Title of Invention	REMOTE PERFORMANCE MONITOR IN A VIRTUAL DATA CENTER COMPLEX
Abstract	Performance data is received at a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) Server residing on a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex. The performance data is generated, and served at predefined intervals, by a Central Performance Data Server operable for the virtual operating system within the virtual data center complex. At least a portion of the performance data is saved in memory accessible to the RPM Server. Then, responsive to a request form an RPM Client residing on an originating virtual machine within the virtual data center complex, at least a portion of data residing in the memory is extracted by the RPM Server and served to the RPM Client.

Title of Invention

REMOTE PERFORMANCE MONITOR IN A VIRTUAL DATA CENTER COMPLEX

Abstract

Performance data is received at a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) Server residing on a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex. The performance data is generated, and served at predefined intervals, by a Central Performance Data Server operable for the virtual operating system within the virtual data center complex. At least a portion of the performance data is saved in memory accessible to the RPM Server. Then, responsive to a request form an RPM Client residing on an originating virtual machine within the virtual data center complex, at least a portion of data residing in the memory is extracted by the RPM Server and served to the RPM Client.

Full Text	REMOTE PERFORMANCE MONITOR IN A VIRTUAL DATA CENTER COMPLEX FIELD OF INVENTION The present invention relates to monitoring the resources of computer systems. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method, computer program product and system for remotely monitoring the performance of a virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex. BACKGROUND Virtual machines are known in the prior art. In general, a virtual machine appears to be a real physical computer system to a computer user, or to a program developed to run on a computer system. However, the virtual machine is not constrained to the physical specifications of the computer hosting the virtual machine; but rather the virtual machine is logical in nature with computing resources (e.g. virtual memory) that are determined by the system administrator responsible for defining the virtual machine. Accordingly, a great deal of flexibility exists for the system administrator whereby the physical resources of a computing system are utilized more efficiently by defining virtual operating systems that are appropriately structured for the specific workloads of the owning enterprise. To this end, a single physical machine may host one or more virtual operating systems, each virtual operating system comprising one or more virtual machines. A virtual machine has the further functionality of hosting a real operating system. That is, a single virtual machine may host a guest operating system creating the illusion that an operating system is running on its own physical computer. This is a very powerful concept in that it facilitates efficient software testing. For example, several dozen departments may be concurrently testing different software products, each in the early stages of development with a high potential of encountering serious errors which would disable an entire operating system. If ail of these departments were running on a single real system, each disabling error for one software product may bring testing to a screeching halt for all other software products being tested on the system. In the virtual world, a disabling error brings down only the guest operating system running the failing software product. All other software testing proceeds, as they each are running on their own unique guest operating system running under a unique virtual machine. In order to further increase the efficiency of computing systems additional flexibility evolved over time whereby a plurality of virtual machines spanning one or more virtual operating systems running on one or more physical computing systems could be defined. This facilitated an easy migration to additional computing power as the work load of an enterprise increased over time. Such a network of virtual machines is herein defined as a "virtual data center complex" It is apparent, with a plurality of virtual machines defined over a plurality of physical computing systems, that a sophisticated performance monitoring capability will be required in order for the system administrators to properly tune the virtual data center complex on an ongoing basis. Various performance monitor programs catering to the needs of the system administrator are known in the prior art, such as IBM's RTM product shipped with IBM's Virtual Machine (VM) operating system. However, virtual machine performance monitor products in the prior art are deficient in that they cater to the needs of the system administrator. As testing work loads have increased in large software development enterprises, it has become increasingly important that users of the virtual machines also have some performance monitoring capability. In this way, the general user (i.e. not the system administrator responsible for the overall operation of the virtual complex) has necessary tools to ensure the timely execution of his or her individual projects. For example, with adequate and timely knowledge of one virtual operating system's performance, a user may decide to target a different virtual operating system for a given work load, thereby expediting his or her individual project, as well as helping to balance the overall workload by choosing a virtual operating system with greater availability of computing resources. Furthermore, the general user may discover that there are performance issues or problems with a given software product by detecting the change in a virtual operating system's performance statistics attendant with the execution of the project software. Further still, by capturing performance screens during project execution, the general user may accumulate helpful documentation to share with the system administrator in those cases where the virtual data center complex is not tuned in an optimal manner for the enterprise. Another shortcoming with prior art virtual machine performance monitors is that they are very restrictive wrth respect to receiving performance information only from previously predetermined systems. For example, if a user or administrator is currently logged on to one virtual machine residing on one physical processor, it may be necessary to logon to a second virtual machine on a different physical processor in order to gain access to the required performance information. This process of logging off of one virtual machine and logging on to a second virtual machine in order to obtain performance information is very inconvenient and impacts the productivity of users and administrators. Accordingly, there is a great need for an enhanced remote performance monitor operable within a virtual data center complex that can facilitate the retrieval of remote performance information by the general user in a manner that is convenient, efficient, and does not jeopardize the security and integrity of the virtual data center complex. DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION To overcome these limitations in the prior art briefly described supra, the present invention provides a method, computer program product and system for remotely monitoring the performance of a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex. In one embodiment a method is described wherein performance data is received at a Remote Performance Monitor (hereinafter RPM) Server residing on a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex. The performance data is generated, and served at predefined intervals, by a Central Performance Data Server operable for the virtual operating system. At least a portion of the performance data is saved in memory accessible to the RPM Server. Then, responsive to a request from. an RPM Client residing in an originating virtual machine withm the virtual data center complex, at least a portion of data residing m the memory is extracted by the RPM Server and served to the RPM Client. In another embodiment, the method may further comprise generating a screen from the extracted portion of performance data and displaying the screen to a user logged on to the originating virtual machine. In still another embodiment, authorization checking is performed and, depending upon the authorization status of the user, an authorization error is returned to the user. in another embodiment still, the user may logon to a different virtual machine and retain the capability to retrieve the same performance data as the original virtual machine. A system of the present invention is also presented for remotely monitoring the performance of a target virtual operating system within a I'irtual data center complex. The system may be embodied in software running on a single computing device or on a plurality of computing devices. The system in the disclosed embodiments substantially includes the modules and structures necessary to carry out the functions presented above with respect to the described method. More particularly, the system, in one embodiment, comprises a computing device, an RPM Client, an RPM Server and a Central Performance Data Server. A signal bearing medium tangibly embodying a program of machine-readable instructions (or alternatively "program code") executable by a digital processing apparatus to perform operations to remotely monitor the performance of a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex. The operation of the program substantially comprises the same functions as described above with respect to the described method. More particularly, the operation of the program comprises execution of an RPM Client, an RPM Server and a Central Performance Data Server. References throughout this specification to features, advantages, or similar language does not imply that all of the features and advantages that may be realized with the present invention should be or are in any single embodiment of the invention. Rather, language referring to the features and advantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, discussion of the features and advantages, and similar language, throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One of ordinary skill in the relevant art will recognize that the invention may be practiced without one or more of the specific features or advantages of a particular embodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages may be recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in all embodiments of the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The present invention is described m conjunction with the appended drawings, where like reference numbers denote the same element throughout the set of drawings: Figure 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary prior art virtual data center complex wherein the present invention may be practiced; S'igure 2 is a block diagram xllustrat2.ng an exemplary Remote Performance Monitor in accordance with the present invention; Figure 3 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary performance screen request; Figure 4 is a block diagram illustrating a second exemplary performance screen request; Figure 5 is a block diagram illustrating a third exemplary performance screen request; Figure 6 is a flow diagram illustrating the logic flow of one embodiment of an .RPM Client; Figure 7 is a flow diagram illustrating the logic flow of one embodiment of an E.PM Server; Figure 8 is a flow diagram illustrating the logic flow of one embodiment of a Central Performance Data Server. DETAILED DESCRIPTION Referring now to Figure 1, a block diagram of a virtual data center complex is shown suitable for practicing the present invention. Virtual data center complex 100 comprises physical system PA 145 and physical system P5 150. Typically physical systems 145 and 150 are mainframe systems, such as the zSeries mainframe computer syszem. (zSeries is a trademark of International Business Machines Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both.) However, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the reference to zSeries is exemplary and that the teachings contained herein are applicable to any physical computing systems. Physical system PA 145 comprises virtual operating system OA 110 and virtual operating system OC 130. Virtual operating system OA 110 comprises virtual machine VA 111, virtual machine VB 112 and virtual machine VC 113. Virtual operating system OC 130 comprises virtual machine VE 131 and virtual machine VF 132. Physical system PB 150 comprises virtual operating system OB 120. Virtual operating system OB 120 comprises virtual machine VD 121; Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the configuration represented in Figure 1 is exemplary rn nature and that an unlimited number of other configurations illustrating a plurality of processors, a plurality of virtual operating systems and a plurality of virtual machines is possible. Also illustrated in Figure 1 are virtual machine users 115, 116, 117, 125, 135 and 136. While a particular virtual machine user may be logged onto a specific virtual machine, the user may have an interest in any number of other virtual machines or virtual operating systems within virtual data center complex 100. For example, user 135 is currently logged on to virtual machine VE 131; however user 135 may have scheduled one or more jobs to run on virtual machine VD 121. Accordingly, user 135 may have an interest in viewing information related to the performance of virtual operating system OB 120 as well as virtual operating system OC 130. User 140 is designated as a "system user" in Figure 1. A system user refers to a user with special privileges to view and change system information within virtual data center complex 100 that is not available to the general user. The system user has special skills and training to understand complex performance data and make appropriate tuning adjustments to enhance the overall virtual data center complex performance. System user 140, as shown, is not currently logged on to any virtual machine, but typically would have access to virtual operating systems 110, 120 and 130. Referring now to Figure 2, the block diagram of Figure 1 is further expanded to show additional components in accordance with the present invention. Virtual operating system OA 110 comprises RPM Server SA 210 and Central Performance Data Server CA 290. Virtual operating system OB 120 comprises RPM Server SB 240 and Central Performance Data Server CB 285; and virtual operating system OC 130 comprises P.PM Server SC 260 and Central Performance Data Server CC 265. Virtual machine VA 111 comprises software component RPM Client CA 212. In like manner, RPM Clients 222, 232, 242, 252 and 262 are shown for virtual machines 112, 113, 121, 131 and 132, respectively. In accordance with the present invention, any RPM Client can communicate with any RPM Server within virtual data center complex 200; and, any RPM Server can communicate with any RPM Client within virtual data center complex 2 00. These communication links are not shown for simplicity, but are assumed to be present in accordance with the above statement. In accordance with the present invention, each of Central Performance Data Servers 290, 285 and 265 may communicate with RPM Server 210, 240 and 260, respectively; and each of RPM Servers 210, 240 and 260 may communicate with Central Performance Data Server 290, 285, and 265, respectively. These communication links are not shown for simplicity, but are assumed to be present in accordance with the above statement. Referring now to Figure 3, the block diagram of Figure 2 is further expanded to illustrate a specific example of a user logged onto one virtual machine requesting performance information pertaining to a different target virtual operating system residing on a different physical machine. User 125 is logged onto virtual machine VD 121 and requests performance information pertaining to virtual operating system OC 130. For this example virtual machine VD 121 is referred to as the originating virtual machine and virtual operating system OC 130 is referred to as the target virtual operating system. The following table illustrates, in a preferred embodiment, some exemplary types of performance information that a general user or authorized user may display by requesting a particular performance screen from an RPM client: In a preferred embodiment, various performance screens may be requested in accordance with a user's authorization level as depicted under the column "Class" above. A designation under the class of "General/Authorized" means that a performance screen is available to the general user, however, various sub-options may be specified that would require a level of appropriate authorization before honoring the request. Responsive to user 125 initiating a request, RPM Client CD 242 receives control and initiates communication 370, whereby RPM Server SC 260 receives control. Responsive to this communication, RPM Server SC 260 retrieves requested performance data from memory accessible to RPM Server SC 250 and returns the requested data over communication link 370 to RPM Client CD 242. RPM Client CD 242 then displays this data to user 125. At predetermined intervals, explained in greater detail infra, RPM Server SC 260 initiates communication 371, whereby Central Perforrnance Data Server 265 receives control. Responsive to this communication. Central Performance Data Server 265 generates the requested performance data and returns the requested data over communication link 371 to RPM Server SC 260. RPM Server SC 260 retains this performance data in accessible memory to satisfy future requests from any RPM Client within virtual data center complex 300. In a preferred embodiment, Central Performance Data Server 265 may be an existing performance server component of a virtual data center complex known in the prior art as "FCON". Referring now to Figure 4, the block diagram of Figure 2 is further expanded to illustrate a specific example of a user logged onto one virtual machine requesting performance information pertaining to a different target virtual operating system, but residing on the same physical machine. User 115 is logged onto virtual machine VA 111 and requests performance information pertaining to virtual operating system OC 130. For this example VA 111 is referred to as the originating virtual machine and virtual operating system OC 130 is referred to as the target virtual operating system. Responsive to user 115 initiating this request for performance information, RPM Client CA 212 receives control and initiates communication 470, whereby RPM Server SC 260 receives control. Responsive to this communication, RPM Server SC 260 retrieves requested performance data from memory accessible to RPM Server SC 260 and returns the requested data over communication link 470 to RPM Client CA 212. RPM Client CA 212 then displays this data to user 115. At predetermined intervals, explained in greater detail infra, RPM Server SO 260 initiates communication 471, whereby Central Performance Data Server 265 receives control. Responsive to this communication, Central Performance Data Server 265 generates the requested performance data and returns this requested data over communication link 471 to RPM Server SC 260. RPM Server SC 260 retains this performance data in accessible memory to satisfy future requests from any RPM Client within virtual data center complex 4 00. Referring now to Figure 5, the block diagram of Figure 2 is further expanded to illustrate a specific example of a user logged onto one virtual machine requesting performance information pertaining to the target virtual operating system that comprises the requesting user's virtual machine. User 125 is logged onto virtual machine VD 121 and requests performance information pertaining to virtual operating system OB 120. For this example VD 121 is referred to as the originating virtual machine and virtual operating system OB 120 is referred to as the target virtual operating system. Responsive to user 125 initiating this request, RPM Client CD 242 receives control and initiates communication 570, whereby RPM Server SB 240 receives control. Responsive to this communication, RPM Server SB 240 retrieves requested performance data from memory accessible to RPM Server SB 24 0 and returns the requested data over communication link 570 to RPM Client CD 242. RPM Client CD 242 then displays this data to user 125. At predetermined intervals, explained in greater detail infra, RPM Server SB 240 initiates communication 571, whereby Central Performance Data Server CB 285 receives control. Responsive to this communication. Central Performance Data Server CB 285 generates the requested performance data and returns the requested data over communication link 571 to RPM Server SB 240. RPM Server SB 240 retains this performance data in accessible memory to satisfy future requests from any RPM Client within virtual data center complex 500. Referring now to Figure 6, flow diagram 600 teaches one embodiment of an RPM Client. Processing begins at step 605 and then, in step 610, a request for a performance screen is received from a user logged on to an originating virtual machine. Continuing with step 615, a test is made to determine if the user request identified a target virtual operating system. If so, in step 620, the node name of the specified target virtual machine is used. Otherwise, if the user request failed to identify a target virtual operating system, then, in step 518, the node name associated with the user's originating virtual machine is defaulted as the target node name. Continuing from either step 620 or step 618, processing resumes at step 625 where the virtual data center complex associated with the target node name is determined. In step 630, a test is made to determine if the virtual data center complex determined by step 625 is the same as the virtual data center complex associated with the user's originating virtual machine (i.e. the virtual machine that the user is logged onto). If the virtual data complex associated with the user's originating virtual machine is different than the virtual data complex associated with the target virtual machine determined in step 625, then, in step 635, processing concludes with an error condition. Otherwise, processing continues with step 645. In step 645, a test is made to determine if the user is authorized to retrieve the requested performance screen. If not, processing concludes at step 650 with an error condition. Otherwise, processing continues at step 655 where the performance screen request is sent to the RPM server associated with the target virtual operating system. Continuing with step 660, the requested performance screen is returned by the RPM server to the RPM client. In step 665, the performance screen is displayed to the user. In an alternative embodiment, performance information exceeding the user's authorization level is expurgated from the performance screen by the RPM client prior to displaying to the user. If another user request is made for a performance screen, at step 670, processing returns to step 610, explained supra. Otherwise, processing concludes normally at step 675. Referring now to Figure 7, flow diagram 700 teaches one embodiment of an RPM Server. Processing begins at step 705 and then, in step 710, initialization processing is performed to establish the presence of the RPM Server in its respective virtual operating system. In step 715 a test is made to determine if an instance of a periodic interval interrupt has occurred. If so, control passes to step 720 where P.PM Server sends a request to the Central Performance Data Server operable on the same virtual operating system as the RPM Server. Then, in step 725, the Central Performance Data Server returns the requested performance screens to RPM Server, where they are stored in RPM Server memory for the processing of future RPM Client requests. Processing then continues with step 755, where RPM Server waits for the next work request at which time control returns to step 715 discussed supra. Returning now to step 715, if the RPM Server request is not an interval interrupt, then processing continues with step 730 where a test is made to determine if this is an RPM Client request. if so, in step 735 an additional test is made to determine if the RPM Client request is valid. If it is not a valid request, processing is abnormally terminated at step 740, otherwise processing continues at step 737 where a test is made to determine if the user is authorized to retrieve the requested performance information. If not, processing abnormally terminates at step 740, otherwise processing continues with step 745. In step 745, the RPM Client requested performance screen is selected from RPM Server memory. Then, at step 750, the requested performance screen selected in step 745, supra, is returned to the RPM Client and processing continues at step 755, discussed supra. Returning now to step 730, if this is not an RPM Client request, then processing proceeds to step 755, discussed supra. Referring now to Figure 8, flow diagram 800 teaches one embodiment of a Central Performance Data Server. Processing begins at step 805, and, in step 810, the Central Performance Data Server is started and initialized responsive to an administrator command. In step 815 a Lest is made to determine if an instance of a periodic interval interrupt has occurred. If so, control passes to step 820 where the Central Performance Data Server collects virtual operating system performance data for the associated virtual operating system. Then, in step 825, the Central Performance Data Server saves this performance data in memory for the processing of future user requests. Processing then continues with step 855, where Central Performance Data Server waits for the next work request at which time control returns to step 815 discussed supra. Returning now to step 815, if the request is not an interval interrupt, then processing continues with step 830 where a test is made to determiine if this is a performance data request from a user of the services of Central Performance Data Server (e.g. an RPM Server). If so, in step 835 an additional test is made to determine if the user request is valid. If it is not a valid request, processing is abnormally terminated at step 840, otherwise processing continues at step 837 where an additional test is made to determine if the user is authorized to retrieve the requested information. If the user is not authorized, processing terminates abnormally at step 840. Otherwise, processing continues with step 845 where the user requested performance data is retrieved from memory accessible to Central Performance Data Server. Then, at step 850, the requested performance data is returned to the user (e.g. RPM Server) who called the Central Performance Data Server service. Following step 850, control passes to step 855 where Central Performance Data Server waits for the next request and then proceeds to step 815, diSCussed supra. Returning now to step 830, if the request is not a user request for data, control passes to step 855, discussed supra. Taken in combination, flow diagrams 600, 700 and 800 in conjunction with supporting diagrams and detailed descriptions provide for remotely monitoring the performance of a virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex by logging onto any virtual machine within that virtual data center complex. In accordance with the teaching contained herein, the general user is afforded great flexibility in efficiently acquiring needed performance information in a manner that is safe and non-disruptive to the virtual data center complex. CLAIMS A method for monitoring the performance of a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex, comprising: receiving, at a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) Server residing on aid target virtual operating system within said virtual data center omplex, performance data, said performance data generated and served to aid RPM Server at predefined intervals by a Central Performance Data erver operable for said virtual operating system; saving at least a portion of said performance data in a memory ccessible to said RPM Server; responsive to a request from a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) lient residing in an originating virtual machine within said virtual data enter complex, extracting by said RPM Server at least a portion of data esiding in said memory and serving said extracted portion to said RPM lient. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising generating a creen comprising said extracted portion by said RPM Client and displaying said screen to a user on said originating virtual machine. 1. The method as claimed in claim 2 wherein said user has an authorization status and in accordance with said authorization status at least a portion of said extracted portion is expurgated prior to inclusion in said screen. I. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein a user on said originating virtual machine, has an authorization status and in accordance with said authorization status said RPM Client returns an authorization error to ;aid user. 5. The method as claimed in_claim 1 wherein said originating virtual aachine runs on said target virtual operating system. 6. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said originating virtual machine runs on a virtual operating system that is distinct from said target virtual operating system. 7. The method as claimed in claim 2 further comprising saving said displayed screen in user accessible computer memory whereby subsequent analysis is facilitated. 8. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said Central Performance Data Server runs on said target virtual operating system. 9. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising periodically collecting, by said Central Performance Data Server, performance data associated with said target virtual operating system. 10. The method as claimed in claim 9 further comprising saving said collected performance data in memory accessible to said Central Performance Data Server. 11. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said target virtual operating system and said originating virtual machine operate on a single physical computer system. 12. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said target virtual operating system resides on a first physical computer system and said originating virtual machine resides on a second physical computer system, said first physical computer system being distinct from said second physical computer system. 13. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said virtual data center complex comprises V virtual machines, wherein V is an integer greater than 1. 14. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein said virtual data center complex further comprises M physical computer systems and wherein M is an integer greater than or equal to 1. 15. The method as claimed in claim 2 further comprising said.user logging on to a second originating virtual machine anywhere within said virtual data center complex, wherein said generated screen is displayed to said user on said second originating virtual machine. 16. A system for monitoring the performance of a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex, comprising: a processor; and a memory accessible to said processor storing instructions that at least: receive, at a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) Server residing on said target virtual operating system within said virtual data center complex, performance data, said performance data generated and served to said RPM Server at predefined intervals by a Central Performance Data Server operable for said virtual operating system; save at least a portion of said performance data in a memory accessible to said RPM Server; and respond to a request from a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) Client residing in an originating virtual machine within said virtual data center complex by extracting, by said RPM Server, at least a portion of data residing in said memory and serving said extracted portion to said RPM Client. 17. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said memory further stores instructions that generate a screen comprising said extracted portion by said RPM Client and displaying said screen to a user on said originating virtual machine. 18. The system as claimed in claim 17 wherein said user has an authorization status and in accordance with said authorization status further instructions are stored in said memory causing at least a portion of said extracted portion to be expurgated prior to inclusion in said screen. 19. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein a user on said originating virtual machine has an authorization status and in accordance with said authorization status further instructions are stored in said memory causing said RPM Client to return an authorization error to said user. 20. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said originating virtual machine runs on said target virtual operating system. 21. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said originating virtual machine runs on a virtual operating system, that is distinct from said target virtual operating system. 22. The system, as claimed in claim 17 wherein said memory further stores instructions that save said displayed screen in user accessible compurer memory whereby subsequent analysis is facilitated. 23. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said Central Performance Dara Server runs on said target virtual operating system. 24. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said memory further stores instructions that cause said Central Performance Data Server to periodically collect performance data associated with said target virtual operating system. 25. The system as claimed in claim 24 wherein said memory further stores instructions that save said collected performance data in a memory accessible to said Central Performance Data Server. 26. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said target virtual operating system and said originating virtual machine operate on a single physical computer system. 27. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said target virtual operating system resides on a first physical computer system and said originating virtual machine resides on a second physical computer system, said first physical computer system being distinct from said second physical computer system. 28. The system as claimed in claim 15 wherein said virtual data center complex comprises V virtual machines, wherein V is an integer greater than 1. 29. The system as claimed in claim 28 wherein said virtual data center complex further comprises M physical computer systems and wherein M is an integer greater than or equal to 1. 30. The system as claimed in claim 17 wherein said user logs onto a second originating virtual machine anywhere within said virtual data center complex, and wherein said generated screen is displayed to said user on said second originating virtual machine.

Full Text

REMOTE PERFORMANCE MONITOR IN A VIRTUAL DATA CENTER COMPLEX
FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates to monitoring the resources of computer systems. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method, computer program product and system for remotely monitoring the performance of a virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex.
BACKGROUND
Virtual machines are known in the prior art. In general, a virtual machine appears to be a real physical computer system to a computer user, or to a program developed to run on a computer system. However, the virtual machine is not constrained to the physical specifications of the computer hosting the virtual machine; but rather the virtual machine is logical in nature with computing resources (e.g. virtual memory) that are determined by the system administrator responsible for defining the virtual machine.
Accordingly, a great deal of flexibility exists for the system administrator whereby the physical resources of a computing system are utilized more efficiently by defining virtual operating systems that are appropriately structured for the specific workloads of the owning enterprise. To this end, a single physical machine may host one or more virtual operating systems, each virtual operating system comprising one or more virtual machines.
A virtual machine has the further functionality of hosting a real operating system. That is, a single virtual machine may host a guest operating system creating the illusion that an operating system is running on its own physical computer. This is a very powerful concept in that it facilitates efficient software testing.
For example, several dozen departments may be concurrently testing different software products, each in the early stages of development with a high potential of encountering serious errors which would disable an entire operating system. If ail of these departments were running on a single real system, each disabling error for one software product may

bring testing to a screeching halt for all other software products being tested on the system.
In the virtual world, a disabling error brings down only the guest operating system running the failing software product. All other software testing proceeds, as they each are running on their own unique guest operating system running under a unique virtual machine.
In order to further increase the efficiency of computing systems additional flexibility evolved over time whereby a plurality of virtual machines spanning one or more virtual operating systems running on one or more physical computing systems could be defined. This facilitated an easy migration to additional computing power as the work load of an enterprise increased over time. Such a network of virtual machines is herein defined as a "virtual data center complex"
It is apparent, with a plurality of virtual machines defined over a plurality of physical computing systems, that a sophisticated performance monitoring capability will be required in order for the system administrators to properly tune the virtual data center complex on an ongoing basis. Various performance monitor programs catering to the needs of the system administrator are known in the prior art, such as IBM's RTM product shipped with IBM's Virtual Machine (VM) operating system.
However, virtual machine performance monitor products in the prior art are deficient in that they cater to the needs of the system administrator. As testing work loads have increased in large software development enterprises, it has become increasingly important that users of the virtual machines also have some performance monitoring capability. In this way, the general user (i.e. not the system administrator responsible for the overall operation of the virtual complex) has necessary tools to ensure the timely execution of his or her individual projects. For example, with adequate and timely knowledge of one virtual operating system's performance, a user may decide to target a different virtual operating system for a given work load, thereby expediting his or her individual project, as well as helping to balance the overall workload by choosing a virtual operating system with greater availability of computing resources.
Furthermore, the general user may discover that there are performance issues or problems with a given software product by detecting the change in a virtual operating system's performance statistics attendant with the

execution of the project software. Further still, by capturing performance screens during project execution, the general user may accumulate helpful documentation to share with the system administrator in those cases where the virtual data center complex is not tuned in an optimal manner for the enterprise.
Another shortcoming with prior art virtual machine performance monitors is that they are very restrictive wrth respect to receiving performance information only from previously predetermined systems. For example, if a user or administrator is currently logged on to one virtual machine residing on one physical processor, it may be necessary to logon to a second virtual machine on a different physical processor in order to gain access to the required performance information. This process of logging off of one virtual machine and logging on to a second virtual machine in order to obtain performance information is very inconvenient and impacts the productivity of users and administrators.
Accordingly, there is a great need for an enhanced remote performance monitor operable within a virtual data center complex that can facilitate the retrieval of remote performance information by the general user in a manner that is convenient, efficient, and does not jeopardize the security and integrity of the virtual data center complex.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
To overcome these limitations in the prior art briefly described supra, the present invention provides a method, computer program product and system for remotely monitoring the performance of a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex.
In one embodiment a method is described wherein performance data is received at a Remote Performance Monitor (hereinafter RPM) Server residing on a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex. The performance data is generated, and served at predefined intervals, by a Central Performance Data Server operable for the virtual operating system.
At least a portion of the performance data is saved in memory accessible to the RPM Server. Then, responsive to a request from. an RPM Client residing in an originating virtual machine withm the virtual data center complex, at least a portion of data residing m the memory is extracted by the RPM Server and served to the RPM Client.

In another embodiment, the method may further comprise generating a screen from the extracted portion of performance data and displaying the screen to a user logged on to the originating virtual machine. In still another embodiment, authorization checking is performed and, depending upon the authorization status of the user, an authorization error is returned to the user. in another embodiment still, the user may logon to a different virtual machine and retain the capability to retrieve the same performance data as the original virtual machine.
A system of the present invention is also presented for remotely monitoring the performance of a target virtual operating system within a I'irtual data center complex. The system may be embodied in software running on a single computing device or on a plurality of computing devices. The system in the disclosed embodiments substantially includes the modules and structures necessary to carry out the functions presented above with respect to the described method. More particularly, the system, in one embodiment, comprises a computing device, an RPM Client, an RPM Server and a Central Performance Data Server.
A signal bearing medium tangibly embodying a program of machine-readable instructions (or alternatively "program code") executable by a digital processing apparatus to perform operations to remotely monitor the performance of a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex. The operation of the program substantially comprises the same functions as described above with respect to the described method. More particularly, the operation of the program comprises execution of an RPM Client, an RPM Server and a Central Performance Data Server.
References throughout this specification to features, advantages, or similar language does not imply that all of the features and advantages that may be realized with the present invention should be or are in any single embodiment of the invention. Rather, language referring to the features and advantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, discussion of the features and advantages, and similar language, throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One of ordinary skill in the relevant art will recognize

that the invention may be practiced without one or more of the specific features or advantages of a particular embodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages may be recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in all embodiments of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention is described m conjunction with the appended drawings, where like reference numbers denote the same element throughout the set of drawings:
Figure 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary prior art virtual data center complex wherein the present invention may be practiced;
S'igure 2 is a block diagram xllustrat2.ng an exemplary Remote Performance Monitor in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 3 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary performance screen request;
Figure 4 is a block diagram illustrating a second exemplary performance screen request;
Figure 5 is a block diagram illustrating a third exemplary performance screen request;
Figure 6 is a flow diagram illustrating the logic flow of one embodiment of an .RPM Client;
Figure 7 is a flow diagram illustrating the logic flow of one embodiment of an E.PM Server;
Figure 8 is a flow diagram illustrating the logic flow of one embodiment of a Central Performance Data Server.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring now to Figure 1, a block diagram of a virtual data center complex is shown suitable for practicing the present invention. Virtual data center complex 100 comprises physical system PA 145 and physical system P5 150. Typically physical systems 145 and 150 are mainframe systems, such as the zSeries mainframe computer syszem. (zSeries is a

trademark of International Business Machines Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both.) However, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the reference to zSeries is exemplary and that the teachings contained herein are applicable to any physical computing systems.
Physical system PA 145 comprises virtual operating system OA 110 and virtual operating system OC 130. Virtual operating system OA 110 comprises virtual machine VA 111, virtual machine VB 112 and virtual machine VC 113. Virtual operating system OC 130 comprises virtual machine VE 131 and virtual machine VF 132. Physical system PB 150 comprises virtual operating system OB 120. Virtual operating system OB 120 comprises virtual machine VD 121;
Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the configuration represented in Figure 1 is exemplary rn nature and that an unlimited number of other configurations illustrating a plurality of processors, a plurality of virtual operating systems and a plurality of virtual machines is possible.
Also illustrated in Figure 1 are virtual machine users 115, 116, 117, 125, 135 and 136. While a particular virtual machine user may be logged onto a specific virtual machine, the user may have an interest in any number of other virtual machines or virtual operating systems within virtual data center complex 100. For example, user 135 is currently logged on to virtual machine VE 131; however user 135 may have scheduled one or more jobs to run on virtual machine VD 121. Accordingly, user 135 may have an interest in viewing information related to the performance of virtual operating system OB 120 as well as virtual operating system OC 130.
User 140 is designated as a "system user" in Figure 1. A system user refers to a user with special privileges to view and change system information within virtual data center complex 100 that is not available to the general user. The system user has special skills and training to understand complex performance data and make appropriate tuning adjustments to enhance the overall virtual data center complex performance. System user 140, as shown, is not currently logged on to any virtual machine, but typically would have access to virtual operating systems 110, 120 and 130.
Referring now to Figure 2, the block diagram of Figure 1 is further expanded to show additional components in accordance with the present

invention. Virtual operating system OA 110 comprises RPM Server SA 210 and Central Performance Data Server CA 290. Virtual operating system OB 120 comprises RPM Server SB 240 and Central Performance Data Server CB 285; and virtual operating system OC 130 comprises P.PM Server SC 260 and Central Performance Data Server CC 265.
Virtual machine VA 111 comprises software component RPM Client CA 212. In like manner, RPM Clients 222, 232, 242, 252 and 262 are shown for virtual machines 112, 113, 121, 131 and 132, respectively.
In accordance with the present invention, any RPM Client can communicate with any RPM Server within virtual data center complex 200; and, any RPM Server can communicate with any RPM Client within virtual data center complex 2 00. These communication links are not shown for simplicity, but are assumed to be present in accordance with the above statement. In accordance with the present invention, each of Central Performance Data Servers 290, 285 and 265 may communicate with RPM Server 210, 240 and 260, respectively; and each of RPM Servers 210, 240 and 260 may communicate with Central Performance Data Server 290, 285, and 265, respectively. These communication links are not shown for simplicity, but are assumed to be present in accordance with the above statement.
Referring now to Figure 3, the block diagram of Figure 2 is further expanded to illustrate a specific example of a user logged onto one virtual machine requesting performance information pertaining to a different target virtual operating system residing on a different physical machine. User 125 is logged onto virtual machine VD 121 and requests performance information pertaining to virtual operating system OC 130. For this example virtual machine VD 121 is referred to as the originating virtual machine and virtual operating system OC 130 is referred to as the target virtual operating system.
The following table illustrates, in a preferred embodiment, some exemplary types of performance information that a general user or authorized user may display by requesting a particular performance screen from an RPM client:

In a preferred embodiment, various performance screens may be requested in accordance with a user's authorization level as depicted under the column "Class" above. A designation under the class of "General/Authorized" means that a performance screen is available to the general user, however, various sub-options may be specified that would require a level of appropriate authorization before honoring the request.
Responsive to user 125 initiating a request, RPM Client CD 242 receives control and initiates communication 370, whereby RPM Server SC 260 receives control. Responsive to this communication, RPM Server SC 260 retrieves requested performance data from memory accessible to RPM Server SC 250 and returns the requested data over communication link 370 to RPM Client CD 242. RPM Client CD 242 then displays this data to user 125.
At predetermined intervals, explained in greater detail infra, RPM Server SC 260 initiates communication 371, whereby Central Perforrnance Data Server 265 receives control. Responsive to this communication. Central Performance Data Server 265 generates the requested performance data and returns the requested data over communication link 371 to RPM Server SC 260. RPM Server SC 260 retains this performance data in accessible memory to satisfy future requests from any RPM Client within virtual data center complex 300.
In a preferred embodiment, Central Performance Data Server 265 may be an existing performance server component of a virtual data center complex known in the prior art as "FCON".
Referring now to Figure 4, the block diagram of Figure 2 is further expanded to illustrate a specific example of a user logged onto one virtual machine requesting performance information pertaining to a different target virtual operating system, but residing on the same physical machine. User 115 is logged onto virtual machine VA 111 and requests performance information pertaining to virtual operating system OC 130. For this example VA 111 is referred to as the originating virtual machine and virtual operating system OC 130 is referred to as the target virtual operating system.
Responsive to user 115 initiating this request for performance information, RPM Client CA 212 receives control and initiates communication 470, whereby RPM Server SC 260 receives control. Responsive to this communication, RPM Server SC 260 retrieves requested performance data from memory accessible to RPM Server SC 260 and returns the requested

data over communication link 470 to RPM Client CA 212. RPM Client CA 212 then displays this data to user 115.
At predetermined intervals, explained in greater detail infra, RPM Server SO 260 initiates communication 471, whereby Central Performance Data Server 265 receives control. Responsive to this communication, Central Performance Data Server 265 generates the requested performance data and returns this requested data over communication link 471 to RPM Server SC 260. RPM Server SC 260 retains this performance data in accessible memory to satisfy future requests from any RPM Client within virtual data center complex 4 00.
Referring now to Figure 5, the block diagram of Figure 2 is further expanded to illustrate a specific example of a user logged onto one virtual machine requesting performance information pertaining to the target virtual operating system that comprises the requesting user's virtual machine. User 125 is logged onto virtual machine VD 121 and requests performance information pertaining to virtual operating system OB 120. For this example VD 121 is referred to as the originating virtual machine and virtual operating system OB 120 is referred to as the target virtual operating system.
Responsive to user 125 initiating this request, RPM Client CD 242 receives control and initiates communication 570, whereby RPM Server SB 240 receives control. Responsive to this communication, RPM Server SB 240 retrieves requested performance data from memory accessible to RPM Server SB 24 0 and returns the requested data over communication link 570 to RPM Client CD 242. RPM Client CD 242 then displays this data to user 125. At predetermined intervals, explained in greater detail infra, RPM Server SB 240 initiates communication 571, whereby Central Performance Data Server CB 285 receives control. Responsive to this communication. Central Performance Data Server CB 285 generates the requested performance data and returns the requested data over communication link 571 to RPM Server SB 240. RPM Server SB 240 retains this performance data in accessible memory to satisfy future requests from any RPM Client within virtual data center complex 500.
Referring now to Figure 6, flow diagram 600 teaches one embodiment of an RPM Client. Processing begins at step 605 and then, in step 610, a request for a performance screen is received from a user logged on to an originating virtual machine. Continuing with step 615, a test is made to determine if the user request identified a target virtual operating

system. If so, in step 620, the node name of the specified target virtual machine is used. Otherwise, if the user request failed to identify a target virtual operating system, then, in step 518, the node name associated with the user's originating virtual machine is defaulted as the target node name.
Continuing from either step 620 or step 618, processing resumes at step 625 where the virtual data center complex associated with the target node name is determined. In step 630, a test is made to determine if the virtual data center complex determined by step 625 is the same as the virtual data center complex associated with the user's originating virtual machine (i.e. the virtual machine that the user is logged onto). If the virtual data complex associated with the user's originating virtual machine is different than the virtual data complex associated with the target virtual machine determined in step 625, then, in step 635, processing concludes with an error condition. Otherwise, processing continues with step 645.
In step 645, a test is made to determine if the user is authorized to retrieve the requested performance screen. If not, processing concludes at step 650 with an error condition. Otherwise, processing continues at step 655 where the performance screen request is sent to the RPM server associated with the target virtual operating system.
Continuing with step 660, the requested performance screen is returned by the RPM server to the RPM client. In step 665, the performance screen is displayed to the user. In an alternative embodiment, performance information exceeding the user's authorization level is expurgated from the performance screen by the RPM client prior to displaying to the user.
If another user request is made for a performance screen, at step 670, processing returns to step 610, explained supra. Otherwise, processing concludes normally at step 675.
Referring now to Figure 7, flow diagram 700 teaches one embodiment of an RPM Server. Processing begins at step 705 and then, in step 710, initialization processing is performed to establish the presence of the RPM Server in its respective virtual operating system. In step 715 a test is made to determine if an instance of a periodic interval interrupt has occurred. If so, control passes to step 720 where P.PM Server sends a request to the Central Performance Data Server operable on the same virtual operating system as the RPM Server. Then, in step 725, the

Central Performance Data Server returns the requested performance screens to RPM Server, where they are stored in RPM Server memory for the processing of future RPM Client requests. Processing then continues with step 755, where RPM Server waits for the next work request at which time control returns to step 715 discussed supra.
Returning now to step 715, if the RPM Server request is not an interval interrupt, then processing continues with step 730 where a test is made to determine if this is an RPM Client request. if so, in step 735 an additional test is made to determine if the RPM Client request is valid. If it is not a valid request, processing is abnormally terminated at step 740, otherwise processing continues at step 737 where a test is made to determine if the user is authorized to retrieve the requested performance information. If not, processing abnormally terminates at step 740, otherwise processing continues with step 745. In step 745, the RPM Client requested performance screen is selected from RPM Server memory. Then, at step 750, the requested performance screen selected in step 745, supra, is returned to the RPM Client and processing continues at step 755, discussed supra. Returning now to step 730, if this is not an RPM Client request, then processing proceeds to step 755, discussed supra.
Referring now to Figure 8, flow diagram 800 teaches one embodiment of a Central Performance Data Server. Processing begins at step 805, and, in step 810, the Central Performance Data Server is started and initialized responsive to an administrator command. In step 815 a Lest is made to determine if an instance of a periodic interval interrupt has occurred. If so, control passes to step 820 where the Central Performance Data Server collects virtual operating system performance data for the associated virtual operating system. Then, in step 825, the Central Performance Data Server saves this performance data in memory for the processing of future user requests. Processing then continues with step 855, where Central Performance Data Server waits for the next work request at which time control returns to step 815 discussed supra.
Returning now to step 815, if the request is not an interval interrupt, then processing continues with step 830 where a test is made to determiine if this is a performance data request from a user of the services of Central Performance Data Server (e.g. an RPM Server). If so, in step 835 an additional test is made to determine if the user request is valid. If it is not a valid request, processing is abnormally terminated at step 840, otherwise processing continues at step 837 where an additional test is made to determine if the user is authorized to retrieve the requested

information. If the user is not authorized, processing terminates abnormally at step 840. Otherwise, processing continues with step 845 where the user requested performance data is retrieved from memory accessible to Central Performance Data Server. Then, at step 850, the requested performance data is returned to the user (e.g. RPM Server) who called the Central Performance Data Server service. Following step 850, control passes to step 855 where Central Performance Data Server waits for the next request and then proceeds to step 815, diSCussed supra. Returning now to step 830, if the request is not a user request for data, control passes to step 855, discussed supra.
Taken in combination, flow diagrams 600, 700 and 800 in conjunction with supporting diagrams and detailed descriptions provide for remotely monitoring the performance of a virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex by logging onto any virtual machine within that virtual data center complex. In accordance with the teaching contained herein, the general user is afforded great flexibility in efficiently acquiring needed performance information in a manner that is safe and non-disruptive to the virtual data center complex.

CLAIMS
A method for monitoring the performance of a target virtual operating system within a virtual data center complex, comprising:
receiving, at a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) Server residing on aid target virtual operating system within said virtual data center omplex, performance data, said performance data generated and served to aid RPM Server at predefined intervals by a Central Performance Data erver operable for said virtual operating system;
saving at least a portion of said performance data in a memory ccessible to said RPM Server;
responsive to a request from a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) lient residing in an originating virtual machine within said virtual data enter complex, extracting by said RPM Server at least a portion of data esiding in said memory and serving said extracted portion to said RPM lient.
The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising generating a creen comprising said extracted portion by said RPM Client and displaying said screen to a user on said originating virtual machine.
1. The method as claimed in claim 2 wherein said user has an authorization status and in accordance with said authorization status at least a portion of said extracted portion is expurgated prior to inclusion in said screen.
I. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein a user on said originating virtual machine, has an authorization status and in accordance with said authorization status said RPM Client returns an authorization error to ;aid user.
5. The method as claimed in_claim 1 wherein said originating virtual aachine runs on said target virtual operating system.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said originating virtual machine runs on a virtual operating system that is distinct from said target virtual operating system.
7. The method as claimed in claim 2 further comprising saving said displayed screen in user accessible computer memory whereby subsequent analysis is facilitated.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said Central Performance Data Server runs on said target virtual operating system.
9. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising periodically collecting, by said Central Performance Data Server, performance data associated with said target virtual operating system.
10. The method as claimed in claim 9 further comprising saving said collected performance data in memory accessible to said Central Performance Data Server.
11. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said target virtual operating system and said originating virtual machine operate on a single physical computer system.

12. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said target virtual operating system resides on a first physical computer system and said originating virtual machine resides on a second physical computer system, said first physical computer system being distinct from said second physical computer system.
13. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said virtual data center complex comprises V virtual machines, wherein V is an integer greater than 1.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein said virtual data center complex further comprises M physical computer systems and wherein M is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
15. The method as claimed in claim 2 further comprising said.user logging on to a second originating virtual machine anywhere within said virtual data center complex, wherein said generated screen is displayed to said user on said second originating virtual machine.
16. A system for monitoring the performance of a target virtual operating
system within a virtual data center complex, comprising:
a processor; and
a memory accessible to said processor storing instructions that at
least:
receive, at a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) Server residing on said target virtual operating system within said virtual data center complex, performance data, said performance data generated

and served to said RPM Server at predefined intervals by a Central Performance Data Server operable for said virtual operating system;
save at least a portion of said performance data in a memory accessible to said RPM Server; and
respond to a request from a Remote Performance Monitor (RPM) Client residing in an originating virtual machine within said virtual data center complex by extracting, by said RPM Server, at least a portion of data residing in said memory and serving said extracted portion to said RPM Client.
17. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said memory further stores instructions that generate a screen comprising said extracted portion by said RPM Client and displaying said screen to a user on said originating virtual machine.
18. The system as claimed in claim 17 wherein said user has an authorization status and in accordance with said authorization status further instructions are stored in said memory causing at least a portion of said extracted portion to be expurgated prior to inclusion in said screen.
19. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein a user on said originating virtual machine has an authorization status and in accordance with said authorization status further instructions are stored in said memory causing said RPM Client to return an authorization error to said user.
20. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said originating virtual machine runs on said target virtual operating system.
21. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said originating virtual machine runs on a virtual operating system, that is distinct from said target virtual operating system.
22. The system, as claimed in claim 17 wherein said memory further stores instructions that save said displayed screen in user accessible compurer memory whereby subsequent analysis is facilitated.
23. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said Central Performance Dara Server runs on said target virtual operating system.
24. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said memory further stores instructions that cause said Central Performance Data Server to

periodically collect performance data associated with said target virtual operating system.
25. The system as claimed in claim 24 wherein said memory further stores
instructions that save said collected performance data in a memory
accessible to said Central Performance Data Server.
26. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said target virtual
operating system and said originating virtual machine operate on a single
physical computer system.
27. The system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said target virtual
operating system resides on a first physical computer system and said
originating virtual machine resides on a second physical computer system,
said first physical computer system being distinct from said second
physical computer system.
28. The system as claimed in claim 15 wherein said virtual data center
complex comprises V virtual machines, wherein V is an integer greater than
1.
29. The system as claimed in claim 28 wherein said virtual data center complex further comprises M physical computer systems and wherein M is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
30. The system as claimed in claim 17 wherein said user logs onto a second originating virtual machine anywhere within said virtual data center complex, and wherein said generated screen is displayed to said user on said second originating virtual machine.

Documents:

http://ipindiaonline.gov.in/patentsearch/GrantedSearch/viewdoc.aspx?id=rUQD7L8LFC7X+XZBhrSSZA==&loc=egcICQiyoj82NGgGrC5ChA==

« Previous Patent

Next Patent »

Patent Number

272267

Indian Patent Application Number

3641/CHENP/2008

PG Journal Number

14/2016

Publication Date

01-Apr-2016

Grant Date

26-Mar-2016

Date of Filing

15-Jul-2008

Name of Patentee

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION

Applicant Address

ARMONK, NEW YORK 10504

Inventors:

#	Inventor's Name	Inventor's Address
1	VASILE, PHIL,	6340 SOLANO DRIVE, SAN JOSE, CA 95119

PCT International Classification Number

G06F11/34

PCT International Application Number

PCT/EP06/69148

PCT International Filing date

2006-11-30

PCT Conventions:

#	PCT Application Number	Date of Convention	Priority Country
1	11/303,826	2005-12-15	U.S.A.