Title of Invention

A TRIPLE POLARIZED CLOVER ANTENNA WITH DIPOLES

Abstract The present invention relates to an antenna arrangement comprising means (1, 72, 72', 77, 77') for providing an approximation of a constant current electrical loop, which is arranged to provide a first essentially toroid-shaped radiation pattern (29), where the antenna arrangement further comprises a first (67) and a second (68) electrical dipole. The electrical dipoles (67, 68) are arranged essentially orthogonal to each other, and are arranged to provide a second (30) and third (31) essentially toroid-shaped radiation pattern which each is essentially orthogonal to the other and to the first essentially toroid-shaped radiation pattern (29). The means (1, 72, 72', 77, 77') for approximation of the constant current electrical loop comprises at least two current path parts (2, 3, 4, 5; 69, 70, 71; 69', 70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74', 75', 76'), where a current (I1, I2, I3, I4) can be applied to each one of said parts (2, 3, 4, 5; 69, 70, 71; 69', 70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74', 75', 76'), so that the current (I1, I2, I3, I4) in each one of said parts (2, 3, 4, 5; 69, 70, 71; 69', 70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74', 75', 76') essentially will be in phase with each other.
Full Text TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to an antenna arrangement comprising means for providing
an approximation of a constant current electrical loop, which approximation of a constant
current electrical loop is arranged to provide a first essentially toroid-shaped radiation
pattern, where the antenna arrangement further comprises a first and a second electrical
dipole, which electrical dipoles are arranged essentially orthogonal to each other, and are
arranged to provide a second and third essentially toroid-shaped radiation pattern which
each is essentially orthogonal to the other and to the first essentially toroid-shaped
radiation pattern.
BACKGROUND ART
The demand for wireless communication systems has grown steadily, and is still growing,
and a number of technological advancement steps have been taken during this growth. In
order to acquire increased system capacity for wireless systems by employing uncorrelated
propagation paths, MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) systems have been considered
to constitute a preferred technology for improving the capacity. MIMO employs a number
of separate independent signal paths, for example by means of several transmitting and
receiving antennas. The desired result is to have a number of uncorrelated antenna ports
for receiving as well as transmitting.
For MIMO it is desired to estimate the channel and continuously update this estimation.
This updating may be performed by means of continuously transmitting so-called pilot
signals in a previously known manner. The estimation of the channel results in a channel
matrix. If a number of transmitting antennas Tx transmit signals, constituting a transmitted
signal vector, towards a number of receiving antennas Rx, all Tx signals are summated in
each one of the Rx antennas, and by means of linear combination, a received signal vector
is formed. By multiplying the received signal vector with the inverted channel matrix, the
channel is compensated for and the original information is acquired, i.e. if the exact
channel matrix is known, it is possible to acquire the exact transmitted signal vector. The
channel matrix thus acts as a coupling between the antenna ports of the Tx and Rx
antennas, respectively. These matrixes are of the size MxN, where M is the number of
2

inputs (antenna ports) of the Tx antenna and N is the number of outputs (antenna ports) of
the Rx antenna. This is previously known for the skilled person in the MIMO system field.
In order for a MIMO system to function efficiently, uncorrelated, or at least essentially
uncorrelated, transmitted signals are required. The meaning of the term "uncorrelated
signals" in this context is that the radiation patterns are essentially orthogonal. This is
made possible for one antenna if that antenna is made for receiving and transmitting in at
least two orthogonal polarizations. If more than two orthogonal polarizations are to be
utilized for one antenna, it is necessary that it is used in a so-called rich scattering
environment having a plurality of independent propagation paths, since it otherwise is not
possible to have benefit from more than two orthogonal polarizations. A rich scattering
environment is considered to occur when many electromagnetic waves co-incide at a
single point in space. Therefore, in a rich scattering environment, more than two
orthogonal polarizations can be utilized since the plurality of independent propagation
paths enables all the degrees of freedom of the antenna to be utilized.
Antennas for MIMO systems may utilize spatial separation, i.e. physical separation, in
order to achieve low correlation between the received signals at the antenna ports. This,
however, results in big arrays that are unsuitable for e.g. hand-held terminals. One other
way to achieve uncorrelated signals is by means of polarization separation, i.e. generally
sending and receiving signals with orthogonal polarizations.
It has then been suggested to use three orthogonal dipoles for a MIMO antenna with three
ports, but such an antenna is complicated to manufacture and requires a lot of space when
used at higher frequencies, such as those used for the MIMO system (about 2 GHz).
In US 2002/0113748, two preferably orthogonally arranged dipoles and a loop element is
disclosed. As shown in Figure 5 of said application, the loop element is in the form of a
ring, fed at a certain point in the ring.
As the diameter of the loop element is suggested to be up to one wavelength at the
working frequency, it is thus indicated that the loop may be several wavelengths long.
3

However, in order to acquire a radiation pattern that is essentially orthogonal to the dipole
patterns using the antenna arrangement according to US 2002/0113748, one method is to
use a small loop. Such a small loop should have a diameter of about a tenth wavelength at
the working frequency, resulting in an approximation of a constant current electrical loop
element. Using a constant current electrical loop, or at least a sufficient approximation
thereof, is an advantageous method to acquire a radiation pattern that is essentially
orthogonal to the dipole patterns.
Although not proposed explicitly in US 2002/0113748, such a small loop antenna could be
deduced from said document. Said small loop antenna is, however, quite narrow-banded
and hence difficult to match properly since it has a high reactive resistance and a low
resistive resistance. Further, such a small loop antenna is considerably smaller than the
adjacent dipole antennas, resulting in an awkward construction.
There is thus a problem with the antenna arrangement according to US 2002/0113748,
since the loop element has to be very small in order to function as a sufficient
approximation of a constant current loop element.
The objective problem that is solved by the present invention is to provide an antenna
arrangement suitable for a MIMO system, which antenna arrangement is capable of
sending and receiving in three essentially uncorrelated polarizations, and should comprise
two essentially orthogonal dipoles and an approximation of constant current electrical loop
element. The approximation of the constant current electrical loop element should further
be easily matched and have a large bandwidth compared to what may be concluded from
prior art solutions.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
This objective problem is solved by means of an antenna arrangement according to the
introduction, which antenna arrangement further is characterized in that the means for
approximation of the constant current electrical loop comprises at least two current path
parts, where a current can be applied to each one of said parts, so that the current in each
one of said parts essentially will be in phase with each other.
4

Preferred embodiments are disclosed in the dependent claims.
Several advantages are achieved by means of the present invention, for example:
- A low-cost triple polarized antenna arrangement is obtained.
- A triple polarized antenna made in planar technique is made possible, avoiding
space consuming antenna arrangements.
- A triple polarized antenna which is easy to manufacture is obtained.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will now be described more in detail with reference to the appended
drawings, where
Figure 1 shows a four-leaf clover antenna;
Figure 2 shows an ideal radiation pattern for a constant current electrical loop;
Figure 3 shows two orthogonal dipole antennas;
Figure 4 shows a four-leaf clover antenna with two orthogonal dipole antennas;
Figure 5 shows an ideal radiation pattern for a dipole antenna;
Figure 6 shows three orthogonal radiation patterns;
Figure 7 shows a side view of the antenna arrangement according to the invention
realized in planar techniques;
Figure 8a shows a four-leaf clover antenna realized in planar techniques;
Figure 8b shows two orthogonal dipole antennas realized in planar
techniques;
Figure 9a shows how three dipole arms are used to emulate a first electrical dipole;
Figure 9a shows how three dipole arms are used to emulate a second electrical dipole;
5

Figure 10a shows a dipole arrangement according to a first case of a first variety;
Figure 10b shows a dipole arrangement according to a second case of a first variety;
Figure 11a shows a dipole arrangement according to a first case of a second variety; and
Figure 11b shows a dipole arrangement according to a second case of a second variety.
PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
According to the present invention, a so-called triple-mode antenna arrangement is
provided. The triple-mode antenna arrangement is designed for transmitting three
essentially orthogonal radiation patterns.
A so-called four-leaf clover antenna 1, which is previously known, is used in the present
invention, and is shown in Figure 1. The four-leaf clover antenna 1 comprises a first 2,
second 3, third 4 and fourth 5 loop of a conductive material, for example a bent copper
wire, where the loops 2, 3, 4, 5 all mainly lie in the same plane, an antenna plane P in the
plane of the paper in Figure 1. Each loop 2, 3, 4, 5 runs from a feeding conductor 6,
having a feeding port 7, to a ground conductor 8, leading to ground 9, preferably they are
all connected to the same feeding conductor 6. The loops 2, 3, 4, 5 are preferably
essentially of the same length and positioned beside each other in a symmetrical circular
clover pattern, as shown in Figure 1.
When following the first loop 2, it starts at a first feeding connection point 10 where it
contacts the feeding conductor 6, runs clockwise and terminates in a first ground
connection point 11 where it contacts the ground conductor 8. The second loop 3,
positioned clockwise relative to the first loop 2, also starts at the first feeding connection
point 10, where it contacts the feeding conductor 6, runs clockwise and terminates in a
second ground connection point 12 where it contacts the ground conductor 8.
The third loop 4, positioned clockwise relative to the second loop 3, starts at the a second
feeding connection point 13, where it contacts the feeding conductor 6, runs clockwise and
terminates in the second ground connection point 12 where it contacts the ground
conductor 8. The fourth loop 5, positioned clockwise relative to the third loop 4, starts at
6

the second feeding connection point 13, where it contacts the feeding conductor 6, runs
clockwise and terminates in the first ground connection point 11, where it contacts the
ground conductor 8.
Each loop 2, 3, 4, 5 comprises an arcuate conductor part 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a and a first 2b, 3b,
4b, 5b and second 2c, 3c, 4c, 5c straight conductor part. The straight conductor parts 2b,
2c of the first loop 2 will form a first 14 and second 15 parallel pair conductor part
together with the adjacent straight conductor parts 5c, 3b of the adjacent fourth 5 and
second 3 loops. In the same way, third 16 and fourth 17 parallel pair conductor parts are
formed. The arcuate conductor parts 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a extend in such a way that they together
form an incomplete essentially circular conducting part. The term incomplete refers to that
the essentially circular conducting part is broken between each arcuate conductor part 2a,
3a, 4a, 5a.
As all the loops 2, 3,4, 5 are fed from the same feeding conductor 6, current Ii, I2,13,14 in
each loop will all be essentially in phase with each other. In particular, in each arcuate
conductor part 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a, the current Ii, h, I3,14 will be in phase with the current Ii, I2,
I3, I4 in all the other arcuate conductor parts 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a. Further, when regarding the
first parallel pair conductor part 14, the currents Ii, I4 in the included straight conductor
parts 2b, 5c run in opposite directions, cancelling each other. The corresponding condition
applies for the second 15, third 16 and fourth 17 parallel pair conductor parts.
This means that a the four-leaf clover antenna 1, by means of superposition of the loops 2,
3, 4, 5, in effect is an approximation of a conducting ring where the current has the same
phase all over the ring. This means that an approximation of an ideal so-called constant
current electrical loop is obtained. The discrepancies of the approximation mainly arise
from the fact the arcuate conductor parts 2a, 3 a, 4a, 5 a do not form a complete and
accurate circle, and that the current I1, I2,I3,I4 in each arcuate conductor part 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a
does not have the same phase along the arcuate conductor part 2a, 3 a, 4a, 5 a in question.
It is possible to use more or fewer clover loops, the more clover loops that are used, the
more accurate the approximation of the ideal conducting ring becomes. On the other hand,
the more clover loops that are used, the more complicated the antenna structure becomes.
7

In the embodiment examples shown, a four leaf clover antenna 1 is used. Further, the
smaller the clover antenna that is used, measured in wavelengths, the better the
approximation becomes, since the current then varies to a smaller extent along the arcuate
conductor part 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a in question. A wavelength here preferably refers to the centre
wavelength of the operational bandwidth of the antenna arrangement according to the
invention.
The ideal radiation pattern 18 of a constant current electrical loop, which is approximated
by a four-leaf clover antenna, is shown in Figure 2, and is shaped as a toroid ring, where
the arc of the toroid ring essentially follows the arcuate conductor parts 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a of
the four-leaf clover antenna 1. The constant current electrical loop ideal radiation pattern
18 has a longitudinal symmetry plane P' that divides the toroid ring in two equal circular
halves, which longitudinal toroid ring symmetry plane P' thus coincide with the four-leaf
clover antenna plane P.
According to the present invention, the four-leaf clover antenna is combined with a first 19
and a second 20 dipole, orthogonally arranged, as shown in Figure 3, which first 19 and
second 20 dipoles are made in a conductive material, for example a bent copper wire. The
first dipole 19 comprises a first feeding part 21 with two parallel conductors 21a, 21b and
a first arm part 22, comprising two dipole arms 22a, 22b, where the two feeding
conductors 21a, 21b are bent 90° in such a way that the conductors, or dipole arms 22a,
22b, now extend in opposite directions until they reach their ends. The second dipole 20
comprises a corresponding second feeding part 23 and second arm part 24 with
corresponding feeding conductors 23a, 23b and dipole arms 24a, 24b. The conducting
parts 21,22,23,24 are preferably of essentially the same length.
With reference to Figure 4, the dipoles 19, 20 are arranged in the centre of the four-leaf
clover antenna, shown schematically with the arcuate conductor parts 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a only.
The dipoles 19, 20 have their respective feeding parts 21, 23 rising perpendicularly to the
four-leaf clover antenna plane P (not shown in Figure 4) and the respective arm part 22, 24
extend essentially parallel to the four-leaf clover antenna plane. The extension of the first
arm part 22 is essentially orthogonal to the extension of the second arm part 24.
8

The ideal radiation pattern 25 of a dipole antenna 26, having a feeding part 27 and a arm
part 28, is shown in Figure 5, and is shaped as a toroid ring. The arm part 28 of the dipole
antenna 26 constitutes a centre axis around which the radiation pattern's 25 toroid ring is
formed. In other words, the arcuate shape of the radiation pattern 25 runs around the arm
part 28 in such a way that the extension of the arm 28 part forms a central symmetry line
for the toroid ring.
Regarding the antenna according to the present invention, with reference to Figure 6, the
antenna diagrams produced are shown in a side view, where the four-leaf clover antenna
plane P runs perpendicular to the plane of the paper.
The four leaf clover antenna 1 produces a first toroid-shaped radiation pattern 29, having
the first longitudinal toroid ring symmetry plane P'. The first radiation pattern 29 is
marked with tilted lines which increase from left to right.
The first dipole antenna 19 produces a second toroid-shaped radiation pattern 30, having a
second longitudinal toroid ring symmetry plane P" which coincide with, or is parallel
with, the plane of the paper and is orthogonal to the first longitudinal toroid ring symmetry
plane P'. The second radiation pattern 30 is marked with tilted lines which decrease from
left to right.
The second dipole antenna 20 produces a third toroid-shaped radiation pattern 31, having a
third longitudinal toroid ring symmetry plane P'" which is orthogonal to both the first
longitudinal toroid ring symmetry plane P' and the second longitudinal toroid ring
symmetry plane P". We thus have a first P', a second P" and a third P'" plane. The third
radiation pattern 31 is marked with horizontal lines.
Ideally, as shown in Figure 6, these radiation patterns 29, 30, 31 have the same phase
centre, but practically the second 30 and third 31 radiation patterns may be elevated or
lowered relative to the first radiation pattern 29. Such a deviation should preferably be
small measured in wavelengths, for example about 10, where  is the centre wavelength
of the operational bandwidth of the antenna arrangement.
9

As the longitudinal toroid ring symmetry planes P', P", P'" are orthogonal to each other,
the radiation patterns are orthogonal to each other, according to the definition below.
As a conclusion, by means of the present invention, three different toroid-shaped radiation
patterns 29, 30, 31 are acquired, where each radiation pattern is orthogonal to the other.
As the radiation patterns are orthogonal, the correlation equals zero, where the correlation
p may be written as

In the equation above, Q. represents a surface and the symbol denotes a complex
conjugate. For the integration of the radiation pattern, D. represents a closed surface
comprising all space angels, and when this integration equals zero, there is no correlation
between the radiation patterns, i.e. the radiation patterns are orthogonal to each other. The
denominator is an effect normalization term.
Having three, at least essentially, orthogonal radiation patterns is very desirable, since this
enables uncorrelated parallel channels in a rich scattering environment, i.e. the rows in the
channel matrix may be independent. This in turn means that the present invention is
applicable for a MIMO system.
In the previously described first embodiment, the four-leaf clover antenna and the first and
second dipoles are made by a bent wire, for example a copper wire. Any other conducting
material will perform the function of the present invention.
In a second embodiment, the four-leaf clover antenna and the first and second dipoles are
made in planar techniques, constituting a microstrip antenna. As shown schematically in
Figure 7, the triple-mode antenna according to the present invention then comprises a first
32, second 33, third 34 and fourth 35 copper-clad dielectric laminate, for example a
Teflon-based laminate, placed on top of each other. Be removing the copper, different
conducting structures may be formed on the laminates 32, 33, 34, 35. Removal of copper
may be made by means etching, or, alternatively, milling.
10

In Figure 7, the first 32, second 33, third 34 and fourth 35 laminates, each one having a
first 36, 37, 38, 39 and second 40, 41, 42, 43 side, are shown from the side, forming a
sandwich structure. The sandwich structure has a top 44, a bottom 45 and a first 46,
second 47 and third 48 intermediate section, where each intermediate section 46, 47, 48 is
formed between two adjacent laminates.
On the top 44, on the first side 36 of the first laminate 32, the dipole arm parts are formed.
Below, at the first intermediate section 46 between the first 32 and second 33 laminate, the
four-leaf clover loops are formed, either on the second side 40 of the first laminate 32 or
on the first side 37 of the second laminate 33. On the side not used, all copper is removed.
Further below, at the second intermediate section 47 between the second 33 and third 34
laminate, the four-leaf clover loops are combined in such way that every loop is connected
to a common feed line and a common ground by means of vias (not shown) connecting the
first 46 and second 47 intermediate sections. A combining network is then formed, either
on the second side 41 of the second laminate 33 or on the first side 38 of the third laminate
34. On the side not used, all copper is removed.
Further below, at the third intermediate 48 section, between the third 34 and fourth 35
laminate, the dipole arm parts are combined in such way that they are connected to
respective feed lines and a common ground by means of vias (not shown) connecting the
top 44 and the third 48 intermediate section 42. Further, a four-leaf clover feeding line is
formed at the third intermediate section 48, by means of vias (not shown) connecting the
second 47 and third 48 intermediate sections. The four-leaf clover feeding line is
connected to a clover antenna connector 49 at the edge of the sandwich. Thus a
combining network is formed, either on the second side 42 of the third laminate 34 or on
the first 39 side of the fourth laminate 35. On the side not used, all copper is removed.
At the bottom 45, on the second side 43 of the fourth laminate 35, a dipole feeding line is
formed for each dipole by means of vias (not shown), connecting the second intermediate
section 47 and the bottom 45. Each dipole feeding line is connected to a dipole antenna
connector 50 (only one shown) at the edge of the sandwich.
11

An example of how the etched clover arms and their feeding vias may look like is shown
in Figure 8a. There, an etched four-leaf clover antenna 1 comprising the first 2, second 3,
third 4 and fourth 5 loop is shown. Each loop is connected to a corresponding first 51,
second 52, third 53 and fourth 54 via. These vias 51, 52, 53, 54 are joined to one point at
another point, in the example with reference to Figure 7 in another layer. A fifth common
central via 55 is also provided, thus totally resulting in two terminals for feeding the four-
leaf clover antenna 1, in the example with reference to Figure 7 these terminals are
available via the clover antenna connector 49.
Further, in Figure 8b, an example of how the etched dipole arms and their feeding vias
may look like is shown. The first dipole 19 has its dipole arms 22a, 22b connected to a
respective first 56 and second 57 dipole via. The second dipole 20 has its dipole arms 24a,
24b connected to a respective first 58 and second 59 dipole via. These vias 51, 52, 53, 54
are preferably brought to another layer, as described in the example with reference to
Figure 7, where each dipole is available via a connector 50 corresponding to the vias 56,
57; 58, 59 of each dipole.
Due to reciprocity, for the transmitting properties of all the triple-mode antenna
arrangements described, there are corresponding equal receiving properties, as known to
those skilled in the art, allowing the triple-mode antenna arrangement to both send and
receive in three essentially uncorrelated modes of operation.
The invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, which only should be
regarded as examples of the present invention, but may vary freely within the scope of the
appended claims.
For example, there does not have to be two discrete dipole antennas. In order to achieve
the dipole radiation patterns described, two electrical dipoles have to be achieved, which
does not necessarily mean that two discrete dipole antennas are required. Two electrical
dipoles may be achieved by using only three dipole arms, a first 60, second 61 and third 62
dipole arm, each arm running outwards from a centre point as shown in Figures 9a and 9b.
The central ends of the dipole arms are connected to a feeding arrangement 63 by means
of appropriate feeding wires 64, 65, 66. The three dipole arms 60, 61, 62 extend in such a
12

way that an angle of essentially 60° is formed between them, i.e. they are extending
symmetrically. In the following, the positive direction of the current is from the centre and
outwards.
In a first mode of operation, as shown in Figure 9a, the first dipole arm 60 is fed with a
current having the relative amplitude -√2, the second dipole arm 61 is fed with a current
having the relative amplitude √2 and the third dipole arm 62 is fed with a current having
the relative amplitude 0. The resulting first electrical dipole 67 (marked with dashed lines)
is directed essentially perpendicular to the third dipole arm 62.
In a second mode of operation, as shown in Figure 9b, the first dipole arm 60 is fed with a
current having the relative amplitude -1√2, the second dipole arm 61 is fed with a current
having the relative amplitude -1√2 and the third dipole arm 62 is fed with a current
having the relative amplitude 1. The resulting second electrical dipole 68 (marked with
dashed lines) is directed essentially parallel to the third dipole arm 62.
Two orthogonal electrical dipoles 67, 68 are thus obtained, using only three dipole arms
60,61,62.
It is also conceivable to use circularly arranged electrical dipoles, instead of the clover
antenna configuration described above, in order to achieve an approximation of a constant
current electrical loop.
In a first version, with reference to Figure 10a and 10b, a first 69, 69', second 70, 70' and
third 71,71' electrical dipole, each preferably in the form of a dipole antenna, are arranged
in the form of an equilateral triangle 72, 72'. Inside this triangle 72, 72', two more
orthogonal electrical dipoles (not shown) are arranged in any one of the ways previously
described.
In a second version, with reference to Figure 11a and 1 lb, a first 73, 73', second 74, 74',
third 75, 75' and fourth 76, 76' electrical dipole, each preferably in the form of a dipole
antenna, are arranged in the form of a square 77, 77'. Inside this square 77 77', two more
orthogonal electrical dipoles (not shown) are arranged in any one of the ways previously
described.
13

In a first case with reference to Figure 10a, and 11a, corresponding dipole feeding
conductor parts 78, 79, 80; 81, 82, 83, 84 are positioned in the middle of each side of the
triangle 72 or the square 77, respectively. This results in that each individual electrical
dipole 69, 70 ,71; 73, 74, 75, 76 is essentially straight.
In a second case with reference to Figure 10b and 11b, corresponding dipole feeding
conductor parts 78', 79', 80'; 81', 82', 83', 84' are positioned in each corner of the
triangle 72' or the square 77', respectively. This results in that each individual electrical
dipole 69', 70' ,71'; 73', 74', 75', 76' is angled, 60° for the triangle and 90° for the square.
The dipoles according to the above should be fed in such a way that the currents (not
indicated in the Figures) in the dipoles all are essentially in phase with each other,
enabling the approximation of a constant current electrical loop,
With reference to the examples with reference to Figure 10a, 10b, 11a and 11b, other
geometrical forms are of course conceivable. As for the clover antenna described above, it
is possible to use different numbers of circularly arranged electrical dipoles. The more
electrical dipoles that are used, the more accurate the approximation of the ideal
conducting ring becomes. On the other hand, the more electrical dipoles that are used, the
more complicated the antenna structure becomes
All planes P, P', P", P'" described are imaginary and added for explanatory reasons only.
The layer configuration described with reference to Figure 7 is only an example of how
such an arrangement may be realized. Many other such configurations are possible within
the scope of the invention.
Many other configurations which are not made in planar techniques are also conceivable.
As mentioned previously, bent wires may for example be used.
All feeding lines, combining network and connections which are not discussed more in
detail in the description are of a commonly known type, easily designed and/or acquired
by the skilled person.
14

The clover antenna is not necessary for carrying out the invention, the essence of that part
of the antenna arrangement according to the invention is to provide at least an
approximation to a constant current electrical loop lying in the previously mentioned four-
leaf clover antenna plane P, which more generally constitutes an antenna plane P in which
the resulting approximated constant current electrical loop lies.
A clover antenna according to the embodiments above is a preferred way to provide such
an approximation. The number of clover loops may vary, as mentioned above, but should
not be less than two in order to provide any positive effect. The loops do not have to lie
exactly in the same plane, but may be slightly tilted with the working principle
maintained. The direction of the electrical current may vary from the ones disclosed.
15

WE CLAIM:
1. Antenna arrangement comprising means (1, 72, 72', 77, 77') for providing
an approximation of a constant current electrical loop, which approximation of a constant
current electrical loop is arranged to provide a first essentially toroid-shaped radiation
pattern (29), where the antenna arrangement further comprises a first (67) and a second
(68) electrical dipole, which electrical dipoles (67, 68) are arranged essentially orthogonal
to each other, and are arranged to provide a second (30) and third (31) essentially toroid-
shaped radiation pattern which each is essentially orthogonal to the other and to the first
essentially toroid-shaped radiation pattern (29), characterized in that the means
(1, 72, 72', 77, 77') for approximation of the constant current electrical loop comprises at
least two current path parts (2, 3, 4, 5; 69, 70, 71; 69', 70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74',
75', 76'), where a current (I1, I2, I3, I4) can be applied to each one of said parts (2, 3, 4, 5;
69, 70, 71; 69', 70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74', 75', 76'), so that the current (I1 I2,13,14)
in each one of said parts (2, 3, 4, 5; 69, 70, 71; 69', 70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74', 75',
76') essentially will be in phase with each other.
2. Antenna arrangement according to claim 1, characterized in that
the constant current electrical loop is approximated by a clover antenna (1).
3. Antenna arrangement according to claim 2, characterized in that
the clover antenna is a four-leaf clover antenna (1).
4. Antenna arrangement according to claim 1, characterized in that
the constant current electrical loop is approximated by at least three circularly arranged
electrical dipoles (69, 70, 71; 73, 74, 75,76; 69', 70' ,71'; 73', 74', 75', 76').
5. Antenna arrangement according to any one of the previous claims,
characterized in that each one of the first and second electrical dipoles (67, 68) is
formed by means of a dipole antenna (19, 20), each dipole antenna (19, 20) having two
dipole arms (22a, 22b; 24a, 24b).
6. Antenna arrangement according to any one of the claims 1-4,
characterized in that each one of the first and second electrical dipoles (67, 68)
16

are formed by means of a dipole antenna arrangement comprising three dipole arms (60,
61, 62), extending from a central point in such a way that an angle of essentially 60° is
formed between them., which dipole antenna arrangement is fed in such a way that the
electrical dipoles (67, 68) are formed.
7. Antenna arrangement according to any one of the previous claims,
characterized in that the antenna arrangement is made using planar techniques.
Dated this 19th day of November 2007.
17

The present invention relates to an antenna arrangement comprising means (1, 72, 72', 77,
77') for providing an approximation of a constant current electrical loop, which is
arranged to provide a first essentially toroid-shaped radiation pattern (29), where the
antenna arrangement further comprises a first (67) and a second (68) electrical dipole. The
electrical dipoles (67, 68) are arranged essentially orthogonal to each other, and are
arranged to provide a second (30) and third (31) essentially toroid-shaped radiation pattern
which each is essentially orthogonal to the other and to the first essentially toroid-shaped
radiation pattern (29). The means (1, 72, 72', 77, 77') for approximation of the constant
current electrical loop comprises at least two current path parts (2, 3, 4, 5; 69, 70, 71; 69',
70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74', 75', 76'), where a current (I1, I2, I3, I4) can be applied to each one of said parts (2, 3, 4, 5; 69, 70, 71; 69', 70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74', 75',
76'), so that the current (I1, I2, I3, I4) in each one of said parts (2, 3, 4, 5; 69, 70, 71; 69', 70', 71'; 73, 74, 75, 76; 73', 74', 75', 76') essentially will be in phase with each other.


Documents:

http://ipindiaonline.gov.in/patentsearch/GrantedSearch/viewdoc.aspx?id=j1cQfpcIssthe92t5SJGhw==&loc=wDBSZCsAt7zoiVrqcFJsRw==


Patent Number 270666
Indian Patent Application Number 4427/KOLNP/2007
PG Journal Number 02/2016
Publication Date 08-Jan-2016
Grant Date 07-Jan-2016
Date of Filing 19-Nov-2007
Name of Patentee TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
Applicant Address SE-164 83 STOCKHOLM
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 MEDBO, JONAS BLÅHAKEVÄGEN 17A, S-756 52 UPPSALA
2 MANHOLM, LARS EKLANDAGATAN 8, S-412 55 GÖTEBORG
3 HARRYSSON, FREDRIK ORMEBÄCKSGATAN 3A, S-416 78 GÖTEBORG
PCT International Classification Number H01Q 21/26
PCT International Application Number PCT/SE2005/000642
PCT International Filing date 2005-04-29
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 NA