Title of Invention

"APPARATUS COMPRISING A FLEXIBLE TEXTILE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THEREOF"

Abstract Apparatus comprising: a flexible textile structure configured to contain a cable, said structure comprising flexible material adjoined in such a way as to define at least one longitudinal channel, said structure being biased toward an open configuration and resiliently collapsible in a transverse direction, each channel of said structure being configured such that a cable is positioned in said channel; wherein said flexible material comprises fabric made of yarns selected from the group consisting of: glass, aramid, PVDF, melamine, ceramic, polyvinyl chloride, polyphenylene sulfide and mineral fibers including basalt, glass, carbon, and any combination thereof.
Full Text The present invention relates to apparatus comprising a flexible textile structure and method for manufacturing thereof.
Background of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to tubular conduit of the type that
might be employed for the housing of underground cables, aerial cables, intrabuilding cables,
such as fiber optic cable, coaxial cable, or the like. More particularly, the present invention
relates to a fire resistant partitioning device, which may be inserted into such a conduit such
that the conduit is divided into separate areas. Specifically, the present invention is directed
toward an elongated partitioning device which is fire resistant and flexible, such that it may
be inserted into a conduit which is already in place, which may already have at least one cable
positioned therein, and which may have turns, bends, or the like therein.
Cable, such as fiber optic communication cable, is often provided underground
in great lengths, and may even extend for many miles. It is known in the art to bury the cable
in the ground so that the area above ground is not cluttered with the cable and its respective
support apparatus. Furthermore, by positioning the cable underground, it is more protected
from the weather and other potentially damaging circumstances.
It is also known in the cable art to position the cable within a conduit in order
to more fully protect the cable in the ground. The conduit is often formed from lengths of
polyvinyl chloride tubing or the like, which is laid in the ground. A rope is then blown
through the conduit, and the rope in turn is attached to one of the communication cables. By
pulling the rope, the cable is drawn through the conduit. Once in place within the conduit, the
cable is protected from damage which may be caused by weather, water and the like.
It has been found that certain rodents will sometimes gnaw through an
underground conduit. Hence, much underground conduit is employed which has a diameter
of two inches or( more, which is large enough to impede damage from most rodents. While
such conduit provides excellent protection for communication cable, there is also much
unused or "dead" space within such a conduit. With the advent of fiber optic cables, which
maybe only a half-inch or less in diameter, there is even more dead space within an average
conduit.
When a conduit is in place, it may be subsequently desired to run a second
communications cable at the same location. As such, it would be desirable from a cost and
time standpoint to make use of the dead space within an existing conduit, rather than lay a
new length of conduit. However, it has been found that it is difficult to merely insert a
second cable into a conduit which already contains a first cable. When a rope is blown into a
conduit already containing a cable, or a second cable is "snaked" through the conduit, they are
often impeded by the first cable, making it impossible to insert the second cable.
It has been suggested to provide a divider to be inserted into a conduit in order
to separate the conduit into discrete sections, thus making insertion of the second cable easier.
A problem has been encountered in that when conduit is placed over long distances,
undulations will invariably occur therein. Also, planned curves, such as at underpasses or the
like, will often be encountered rendering the placement of known dividers therein difficult, if
not impossible.
A need exists therefore for a device to separate or partition a conduit, such as
an underground communication cable conduit, into discrete sections. The device must be
capable of being inserted into a conduit that is already in place, which may undulate over
many miles, and which may have sharp turns therein. A need also exists for a partitioning
device which will provide for improved use of the space within a conduit. Further, a need
exists for a partitioning device that may be used within buildings, and which would meet
necessary building code requirements for fire resistance, while facilitating cable placement
and maintaining installation performance.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention comprises a flexible innerduct structure configured to contain a cable within a conduit. The innerduct structure includes a pair of adjacent strip-shaped layers of flexible material that are joined along their longitudinal edges to define a channel through which the cable can extend longitudinally through the innerduct structure " between the layers. In accordance with a principal feature of the invention, the adjacent layers have differing widths between their longitudinal edges, whereby the wider layer bulges away from the narrower layer to impart an open configuration to the channel.
Other principal features of the invention relate to the material of which the innerduct structure is formed. Such features include the structure of the material, such as a woven structure, and further include properties such as melting point, tensile strength, elongation, coefficient of friction, crimp resistance, fire resistance and compression recovery.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The invention shall become apparent from the description which follows, in
view of the drawings in which:
Fig. 1 is an isometric view of a conduit insert apparatus comprising a first
embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the apparatus of Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 is an isometric showing the apparatus of Fig. 1 within a conduit;
Fig. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an apparatus comprising a second embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 5 is a partial view of an optical fiber cable used in accordance with the invention;
Fig. 6 is a schematic view of a strip of innerduct layer material constructed in accordance with the invention;
Fig. 7 schematically shows the apparatus of Fig. 4 on a test device; and
Fig. 8 is a schematic view of another strip of innerduct layer material constructed in accordance with the invention.
Description of Preferred Embodiments
Referring now to the drawings, the reference number 10 represents an insert, which may be referred to as an innerduct, to be inserted in an optical fiber cable conduit 12. As shown in Fig. 3, a single innerduct 10 is shown in a conduit 12, but it should be understood that multiple innerducts like the innerduct 10 can be inserted in a conduit 12 depending on the diameter of the conduit 12. For example, it is contemplated that three such innerducts can be inserted in a 4-inch diameter conduit providing nine channels for the insertion of fiber optic cable.
Each innerduct 10 defines of a plurality of channels 14, which are formed by interconnected layers of fabric 16, 18, 20 and 22, etc. in the first embodiment of the invention each innerduct 10 has three channels 14 formed by the above noted layers 16, 18, 20 and 22 which are interconnected at their opposite longitudinal side edge portions by having the edge portions 25 of the lower layer 16 overlap the edge portions of the other layers and, by sewing 24 or other suitable methods such as ultrasonic welding, connecting the layers 16,18,20 and 22 together.
The fabric material preferably is soft and pliable, allowing the innerduct 10 to
be pulled through the conduit 12 without snagging or generating too much heat and also is
diverse enough so that the cable in one channel 14 does not contact the cable in the next
adjacent channel 14. To this end the layers 16,18,20 and 22 in the first embodiment are
100% plain woven nylon fabrics having a 520 denier monofilament in both the warp and fill
direction woven with a pick and end count of 30 picks and 35 ends, although the pick and end
count may fall into a preferred range of 25 to 35 picks and 30 to 40 ends. Further, this
embodiment also includes a melamine cyanurate additive extruded within the yarns to impart
fire resistance. The fabric has a weight of 5.2 oz. per square yard. It is understood that the
monofilament denier can vary from 200 -1000 denier and the pick and end could well be
altered to provide the desired cover to prevent contact of the fiber optic cables.
As stated above, one preferred yarn is 520 denier nylon 6 monofilament but
another yarn, such as a 520 denier polyester, can be used so long as it has the desired
characteristics.
The innerduct 10 is preferable constructed in the following manner. The fabric
layers 16,18, 20 and 22 are initially woven in long wide shapes and are cut along the warp
direction into strips with the center strip 20 being the narrowest, the next adjacent strips 18
and 22 being wider, and the strip 16 being the widest so that when the strips 16-22 are mated
and joined at their longitudinal edge portions the channels 14 will be formed by the bulging of
the wider strips 16,18 and 22. After the strips 16,18, 20 and 22 have been cut they are laid
in between each of the adjacent strips. Then the opposite longitudinal side edge portions 25
of the lower strip 16 are folded over those of the other strips and are sewn to form the
innerduct 10 shown in Fig. 1.
The innerduct 10 may be manufactured in long lengths for insertion in
previously installed conduits 12, or may be installed in open plenum spaces, vertical or
horizontal open spaces within a building such as elevator shafts, utility spaces, and electrical
cable trays, etc. Each layer 16-22 is formed in a correspondingly long length by stitching or
otherwise joining successive strips of the fabric material together end to end. Pull lines 26,
which are preferably woven plastic or aramid tapes or plastic ropes, are tied to the optical
fiber cables (not shown) at one end and are pulled through the channels 14 by grasping and
pulling the lines 26 at the other end. The pull lines 26 are preferably placed over the layers
16,18 and 20 before the layers 16-22 are overlapped and joined at their longitudinal edge
portions.
As shown for example in Fig. 3, a single innerduct 10 is inserted in a conduit
12 having an inner diameter of 4". The strip-shaped fabric layer 20 is 3" wide, the layers 18
and 22 are 4" wide, and the layer 16 is 6" wide. The width of the narrowest layer is thus less
than the inner diameter of the conduit 12. This helps to minimize factional engagement of
the innerduct 10 with the conduit 12 when the innerduct 10 is being pulled through the
conduit 12.
The above described innerduct is readily manufactured and provides a
structure which allows optical fiber cables to be pulled through without snagging or excessive
heat build-up due to friction and does not allow contact or alternation losses between adjacent
fiber optic cables in other channels of the insert.
A flexible innerduct structure 100 comprising a second embodiment of the
invention is shown in Fig. 4. Like the innerduct structure 10 in the first embodiment, the
innerduct structure 100 in the second embodiment comprises strip-shaped layers of flexible
woven material 102, 104,106 and 108 that are joined along their longitudinal edge portions
110,112,114 and 116, respectively, by stitching 118. Each pair of adj acent layers defines a
respective cable channel 121,123 or 125. In accordance with the invention, the layers in each
pair have differing widths between their longitudinal edges such that the wider layer in the
pair bulges away from the narrower layer. This imparts open configurations to the channels
121,123 or 125.
As in the innerduct 10, the open configurations of the channels 121,123 and
125 in the innerduct 100 facilitate insertion of cables longitudinally through the channels 121,
123 and 125 by the use of respective pull lines 131,133 and 135. This is because the spacing
between the layers 102-108 helps to prevent them from being pulled along with the cables,
and thus helps to prevent bunching-up of the innerduct 100 within the conduit under the
influence of the cable and pull lines 131-135 moving longitudinally through the channels 121,
123 and 125.
As described above, the cross section of the innerduct 10 is defined by separate
strips of fabric material that are interconnected at their longitudinal edge portions to define
overlying layers 16, 18, 20 and 22. As shown in Fig. 4, the overlying layers 102,104, 106
and 108 of the innerduct 100 also are interconnected at their longitudinal edge portions, but
are defined by folded sections of a single strip 140 of fabric material. Two, three, four (Fig.
2) or more strips could be used to define overlying layers in accordance with the invention.
Each strip is one of a plurality of successive strips that are joined together end to end to
provide the innerduct with a length that may extend, for example, from three to four miles.
Fig 5 is a schematic partial view of an optical fiber cable 150 to be installed
in an innerduct constructed in accordance with the invention. The cable 150 includes a
plastic sheath 152 containing a bundle of optical fibers 154. Preferably, each layer of the
innerduct that receives the cable 150 is formed of a flexible plastic material that is specified
with reference to the plastic sheath 152 so as to have a melting temperature not lower than,
and most preferably higher than, the melting temperature of the plastic sheathing material.
This helps to ensure that sliding friction will not cause the cable 150 to burn through the
innerduct when the cable 150 is being pulled longitudinally through the innerduct. In
accordance with this feature of the invention, the innerduct layers are preferably formed of
nylon 6 so as to have a melting temperature of about 220 degrees C.
The resistance to cable burn-through can also be specified with reference to a
pull line duct cutting test substantially similar to the test known as the Bellcore pull line duct
cutting test. In accordance with this feature of the invention, the innerduct layer material is
preferably specified such that a 0.25 diameter polypropylene rope will not bum through a test
sample of the innerduct structure when pulled through the test sample at 100 feet per minute
and 450 pounds tension for at least 90 seconds.
The innerduct layer material may further be specified with reference to the
material of which the pull lines are formed. In accordance with this feature of the invention,
the layer material and the pull line material preferably have respective values of elongation
percentage that are substantially equal for a given tensile load. If elongation of the innerduct
differs substantially from that of a pull line, one of those structures may lag relative to the
other when they are pulled together through a conduit in which they are to be installed
together. The elongation percentages of the layer material and the pull line material are
preferably not greater than about 75 percent at a peak tensile load, i.e., just prior to tensile
failure, and are preferably within the range of about 15 to about 60 percent. A more preferred
range extends from about 25 to about 40 percent. For example, nylon 6 is a preferred
material and has an elongation of about 40 percent at a peak tensile load. Polyester is another
preferred material and has an elongation of about 25 percent at a peak tensile load.
Other features of the invention relate to the tensile strength of the innerduct
layer material. In an innerduct constructed in accordance with the invention, each layer
preferably has a longitudinal tensile strength of at least about 12.5 pounds per inch of width.
The longitudinal tensile strength of each layer maybe within the range of about 12.5 to about
300 pounds per inch of width, and more preferably is within the range of about 50 to about
250 pounds per inch of width. However, the longitudinal tensile strength of each layer is
most preferably within the range of about 100 to about 200 pounds per inch of width. For
example, each layer 102,104,106 and 108 in the innerduct 100 maybe formed of a woven
fabric having both warp and fill yarns formed of nylon 6, with a longitudinal tensile strength
of about 150 pounds per inch of width.
The interconnected layers should together provide the innerduct structure, as a
whole, with a longitudinal tensile strength of at least about 90 pounds, but may provide a
longitudinal tensile strength within the range of about 50 to about 5,000 pounds. A more
preferred range is from about 125 to 4,500 pounds, and a range of about 1,250 to about 4,000
pounds is most preferable.
Additional features of the invention can be described with reference to Fig. 6.
Specifically, Fig. 6 is a schematic view of a strip 160 of woven innerduct fabric material for
use in accordance with the invention. The strip has warp yarns 162 extending along its length
and has fill yarns 164 extending across its width. The fill yams 164 are flexible but have a
degree of rigidity or a resistance to crimping that helps the wider layers of the innerduct to
retain their bulged condition relative to the adjacent narrower layers, as shown for example in
Fig. 4, without being crimped or creased inward toward the adjacent narrower layers. Such
crimping or creasing is of less concern in the longitudinal direction of the layers. Therefore,
the warp yams 162 of Fig. 6 may have a crimp resistance that is less than the crimp resistance
of the fill yarns 164. Such is the case in the preferred embodiment of the strip 160 in which
the warp yarns 162 are formed of polyester, which has a first crimp resistance, and the fill
yams 164 are formed of nylon 6, which has a second, greater crimp resistance. Polyester is
preferably used for the warp yams 162 so as to minimize the elongation differential with the
pull lines, which also are preferably formed of polyester.
The crimp resistance can be expressed in terms of the crimp recovery angle.
The crimp recovery angle is a measure of the degree to which a sample of the material returns
toward a flat unfolded condition after having once been folded 180 degrees about a fold line
in accordance with AATCC method 66. For example, a particular innerduct layer material
constructed in accordance with the invention has heatset polyester warp yarns and nylon 6 fill
yarns. That material was found to have a crimp recovery angle of 70 degrees in the warp
direction and 135 degrees in the fill direction. A similar material with greige polyester rather
than heatset polyester was found to have a crimp recovery angle of 50 degrees in the warp
direction and 125 degrees in the fill direction. A material having heat set polyester yarns in
both the warp and fill directions was found to have a crimp recovery angle of 90 degrees in
the warp direction and 75 degrees in the fill direction. A similar material having only greige
nylon yarns in both the warp and fill directions is found to have a crimp recovery angle 130
degrees in the warp direction and 120 degrees in the fill direction.
The innerduct layer material should be rigid enough to resist collapsing upon
itself or bunching up under the influence of the pull lines and cables, but also should be
flexible enough to be pulled easily through rums and undulation in the duct in which it is
installed. The INDA IST90.3 test procedure is a method of determining the rigidity of the
innerduct layer material. In this procedure, a test sample of flexible material is laid out over a
slotted surface. A blade is then used to force the material through the slot. The results are
expressed in terms of the applied force. In accordance with the invention, a strip of innerduct
layer material extending longitudinally across the slot will be forced to bend along a
transversely extending fold line. Such a strip will preferably have rigidity test results within
the range of about 950 to about 1,750 grams. A strip of innerduct layer material extending
transversely across the slot will be forced to bend about a longitudinally extending fold line,
and will preferably have rigidity test results within the range of about 150 to about 750 grams.
The strip of innerduct layer material will thus have a lesser rigidity across its width. The
correspondingly greater degree of flexibility across its width helps to avoid creasing and
thereby helps the wider layers of the innerduct to retain their bulged condition relative to the
adjacent narrower layers, as described above with reference to Fig. 4. For example, the strip
160 (Fig. 6) of woven innerduct fabric material has fill yams 164 that are formed of nylon 6.
Such yarns are found to have rigidity test results within the range of about 350 to about 550
grams. The warp yarns 162 are formed of polyester. Such yarns are found to have rigidity
test results within the range of about 1,250 to about 1,450 grams.
The coefficient of friction also can be specified for the innerduct layer material
in accordance with the invention. In accordance with this feature of the invention, the
innerduct layer material preferably has a dry static coefficient of friction, based on high
density polyethylene on the material with a longitudinal line of action, within the range of
about 0.010 to about 0.500. This range is more preferably from about 0.025 to about 0.250,
and is preferably from about 0.035 to about 0.100. For example, a woven innerduct layer
having polyester warp yarns and nylon 6 fill yarns was found to have a dry static coefficient
of friction, based on high density polyethylene on the material with a longitudinal line of
action, of 0.064. A similar-material having heat set polyester warp yarns had a corresponding
coefficient of friction of 0.073. A material having heat set polyester yarns in both the warp
and fill directions had a corresponding coefficient of friction of 0.090, and a material having
nylon 6 greige yarn in both the warp and fill directions had a corresponding coefficient of
friction of 0.067. These coefficients of friction differed for transversely directed lines of
action on the four foregoing materials and were, respectively, 0.085, 0.088, 0.110, and 0.110.
The dynamic or sliding coefficients of friction for these materials, again based on high
density polyethylene on the material with a longitudinal line of action, were found to be
0.063, 0.56, 0.058, and 0.049, respectively. The transverse counterparts to these dynamic
values were 0.064, 0.067, 0.078, and 0.075, respectively. Although these tested values of
sliding coefficient of friction are most preferred, the invention comprises broader ranges such
as the range from about 0.0050 to about 0.1250, as well as an intermediate range of about
0.0075 to about 0.0625, and a narrower range of about 0.0100 to about 0.0250.
Additional features of the invention relate to the open configurations of the
channels in the innerduct structures. Preferably, in addition to the differing widths of the
adjacent layers, the invention further comprises a material property of the layers that
contributes to the open configurations of the channels defined by and between the layers.
This material property of the layers is a spring-like resilience that enables the innerduct
structure to maintain a free standing condition such as, for example, the condition in which
the innerduct structure 100 is shown in Fig. 7. When the innerduct 100 is fully flattened
against the surface 200 by an actuator 202 under the influence of an applied test force F, it
will preferably rebound fully or substantially folly to its original freestanding condition as the
force F is relieved upon retraction of the actuator 202. By "fully flattened" it is meant that the
wider layers 104, 106 and 108 are deflected toward and against the narrowest layer 102 until
the applied test force F reaches a peak level at which no further compression will occur
without damage to the innerduct 100. This fully flattened condition will include folds
between overlapping plies of the wider layers 104,106 and 108. Preferably, the innerduct
100, or another innerduct constructed in accordance with the invention, will not undergo a
next subsequent compression in the same manner under the influence of a peak applied test
force that is less than about §5 to 100 percent of the previous peak applied test force. This
indicates the correspondingly high degree to which the innerduct tends to retain an open
configuration for passage of cables through the cable channels.
Fig. 8 is a view similar to Fig. 6 showing an alternative strip 200 of innerduct
layer material constructed in accordance with the present invention. Like the strip 160 shown
in Fig. 6, the strip 200 comprises a woven structure having warp yarns 202 and fill yarns 204.
The strip 200 further comprises a barrier 206 that blocks air from flowing through the strip
200 between the warp yams 202 and the fill yarns 204. Such impervious strips enable a cable
to be blown through the innerduct structure without a loss of pneumatic pressure that could
otherwise result from the passage of air outward through layers.
impervious strips could be used to define all of the layers of the innerduct
structure, but would more preferably be used to define the outermost layers of the innerduct
structure. For example, a pair of strips like the strip 200 could be used to define the
outermost layers 16 and 22 of the innerduct structure 10 described above. A single strip like
the strip 200 could be used to define all of the layers 102-108 of the innerduct structure 100
described above. In the embodiment shown in Fig. 8, the barrier 206 is a thin layer of plastic
material that is bonded to the yarns 202 and 204 in a heat lamination process. If a plastic air
barrier like the layer 206 is included in the innerduct structure at a location facing inward of a
cable channel, it is preferably formed of a plastic material having a melting temperature that
is not less than the melting temperature of the plastic sheathing material on the cable that is to
be blown through the channel.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the flexible innerduct partitioning device may be made from fire resistant materials, particularly for use in buildings and other structures. Building codes require certain levels of fire resistance and limit levels of smoke generation for structural components, so any flexible innerduct used for such purposes would be required to meet such codes. A fire resistant flexible innerduct partitioning device may be installed within buildings., and particularly within HVAC systems, vertical and horizontal open shafts or utility spaces, such as elevator shafts, electrical cable

trays, EMT duct systems, etc. Most building installations do not require extensive lengths of cable or innerduct, and are usually pulled through less than 1000 feet. For installations of these short lengths of cable and innerducts, lubricants are generally not required. Further, it should be understood that the innerduct may be used for such applications without being installed within a pipe or duct system.
In order to provide a fire resistant flexible innerduct device, the structure described above may be manufactured in one embodiment using fabric made from fiberglass yams. In one preferred embodiment, the glass yarns are in the range of 1800 yards/lb to 22,500 yards/lb, and the fibers are woven into a plain weave structure. The fiberglass yarns may be coated with PVC or some other acceptable material, including by way of example silicone, acrylics, polyethylene or other olefins. The fiberglass fabric can be coated with binder, or the individual yarns may be coated prior to fabric formation. The coating may be used to provide protection to the brittle glass yarns, to add stability to the fabric, or to provide the necessary rigidity to the fabric to allow the chambers to be biased toward an open configuration. Alternatively, a multi-component yarn may be used, which has a glass core, wrapped with melamine, then wrapped with a fire resistant polyester. This alternative multi-component yam is considered to be a core-sheath type of yam.
In another alternate embodiment, flame resistance maybe imparted to the flexible innerduct structure by using other types of materials, including aramid fibers, melamine fibers, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) fibers, or Alurnina-Boria-Silica (ceramic) fibers.
Yet another method for imparting flame resistance to a flexible innerduct structure includes extruding yam with a fiame-retardant additive in the base polymer, such as polyester and nylon. Potential additives that may be used in such an extrusion process include mtumescent compounds including alumina trihydrate, magnesium oxides, magnesium borates; other boron containing compounds such as zinc borate, ammonium phosphate; residue forming carbonaceous materials including pentaerythritol, alkyd resins, or polyols; nitrogen containing compounds including melamine, and dicyandiamide, antimony oxides; halogenated organics, such as decabromodiphenyl oxide; phosphorous containing compounds such as ammonium phosphates; other phosphate salts, and organic phosphates. These flame retardants are commonly used in combination with each other such as a halogenated hydrocarbon system with antimony oxide (such as Dechlorane Plus®).
Still another method of imparting flame retardant to a flexible innerduct
structure is to treat the material with a flame retardant coating. Possible flame-retardants that
may be used for such a coating include the list set forth above, with or without a binder
system.
One particularly effective method of producing a fire resistant flexible
innerduct structure is to extrude Nylon 6 resin with a melamine cyanurate additive at
approximately 6% to 8% by weight. Thus, the structure of this embodiment may include a
fabric having 520 denier Nylon 6 with a 6.75% melamine cyanurate in both the warp and fill
directions, in a plain weave of preferably a 30 x 35 construction. It should be understood that
the additive may comprise from 2% to 12% by weight of the extruded yarn, preferably 4% to
10%, and more preferably 6% to 8%.
It should be understood that pull tapes also may be rendered fire resistant by using any of the methods or materials set forth above.
The invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments. Those skilled in the art will perceive improvements, changes and modifications. Such improvements, changes and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims.








WE CLAIM:
1. Apparatus comprising: a flexible textile structure configured to contain a cable, said structure comprising flexible material adjoined in such a way as to define at least one longitudinal channel, said structure being biased toward an open configuration and resiliency collapsible in a transverse direction, each channel of said structure being configured such that a cable is positioned in said channel; wherein said flexible material comprises fabric made of yarns selected from the group consisting of: glass, aramid, PVDF, melamine, ceramic, polyvinyl chloride, polyphenylene sulfide and mineral fibers including basalt, glass, carbon, and any combination thereof.
2. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said fabric is coated with material selected from the group consisting at polyvinyl chloride, silicone, acrylics, polyethylene or other olefins, and any combination thereof.
3. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said fiber yams are in the range of 40 to 2500 denier.
4. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein fabric structure is chosen from the group consisting of: woven fabric, knit fabric, laid scrim, nonwoven fabric, or any combination thereof.
5 The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said flexible material defines a plurality of longitudinal channels.
6. Apparatus comprising: a flexible structure configured to contain a cable, said structure comprising flexible material adjoined in such a way as to define at least one longitudinal channel, said structure being biased toward an open configuration and resiliently collapsible in a transverse direction, wherein each


channel of said structure is configured such that a cable is positioned in said channel; and wherein said flexible material comprises synthetic material containing a flame retardant additive.
7. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein said flame retardant additive is selected from the group consisting of: alumina trihydrate, magnesium oxides, magnesium borates, zinc borate, ammonium phosphate, pentaerythritol, alkyd resins, polyols, melamine, melamine cyanurate, dicyanodiamide, antimony oxides, halogenated organics, decabromodiphenyl oxide, ammonium phosphates, and organic phosphates and any combination thereof.
8. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein said synthetic material is selected from the group consisting of nylon, polyester, polyolefins, polypropylene and any combination thereof.
9. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein said flame retardant additive is melamine cyanurate and comprises 6% to 8% by weight of said synthetic material.
10. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein said flexible material is made from yarns having a denier range of 200 denier to 1000 denier.

11. The apparatus as claimed in claim 10, wherein said yarn is a monofilament.
12. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein said synthetic material is woven into a plain weave.
13. The apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein said plain weave is a 30 x 35 construction.

14. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein said flexible textile material defines a plurality of longitudinal channels.
15. A method for manufacturing a fire resistant flexible innerduct structure, said method comprising the steps of: providing a synthetic polymer and a fire resistant additive to an extruder; extruding said synthetic polymer and said additive to form flexible yarns; and using said flexible fibers to form a structure defining at least one longitudinal channel configured to carry a cable, said structure being biased toward an open configuration and resiliently collapsible in a transverse direction, such that a cable is positioned in said channel.
16. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein said synthetic polymer is selected from the group consisting of: nylon, polyester, polyolefins, polypropylene, and any combination thereof.
17. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein said additive is selected from the group consisting of: alumina trihydrate, magnesium oxides, magnesium borates, zinc borate, ammonium phosphate, pentaerythritol, alkyd resins, polyols, melamine, melamine cyanurate, dicyandiamide, antimony oxides, halogenated organics, decabromodiphenyl oxide, ammonium phosphates, and organic phosphates and any combination thereof.
18. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein said melamine cyanurate additive comprises about 6% to 8% of the weight of said extruded fiber.
19. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein said flexible yarns are selected from the group consisting of monofilament, multifilament, multi-component yarns, or any combination thereof.


20. Apparatus comprising: a flexible textile structure configured to contain a cable,
said structure comprising flexible material adjoined in such a way as to define at
least one longitudinal channel, said structure being biased toward an open
configuration and resiliency collapsible in a transverse direction, wherein each
channel of said structure is configured such that a cable is positioned in said
channel; and wherein said flexible material comprises fabric made of multi-
component fibers, at least one component of said multi-component fibers being
flame resistant.
21. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20, wherein said multi-component fibers are core-sheath types of fibers.
22. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20, wherein said multi-component fibers include a glass core wrapped with a layer of melamine.
23. The apparatus as claimed in claim 22, wherein said multi-component fibers further include a layer of fire resistant polyester.

Documents:

http://ipindiaonline.gov.in/patentsearch/GrantedSearch/viewdoc.aspx?id=RY8ZkNTZDfmtn9mbN3nLgQ==&loc=+mN2fYxnTC4l0fUd8W4CAA==


Patent Number 272582
Indian Patent Application Number 2642/DELNP/2004
PG Journal Number 16/2016
Publication Date 15-Apr-2016
Grant Date 11-Apr-2016
Date of Filing 09-Sep-2004
Name of Patentee MILLIKEN & COMPANY
Applicant Address 920 MILLIKEN ROAD, SPARTANBURG, SC 29303, U.S.A
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 DAVID DREW MORRIS 7 PRESWICK PARK DRIVE, NEWNAN, GA 30265, U.S.A
PCT International Classification Number G02B 6/44
PCT International Application Number PCT/US2003/08607
PCT International Filing date 2003-03-20
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 10/109,384 2002-03-28 U.S.A.