Title of Invention

"ENHANCED BIMATOPROST OPTHALMIC SOLUTION"

Abstract A composition comprising from 0.005% to 0.02% bimatoprost by weight and from 100 ppm to 250 ppm benzalkonium chloride, wherein said composition is an aqueous liquid which is formulated for ophthalmic administration is disclosed herein. A method which is useful in treating glaucoma or ocular hypertension related thereto is also disclosed herein.
Full Text ENHANCED BIMATOPROST OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION
By Inventors
Chin-Ming Chang, James N. Chang, Rhett M. Schiffman, R. Scott Jordan,
and Joan-En Chang-Lin
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions comprising bimatoprost.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Description of Related Art
Bimatoprost, shown below, is a prostamide marketed commercially for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension.(Formula Removed)
Formula I
Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) is a preservative used in many commercial ophthalmic products to prevent microbial contamination in multi-use products. The commercial eye drops (Bimatoprost, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) contain 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.005% BAK. Although no other prostamides are currently marketed for the treatment of glaucoma, several prostaglandin analogs
are commercially available which use BAK as a preservative. These include latanoprost (Xalatan), travoprost (Travatan), and unoprostone isopropyl (Rescula), which require significantly more BAK, from 150-200 ppm, to meet antimicrobial effectiveness tests in the United States and Europe.
United States Patent No. 6,596,765 B2 discloses a composition comprising 0.005% or 0.0005% latanoprost and 0.2 mg/mL BAK.
United States Patent No. 6,646,001 B2 discloses compositions comprising 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.01% BAK or "0.01% + 5% excess" BAK.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES
Figure 1 is a plot showing the aqueous humor concentration of the parent acid of bimatoprost after topical administration of several formulations.
Figure 2 is a plot showing the membrane permeability of bimatoprost in several different formulations.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A composition comprising from 0.005% to 0.02% bimatoprost by weight and from 100 ppm to 250 ppm benzalkonium chloride, wherein said composition is an aqueous liquid which is formulated for ophthalmic administration is disclosed herein.
A method which is useful in treating glaucoma or ocular hypertension related thereto is also disclosed herein.
An aqueous liquid which is formulated for ophthalmic administration is formulated such that it can be administered topically to the eye. The comfort should be maximized as much as possible, although sometimes formulation considerations (e.g. drug stability) may necessitate less than optimal comfort.
In certain compositions the concentration of bimatoprost is from 0.01% to 0.02%, In other compositions the concentration of bimatoprost is from 0.015% to 0.02%,
In certain compositions the concentration of BAK is from 150 ppm to 200 ppm. In other compositions the concentration of BAK is from 150 ppm to 200 ppm. In other compositions the concentration of BAK is from 150 ppm to 250 ppm.
In ophthalmic compositions, a chelating agent may be used to enhance preservative effectiveness. Suitable chelating agents are those known in the art, and, while not intending to be limiting, edetate salts (EDTA) are useful chelating agents.
In certain compositions, concentration of EDTA is at least 0.001%. In other compositions, the concentration of EDTA is at least 0.01%. In other compositions the concentration of EDTA is 0.15% or less. In other compositions the concentration of EDTA is 0.1% or less. In other compositions the concentration of EDTA is 0.05% or less.
Certain compositions comprise from 150 to 250 ppm BAK and an effective amount of EDI A.
As is known in the art, buffers are commonly used to adjust the pH to a desirable range for ophthalmic use. Generally, a pH of around 6-8 is desired, and in certain compositions a pH of 7.4 is desired. Many buffers including salts of inorganic acids such as phosphate, borate, and sulfate are known.
Another commonly used excipient in ophthalmic compositions is a viscosity-enhancing, or a thickening agent. Thickening agents are used for a variety of reasons, ranging from improving the form of the formulation for convenient administration to improving the contact with the eye to improve bioavailability. The viscosity-enhancing agent may comprise a polymer containing hydrophilic groups such as monosaccharides, polysaccharides, ethylene oxide groups, hydroxyl groups, carboxylic acids or other charged functional groups. While not intending to limit the scope of the invention, some examples of useful viscosity-enhancing agents are sodium carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, povidone, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyethylene glycol.
In ophthalmic solutions, tonicity agents often are used to adjust the composition of the formulation to the desired isotonic range. Tonicity agents
are well known in the art and some examples include glycerin, mannitol, sorbitol, sodium chloride, and other electrolytes.
One composition has a pH of 7.4 and consists essentially of 0.015% bimatoprost, 200 ppm benzalkonium chloride, from 0 to 0.03% EDTA, a phosphate buffer, NaCl, and water.
Another composition has a pH of 7.4 and comprises 0.02% bimatoprost, 200 ppm benzalkonium chloride, from 0 to 0.03% EDTA, a phosphate buffer, NaCl, and water.
Another composition has a pH of 7.4 and consists of 0.01% bimatoprost, 200 ppm benzalkonium chloride, from 0 to 0.03% EDTA, a phosphate buffer, NaCl, and water.
The best mode of making and using the present invention are described in the following examples. These examples are given only to provide direction and guidance in how to make and use the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way.
One embodiment comprises 0.01% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment comprises 0.015% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3,
Another embodiment comprises 0.015% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, 0.03%, EDTA, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment comprises 0.02% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3
Another embodiment consists essentially of 0.01% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate,
0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment consists essentially of 0.015% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment consists essentially of 0.015% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, 0.03%, EDTA, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment consists essentially of 0.02% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment consists of 0.01% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment consists of 0.015% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment consists of 0.015% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, 0.03%, EDTA, and water, wherein the pH is 7.3.
Another embodiment consists of 0.02% Bimatoprost, 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride, 0.268% Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Heptahydrate, 0.014% Citric Acid, Monohydrate, 0.81% Sodium Chloride, and water, wherein the pH is 7,3.
Another embodiment comprises 0.0125% bimatoprost, 0.02% benzalkonium chloride, 0.268% sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate,
0.014% citric acid monohydrate, 0.81% sodium chloride, sufficient sodium hydride and/or hydrochloric acid to adjust the pH to 7.3, and water.
Another embodiment consists essentially of 0.0125% bimatoprost, 0.02% benzalkonium chloride, 0.268% sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate, 0.014% citric acid monohydrate, 0.81% sodium chloride, sufficient sodium hydride and/or hydrochloric acid to adjust the pH to 7.3, and water.
Another embodiment consists of 0.0125% bimatoprost, 0.02% benzalkonium chloride, 0.268% sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate, 0.014% citric acid monohydrate, 0.81% sodium chloride, sufficient sodium hydride and/or hydrochloric acid to adjust the pH to 7.3, and water.
Example 1
Formulations containing 0.268% sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate, 0.014% citric acid, 0.83% sodium chloride, with the pH adjusted to 7.3 in qs water, and the amounts of bimatoprost, BAK, and EDTA listed in Table 1 below were prepared by conventional methods well known in the art. Table 1
Formulation
1. 0.03% Bimatoprost (50 ppm BAK) Control
2. 0.03% Bimatoprost - 200 ppm BAK
3. 0.03% Bimatoprost 0.015% TPGS (no preservative)
4. 0.03% Bimatoprost • 0.2% TPGS (no preservative)
5. 0.03% Bimatoprost - 0.4% TPGS (no preservative)
6. 0.03% Bimatoprost - 1.0% TPGS (no preservative)
Example 2
Studies were carried out to determine the effect of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) and d-alpha tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) on ocular absorption of bimatoprost in vivo. For the in vivo study, eighteen female rabbits were given a single 28 uL eyedrop bilaterally and aqueous humor samples were collected (n=3 animals with 6 eyes per formulation) at 60 min postdose. Two rabbits (4 eyes) remained untreated to serve as pre-dose bioanalytical controls. Bimatoprost and its parent carboxylic
acid extracted from aqueous humor and in vitro samples were analyzed by a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with a quantitation range of 0.25-60 ng/mL.
Due to extensive metabolism of bimatoprost in rabbit eyes, its parent acid was used as a surrogate for determining ocular absorption of bimatoprost. Concentration of the acid in rabbit aqueous humor following single dose of 6 different bimatoprost formulations are summarized in Figure 1 and Table 2 below. Table 2

Formulation

Aqueous Humor (ng/mL)



1. 0.03% Bimatoprost (50 ppm BAK) Control

51.0 ±9.4



2. 0.03% Bimatoprost - 200 ppm BAK

87.2 ± 19.0



3. 0.03% Bimatoprost - 0.015% TPGS (no preservative)

26.113.3*



4. 0.03% Bimatoprost 0.2% TPGS (no preservative)

22.913.2*



5. 0.03% Bimatoprost - 0.4% TPGS (no preservative)

19.315.6*



6. 0.03% Bimatoprost - 1.0% TPGS (no preservative)

15.413.3*

a Mean ± SD Per formulation, N=3 rabbits (6 eyes).
* Statistically different (p Test formulations containing 0.015%, 0.2%, 0.4% and 1.0% TPGS resulted in a lower aqueous humor carboxylic acid concentration compared to Bimatoprost by 52%, 59%, 62% and 72%, respectively. In contrast, 0.03% Bimatoprost containing 200 ppm BAK resulted in 57% higher aqueous humor AGN 191522 concentration compared to Bimatoprost (50 ppm BAK).
While not intending to limit the scope of the invention in any way, or be bound by theory, compared to the Bimatoprost control, formulations containing TPGS resulted in decrease bimatoprost permeability. In contrast, formulations with higher BAK resulted in higher permeability.
Example 3
Formulations containing 0.268% sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate, 0.014% citric acid, 0.83% sodium chloride, with the pH adjusted to 7.3 in qs
water, and the amounts of bimatoprost, BAK, and EDTA listed in Table 3 below were prepared by conventional methods well known in the art.
Table 3
Formulation
A. 0.03% Bimatoprost (50 ppm BAK) - Control
B. 0.015% Bimatoprost (50 ppm BAK)
C. 0.015% Bimatoprost (50 ppm BAK) 0.03% EDTA
D. 0.015% Bimatoprost (200 ppm BAK)
E. 0.015% Bimatoprost (200 ppm BAK) 0.03% EDTA
F. 0.015% Bimatoprost (50 ppm BAK) 0.015% EDTA
G. 0.015% Bimatoprost (200 ppm BAK) 0.015% EDTA
H. 0.015% Bimatoprost (125 ppm BAK)
I. 0.015% Bimatoprost (125 ppm BAK) 0.03% EDTA
J. 0.015% Bimatoprost (125 ppm BAK) 0.015% EDTA
K. 0.015% Bimatoprost (150 ppm BAK)
L. 0.015% Bimatoprost (150 ppm BAK) 0.1% EDTA
M. 0.015% Bimatoprost
N. 0.03% Bimatoprost
Example 4
The effect of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) and
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on bimatoprost permeability across primary culture of rabbit corneal epithelial cell layers (RCECL). Corneal epithelial cells were harvested from New Zealand White rabbits and cultured on Transwell™ filters until confluency (Day 5). For the transport experiment, cells were first equilibrated in transport buffer for 1 hour at 37°C. Dosing solution containing 0.015% or 0.03% bimatoprost with varying concentrations of BAK and EDTA was then applied to the apical compartment of the Transwell™ (2 cultures; n=3~4 per culture) and the cells were incubated at 37°C. At 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes postdose, 200 |j,L samples were taken from the basolateral chamber for apical to basolateral (AB) transport. The samples were analyzed by a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with quantitalion range of 1-600 ng/mL.
The results are presented in Figure 2.
Example 5
A drop of formulation J is administered once daily topically to the eye of a person suffering from glaucoma. After a few hours, intraocular pressure drops more and less hyperemia is observed than would be observed for formulation A. Lowered intraocular pressure persists for as long as the treatment continues.





CLAIMS
What is claimed is:
1. A composition comprising from 0.005% to 0.02% bimatoprost by
weight and from 100 ppm to 250 ppm benzalkonium chloride, wherein said
composition is an aqueous liquid which is formulated for ophthalmic
administration.
2. The composition of claim 1 which further comprises an effective amount
ofEDTA.
3. The composition of claim 2 wherein the concentration of benzalkonium
chloride is from 150 ppm to 200 ppm.
4. The composition of claim 3 having a pH of 7.4 which consists
essentially of 0.015% bimatoprost, 200 ppm benzalkonium chloride, from 0 to
0.03% EDTA, a phosphate buffer, NaCl, and water.
5. The composition of claim 1 wherein the concentration of bimatoprost is
from 0.01% to 0.02%.
6. The composition of claim 5 wherein the concentration of bimatoprost is
from 0.015% to 0.02%.
7. The composition of claim 6 wherein the concentration of benzalkonium
chloride is from 150 ppm to 200 ppm.
8. The composition of claim 7 wherein the concentration of benzalkonium
chloride is 200 ppm.
9. The composition of claim 6 which further comprises an effective amount
ofEDTA.
10. The composition of claim 9 having a pH of 7.4 which comprises
0.015% bimatoprost, 200 ppm benzalkonium chloride, from 0 to 0.03% EDTA,
a phosphate buffer, and NaCl.
11. The composition of claim 10 having a pH of 7.4 which consists of
0.015% bimatoprost, 200 ppm benzalkonium chloride, from 0 to 0.03% EDTA,
a phosphate buffer, NaCl, and water.
12. A method comprising administering to a mammal suffering from
glaucoma or intraocular hypertension a composition comprising from 0.005% to
0.02% bimatoprost by weight and from 100 ppm to 250 ppm benzalkonium chloride.
13. The composition of claim 2 comprising from 0.001% to 0.15% EDTA.
14. The composition of claim 13 comprising from 0.01 % to 0.1 % EDTA.
15. The composition of claim 14 comprising from 0.01% to 0.05% EDTA.
16. The composition of claim 2 comprising from 150 to 250 ppm BAK
17. The composition of claim 5 comprising 0.0125% bimatoprost, 0.02%
benzalkonium chloride, 0.268% sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate,
0.014% citric acid monohydrate, 0.81% sodium chloride, sufficient sodium
hydride and/or hydrochloric acid to adjust the pH to 7.3, and water.

Documents:

6652-delnp-2007-1-Abstract-(01-10-2014).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-1-Claims-(01-10-2014).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-1-Correspondence Others-(01-10-2014).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-1-Form-2-(01-10-2014).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Abstract-(24-12-2013).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-abstract.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Claims-(24-12-2013).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-claims.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Correspondence Others-(01-10-2014).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Correspondence Others-(24-12-2013).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Correspondence-Others-(07-03-2014).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Correspondence-Others-(17-07-2013).pdf

6652-DELNP-2007-Correspondence-Others.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-description (complete).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Drawings-(24-12-2013).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-drawings.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-form-1.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Form-18-(10-02-2009).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Form-2-(24-12-2013).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-form-2.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Form-3-(07-03-2014).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Form-3-(24-12-2013).pdf

6652-DELNP-2007-Form-3.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Form-5-(01-10-2014).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-form-5.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-GPA-(24-12-2013).pdf

6652-delnp-2007-pct-101.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-pct-105.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-pct-210.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-pct-220.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-pct-237.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-pct-304.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-pct-311.pdf

6652-delnp-2007-Petition-137-(24-12-2013).pdf


Patent Number 263623
Indian Patent Application Number 6652/DELNP/2007
PG Journal Number 46/2014
Publication Date 14-Nov-2014
Grant Date 07-Nov-2014
Date of Filing 28-Aug-2007
Name of Patentee ALLERGAN,INC.
Applicant Address 2525 DUPONT DRIVE, T2-7H, IRVINE, CA 92612, USA.
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 CHIN-MING CHANG 11645 MAYNARD AVENUE, TUSTIN, CA 92782, USA.
2 JAMES N.CHANG 36 CERVANTES, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660, USA.
3 RHETT M.SCHIFFMAN 1843 TEMPLE HILLS DRIVE, LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651, USA.
4 R.SCOTT JORDAN 21222 SUGARBUSH CIRCLE, TRABUCO CANYON, CA 92679, USA
5 JOAN-EN CHANG-LIN 2226 HUNTLEY DRIVE, TUSTIN, CA 92782, USA.
PCT International Classification Number A61K 31/5575
PCT International Application Number PCT/US2006/009124
PCT International Filing date 2006-03-14
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 11/083,261 2005-03-16 U.S.A.