing the back pressure behaviour after coating with an
equal mass of catalyst or to increase the active mass at a comparable back pressure
behaviour after coating.
The process uses ceramic honeycomb bodies through which parallel flow channels

separated from one another by channel walls having an open pore structure run from an
entry end face to an exit end face. Coating is carried out using a catalyst suspension
containing solids suspended in a carrier liquid. The process is characterized in that the
flow channels are alternately temporarily closed at the entry and exit end face, the
5 catalyst suspension is allowed to flow through the honeycomb body from the entry face
to the exit face and the alternately closed flow channels are subsequently opened again.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term honeycomb bodies refers to flow-
through honeycomb bodies whose flow channels are open at both ends. According to
the invention, these flow channels are temporarily alternately closed at the entry and
10 exit end face for the purpose of carrying out coating. These are in contrast to wall-flow
honeycomb bodies whose flow channels are permanently alternately closed at the entry
and exit end face.
In contrast to conventional coating processes for honeycomb bodies, the present process
forces the coating suspension to flow through the pore system of the material of the
15 channel walls during the coating procedure. In this way, the surfaces of the pores are
coated in a targeted manner. Depending on the particle size distribution of the solids in
the coating suspension and on the average pore diameter of the ceramic material of the
honeycomb body, this results in more or less pronounced filtration of the coating
suspension. It is thus possible to set the mass ratio of the coating suspension deposited
20 in the pores to the coating suspension deposited on the channel walls in a defined
manner by appropriate choice of the particle size distribution. However, preference is
given to filling the pores of the channel walls as completely as possible with catalyst
composition in order to keep the coating on the wall surfaces as low as possible at the
desired coating concentration. At an appropriately low coating concentration, it is even
25 possible to accommodate all of the catalyst composition in the pores.
The catalyst suspension can be sucked through or pumped through the honeycomb
bodies. As an alternative, the honeycomb bodies can be dipped into the catalyst
suspension or have the catalyst suspension poured over them, as long as it is ensured
that in this procedure the coating suspension has to pass through the channel walls.
30 The temporary alternate closure of the flow channels is effected using the methods
known for producing alternately closed wall flow filters. As in the case of wall flow
filters, the thickness of the temporary closure is restricted to a few millimetres.
The sealing compositions are not subject to any restrictions. They merely have to be

able to be introduced into the flow channels by known methods and be solid at the usual
working temperatures for coating honeycomb bodies. The honeycomb bodies are
usually coated at room temperature. Suitable sealing compositions are, for example,
compositions which melt or vaporize at elevated temperature, preferably above 80°C,
5 can be dissolved out by means of solvents or can be decomposed thermally or reacted
chemically. The latter category includes, in particular, organic sealing compositions
which can either be burnt or ashed. Suitable compositions of this type are, for example,
water-insoluble fillers which can be burnt out, e.g. natural or synthetic waxes, in
particular paraffin wax, or polymers such as polyethylene wax. Preference is given to
10 waxes having a melting point above 80°C.
Honeycomb bodies suitable for the process of the invention are in general all porous
honeycomb bodies having open porosity. Depending on the average pore size, the solids
of the coating dispersion have to have a correspondingly small particle diameter. In the
case of average pore sizes in the range from 3 to 10 µm, preference is given to using
15 solids having average particle diameters in the colloidal range ( having an average particle size d50 in the range from 3 to 5 urn or from 1 to 3 µm are
also suitable. It is, however, also possible to use solids having a wide particle size range
or solids having a multimodal particle size distribution. Filtration then occurs during
coating: particles having small particle diameters are deposited in the pores of the
20 honeycomb body while the larger particles are deposited on the channel walls.
However, preference is given to using highly porous honeycomb bodies having a
porosity in the range from 30 to 90% and an average pore diameter in the range from 10
to 50 µm.
The process of the invention allows, compared to standard honeycomb bodies, more
25 catalytically active composition to be applied to the support at a comparable layer
thickness on the channel surface or at a comparable hydraulic diameter of the flow
channel.
The following examples and Figures 1 and 5 illustrate the invention. The figures show
Figure 1: drawing based on photographs of a transverse section through a
30 conventionally coated honeycomb body as per Comparative Example 1
Figure 2: part II of Figure 1
Figure 3: drawing based on photographs of a transverse section through a

honeycomb body coated according to the invention as per Example 1
Figure 4: part IV of Figure 3
Figure 5: back pressure as a function of flow for three honeycomb bodies:
A) uncoated honeycomb body
5 B) honeycomb body coated according to the invention
C) conventionally coated honeycomb body
Example 1
The flow channels of a cordierite honeycomb body were closed alternately by means of
a paraffin wax. The honeycomb body had a diameter of 14.4 cm, a length of 15.24 and a
10 cell density of 46.5 cm-2 and a thickness of the channel walls of 0.3 mm. The porosity of
the material was 65% at an average pore diameter of 22 µm.
This honeycomb body was coated with a conventional SCR catalyst comprising a
titanium dioxide powder on which 1.5% by weight of vanadium pentoxide and 9.3% by
weight of tungsten had been deposited. For this purpose, the titanium oxide powder was
15 suspended in water and milled by means of a Dyno mill to an average particle diameter
d50 of less than 1 µm and d90 of honeycomb body and excess washcoat was sucked out at the rear side of the filter by
application of a vacuum. Repetition of this procedure one more time resulted in the
honeycomb body being coated with an amount of catalyst of 240 g per litre of
20 honeycomb body volume. After coating, the honeycomb body was dried and calcined so
that the alternate paraffin seals of the flow channels were melted and burnt.
Comparative Example 1
For comparison, a honeycomb body identical to that in Example 1 was coated with the
catalyst suspension without prior alternate closure of the flow channels, dried and
25 calcined. The mass of catalyst after coating was 234 g/1.
To examine the layer thickness distribution, transverse sections of the catalysts were
prepared and examined in a scanning electron microscope. Drawings of corresponding
photographs are shown in Figures 1 to 4.
Figure 1 shows a cross section of the honeycomb body (1) coated as described in
30 Comparative Example 1. Figure 2 shows an enlargement of part II of Figure 1. The
reference numeral (2) denotes the flow channels of the honeycomb body and (3) denotes

its cordierite framework having the pores (4). Virtually all the catalyst material is
present as coating (5b) on the channel walls. Only a small part (5a) has penetrated into
the pores of the cordierite framework in the surface region of the channel walls,
Figures 3 and 4 show the cross sections corresponding to Figures 1 and 2 for the
5 catalyst coated as described in Example 1. As a result of the coating suspension being
pumped through the channel walls bounding the flow channels, the pores of the
cordierite framework have been filled with catalyst material both in the interior of the
channel walls (5c) and in the surface region of the channel walls (5a). Further coating
material (5b) is present on the channel walls since, at the chosen coating concentration
10 of about 240 g/1, it is not possible for the entire catalyst material to be accommodated in
the pores of the channel walls.
Example 2
To measure the back pressure of honeycomb bodies according to the invention and
conventionally coated honeycomb bodies, two further honeycomb bodies having the
15 same dimensions as in the above examples were coated with an iron-exchanged zeolite
by methods analogous to Example 1 and Comparative Example 1. The coating
concentration on the honeycomb body coated according to the invention was 330 g/1 of
honeycomb body volume and that on the conventionally coated honeycomb body was
327.5 g/1.
20 The back pressure caused by these honeycomb bodies was measured as a function of the
flow of air through the body. An uncoated honeycomb body was also examined for
comparison. The results of these measurements are shown in Figure 5. Curve A is the
back pressure for the uncoated honeycomb body, curve B is that for the honeycomb
body coated according to the invention and curve C is that for the conventionally coated
25 honeycomb body.
The honeycomb body coated according to the invention displays a significantly lower
back pressure than the conventionally coated honeycomb body. Although only a small
proportion of the coating composition can be taken up by the pores in the channel walls
at the chosen coating concentration of greater than 300 g/1, this has a very positive
30 effect on the back pressure.

Claims
1. Process for the catalytic coating of ceramic honeycomb bodies through which
parallel flow channels separated from one another by channel walls having an
open pore structure run from an entry end face to an exit end face, in which
5 coating is carried out using a catalyst suspension containing solids suspended in
a carrier liquid, characterized in that the flow channels are alternately
temporarily closed at the entry and exit end face, the catalyst suspension is
allowed to flow through the honeycomb body from the entry face to the exit face
and the alternately closed flow channels are subsequently opened again.
10 2. Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the catalyst suspension is
sucked or pumped through the honeycomb body.
3. Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the honeycomb body is
dipped into the catalyst suspension or the catalyst suspension is poured over it.
4. Process according to Claim 2 or 3, characterized in that the flow channels are
15 alternately closed by means of a sealing composition which is solid at the
customary working temperatures in the coating of honeycomb bodies and melts
or vaporizes at elevated temperature, can be dissolved out by means of solvents,
can be decomposed thermally or can be reacted chemically.
5. Process according to Claim 4, characterized in that a natural or synthetic wax
20 which has a melting point above 80°C and burns during calcination of the coated
honeycomb body is used as sealing composition.
6. Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the honeycomb bodies have a
porosity in the range from 30 to 90% and an average pore diameter of from 10 to
50 (am.
25 7. Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the solids of the suspension
have an average particle size d50 in the range from 3 to 5 µm.
8. Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the solids of the suspension
have an average particle size d50 in the range from 1 to 3 µm.
9. Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the solids of the suspension
30 have an average particle size d50 of less thanl µm.

The invention relates to a process for coating ceramic honeycomb bodies with a coating
suspension containing, in a carrier liquid, catalyst components as solids and/or in
dissolved form. The honeycomb bodies have parallel flow channels running through
them. The walls of the flow channels generally have an open pore structure. To coat the
channel walls and in particular also the interior surfaces of the pores with the coating
suspension, it is proposed that the flow channels be temporarily alternately closed and
the coating suspension be forced through the open pore structure of the channel walls.
The coating is subsequently dried and calcined. To close the flow channels, it is
possible to use thermally or chemically decomposable or soluble compositions which
are decomposed or dissolved either during calcination or by means of a subsequent
chemical treatment. The coated honeycomb bodies are preferably used for the
purification of exhaust gases from automobiles.

Documents:

02808-kolnp-2008-abstract.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-claims.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-correspondence others.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-description (complete).pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-drawings.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-form 1.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-form 2.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-form 3.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-form 5.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-international publication.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-international search report.pdf

02808-kolnp-2008-pct request form.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(18-12-2012)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(27-03-2014)-ABSTRACT.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(27-03-2014)-ANNEXURE TO FORM 3.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(27-03-2014)-CLAIMS.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(27-03-2014)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(27-03-2014)-OTHERS.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(27-03-2014)-PETITION UNDER RULE 137.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(31-03-2014)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-(31-03-2014)-PA.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-CORRESPONDENCE 1.1.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-CORRESPONDENCE-1.2.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-FORM 18-1.1.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-FORM 18.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-FORM 26.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-ABSTRACT.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-CLAIMS.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-DRAWINGS.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-FORM 1.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-FORM 2.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-FORM 3.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-FORM 5.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-LETTER PATENT.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-GRANTED-SPECIFICATION-COMPLETE.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT & OTHERS.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-OTHERS.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-PETITION UNDER RULE 137.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

2808-kolnp-2008-TRANSLATED COPY OF PRIORITY DOCUMENT-1.1.pdf

2808-KOLNP-2008-TRANSLATED COPY OF PRIORITY DOCUMENT.pdf

abstract-02808-kolnp-2008.jpg


Patent Number 262772
Indian Patent Application Number 2808/KOLNP/2008
PG Journal Number 37/2014
Publication Date 12-Sep-2014
Grant Date 11-Sep-2014
Date of Filing 10-Jul-2008
Name of Patentee UMICORE AG & CO. KG
Applicant Address RODENBACHER CHAUSSEE 4 63457 HANAU-WOLFGANG
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 PFEIFER, MARCUS WITTKULLER STRASSE 154A, 42719 SOLINGEN
2 KOEGEL, MARKUS STEINHEIMER STRASSE 16 63500 SELIGENSTADT.
3 LOX, EGBERT, S., J. AM LAERCHENTOR 8, 36355 GREBENHAIN-HOCHWALDHAUSEN
4 KREUZER, THOMAS PHILIPP-REIS-STRASSE 13 61184 KARBEN
5 SPURK, PAUL GEORGENSTRASSE 14A 64331 WEITERSTADT
PCT International Classification Number B01J 37/00
PCT International Application Number PCT/EP2006/011152
PCT International Filing date 2006-11-22
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 10 2005 062 317.4 2005-12-24 Germany