Title of Invention

A METHOD OF EXPRESSING A LIM MINERALIZATION PROTEIN IN A NON-OSSEOUS MAMMALIAN CELL"

Abstract Methods of expressing LIM mineralization protein in non-osseous mammalian cells, such as stem cells or intervertebral disc cells (e.g., cells of the annulus fibrosus, or cells of the nucleus pulposus) are described. The methods involve transfecting the cells with an isolated nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a LIM mineralization protein operably linked to a promoter. Transfection may be accomplished ex vivo or in vivo by direct injection of virus or naked DNA, or by a nonviral vector such as a plasmid. Expression of the LIM mineralization protein can stimulate proteoglycan and/or collagen production in cells capable of producing proteoglycyan and/or collagen. Methods for treating disc disease associated with trauma or disc degeneration are also described. (FIG.)1
Full Text TITLE OF THE INVENTION
A METHOD OF EXPRESSING A LIM MINERALIZATION
PROTEIN IN A NON-OSSEOUS MAMMALIAN CELL
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Serial
No. 60/331,321 filed November 14, 2001. The entirety of that provisional
application is incorporated herein by reference.
This application is related to U.S. Patent Application Serial
No. 09/124,238, filed My 29, 1988, now U.S. Patent No. 6,300,127, and U.S.
Patent Application Serial No. 09/959,578, filed April 28, 2000, pending. Each of
these applications is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
The field of the invention relates generally to methods for expressing LIM
mineralization proteins in non-osseous cells such as intervertebral disc cells or
cells of the nucleus pulposus. More specifically, the field of the invention relates
to transfecting non-osseous cells such as intervertebral disc cells with a nucleic
acid encoding a LIM mineralization protein.
Background of the Technology
Osteoblasts are thought to differentiate from pluripotent mesenchymal stem
cells. The maturation of an osteoblast results in the secretion of an extracellular
matrix which can mineralize and form bone. The regulation of this complex
process is not well understood but is thought to involve a group of signaling
glycoproteins known as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). These proteins
have been shown to be involved with embryonic dorsal-ventral patterning, limb
bud development, and fracture repair in adult animals. B. L. Hopan. Genes &
Develop., 10, 1580 (1996). This group of transforming growth factor-beta
superfamily secreted proteins has a spectrum of activities in a variety of cell types

at different stages of differentiation; differences in physiological activity between
these closely related molecules have not been clarified. D. M. Kingsley, Trends
Genet, 10, 16(1994).
To better discern the unique physiological role of different BMP signaling
proteins, we recently compared the potency of BMP-6 with that of BMP-2 and
BMP-4, for inducing rat calvarial osteoblast differentiation. Boden. et al..
Endocrinology, 137, 3401 (1996). We studied this process in first passage
(secondary) cultures of fetal rat calvaria that require BMP or glucocorticoid for
initiation of differentiation. In this model of membranous bone formation,
glucocorticoid (GC) or a BMP will initiate differentiation to mineralized bone
nodules capable of secreting osteocalcin, the osteoblast-specific protein. This
secondary culture system is distinct from primary rat osteoblast cultures which
undergo spontaneous differentiation. In this secondary system, glucocorticoid
resulted in a ten-fold induction of BMP-6 mRNA and protein expression which
was responsible for the enhancement of osteoblast differentiation. Boden. et al..
Endocrinology, 138, 2920 (1997).
In addition to extracellular signals, such as the BMPs, intracellular signals
or regulatory molecules may also play a role in the cascade of events leading to
formation of new bone. One broad class of intracellular regulatory molecules are
the LIM proteins, which are so named because they possess a characteristic
structural motif known as the LIM domain. The LIM domain is a cysteine-rich
structural motif composed of two special zinc fingers that are joined by a 2-amino
acid spacer. Some proteins have only LIM domains, while others contain a variety
of additional functional domains. LIM proteins form a diverse group, which
includes transcription factors and cytoskeletal proteins. The primary role of LIM
domains appears to be in mediating protein-protein interactions, through the
formation of dimers with identical or different LIM domains, or by binding distinct
proteins.
In LIM homeodomain proteins, that is, proteins having both LIM domains
and a homeodomain sequence, the LIM domains function as negative regulatory
elements. LIM homeodomain proteins are involved in the control of cell lineage
determination and the regulation of differentiation, although LIM-only proteins
may have similar roles. LIM-only proteins are also implicated in the control of cell
proliferation since several genes encoding such proteins are associated with
oncogenic chromosome translocations.
Humans and other mammalian species are prone to diseases or injuries that
require the processes of bone repair and/or regeneration. For example, treatment of
fractures would be improved by new treatment regimens that could stimulate the
natural bone repair mechanisms, thereby reducing the time required for the
fractured bone to heal. In another example, individuals afflicted with systemic
bone disorders, such as osteoporosis, would benefit from treatment regimens that
would results in systemic formation of new bone. Such treatment regimens would
reduce the incidence of fractures arising from the loss of bone mass that is a
characteristic of this disease.
For at least these reasons, extracellular factors, such as the BMPs, have
been investigated for the purpose of using them to stimulate formation of new bone
in vivo. Despite the early successes achieved with BMPs and other extracellular
signalling molecules, their use entails a number of disadvantages. For example,
relatively large doses of purified BMPs are required to enhance the production of
new bone, thereby increasing the expense of such treatment methods.
Furthermore, extracellular proteins are susceptible to degradation following their
introduction into a host animal. In addition, because they are typically
immunogenic, the possibility of stimulating an immune response to the
administered proteins is ever present.
Due to such concerns, it would be desirable to have available treatment
regimens that use an intracellular signaling molecule to induce new bone
formation. Advances in the field of gene therapy now make it possible to
introduce into osteogenic precursor cells, that is, cells involved in bone formation,
or peripheral blood leukocytes, nucleotide fragments encoding intracellular signals
that form part of the bone formation process. Gene therapy for bone formation
offers a number of potential advantages: (1) lower production costs; (2) greater
efficacy, compared to extracellular treatment regiments, due to the ability to
achieve prolonged expression of the intracellular signal; (3) it would by-pass the
possibility that treatment with extracellular signals might be hampered due to the
presence of limiting numbers of receptors for those signals; (4) it permits the
delivery of transfected potential osteoprogenitor cells directly to the site where
localized bone formation is required; and (5) it would permit systemic bone
formation, thereby providing a treatment regimen for osteoporosis and other
metabolic bone diseases.
In addition to diseases of the bone, humans and other mammalian species
are also subject to intervertebral disc degeneration, which is associated with,
among other things, low back pain, disc herniations, and spinal stenosis. Disc
degeneration is associated with a progressive loss of proteoglycan matrix. This
may cause the disc to be more susceptible to bio-mechanical injury and
degeneration. Accordingly, it would be desirable to have a method of stimulating
proteoglycan and/or collagen synthesis by the appropriate cells, such as, for
example, cells of the nucleous pulposus, cells of the annulus fibrosus, and cells of
the intervertebral disc.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a first aspect of the invention, a method of expressing a LIM
mineralization protein in a non-osseous mammalian cell is provided. According to
this aspect of the invention, the method comprises transfecting the cell with an
isolated nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the LIM
mineralization protein operably linked to a promoter. The cell can be a cell
capable of producing proteoglycan and/or collagen such that the expression of the
LIM mineralization protein stimulates proteoglycan and/or collagen synthesis in
the cell. The isolated nucleic acid according to this aspect of the invention can be a
nucleic acid which can hybridize under standard conditions to a nucleic acid
molecule complementary to the full length of SEQ. ID NO: 25; and/or a nucleic
acid molecule which can hybridize under highly stringent conditions to a nucleic
acid molecule complementary to the full length of SEQ. ID NO: 26. The cell can
be a stem cell, an intervertebral disc cell, a cell of the annulus fibrosus, or a cell of
the nucleus pulposus.
According to a second aspect of the invention, a non-osseous mammalian
cell comprising an isolated nucleic acid sequence encoding a LIM mineralization
protein is provided. According to this aspect of the invention, the cell can be a
stem cell, a cell of the nucleus pulposus, a cell of the annulus fibrosus, or an
intervertebral disc cell.
According to a third aspect of the invention, a method of treating
intervertebral disc injury or disease is provided. According to this aspect of the
invention, the method comprises transfecting an isolated nucleic acid into a
mammalian cell capable of producing proteoglycan and/or collagen. The isolated
nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a LIM mineralization
protein operably linked to a promoter. The LIM mineralization protein stimulates
proteoglycan and/or collagen synthesis in the cell.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, an intervertebral disc implant
is provided. According to this aspect of the invention, the implant comprises a
carrier material and a plurality of mammalian cells comprising an isolated nucleic
acid sequence encoding a LIM mineralization protein. Also according to this
aspect of the invention, the carrier material comprises a porous matrix of
biocompatible material and the mammalian cells are incorporated into the carrier
material.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACCOMPANYING THE DRAWINGS
The present invention may be better understood with reference to the
accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the production of sulfated glycosaminoglycan
(sGAG) after expression of HLMP-1 by rat intervertebral disc cells transfected
with different MOIs;
FIG. 2 is a chart showing the dose response of rat intervertebral disc cells
six days after infection with different MOI of AdHLMP-1;
FIG. 3 is a chart showing the expression of Aggrecan and BMP-2 mRNA
by AdHLMP-1 transfected rat intervertebral disc cells six days following
transfection with an MOI of 250 virions/cell;
FIG. 4A is a chart showing HLMP-1 mRNA expression 12 hours after
infection with Ad-hLMP-1 at different MOIs;
FIG. 4B is a chart showing the production of sGAG in medium from 3 to 6
days after infection;
FIG. 5 is a chart showing time course changes of the production of sGAG;
FIG. 6A is a chart showing gene response to LMP-1 over-expression in rat
annulus fibrosus cells for aggrecan
FIG. 6B is a chart showing gene response to LMP-1 over-expression in rat
annulus fibrosus cells for BMP-2;
FIG 7 is a graph showing the time course of HLMP-1 mRNA levels in rat
annulus fibrosus cells after infection with AdLMP-1 at MOI of 25;
FIG. 8 is a chart showing changes in mRNA levels of BMPs and aggrecan
in response to HLMP-1 over-expression;
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the time course of sGAG production
enhancement in response to HLMP-1 expression;
FIG. 10 is a chart showing that the LMP-1 mediated increase in sGAG
production is blocked by noggin; and
FIG. 11 is a graph showing the effect of LMP-1 on sGAG in media after
day 6 of culture in monolayer.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention relates to the transfection of non-osseous cells with
nucleic acids encoding LIM mineralization proteins. The present inventors have
discovered that transfection of non-osseous cells such as intervertebral disc cells
with nucleic acids encoding LIM mineralization proteins can result in the increased
synthesis of proteoglycan, collagen and other intervertebral disc components and
tissue. The present invention also provides a method for treating intervertebral
disc disease associated with the loss of proteoglycan, collagen, or other
intervertebral disc components.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the
following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to
provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS
BMP Bone Morphogenetic Protein
HLMP-1 Human LMP-1, also designated as Human LIM
Protein or HLMP
HLMP-ls Human LMP-1 Short (truncated) protein
HLMPU Human LIM Protein Unique Region
LMP LIM mineralization protein
MEM Minimal essential medium
Trm Triamcinolone
?-GlyP Beta-glycerolphosphate
RACE Rapid Amplification of cDN A Ends
RLMP Rat LIM mineralization protein, also designated
asRLMP-1
RLMPU Rat LIM Protein Unique Region
RNAsin RNase inhibitor
ROB Rat Osteoblast
10-4 Clone containing cDNA sequence for RLMP
(SEQIDNO:2)
UTR Untranslated Region
HLMP-2 Human LMP Splice Variant 2
HLMP-3 Human LMP Splice Variant 3
MOI multiplicity of infection
sGAG sulfated glycosaminoglycan
AdHLMP-1 Recombinant Type 5 Adenovirus comprising
nucleotide sequence encoding HLMP-1
A LIM gene (10-4/RLMP) has been isolated from stimulated rat calvarial
osteoblast cultures (SEQ. ID NO: 1, SEQ. ID NO: 2). See U.S. Patent
No. 6,300,127. This gene has been cloned, sequenced and assayed for its ability to
enhance the efficacy of bone mineralization in vitro. The protein RLMP has been
found to affect the mineralization of bone matrix as well as the differentiation of
cells into the osteoblast lineage. Unlike other known cytokines (e.g., BMPs),
RLMP is not a secreted protein, but is instead an intracellular signaling molecule.
This feature has the advantage of providing intracellular signaling amplification as
well as easier assessment of transfected cells. It is also suitable for more efficient
and specific in vivo applications. Suitable clinical applications include
enhancement of bone repair in fractures, bone defects, bone grafting, and normal
homeostasis in patients presenting with osteoporosis.
The amino acid sequence of a corresponding human protein, named human
LMP-1 ("HLMP1"), has also been cloned, sequenced and deduced. See U.S.
Patent No. 6,300,127. The human protein has been found to demonstrate enhanced
efficacy of bone mineralization in vitro and in vivo.
Additionally, a truncated (short) version of HLMP-1, termed HLMP-ls, has
been characterized. See U.S. Patent No. 6,300,127. This short version resulted
from a point mutation in one source of a cDNA clone, providing a stop codon
which truncates the protein. HLMP-ls has been found to be fully functional when
expressed in cell culture and in vivo.
Using PCR analysis of human heart cDNA library, two alternative splice
variants (referred to as HLMP-2 and HLMP-3) have been identified that differ
from HLMP-1 in a region between base pairs 325 and 444 in the nucleotide
sequence encoding HLMP-1. See U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/959,578,
filed April 28, 2000, pending. The HLMP-2 sequence has a 119 base pair deletion
and an insertion of 17 base pairs in this region. Compared to HLMP-1, the
nucleotide sequence encoding HLMP-3 has no deletions, but it does have the same
17 base pairs as HLMP-2, which are inserted at position 444 in the HLMP-1
sequence.
LMP is a pluripotent molecule, which regulates or influences a number of
biological processes. The different splice variants of LMP are expected to have
different biological functions in mammals. They may play a role in the growth,
differentiation, and/or regeneration of various tissues. For example, some form of
LMP is expressed not only in bone, but also in muscle, tendons, ligaments, spinal
cord, peripheral nerves, and cartilage.
According to one aspect, the present invention relates to a method of
stimulating proteoglycan and/or collagen synthesis in a mammalian cell by
providing an isolated nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding LIM
mineralization protein operably linked to a promoter; transfecting said isolated
nucleic acid sequence into a mammalian cell capable of producing proteoglycan;
and expressing said nucleotide sequence encoding LIM mineralization protein,
whereby proteoglycan synthesis is stimulated. The mammalian cell may be a non-
osseous cell, such as an intervertebral disc cell, a cell of the annulus fibrosus, or a
cell of the nucleus pulposus. Transfection may occur either ex vivo or in vivo by
direct injection of virus or naked DNA, such as, for example, a plasmid. In certain
embodiments, the virus is a recombinant adenovirus, preferably AdHLMP-1.
Another embodiment of the invention comprises a non-osseous mammalian
cell comprising an isolated nucleic acid sequence encoding a LIM mineralization
protein. The non-osseous mammalian cell may be a stem cell (e.g., a pluripotential
stem cell or a mesenchymal stem cell) or an intervertebral disc cell, preferably a
cell of the nucleus pulposus or a cell of the annulus fibrosus.
In a different aspect, the invention is directed to a method of expressing an
isolated nucleotide sequence encoding LIM mineralization protein in a non-
osseous mammalian cell, comprising providing an isolated nucleic acid comprising
a nucleotide sequence encoding LIM mineralization protein operably linked to a
promoter; transfecting said isolated nucleic acid sequence into a non-osseous
mammalian cell; and expressing said nucleotide sequence encoding LIM
mineralization protein. The non-osseous mammalian cell may be a stem cell or an
intervertebral disc cell (e.g., a cell of the nucleus pulposus or annulus fibrosus).
Transfection may occur either ex vivo or in vivo by direct injection of virus or
naked DNA, such as, for example, a plasmid. The virus can be a recombinant
adenovirus, preferably AdHLMP-1.
In yet another embodiment, the invention is directed to a method of treating
intervertebral disc disease by reversing, retarding or slowing disc degeneration,
comprising providing an isolated nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence
encoding LIM mineralization protein operably linked to a promoter; transfecting
said isolated nucleic acid sequence into a mammalian cell capable of producing
proteoglycan; and stimulating proteoglycan synthesis in said cell by expressing
said nucleotide sequence encoding LIM mineralization protein, whereby disc
degeneration is reversed, halted or slowed. The disc disease may involve lower
back pain, disc herniation, or spinal stenosis. The mammalian cell may be a non-
osseous cell, such as a stem cell or an intervertebral disc cell (e.g., a cell of the
annulus fibrosus, or a cell of the nucleus pulposus).
Transfection may occur either ex vivo or in vivo by direct injection of virus
or naked DNA, such as, for example, a plasmid. In certain embodiments, the virus
is a recombinant adenovirus, preferably AdHLMP-1.
The present invention relates to novel mammalian LIM proteins, herein
designated LIM mineralization proteins, or LMPs. The invention relates more
particularly to human LMP, known as HLMP or HLMP-1, or alternative splice
variants of human LMP, which are known as HLMP-2 or HLMP-3. The
Applicants have discovered that these proteins enhance bone mineralization in
mammalian cells grown in vitro. When produced in mammals, LMP also induces
bone formation in vivo.
Ex vivo transfection of bone marrow cells, osteogenic precursor cells,
peripheral blood cells, and stem cells (e.g., pluripotential stem cells or
mesenchymal stem cells) with nucleic acid that encodes a LIM mineralization
protein (e.g., LMP or HLMP), followed by reimplantation of the transfected cells
in the donor, is suitable for treating a variety of bone-related disorders or injuries.
For example, one can use this method to: augment long bone fracture repair;
generate bone in segmental defects; provide a bone graft substitute for fractures;
facilitate tumor reconstruction or spine fusion; and provide a local treatment (by
injection) for weak or osteoporotic bone, such as in osteoporosis of the hip,
vertebrae, or wrist. Transfection with LMP or HLMP-encoding nucleic acid is also
useful in: the percutaneous injection of transfected marrow cells to accelerate the
repair of fractured long bones; treatment of delayed union or non-unions of long
bone fractures or pseudoarthrosis of spine fusions; and for inducing new bone
formation in avascular necrosis of the hip or knee.
In addition to ex vivo methods of gene therapy, transfection of a
recombinant DNA vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence that encodes LMP or
HLMP can be accomplished in vivo. When a DNA fragment that encodes LMP or
HLMP is inserted into an appropriate viral vector, for example, an adenovirus
vector, the viral construct can be injected directly into a body site were
endochondral bone formation is desired. By using a direct, percutaneous injection
to introduce the LMP or HLMP sequence stimulation of bone formation can be
accomplished without the need for surgical intervention either to obtain bone
marrow cells (to transfect ex vivo) or to reimplant them into the patient at the site
where new bone is required. Alden, et al., Neurosurgical Focus (1998), have
demonstrated the utility of a direct injection method of gene therapy using a cDNA
that encodes BMP-2, which was cloned into an adenovirus vector.
It is also possible to carry out in vivo gene therapy by directly injecting into
an appropriate body site, a naked, that is, unencapsulated, recombinant plasmid
comprising a nucleic acid sequence that encodes HLMP. In this embodiment of
the invention, transfection occurs when the naked plasmid DNA is taken up, or
internalized, by the appropriate target cells, which have been described. As in the
case of in vivo gene therapy using a viral construct, direct injection of naked
plasmid DNA offers the advantage that little or no surgical intervention is required.

Direct gene therapy, using naked plasmid DNA that encodes the endothelial cell
mitogen VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), has been successfully
demonstrated in human patients. Baumeartner. et al., Circulation, 97, 12, 1114-
1123(1998).
For intervertebral disc applications, ex vivo transfection may be
accomplished by harvesting cells from an intervertebral disc, transfecting the cells
with nucleic acid encoding LMP in vitro, followed by introduction of the cells into
an intervertebral disc. The cells may be harvested from or introduced back into the
intervertebral disc using any means known to those of skill in the art, such as, for
example, any surgical techniques appropriate for use on the spine. In one
embodiment, the cells are introduced into the intervertebral disc by injection.
Also according to the invention, stem cells (e.g., pluripotential stem cells or
mesenchymal stem cells) can be transfected with nucleic acid encoding a LIM
Mineralization Protein ex vivo and introduced into the intervertebral disc (e.g., by
injection).
The cells transfected ex vivo can also be combined with a carrier to form an
intervertebral disc implant. The carrier comprising the transfected cells can then be
implanted into the intervertebral disc of a subject. Suitable carrier materials are
disclosed in Helm, et al., "Bone Graft Substitutes for the Promotion of Spinal
Arthrodesis", Neurosurg Focus, Vol. 10 (4): April 2001. The carrier preferably
comprises a biocompatible porous matrix such as a demineralized bone matrix
(DBM), a biocompatible synthetic polymer matrix or a protein matrix. Suitable
proteins include extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen. The cells
transfected with the LMP ex vivo can be incorporated into the carrier (i.e., into the
pores of the porous matrix) prior to implantation.
Similarly, for intervertebral disc applications where the cells are transfected
in vivo, the DNA may be introduced into the intevertebral disc using any suitable
method known to those of skill in the art. In one embodiment, the nucleic acid is
directly injected into the intervertebral space.
By using an adenovirus vector to deliver LMP into osteogenic cells,
transient expression of LMP is achieved. This occurs because adenovirus does not
incorporate into the genome of target cells that are transfected. Transient
expression of LMP, that is, expression that occurs during the lifetime of the
transfected target cells, is sufficient to achieve the objects of the invention. Stable
expression of LMP, however, can occur when a vector that incorporates into the
genome of the target cell is used as a delivery vehicle. Retrovirus-based vectors,
for example, are suitable for this purpose.
Stable expression of LMP is particularly useful for treating various
systemic bone-related disorders, such as osteoporosis and osteogenesis imperfecta.
For this embodiment of the invention, in addition to using a vector that integrates
into the genome of the target cell to deliver an LMP-encoding nucleotide sequence
into target cells, LMP expression can be placed under the control of a regulatable
promoter. For example, a promoter that is turned on by exposure to an exogenous
inducing agent, such as tetracycline, is suitable.
Using this approach, one can stimulate formation of new bone on a
systemic basis by administering an effective amount of the exogenous inducing
agent. Once a sufficient quantity of bone mass is achieved, administration of the
exogenous inducing agent can be discontinued. This process may be repeated as
needed to replace bone mass lost, for example, as a consequence of osteoporosis.
Antibodies specific for HLMP are particularly suitable for use in methods for
assaying the osteoinductive, that is, bone-forming, potential of patient cells. In this
way one can identify patients at risk for slow or poor healing of bone repair. Also,
HLMP-specific antibodies are suitable for use in marker assays to identify risk
factors in bone degenerative diseases, such as, for example, osteoporosis.
Following well known and conventional methods, the genes of the present
invention are prepared by ligation of nucleic acid segments that encode LMP to
other nucleic acid sequences, such as cloning and/or expression vectors. Methods
needed to construct and analyze these recombinant vectors, for example, restriction
endonuclease digests, cloning protocols, mutagenesis, organic synthesis of
oligonucleotides and DNA sequencing, have been described. For DNA sequencing
DNA, the dieoxyterminator method is the preferred.

Many treatises on recombinant DNA methods have been published,
including Sambrook. et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edition,
Cold Spring Harbor Press, (1988), Davis, et al., Basic Methods in Molecular
Biology, Elsevier (1986), and Ausubel. et al., Current Protocols in Molecular
Biology, Wiley Interscience (1988). These reference manuals are specifically
incorporated by reference herein.
Primer-directed amplification of DNA or cDNA is a common step in the
expression of the genes of this invention. It is typically performed by the
polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,800, 159
to Mullis, et al. and other published sources. The basic principle of PCR is the
exponential replication of a DNA sequence by successive cycles of primer
extension. The extension products of one primer, when hybridized to another
primer, becomes a template for the synthesis of another nucleic acid molecule. The
primer-template complexes act as substrate for DNA polymerase, which in
performing its replication function, extends the primers. The conventional enzyme
for PCR applications is the thermostable DNA polymerase isolated from Thermus
aquaticus, or Taq DNA polymerase.
Numerous variations of the basic PCR method exist, and a particular
procedure of choice in any given step needed to construct the recombinant vectors
of this invention is readily performed by a skilled artisan. For example, to measure
cellular expression of 10-4/RLMP, RNA is extracted and reverse transcribed under
standard and well known procedures. The resulting cDNA is then analyzed for the
appropriate mRNA sequence by PCR.
The gene encoding the LIM mineralization protein is expressed in an
expression vector in a recombinant expression system. Of course, the constructed
sequence need not be the same as the original, or its complimentary sequence, but
instead may be any sequence determined by the degeneracy of the DNA code that
nonetheless expresses an LMP having bone forming activity. Conservative amino
acid substitutions, or other modifications, such as the occurrence of an amino-
terminal methionine residue, may also be employed.

A ribosome binding site active in the host expression system of choice is
ligated to the 5" end of the chimeric LMP coding sequence, forming a synthetic
gene. The synthetic gene can be inserted into any one of a large variety of vectors
for expression by ligating to an appropriately linearized plasmid. A regulatable
promoter, for example, the E. coli lac promoter, is also suitable for the expression
of the chimeric coding sequences. Other suitable regulatable promoters include
trp, tac, recA, T7 and lambda promoters.
DNA encoding LMP is transfected into recipient cells by one of several
standard published procedures, for example, calcium phosphate precipitation,
DEAE-Dextran, electroporation or protoplast fusion, to form stable transformants.
Calcium phosphate precipitation is preferred, particularly when performed as
follows.
DNAs are coprecipitated with calcium phosphate according to the method
of Graham and Van Per. Virology, 52, 456 (1973), before transfer into cells. An
aliquot of 40-50 µg of DNA, with salmon sperm or calf thymus DNA as a carrier,
is used for 0.5 x 106 cells plated on a 100 mm dish. The DNA is mixed with 0.5 ml
of 2X Hepes solution (280 mM NaCl, 50 mM Hepes and 1.5 mM Na2HPO4,
pH 7.0), to which an equal volume of 2x CaCl2 (250 mM CaCl2 and 10 mM Hepes,
pH 7.0) is added. A white granular precipitate, appearing after 30-40 minutes, is
evenly distributed dropwise on the cells, which are allowed to incubate for 4-16
hours at 37°C. The medium is removed and the cells shocked with 15% glycerol
in PBS for 3 minutes. After removing the glycerol, the cells are fed with
Dulbecco"s Minimal Essential Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine
serum.
DNA can also be transfected using: the DEAE-Dextran methods of
Kimura, et al., Virology, 49:394 (1972) and Sompayrac, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 78, 7575 (1981); the electroporation method of Potter. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 81, 7161 (1984); and the protoplast fusion method of Sandri-
Goddin, et al., Molec. Cell. Biol., 1, 743 (1981).
Phosphoramidite chemistry in solid phase is the preferred method for the
organic synthesis of oligodeoxynucleotides and polydeoxynucleotides. In addition,

many other organic synthesis methods are available. Those methods are readily
adapted by those skilled in the art to the particular sequences of the invention.
The present invention also includes nucleic acid molecules that hybridize
under standard conditions to any of the nucleic acid sequences encoding the LIM
mineralization proteins of the invention. "Standard hybridization conditions" will
vary with the size of the probe, the background and the concentration of the nucleic
acid reagents, as well as the type of hybridization, for example, in situ, Southern
blot, or hybrization of DNA-RNA hybrids (Northern blot). The determination of
"standard hybridization conditions" is within the level of skill in the art. For
example, see U.S. Patent 5,580,775 to Fremeau. et al., herein incorporated by
reference for this purpose. See also. Southern. J. Mol. Biol., 98:503 (1975),
Alwine. et al., Meth. Enzymol., 68:220 (1979), and Sambrook. et al., Molecular
Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edition, Cold Spring Harbor Press, 7.19-7.50
(1989).
One preferred set of standard hybrization conditions involves a blot that is
prehybridized at 42°C for 2 hours in 50% formamide, 5X SSPE (150 nM NaCl,
10 mM Na H2PO4 [pH 7.4], 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0])l 5X Denhardt"s solution
(20 mg Ficoll, 20 mg polyvinylpyrrolidone and 20 mg BSA per 100 ml water),
10% dextran sulphate, 1% SDS and 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA. A 32P- labeled
cDNA probe is added, and hybridization is continued for 14 hours. Afterward, the
blot is washed twice with 2X SSPE, 0.1 % SDS for 20 minutes at 22°C, followed
by a 1 hour wash at 65°C in 0.1X SSPE, 0.1 %SDS. The blot is then dried and
exposed to x-ray film for 5 days in the presence of an intensifying screen.
Under "highly stringent conditions," a probe will hybridize to its target
sequence if those two sequences are substantially identical. As in the case of
standard hybridization conditions, one of skill in the art can, given the level of skill
in the art and the nature of the particular experiment, determine the conditions
under which only substantially identical sequences will hybridize.
According to one aspect of the present invention, an isolated nucleic acid
molecule comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a LIM mineralization
protein is provided. The nucleic acid molecule according to the invention can be a

molecule which hybridizes under standard conditions to a nucleic acid molecule
complementary to the full length of SEQ. ID NO: 25 and/or which hybridizes
under highly stringent conditions to a nucleic acid molecule complementary to the
full length of SEQ. ID NO: 26. More specifically, the isolated nucleic acid
molecule according to the invention can encode HLMP-1, HLMP-1s, RLMP,
HLMP-2, or HLMP-3.
Another aspect of the invention includes the proteins encoded by the
nucleic acid sequences. In still another embodiment, the invention relates to the
identification of such proteins based on anti-LMP antibodies. In this embodiment,
protein samples are prepared for Western blot analysis by lysing cells and
separating the proteins by SDS-PAGE. The proteins are transferred to
nitrocellulose by electrobloffing as described by Ausubel, et al., Current Protocols
in Molecular Biology, John Wiley and Sons (1987). After blocking the filter with
instant nonfat dry milk (1 gm in 100 ml PBS), anti-LMP antibody is added to the
filter and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The filter is washed
thoroughly with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with horseradish
peroxidase (HRPO)-antibody conjugate for 1 hour at room temperature. The filter
is again washed thoroughly with PBS and the antigen bands are identified by
adding diaminobenzidine (DAB).
Monospecific antibodies are the reagent of choice in the present invention,
and are specifically used to analyze patient cells for specific characteristics
associated with the expression of LMP. "Monospecific antibody" as used herein is
defined as a single antibody species or multiple antibody species with homogenous
binding characteristics for LMP. "Homogeneous binding" as used herein refers to
the ability of the antibody species to bind to a specific antigen or epitope, such as
those associated with LMP, as described above. Monospecific antibodies to LMP
are purified from mammalian antisera containing antibodies reactive against LMP
or are prepared as monoclonal antibodies reactive with LMP using the technique of
Kohler and Milstein. Kohler, et al., Nature. 256, 495-497 (1975). The LMP
specific antibodies are raised by immunizing animals such as, for example, mice,

rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, goats or horses, with an appropriate concentration of
LMP either with or without an immune adjuvant.
In this process, pre-immune serum is collected prior to the first
immunization. Each animal receives between about 0.1 mg and about 1000 mg of
LMP associated with an acceptable immune adjuvant, if desired. Such acceptable
adjuvants include, but are not limited to, Freund"s complete, Freund"s incomplete,
alum-precipitate, water in oil emulsion containing Corynebacterium parvum and
tRNA adjuvants. The initial immunization consists of LMP in, preferably,
Freund"s complete adjuvant injected at multiple sites either subcutaneously (SC),
intraperitoneally (IP) or both. Each animal is bled at regular intervals, preferably
weekly, to determine antibody titer. The animals may or may not receive booster
injections following the initial immunization. Those animals receiving booster
injections are generally given an equal amount of the antigen in Freund"s
incomplete adjuvant by the same route. Booster injections are given at about three
week intervals until maximal titers are obtained. At about 7 days after each
booster immunization or about weekly after a single immunization, the animals are
bled, the serum collected, and aliquots are stored at about -20°C.
Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) reactive with LMP are prepared by
immunizing inbred mice, preferably Balb/c mice, with LMP. The mice are
immunized by the IP or SC route with about 0.1 mg to about 10 mg, preferably
about 1 mg, of LMP in about 0.5 ml buffer or saline incorporated in an equal
volume of an acceptable adjuvant, as discussed above. Freund"s complete adjuvant
is preferred. The mice receive an initial immunization on day 0 and are rested for
about 3-30 weeks. Immunized mice are given one or more booster immunizations
of about 0.1 to about 10 mg of LMP in a buffer solution such as phosphate
buffered saline by the intravenous (IV) route. Lymphocytes from antibody-
positive mice, preferably splenic lymphocytes, are obtained by removing the
spleens from immunized mice by standard procedures known in the art.
Hybridoma cells are produced by mixing the splenic lymphocytes with an
appropriate fusion partner, preferably myeloma cells, under conditions which will
allow the formation of stable hybridomas. Fusion partners may include, but are not

limited to: mouse myelomas P3/NSl/Ag 4-1; MPC-11; S-194 and Sp 2/0, with Sp
2/0 being preferred. The antibody producing cells and myeloma cells are fused in
polyethylene glycol, about 1,000 mol. wt., at concentrations from about 30% to
about 50%. Fused hybridoma cells are selected by growth in hypoxanthine,
thymidine and aminopterin in supplemented Dulbecco"s Modified Eagles Medium
(DMEM) by procedures known in the art. Supernatant fluids are collected from
growth positive wells on about days 14, 18, and 21, and are screened for antibody
production by an immunoassay such as solid phase immunoradioassay (SPIRA)
using LMP as the antigen. The culture fluids are also tested in the Ouchterlony
precipitation assay to determine the isotype of the mAb. Hybridoma cells from
antibody positive wells are cloned by a technique such as the soft agar technique of
MacPherson. "Soft Agar Techniques: Tissue Culture Methods and Applications",
Kruse and Paterson (eds.), Academic Press (1973). See, also, Harlow, et al.,
Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Laboratory (1988).
Monoclonal antibodies may also be produced in vivo by injection of
pristane- primed Balb/c mice, approximately 0.5 ml per mouse, with about 2x106 to
about 6x106 hybridoma cells about 4 days after priming. Ascites fluid is collected
at approximately 8-12 days after cell transfer and the monoclonal antibodies are
purified by techniques known in the art.
In vitro production in anti-LMP mAb is carried out by growing the
hydridoma cell line in DMEM containing about 2% fetal calf serum to obtain
sufficient quantities of the specific mAb. The mAb are purified by techniques
known in the art.
Antibody titers of ascites or hybridoma culture fluids are determined by
various serological or immunological assays, which include, but are not limited to,
precipitation, passive agglutination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent antibody
(ELISA) technique and radioimmunoassay (RIA) techniques. Similar assays are
used to detect the presence of the LMP in body fluids or tissue and cell extracts.
It is readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the above described
methods for producing monospecific antibodies may be utilized to produce

antibodies specific for polypeptide fragments of LMP, full-length nascent LMP
polypeptide, or variants or alleles thereof.
In another embodiment, the invention is directed to alternative splice
variants of HLMP-1. PCR analysis of human heart cDNA revealed mRNA for two
HLMP alternative splice variants, named HLMP-2 and HLMP-3, that differ from
HLMP-1 in a region between base pairs 325 and 444 in the HLMP-1 sequence.
The HLMP-2 sequence has a 119 base pair deletion and an insertion of 17 base
pairs in this region. These changes preserve the reading frame, resulting in a 423
amino acid protein, which compared to HLMP-1, has a net loss of 34 amino acids
(40 amino acids deleted plus 6 inserted amino acids). HLMP-2 contains the c-
terminal LIM domains that are present in HLMP-1.
Compared to HLMP-1, HLMP-3 has no deletions, but it does have the same
17 base pair insertion at position 444. This insertion shifts the reading frame,
causing a stop codon at base pairs 459-461. As a result, HLMP-3 encodes a
protein of 153 amino acids. This protein lacks the c-terminal LIM domains that are
present in HLMP-1 and HLMP-2. The predicted size of the proteins encoded by
HLMP-2 and HLMP-3 was confirmed by western blot analysis.
PCR analysis of the tissue distribution of the three splice variants revealed
that they are differentially expressed, with specific isoforms predominating in
different tissues. HLMP-1 is apparently the predominant form expressed in
leukocytes, spleen, lung, placenta, and fetal liver. HLMP-2 appears to be the
predominant isoform in skeletal muscle, bone marrow, and heart tissue. HLMP-3,
however, was not the predominant isoform in any tissue examined.
Over-expression of HLMP-3 in secondary rat osteoblast cultures induced
bone nodule formation (287±56) similar to the effect seen for glucicorticoid
(272±7) and HLMP-1 (232±200). Since HLMP-3 lacks the C-terminal LIM
domains, there regions are not required for osteoinductive activity.
Over-expression of HLMP-2, however, did not induce nodule formation
(11±3). These data suggest that the amino acids encoded by the deleted 119 base
pairs are necessary for osteoinduction. The data also suggest that the distribution
of HLMP splice variants may be important for tissue-specific function.

Surprisingly, we have shown that HLMP-2 inhibits steroid-induced osteoblast
formation in secondary rat osteoblast cultures. Therefore, HLMP-2 may have
therapeutic utility in clinical situations where bone formation is not desirable.
On July 22, 1997, a sample of 10-4/RLMP in a vector designated
pCMV2/RLMP (which is vector pRc/CMV2 with insert 10-4 clone/RLMP) was
deposited with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 12301 Parklawn
Drive, Rockville, MD 20852. The culture accession number for that deposit is
209153. On March 19, 1998, a sample of the vector pHis-A with insert HLPM-ls
was deposited at the American Type Culture Collection ("ATCC"). The culture
accession number for that deposit is 209698. On April 14, 2000, samples of
plasmids pHAhLMP-2 (vector pHisA with cDNA insert derived from human heart
muscle cDNA with HLMP-2) and pHAhLMP-3 (vector pHisA with cDNA insert
derived from human heart muscle cDNA with HLMP-3) were deposited with the
ATCC, 10801 University Blvd., Manassas, VA, 20110-2209, USA, under the
conditions of the Budapest treaty. The accession numbers for these deposits are
PTA-1698 and PTA-1699, respectively. These deposits, as required by the
Budapest Treaty, will be maintained in the ATCC for at least 30 years and will be
made available to the public upon the grant of a patent disclosing them. It should
be understood that the availability of a deposit does not constitute a license to
practice the subject invention in derogation of patent rights granted by government
action.
In assessing the nucleic acids, proteins, or antibodies of the invention,
enzyme assays, protein purification, and other conventional biochemical methods
are employed. DNA and RNA are analyzed by Southern blofting and Northern
blotting techniques, respectively. Typically, the samples analyzed are size
fractionated by gel electrophoresis. The DNA or RNA in the gels are then
transferred to nitrocellulose or nylon membranes. The blots, which are replicas of
sample patterns in the gels, were then hybridized with probes. Typically, the
probes are radio-labeled, preferably with 32P , although one could label the probes
with other signal-generating molecules known to those in the art. Specific bands of
interest can then be visualized by detection systems, such as autoradiography.

For purposes of illustrating preferred embodiments of the present invention,
the following, non-limiting examples are included. These results demonstrate the
feasibility of inducing or enhancing the formation of bone using the LIM
mineralization proteins of the invention, and the isolated nucleic acid molecules
encoding those proteins.
EXAMPLE 1: Calvarial Cell Culture
Rat calvarial cells, also known as rat osteoblasts ("ROB"), were obtained
from 20-day pre-parturition rats as previously described. Boden, et al.,
Endocrinology, 137, 8, 3401-3407 (1996). Primary cultures were grown to
confluence (7 days), trypsinized, and passed into 6-well plates (1 x 105 cells/35 mm
well) as first subculture cells. The subculture cells, which were confluent at day 0,
were grown for an additional 7 days. Beginning on day 0, media were changed and
treatments (Trm and/or BMPs) were applied, under a laminar flow hood, every 3 or
4 days. The standard culture protocol was as follows: days 1-7, MEM, 10% FBS,
50 µg/ml ascorbic acid, ± stimulus; days 8-14, BGJb medium, 10% FBS, 5mM ?-
GlyP (as a source of inorganic phosphate to permit mineralization). Endpoint
analysis of bone nodule formation and osteocalcin secretion was performed at
day 14. The dose of BMP was chosen as 50 ng/ml based on pilot experiments in
this system that demonstrated a mid-range effect on the dose-response curve for all
BMPs studied.
EXAMPLE 2: Antisense Treatment And Cell Culture
To explore the potential functional role of LMP-1 during membranous bone
formation, we synthesized an antisense oligonucleotide to block LMP-1 mRNA
translation and treated secondary osteoblast cultures that were undergoing
differentiation initiated by glucocorticoid. Inhibition of RLMP expression was
accomplished with a highly specific antisense oligonucleotide (having no
significant homologies to known rat sequences) corresponding to a 25 bp sequence
spanning the putative translational start site (SEQ. ID NO: 42). Control cultures
either did not receive oligonucleotide or they received sense oligonucleotide.

Experiments were performed in the presence (preincubation) and absence of
lipofectamine. Briefly, 22 µg of sense or antisense RLMP oligonucleotide was
incubated in MEM for 45 minutes at room temperature. Following that incubation,
either more MEM or pre-incubated lipofectamine/MEM (7% v/v; incubated 45
minutes at room temperature) was added to achieve an oligonucleotide
concentration of 0.2 µM. The resulting mixture was incubated for 15 minutes at
room temperature. Oligonucleotide mixtures were then mixed with the appropriate
medium, that is, MEM/Ascorbate/±Trm, to achieve a final oligonucleotide
concentration of 0.1 µM.
Cells were incubated with the appropriate medium (±stimulus) in the
presence or absence of the appropriate oligonucleotides. Cultures originally
incubated with lipofectamine were re-fed after 4 hours of incubation (37°C; 5%
CO2) with media containing neither lipofectamine nor oligonucleotide. All
cultures, especially cultures receiving oligonucleotide, were re-fed every 24 hours
to maintain oligonucleotide levels.
LMP-1 antisense oligonucleotide inhibited mineralized nodule formation
and osteocalcin secretion in a dose-dependent manner, similar to the effect of
BMP-6 oligonucleotide. The LMP-1 antisense block in osteoblast differentiation
could not be rescued by addition of exogenous BMP-6, while the BMP-6 antisense
oligonucleotide inhibition was reversed with addition of BMP-6. This experiment
further confirmed the upstream position of LMP-1 relative to BMP-6 in the
osteoblast differentiation pathway. LMP-1 antisense oligonucleotide also inhibited
spontaneous osteoblast differentiation in primary rat osteoblast cultures.
EXAMPLE 3: Quantitation of Mineralized Bone Nodule Formation
Cultures of ROBs prepared according to Examples 1 and 2 were fixed
overnight in 70% ethanol and stained with von Kossa silver stain. A semi-
automated computerized video image analysis system was used to quantitate
nodule count and nodule area in each well. Boden, et al., Endocrinology, 137, 8,
3401-3407 (1996). These values were then divided to calculate the area per nodule
values. This automated process was validated against a manual counting technique
and demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.92 (p
expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) calculated from 5 or 6
wells at each condition. Each experiment was confirmed at least twice using cells
from different calvarial preparations.
EXAMPLE 4: Quantitation of Osteocalcin Secretion
Osteocalcin levels in the culture media were measured using a competitive
radioimmunoassay with a monospecific polygonal antibody (Pab) raised in our
laboratory against the C-terminal nonapeptide of rat osteocalcin as described in
Nanes, et al., Endocrinology. 127:588(1990). Briefly, 1 µg of nonapeptide was
iodinated with 1 mCi 125I-Na by the lactoperoxidase method. Tubes containing 200
gl of assay buffer (0.02 M sodium phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 0.001 % thimerosal,
0.025% BSA) received media taken from cell cultures or osteocalcin standards
(0 - 12,000 frnole) at 100 gl/tube in assay buffer. The Pab (1:40,000; 100 µl) was
then added, followed by the iodinated peptide (12,000 cpm; 100 µl). Samples
tested for non-specific binding were prepared similarly but contained no antibody.
Bound and free PAbs were separated by the addition of 700 µl goat
antirabbit IgG, followed by incubation for 18 hours at 4°C. After samples were
centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 45 minutes, the supernatants were decanted and the
precipitates counted in a gamma counter. Osteocalcin values were reported in
fmole/100 µl, which was then converted to pmole/ml medium (3-day production)
by dividing those values by 100. Values were expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. of
triplicate determinations for 5-6 wells for each condition. Each experiment was
confirmed at least two times using cells from different calvarial preparations.
EXAMPLE 5: Effect of Trm and RLMP on Mineralization In Vitro
There was little apparent effect of either the sense or antisense
oligonucleotides on the overall production of bone nodules in the non-stimulated
cell culture system. When ROBs were stimulated with Trm, however, the
antisense oligonucleotide to RLMP inhibited mineralization of nodules by > 95%.
The addition of exogenous BMP-6 to the oligonucleotide-treated cultures did not
rescue the mineralization of RLMP-antisense-treated nodules.

Osteocalcin has long been synonymous with bone mineralization, and
osteocalcin levels have been correlated with nodule production and mineralization.
The RLMP-antisense oligonucleotide significantly decreases osteocalcin
production, but the nodule count in antisense-treated cultures does not change
significantly. In this case, the addition of exogenous BMP-6 only rescued the
production of osteocalcin in RLMP-antisense-treated cultures by 10-15%. This
suggests that the action of RLMP is downstream of, and more specific than,
BMP-6.
EXAMPLE 6: Harvest and Purification of RNA
Cellular RNA from duplicate wells of ROBs (prepared according to
Examples 1 and 2 in 6-well culture dishes) was harvested using 4M guanidine
isothiocyanate (GIT) solution to yield statistical triplicates. Briefly, culture
supernatant was aspirated from the wells, which were then overlayed with 0.6 ml
of GIT solution per duplicate well harvest. After adding the GIT solution, the
plates were swirled for 5-10 seconds (being as consistent as possible). Samples
were saved at -70 °C for up to 7 days before further processing.
RNA was purified by a slight modification of standard methods according
to Sambrook, et al. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, Chapter 7.19, 2nd
Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Press (1989). Briefly, thawed samples received 60 µl
2.0 M sodium acetate (pH 4.0), 550 µl phenol (water saturated) and 150 µl
chlorofornrisoamyl alcohol (49:1). After vortexing, the samples were centrifuged
(10000 x g; 20 minutes; 4 °C), the aqueous phase transferred to a fresh tube, 600
ul isopropanol was added and the RNA precipitated overnight at -20°C.
Following the overnight incubation, the samples were centrifuged
(10000 x g; 20 minutes) and the supernatant was aspirated gently. The pellets were
resuspended in 400 µl DEPC-treated water, extracted once with phenol:hloroform
(1:1), extracted with chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and precipitated overnight
at -20°C after addition of 40 µl sodium acetate (3.0 M; pH 5.2) and 1.0 ml absolute
ethanol. To recover the cellular RNA, the samples were centrifuged
(10000 x g; 20 min), washed once with 70% ethanol, air dried for 5-10 minutes and

resuspended in 20 µl of DEPC-treated water. RNA concentrations were calculated
from optical densities that were determined with a spectrophotometer.
EXAMPLE 7: Reverse Transcription-Polvmerase Chain Reaction 25
Heated total RNA (5 µg in 10.5 ul total volume DEPC-H2O at 65°C for
5 minutes) was added to tubes containing 4 µl 5X MMLV-RT buffer, 2 µl dNTPs,
2 µl dT17 primer (10 pmol/ml), 0.5 µl RNAsin (40 U/ml) and 1 µl MMLV-RT
(200 units/µl). The samples were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour, then at 95°C for
5 minutes to inactivate the MMLV-RT. The samples were diluted by addition of
80 µl of water.
Reverse-transcribed samples (5 µl) were subjected to polymerase-chain
reaction using standard methodologies (50 µl total volume). Briefly, samples were
added to tubes containing water and appropriate amounts of PCR buffer, 25 mM
MgCl2, dNTPs, forward and reverse primers for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAP, a housekeeping gene) and/or BMP-6,32P-dCTP, and Taq
polymerase. Unless otherwise noted, primers were standardized to run consistently
at 22 cycles (94°C, 30"; 58°C, 30"; 72°C, 20").
EXAMPLE 8: Quantitation of RT-PCR Products bv Polvacrylamide Gel
Electrophoresis (PAGE) and PhosphorImager Analysis
RT-PCR products received 5 µl/tube loading dye, were mixed, heated at
65 °C for 10 min and centrifuged. Ten ul of each reaction was subjected to PAGE
(12% polyacrylamide:bis; 15 V/well; constant current) under standard conditions.
Gels were then incubated in gel preserving buffer (10% v/v glycerol, 7% v/v acetic
acid, 40% v/v methanol, 43% deionized water) for 30 minutes, dried (80°C) in
vacuo for 1-2 hours and developed with an electronically-enhanced
phosphoresence imaging system for 6-24 hours. Visualized bands were analyzed.
Counts per band were plotted graphically.

EXAMPLE 9: Differential Display PCR
RNA was extracted from cells stimulated with glucocorticoid (Trm, 1 nM).
Heated, DNase-treated total RNA (5 µg in 10.5 µl total volume in DEPC- H2O at
65 °C for 5 minutes) was reverse transcribed as described in Example 7, but H-T11
M (SEQ. ID. NO: 4) was used as the MMLV-RT primer. The resulting cDNAs
were PCR-amplified as described above, but with various commercial primer sets
(for example, H-T11G (SEQ. ID NO: 4) and H-AP-10 (SEQ. ID NO: 5); GenHunter
Corp, Nashville, TN). Radio-labeled PCR products were fractionated by gel
electrophoresis on a DNA sequencing gel. After electrophoresis, the resulting gels
were dried in vacuo and autoradiographs were exposed overnight. Bands
representing differentially-expressed cDNAs were excised from the gel and
reamplified by PCR using the method of Conner, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 88, 278 (1983). The products of PCR reamplification were cloned into the
vector PCR-11 (TA cloning kit; InVitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
EXAMPLE 10: Screening of a UMR 106 Rat Osteosarcoma Cell cDNA Library
A UMR 106 library (2.5 x 1010 pfu/ml) was plated at 5 x 104 pfu/ml onto
agar plates (LB bottom agar) and the plates were incubated overnight at 37°C.
Filter membranes were overlaid onto plates for two minutes. Once removed, the
filters were denatured, rinsed, dried and UV cross-linked. The filters were then
incubated in pre-hyridization buffer (2X PIPES [pH 6.5], 5% formamide, 1% SDS
and 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA) for 2 h at 42°C. A 260 base-pair
radio-labeled probe (SEQ. ID NO: 3; 32P labeled by random priming) was added to
the entire hybridization mix/filters, followed by hybridization for 18 hours at 42°C.
The membranes were washed once at room temperature (10 min, 1 x SSC, 0.1%
SDS) and three times at 55°C (15 min, 0.1 x SSC, 0.1 % SDS).
After they were washed, the membranes were analyzed by autoradiography
as described above. Positive clones were plaque purified. The procedure was
repeated with a second filter for four minutes to minimize spurious positives.
Plaque-purified clones were rescued as lambda SK(-) phagemids. Cloned cDNAs
were sequenced as described below.

EXAMPLE 11: Sequencing of Clones
Cloned cDNA inserts were sequenced by standard methods. Ausubel. et al.,
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Wiley Interscience (1988). Briefly,
appropriate concentrations of termination mixture, template and reaction mixture
were subjected to an appropriate cycling protocol (95°C, 30 s; 68°C, 30 s; 72°C,
60 s; x 25). Stop mixture was added to terminate the sequencing reactions. After
heating at 92 °C for 3 minutes, the samples were loaded onto a denaturing 6%
polyacrylamide sequencing gel (29:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide). Samples were
electrophoresed for about 4 hours at 60 volts, constant current. After
electrophoresis, the gels were dried in vacuo and autoradiographed.
The autoradiographs were analyzed manually. The resulting sequences
were screened against the databases maintained by the National Center for
Biotechnology Information (NIH, Bethesda, MD; hftp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/)
using the BLASTN program set with default parameters. Based on the sequence
data, new sequencing primers were prepared and the process was repeated until the
entire gene had been sequenced. All sequences were confirmed a minimum of
three times in both orientations.
Nucleotide and amino acid sequences were also analyzed using the
PCGENE software package (version 16.0). Percent homology values for
nucleotide sequences were calculated by the program NALIGN, using the
following parameters: weight of non-matching nucleotides, 10; weight of non-
matching gaps, 10; maximum number of nucleotides considered, 50; and minimum
number of nucleotides considered, 50.
For amino acid sequences, percent homology values were calculated using
PALIGN. A value of 10 was selected for both the open gap cost and the unit gap
cost.
EXAMPLE 12: Cloning of RLMP cDNA
The differential display PCR amplification products described in Example 9
contained a major band of approximately 260 base pairs. This sequence was used
to screen a rat osteosarcoma (UMR 106) cDNA library. Positive clones were

subjected to nested primer analysis to obtain the primer sequences necessary for
amplifying the full length cDNA. (SEQ. ID NOs: 11, 12, 29, 30 and 31). One of
those positive clones selected for further study was designated clone 10-4.
Sequence analysis of the full-length cDNA in clone 10-4, determined by
nested primer analysis, showed that clone 10-4 contained the original 260 base-pair
fragment identified by differential display PCR. Clone 10-4 (1696 base pairs;
SEQ ID NO: 2) contains an open reading frame of 1371 base pairs encoding a
protein having 457 amino acids (SEQ. ID NO: 1). The termination codon, TGA,
occurs at nucleotides 1444-1446. The polyadenylation signal at nucleotides 1675-
1680, and adjacent poly(A)+ tail, was present in the 3" noncoding region. There
were two potential N-glycosylation sites, Asn-Lys-Thr and Asn-Arg-Thr, at amino
acid positions 113-116 and 257-259 in SEQ. ID NO: 1, respectively. Two
potential cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation sites, Ser
and Thr, were found at amino acid positions 191 and 349, respectively. There were
five potential protein kinase C phosphorylation sites, Ser or Thr, at amino acid
positions 3, 115, 166, 219, 442. One potential ATP/GTP binding site motif A (P-
loop), Gly-Gly-Ser-Asn-Asn-Gly-Lys-Thr, was determined at amino acid positions
272-279.
In addition, two highly conserved putative LIM domains were found at
amino acid positions 341-391 and 400-451. The putative LIM domains in this
newly identified rat cDNA clone showed considerable homology with the LIM
domains of other known LIM proteins. However, the overall homology with other
rat LIM proteins was less than 25%. RLMP (also designated 10-4) has 78.5%
amino acid homology to the human enigma protein (see U.S. Patent
No. 5,504,192), but only 24.5% and 22.7% amino acid homology to its closest rat
homologs, CLP-36 and RIT-18, respectively.
EXAMPLE 13: Northern Blot Analysis of RLMP Expression
Thirty ug of total RNA from ROBs, prepared according to Examples 1 and
2, was size fractionated by formaldehyde gel electrophoresis in 1 % agarose flatbed
gels and osmotically transblotted to nylon membranes. The blot was probed with a

600 base pair EcoRl fragment of full-length 10-4 cDNA labeled with 32P-dCTP by
random priming.
Northern blot analysis showed a 1.7 kb mRNA species that hybridized with
the RLMP probe. RLMP mRNA was up-regulated approximately 3.7-fold in
ROBs after 24 hours exposure to BMP-6. No up-regulation of RMLP expression
was seen in BMP-2 or BMP-4-stimulated ROBs at 24 hours.
EXAMPLE 14: Statistical Methods
For each reported nodule/osteocalcin result, data from 5-6 wells from a
representative experiment were used to calculate the mean ± S.E.M. Graphs may
be shown with data normalized to the maximum value for each parameter to allow
simultaneous graphing of nodule counts, mineralized areas and osteocalcin.
For each reported RT-PCR, RNase protection assay or Western blot
analysis, data from triplicate samples of representative experiments, were used to
determine the mean ± S.E.M. Graphs may be shown normalized to either day 0 or
negative controls and expressed as fold-increase above control values.
Statistical significance was evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance
with post-hoc multiple comparison corrections of Bonferroni as appropriate.
P. V. Huntsberger, "The Analysis of Variance", Elements of Statistical Variance,
P. Billingsley (ed.), Allyn & Bacon Inc., Boston, MA, 298-330 (1977) and
SigmaStat, Jandel Scientific, Corte Madera, CA. Alpha levels for significance
were defined as p EXAMPLE 15: Detection of Rat LIM Mineralization Protein bv Western Blot
Analysis
Polyclonal antibodies were prepared according to the methods of
England, et al., Biochim.Biophys. Acta, 623, 171 (1980) and Timmer, et al., J.
Biol. Chem., 268, 24863 (1993).
HeLa cells were transfected with pCMV2/RLMP. Protein was harvested
from the transfected cells according to the method of Hair, et al., Leukemia

Research, 20, 1 (1996). Western Blot Analysis of native RLMP was performed as
described by Towbin, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76:4350 (1979).
EXAMPLE 16: Synthesis of the Rat LMP-Uniaue (RLMPU) derived Human
PCR product
Based on the sequence of the rat LMP-1 cDNA, forward and reverse PCR
primers (SEQ. ID NOS: 15 and 16) were synthesized and a unique 223 base-pair
sequence was PCR amplified from the rat LMP-1 cDNA. A similar PCR product
was isolated from human MG63 osteosarcoma cell cDNA with the same PCR
primers.
RNA was harvested from MG63 osteosarcoma cells grown in T-75 flasks.
Culture supernatant was removed by aspiration and the flasks were overlayed with
3.0 ml of GIT solution per duplicate, swirled for 5-10 seconds, and the resulting
solution was transferred to 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes (6 tubes with 0.6 ml/tube).
RNA was purified by a slight modification of standard methods, for example, see
Sambrook. et al.. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Chapter 7, page 19,
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1989) and Boden. et al.. Endocrinology,
138, 2820-2828 (1997). Briefly, the 0.6 ml samples received 60 µl 2.0 M sodium
acetate (pH 4.0), 550 ul water saturated phenol and 150 µl chloroform:isoamyl
alcohol (49:1). After addition of those reagents, the samples were vortexed,
centrifuged (10000 x g; 20 min; 4C) and the aqueous phase transferred to a fresh
tube. Isopropanol (600 µl) was added and the RNA was precipitated overnight at
-20°C. The samples were centrifuged (10000 x g; 20 minutes) and the supernatant
was aspirated gently. The pellets were resuspended in 400 µl of DEPC-treated
water, extracted once with phenolxhloroform (1:1), extracted with
chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and precipitated overnight at -20 °C in 40 ul
sodium acetate (3.0 M; pH 5.2) and 1.0 ml absolute ethanol. After precipitation,
the samples were centrifuged (10000 x g; 20 min), washed once with 70% ethanol,
air dried for 5-10 minutes and resuspended in 20 µl of DEPC-treated water. RNA
concentrations were derived from optical densities.

Total RNA (5 µg in 10.5 µl total volume in DEPC-H2O) was heated at
65 °C for 5 minutes, and then added to tubes containing 4 µl 5X MMLV-RT buffer,
2 µl dNTPS, 2 µl dT17 primer (10 pmol/ml), 0.5 µl RNAsin (40 U/ml) and 1 µl
MMLV-RT (200 units/µl). The reactions were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour.
Afterward, the MMLV-RT was inactivated by heating at 95 °C for 5 minutes. The
samples were diluted by addition of 80 µl water.
Transcribed samples (5 µl) were subjected to polymerase-chain reaction
using standard methodologies (50 µl total volume). Boden, et al., Endocrinology,
138, 2820-2828 (1997); Ausubel, et al., "Quantitation of Rare DNAs by the
Polymerase Chain Reaction", Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,
Chapter 15.31-1, Wiley & Sons, Trenton, NJ (1990). Briefly, samples were added
to tubes containing water and appropriate amounts of PCR buffer (25 mM MgCl2,
dNTPs, forward and reverse primers (for RLMPU; SEQ. ID NOS: 15 and 16),
32P-dCTP, and DNA polymerase. Primers were designed to run consistently at 22
cycles for radioactive band detection and 33 cycles for amplification of PCR
product for use as a screening probe (94°C, 30 sec, 58°C, 30 sec; 72°C, 20 sec).
Sequencing of the agarose gel-purified MG63 osteosarcoma-derived PCR
product gave a sequence more than 95% homologous to the RLMPU PCR product.
That sequence is designated HLMP unique region (HLMPU; SEQ. ID NO: 6).
EXAMPLE 17: Screening of reverse-transcriptase-derived MG63 cDNA
Screening was performed with PCR using specific primers (SEQ. ID
NOS:16 and 17) as described in Example 7. A 717 base-pair MG63 PCR product
was agarose gel purified and sequenced with the given primers (SEQ. ID NOs: 12,
15, 16, 17, 18, 27 and 28). Sequences were confirmed a minimum of two times in
both directions. The MG63 sequences were aligned against each other and then
against the full-length rat LMP cDNA sequence to obtain a partial human LMP
cDNA sequence (SEQ. ID NO: 7).

EXAMPLE 18: Screening of a Human Heart cDNA Library
Based on Northern blot experiments, it was determined that LMP-1 is
expressed at different levels by several different tissues, including human heart
muscle. A human heart cDNA library was therefore examined. The library was
plated at 5 x 104 pfu/ml onto agar plates (LB bottom agar) and plates were grown
overnight at 37°C. Filter membranes were overlaid onto the plates for two minutes.
Afterward, the filters denatured, rinsed, dried, UV cross-linked and incubated in
pre-hyridization buffer (2X PIPES [pH 6.5]; 5% formamide, 1 % SDS, 100 g/ml
denatured salmon sperm DNA) for 2 h at 42 °C. A radio-labeled, LMP-unique,
223 base-pair probe (32P, random primer labeling; SEQ ID NO: 6) was added and
hybridized for 18 h at 42 °C. Following hybridization, the membranes were
washed once at room temperature (10 min, 1 x SSC, 0.1 % SDS) and three times at
55 °C (15 min, 0.1 x SSC, 0.1 % SDS). Double-positive plaque-purified heart
library clones, identified by autoradiography, were rescued as lambda phagemids
according to the manufacturers" protocols (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
Restriction digests of positive clones yielded cDNA inserts of varying sizes.
Inserts greater than 600 base-pairs in length were selected for initial screening by
sequencing. Those inserts were sequenced by standard methods as described in
Example 11.
One clone, number 7, was also subjected to automated sequence analysis
using primers corresponding to SEQ. ID NOS: 11-14, 16 and 27. The sequences
obtained by these methods were routinely 97-100% homologous. Clone 7 (Partial
Human LMP-1 cDNA from a heart library; SEQ. ID NO: 8) contained a sequence
that was more than 87% homologous to the rat LMP cDNA sequence in the
translated region.
EXAMPLE 19: Determination of Full-Length Human LMP-1 cDNA
Overlapping regions of the MG63 human osteosarcoma cell cDNA
sequence and the human heart cDNA clone 7 sequence were used to align those
two sequences and derive a complete human cDNA sequence of 1644 base-pairs.
NALIGN, a program in the PCGENE software package, was used to align the two

sequences. The overlapping regions of the two sequences constituted
approximately 360 base-pairs having complete homology except for a single
nucleotide substitution at nucleotide 672 in the MG63 cDNA (SEQ. ID NO: 7)
with clone 7 having an "A" instead of a "G" at the corresponding nucleotide 516
(SEQ. ID NO: 8).
The two aligned sequences were joined using SEQIN, another subprogram
of PCGENE, using the "G" substitution of the MG63 osteosarcoma cDNA clone.
The resulting sequence is shown in SEQ. ID NO: 9. Alignment of the novel
human-derived sequence with the rat LMP-1 cDNA was accomplished with
NALIGN. The full-length human LMP-1 cDNA sequence (SEQ. ID NO: 9) is
87.3% homologous to the translated portion of rat LMP-1 cDNA sequence.
EXAMPLE 20: Determination of Amino Acid Sequence of Human LMP-1
The putative amino acid sequence of human LMP-1 was determined with
the PCGENE subprogram TRANSL. The open reading frame in SEQ. ID NO: 9
encodes a protein comprising 457 amino acids (SEQ. ID NO: 10). Using the
PCGENE subprogram Palign, the human LMP-1 amino acid sequence was found
to be 94.1% homologous to the rat LMP-1 amino acid sequence.
EXAMPLE 21: Determination of the 5 Prime Untranslated Region of the
Human LMP cDNA
MG63 5" cDNA was amplified by nested RT-PCR of MG63 total RNA
using a 5" rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5" RACE) protocol. This method
included first strand cDNA synthesis using a lock-docking oligo (dT) primer with
two degenerate nucleotide positions at the 3" end (Chenchik, et al.,
CLONTECHniques, X:5 (1995); Borson, et al., PC Methods Applic, 2, 144
(1993)). Second-strand synthesis is performed according to the method of
Gubler. et al.. Gene, 2, 263 (1983), with a cocktail of Escherichia coli DNA
polymerase 1, RNase H, and E. coli DNA ligase. After creation of blunt ends with
T4 DNA polymerase, double-stranded cDNA was ligated to the fragment (5"-
CTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCTCGAGCGGCCGCCCGGGCAGGT-3")

(SEQ. ID NO: 19). Prior to RACE, the adaptor-ligated cDNA was diluted to a
concentration suitable for Marathon RACE reactions (1:50). Adaptor-ligated
double-stranded cDNA was then ready to be specifically cloned.
First-round PCR was performed with the adaptor-specific oligonucleotide,
5"-CCATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC- 3" (API) (SEQ. ID NO: 20) as
sense primer and a Gene Specific Primer (GSP) from the unique region described
in Example 16 (HLMPU). The second round of PCR was performed using a
nested primers GSP1-HLMPU (antisense/reverse primer) (SEQ. ID NO: 23) and
GSP2-HLMPUF (SEQ. ID NO: 24) (see Example 16; sense/forward primer). PCR
was performed using a commercial kit (Advantage cDNA PCR core kit;
CloneTech Laboratories Inc., Palo Alto, CA) that utilizes an antibody-mediated,
but otherwise standard, hot-start protocol. PCR conditions for MG63 cDNA
included an initial hot-start denaturation (94°C, 60 sec) followed by: 94°C, 30 sec;
60°C, 30 sec; 68°C, 4 min; 30 cycles. The flrstround PCR product was
approximately 750 base-pairs in length whereas the nested PCR product was
approximately 230 base-pairs. The first-round PCR product was cloned into
linearized pCR 2.1 vector (3.9 Kb). The inserts were sequenced in both directions
using M13 Forward and Reverse primers (SEQ. ID NO: 11; SEQ. ID NO: 12).
EXAMPLE 22: Determination of Full-length Human LMP-1 cDNA with
5 Prime UTR
Overlapping MG63 human osteosarcoma cell cDNA 5"-UTR sequence
(SEQ. ID NO: 21), MG63 717 base-pair sequence (Example 17; SEQ. ID NO: 8)
and human heart cDNA clone 7 sequence (Example 18) were aligned to derive a
novel human cDNA sequence of 1704 base-pairs (SEQ. ID NO: 22). The
alignment was accomplished with NALIGN, (both PCGENE and Omiga 1.0;
Intelligenetics). Over-lapping sequences constituted nearly the entire 717 base-pair
region (Example 17) with 100% homology. Joining of the aligned sequences was
accomplished with SEQIN.

EXAMPLE 23: Construction of LIM Protein Expression Vector
The construction of pHIS-5ATG LMP-ls expression vector was carried out
with the sequences described in Examples 17 and 18. The 717 base-pair clone
(Example 17; SEQ. ID NO: 7) was digested with Clal and EcoRV. A small
fragment (-r250 base-pairs) was gel purified. Clone 7 (Example 18; SEQ. ID
NO: 8) was digested with ClaI and XbaI and a 1400 base-pair fragment was gel
purified. The isolated 250 base-pair and 1400 base-pair restriction fragments were
ligated to form a fragment of ~1650 base-pairs.
Due to the single nucleotide substitution in Clone 7 (relative to the 717
base-pair PCR sequence and the original rat sequence) a stop codon at translated
base-pair 672 resulted. Because of this stop codon, a truncated (short) protein was
encoded, hence the name LMP-ls. This was the construct used in the expression
vector (SEQ. ID NO: 32). The full length cDNA sequence with 5" UTR (SEQ. ID
NO: 33) was created by alignment of SEQ. ID NO: 32 with the 5" RACE sequence
(SEQ. ID NO: 21). The amino acid sequence of LMP-ls (SEQ. ID NO: 34) was
then deduced as a 223 amino acid protein and confirmed by Western blot (as in
Example 15) to run at the predicted molecular weight of -23.7 kD.
The pHis-ATG vector (InVitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was digested with
EcoRV and Xbal. The vector was recovered and the 650 base-pair restriction
fragment was then ligated into the linearized pHis-ATG. The ligated product was
cloned and amplified. The pHis-ATG-LMP-ls Expression vector, also designated
pHIS-A with insert HLMP-ls, was purified by standard methods.
EXAMPLE 24: Induction of Bone Nodule Formation and Mineralization In vitro
with LMP Expression Vector
Rat Calvarial cells were isolated and grown in secondary culture according
to Example 1. Cultures were either unstimulated or stimulated with glucocorticoid
(GC) as described in Example 1. A modification of the Superfect Reagent
(Qiagen, Valencia, CA) transfection protocol was used to transfect 3 µg/well of
each vector into secondary rat calvarial osteoblast cultures according to
Example 25.

Mineralized nodules were visualized by Von Kossa staining, as described in
Example 3. Human LMP-ls gene product over expression alone induced bone
nodule formation (~203 nodules/well) in vitro. Levels of nodules were
approximately 50% of those induced by the GC positive control
(~412 nodules/well). Other positive controls included the pHisA-LMP-Rat
expression vector (~152 nodules/well) and the pCMV2/LMP-Rat-Fwd Expression
vector (~206 nodules/well), whereas the negative controls included the
pCMV2/LMP-Rat-Rev. expression vector (~2 nodules/well) and untreated (NT)
plates (~4 nodules/well). These data demonstrate that the human cDNA was at
least as osteoinductive as the rat cDNA. The effect was less than that observed
with GC stimulation, most likely due to sub-optimal doses of Expression vector.
EXAMPLE 25: LMP-Induced Cell Differentiation In Vitro and In Vivo
The rat LMP cDNA in clone 10-4 (see Example 12) was excised from the
vector by double-digesting the clone with NotI and Apal overnight at 37°C.
Vector pCMV2 MCS (InVitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was digested with the same
restriction enzymes. Both the linear cDNA fragment from clone 10-4 and pCMV2
were gel purified, extracted and ligated with T4 ligase. The ligated DNA was gel
purified, extracted and used to transform E. coli JM109 cells for amplification.
Positive agar colonies were picked, digested with NotI and Apal and the restriction
digests were examined by gel electrophoresis. Stock cultures were prepared of
positive clones.
A reverse vector was prepared in analogous fashion except that the
restriction enzymes used were Xbal and Hindlll. Because these restriction
enzymes were used, the LMP cDNA fragment from clone 10-4 was inserted into
pRc/CMV2 in the reverse (that is, non-translatable) orientation. The recombinant
vector produced is designated pCMV2/RLMP.
An appropriate volume of pCMV10-4 (60 nM final concentration is optimal
[3µg]; for this experiment a range of 0-600 nM/well [0-30 µg/well] final
concentration is preferred) was resuspended in Minimal Eagle Media (MEM) to
450 µl final volume and vortexed for 10 seconds. Superfect was added (7.5 µl/ml

final solution), the solution was vortexed for 10 seconds and then incubated at
room temperature for 10 minutes. Following this incubation, MEM supplemented
with 10% FBS (1 ml/well; 6 ml/plate) was added and mixed by pipetting.
The resulting solution was then promptly pipetted (1 ml/well) onto washed
ROB cultures. The cultures were incubated for 2 hours at 37 °C in a humidified
atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Afterward, the cells were gently washed once
with sterile PBS and the appropriate normal incubation medium was added.
Results demonstrated significant bone nodule formation in all rat cell
cultures which were induced with pCMV10-4. For example, pCMV10-4
transfected cells produced 429 nodules/well. Positive control cultures, which were
exposed to Trm, produced 460 nodules/well. In contrast, negative controls, which
received no treatment, produced 1 nodule/well. Similarly, when cultures were
transfected with pCMV10-4 (reverse), no nodules were observed.
For demonstrating de novo bone formation in vivo, marrow was aspirated
from the hind limbs of 4-5 week old normal rats (rnu/+; heterozygous for recessive
athymic condition). The aspirated marrow cells were washed in alpha MEM,
centrifuged, and RBCs were lysed by resuspending the pellet in 0.83% NH4Cl in
10 mM Tris (pH 7.4). The remaining marrow cells were washed 3x with MEM and
transfected for 2 hours with 9 µg of pCMV-LMP-ls (forward or reverse
orientation) per 3 x 106 cells. The transfected cells were then washed 2X with
MEM and resuspended at a concentration of 3 x 107 cells/ml.
The cell suspension (100 µl) was applied via sterile pipette to a sterile 2x5
mm type I bovine collagen disc (Sulzer Orthopaedics, Wheat Ridge, CO). The
discs were surgically implanted subcutaneously on the skull, chest, abdomen or
dorsal spine of 4-5 week old athymic rats (rnu/rnu). The animals were scarified at
3-4 weeks, at which time the discs or surgical areas were excised and fixed in 70%
ethanol. The fixed specimens were analyzed by radiography and undecalcified
histologic examination was performed on 5 urn thick sections stained with Goldner
Trichrome. Experiments were also performed using devitalized (guanidine
extracted) demineralized bone matrix (Osteotech, Shrewsbury, NJ) in place of
collagen discs.

Radiography revealed a high level of mineralized bone formation that
conformed to the form of the original collagen disc containing LMP-ls transfected
marrow cells. No mineralized bone formation was observed in the negative control
(cells transfected with a reverse-oriented version of the LMP-ls cDNA that did not
code for a translated protein), and absorption of the carrier appeared to be well
underway.
Histology revealed new bone trabeculae lined with osteoblasts in the
LMP-ls transfected implants. No bone was seen along with partial resorption of
the carrier in the negative controls.
Radiography of a further experiment in which 18 sets (9 negative control
pCMV-LMP-REV & 9 experimental pCMV-LMP-ls) of implants were added to
sites alternating between lumbar and thoracic spine in athymic rats demonstrated
0/9 negative control implants exhibiting bone formation (spine fusion) between
vertebrae. All nine of the pCMV-LMP-ls treated implants exhibited solid bone
fusions between vertebrae.
EXAMPLE 26: The Synthesis of pHIS-5" ATG LMP-ls Expression Vector from
the sequences Demonstrated in Examples 2 and 3
The 717 base-pair clone (Example 17) was digested with Clal and EcoRV
(New England Biologicals, city, MA). A small fragment (~250 base pairs) was gel
purified. Clone No. 7 (Example 18) was digested with Clal and Xbal. A 1400
base-pair fragment was gel purified from that digest. The isolated 250 base-pair
and 1400 base-pair cDNA fragments were ligated by standard methods to form a
fragment of ~1650 bp. The pHis-A vector (InVitrogen) was digested with EcoRV
and Xbal. The linearized vector was recovered and ligated to the chimeric 1650
base-pair cDNA fragment. The ligated product was cloned and amplified by
standard methods, and the phis-A-5" ATG LMP-ls expression vector, also
denominated as the vector pHis-A with insert HLMP-ls, was deposited at the
ATCC as previously described.

EXAMPLE 27: The Induction of Bone Nodule Formation and Mineralization In
Vitro With pHis-5" ATG LMP-ls Expression Vector
Rat calvarial cells were isolated and grown in secondary culture according
to Example 1. Cultures were either unstimulated or stimulated with glucocorticoid
(GC) according to Example 1. The cultures were transfected with 3 µg of
recombinant pHis-A vector DNA/well as described in Example 25. Mineralized
nodules were visualized by Von Kossa staining according to Example 3.
Human LMP-ls gene product overexpression alone (i.e., without GC
stimulation) induced significant bone nodule formation (~203 nodules/well) in
vitro. This is approximately 50% of the amount of nodules produced by cells lo
exposed to the GC positive control (~412 nodules/well). Similar results were
obtained with cultures transfected with pHisA-LMP-Rat Expression vector (~152
nodules/well) and pCMV2/LMP-Rat-Fwd (~206 nodules/well). In contrast, the
negative control pCMV2/LMP-Rat-Rev yielded (~2 nodules/well), while
approximately 4 nodules/well were seen in the untreated plates. These data
demonstrate that the human LMP-1 cDNA was at least as osteoinductive as the rat
LMP-1 cDNA in this model system. The effect in this experiment was less than
that observed with GC stimulation; but in some the effect was comparable.
EXAMPLE 28: LMP Induces Secretion of a Soluble Osteoinductive Factor
Overexpression of RLMP-1 or HLMP-ls in rat calvarial osteoblast cultures
as described in Example 24 resulted in significantly greater nodule formation than
was observed in the negative control. To study the mechanism of action of LIM
mineralization protein conditioned medium was harvested at different time points,
concentrated to 10 X, sterile filtered, diluted to its original concentration in
medium containing fresh serum, and applied for four days to untransfected cells.
Conditioned media harvested from cells transfected with RLMP-1 or
HLMP-ls at day 4 was approximately as effective in inducing nodule formation as
direct overexpression of RLMP-1 in transfected cells. Conditioned media from
cells transfected with RLMP-1 or HLMP-1 in the reverse orientation had no
apparent effect on nodule formation. Nor did.conditioned media harvested from

LMP-1 transfected cultures before day 4 induce nodule formation. These data
suggest that expression of LMP-1 caused the synthesis and/or secretion of a soluble
factor, which did not appear in culture medium in effective amounts until 4 days
post transfection.
Since overexpression of rLMP-1 resulted in the secretion of an
osteoinductive factor into the medium, Western blot analysis was used to
determine if LMP-1 protein was present in the medium. The presence of RLMP-1
protein was assessed using antibody specific for LMP-1 (QDPDEE) and detected
by conventional means. LMP-1 protein was found only in the cell layer of the
culture and not detected in the medium.
Partial purification of the osteoinductive soluble factor was accomplished
by standard 25% and 100% ammonium sulfate cuts followed by DE-52 anion
exchange batch chromatography (100 tnM or 500 mM NAC1). All activity was
observed in the high ammonium sulfate, high NaCl fractions. Such localization is
consistent with the possibility of a single factor being responsible for conditioning
the medium.
EXAMPLE 29: Gene Therapy In Lumbar Spine Fusion Mediated by Low Dose
Adenovirus
This study determined the optimal dose of adenoviral delivery of the LMP-
1 cDNA (SEQ. ID NO: 2) to promote spine fusion in normal, that is, immune
competent, rabbits.
A replication-deficient human recombinant adenovirus was constructed
with the LMP-1 cDNA (SEQ. ID NO: 2) driven by a CMV promoter using the
Adeno-Quest™ Kit (Quantum Biotechnologies, Inc., Montreal). A commercially
available (Quantum Biotechnologies, Inc., Montreal) recombinant adenovirus
containing the beta-galactosidase gene was used as a control.
Initially, an in vitro dose response experiment was performed to determine
the optimal concentration of adenoyirus-delivered LMP-1 ("AdV-LMP-1") to
induce bone differentiation in rat calvarial osteoblast cultures using a 60-minute
transduction with a multiplicity of infection ("MOI") of 0.025, 0.25, 2.5, or 25

plaque-forming units (pfu) of virus per cell. Positive control cultures were
differentiated by a 7-day exposure to 109 M glucocorticoid ("GC"). Negative
control cultures were left untreated. On day 14, the number of mineralized bone
nodules was counted after von Kossa staining of the cultures, and the level of
osteocalcin secreted into the medium (pmol/mL) was measured by
radioimmunoassay (mean ± SEM).
The results of this experiment are shown in Table 1. Essentially no
spontaneous nodules formed in the untreated negative control cultures. The data
show that a MOI equal to 0.25 pfu/cell is most effective for osteoinducing bone
nodules, achieving a level comparable to the positive control (GC). Lower and
higher doses of adenovirus were less effective.
TABLE I

In vivo experiments were then performed to determine if the optimal in
vitro dose was capable of promoting intertransverse process spine fusions in
skeletally mature New Zealand white rabbits. Nine rabbits were anesthetized and
3 cc of bone marrow was aspirated from the distal femur through the intercondylar
notch using an 18 gauge needle. The buffy coat was then isolated, a 10-minute
transduction with AdV-LMP-1 was performed, and the cells were returned to the
operating room for implantation. Single level posterolateral lumbar spine
arthrodesis was performed with decortication of transverse processes and insertion
of carrier (either rabbit devitalized bone matrix or a collagen sponge) containing 8-
15 million autologous nucleated buffy coat cells transduced with either AdV-LMP-
1 (MOI = 0.4) or AdV-BGal (MOI = 0.4). Rabbits were euthanized after 5 weeks

and spine fusions were assessed by manual palpation, plain x-rays, CT scans, and
undecalcified histology.
The spine fusion sites that received AdV-LMP-1 induced solid, continuous
spine fusion masses in all nine rabbits. In contrast, the sites receiving AdV-BGal,
or a lower dose of AdV-LMP-1 (MOI = 0.04) made little or no bone and resulted
in spine fusion at a rate comparable to the carrier alone ( were consistent as evaluated by manual palpation, CT scan, and histology. Plain
radiographs, however, sometimes overestimated the amount of bone that was
present, especially in the control sites. LMP-1 cDNA delivery and bone induction
was successful with both of the carrier materials tested. There was no evidence of
systemic or local immune response to the adenovirus vector.
These data demonstrate consistent bone induction in a previously validated
rabbit spine fusion model which is quite challenging. Furthermore, the protocol of
using autogenous bone marrow cells with intraoperative ex vivo gene transduction
(10 minutes) is a more clinically feasible procedure than other methods that call for
overnight transduction or cell expansion for weeks in culture. In addition, the most
effective dose of recombinant adenovirus (MOI=0.25) was substantially lower than
doses reported in other gene therapy applications (MOI 40-500). We believe this is
due to the fact that LMP-1 is an intracellular signaling molecule and may have
powerful signal amplification cascades. Moreover, the observation that the same
concentration of AdV-LMP-1 that induced bone in cell culture was effective in
vivo was also surprising given the usual required increase in dose of other growth
factors when translating from cell culture to animal experiments. Taken together,
these observations indicate that local gene therapy using adenovirus to deliver the
LMP-1 cDNA is possible and the low dose required will likely minimize the
negative effects of immune response to the adenovirus vector.
EXAMPLE 30: Use of Peripheral Venous Blood Nucleated Cells rBuffv Coat) for
Gene Therapy With LMP-1 cDNA To Make Bone
In four rabbits we performed spine fusion surgery as above (Example 29)
except the transduced cells were the buffy coat from venous blood rather than bone

marrow. These cells were transfected with Adeno-LMP or pHIS-LMP plasmid and
had equivalent successful results as when bone marrow cells were used. This
discovery of using ordinary venous blood cells for gene delivery makes gene
therapy more feasible clinically since it avoids painful marrow harvest under
general anesthesia and yields two times more cells per mL of starting material.
EXAMPLE 31: Isolation of Human LMP-1 Splice Variants
Intron/Exon mRNA transcript splice variants are a relatively common
regulatory mechanism in signal-transduction and cellular/tissue development.
Splice variants of various genes have been shown to alter protein-protein, protein-
DNA, protein-RNA, and protein-substrate interactions. Splice variants may also
control tissue specificity for gene expression allowing different forms (and
therefore functions) to be expressed in various tissues. Splice variants are a
common regulatory phenomenon in cells. It is possible that the LMP splice
variants may result in effects in other tissues such as nerve regeneration, muscle
regeneration, or development of other tissues.
To screen a human heart cDNA library for splice variants of the HLMP-1
sequence, a pair of PCR primer corresponding to sections of SEQ. ID NO: 22 was
prepared. The forward PCR primer, which was synthesized using standard
techniques, corresponds to nucleotides 35-54 of SEQ. ID NO: 22. It has the
following sequence:
5" GAGCCGGCATCATGGATTCC 31 (SEQ. ID NO: 35)
The reverse PCR primer, which is the reverse complement of nucleotides
820-839 in SEQ. ID NO: 22, has the following sequence:
5" GCTGCCTGCACAATGGAGGT 3" (SEQ. ID NO: 36)
The forward and reverse PCR primers were used to screen human heart
cDNA (ClonTech, Cat No. 7404-1) for sequences similar to HLMP-1 by standard

techniques, using a cycling protocol of 94°C for 30 seconds, 64°C for 30 seconds,
and 72°C for 1 minute, repeated 30 times and followed by a 10 minute incubation
at 72°C. The amplification cDNA sequences were gel-purified and submitted to
the Emory DNA Sequence Core Facility for sequencing. The clones were
sequenced using standard techniques and the sequences were examined with
PCGENE (intelligenetics; Programs SEQUIN and NALIGN) to determine
homology to SEQ. ID NO: 22. Two homologous nucleotide sequences with
putative alternative splice sites compared to SEQ. ID NO: 22 were then translated
to their respective protein products with Intelligenetic"s program TRANSL.
One of these two novel human cDNA sequences (SEQ. ID NO: 37)
comprises 1456 bp:


CATTTCTGGG TAGGGCTGGC AATGGTTGCC TTAACCCTGG CTCCTGGCCC GAGCCTGGGC 14 40
TCCCGGGCCC TGCCCA 1456
Reading frame shifts caused by the deletion of a 119 bp fragment (between
X) and the addition of a 17 bp fragment (underlined) results in a truncated gene
product having the following derived amino acid sequence (SEQ. ID NO: 38):



This 423 amino acid protein demonstrates 100% homology to the protein
shown in SEQ. ID NO. 10, except for the sequence in the highlighted area (amino
acids 94-99), which are due to the nucleotide changes depicted above.
The second novel human heart cDNA sequence (SEQ. ID NO: 39)
comprises 1575 bp:



Reading frame shifts caused by the addition of a 17 bp fragment (bolded,
italicized and underlined) results in an early translation stop codon at position 565-
567 (underlined).
The derived amino acid sequence (SEQ. ID NO: 40) consists of 153 amino
acids:

This protein demonstrates 100% homology to SEQ. ID NO: 10 until amino
acid 94, where the addition of the 17 bp fragment depicted in the nucleotide
sequence results in a frame shift. Over amino acids 94-153, the protein is not
homologous to SEQ. ID NO: 10. Amino acids 154-457 in SEQ. ID NO: 10 are not
present due to the early stop codon depicted in nucleotide sequence.

EXAMPLE 32: Genomic HLMP-1 Nucleotide Sequence
Applicants have identified the genomic DNA sequence encoding HLMP-1,
including putative regulatory elements associated with HLMP-1 expression. The
entire genomic sequence is shown in SEQ. ID. NO: 41. This sequence was derived
from AC023788 (clone RP11-564G9), Genome Sequencing Center, Washington
University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
The putative promoter region for HLMP-1 spans nucleotides 2,660-8,733 in
SEQ. ID NO: 41. This region comprises, among other things, at least ten potential
glucocorticoid response elements ("GREs") (nucleotides 6148-6153, 6226-6231,
6247-6252, 6336-6341, 6510-6515, 6552-6557, 6727-6732, 6752-6757, 7738-
7743, and 8255-8260), twelve potential Sma-2 homologues to Mothers against
Drosophilla decapentaplegic ("SMAD") binding element sites (nucleotides 3569-
3575, 4552-4558, 4582-4588, 5226-5232, 6228-6234, 6649-6655, 6725-6731,
6930-6936, 7379-7384, 7738-7742, 8073-8079, and 8378-8384), and three TATA
boxes (nucleotides 5910-5913, 6932-6935, and 7380-7383). The three TATA
boxes, all of the GREs, and eight of the SMAD binding elements ("SBEs") are
grouped in the region spanning nucleotides 5,841-8,733 in SEQ. ID NO: 41. These
regulatory elements can be used, for example, to regulate expression of exogenous
nucleotide sequences encoding proteins involved in the process of bone formation.
This would permit systemic administration of therapeutic factors or genes relating
to bone formation and repair, as well as factors or genes associated with tissue
differentiation and development.
In addition to the putative regulatory elements, 13 exons corresponding
to the nucleotide sequence encoding HLMP-1 have been identified. These exons
span the following nucleotides in SEQ. ID NO: 41:



In HLMP-2 there is another exon (Exon 5A), which spans nucleotides
14887-14904.
EXAMPLE 33: Expression of HLMP-1 in Intervertebral Disc Cells
LIM mineralization protein-1 (LMP-1) is an intracellular protein that can
direct cellular differentiation in osseous and non-osseous tissues. This example
demonstrates that expressing human LMP-1 ("HLMP-1") in intervertebral disc
cells increases proteoglycan synthesis and promotes a more chondrocytic
phenotype. In addition, the effect of HLMP-1 expression on cellular gene
expression was demonstrated by measuring Aggrecan and BMP-2 gene expression.
Lumbar intervertebral disc cells were harvested from Sprague-Dawley rats by
gentle enzymatic digestion and cultured in monolayer in DMEM/F12
supplemented with 10% FBS. These cells were then split into 6 well plates at
approximately 200,000 cells per well and cultured for about 6 days until the cells
reached approximately 300,000 cells per well. The culture media was changed to 1
% FBS DMEM/F12 and this was considered Day 0.
Replication deficient Type 5 adenovirus comprising a HLMP-1 cDNA
operably linked to a cytomegalovirus ("CMV") promoter has been previously
described, for example, in U.S. Patent No. 6,300,127. The negative control
adenovirus was identical except the HLMP-1 cDNA was replaced by LacZ cDNA.
For a positive control, uninfected cultures were incubated in the continuous
presence of BMP-2 at a concentration of 100 nanograms/milliliter.

On Day 0, the cultures were infected with adenovirus for 30 minutes at
37°C in 300 microliters of media containing 1 % FBS. Fluorescence Activated
Cell Sorter ("FACS") analysis of cells treated with adenovirus containing the green
fluorescent protein ("GFP") gene ("AdGFP") was performed to determine the
optimal dose range for expression of transgene. The cells were treated with
adenovirus containing the human LMP-1 cDNA (AdHLMP-1) (at MOIs of 0, 100,
300,1000, or 3000) or with adenovirus containing the LacZ marker gene (AdLacZ
MOI of 1000) (negative control). The culture media was changed at day 3 and day
6 after infection.
Proteoglycan production was estimated by measuring the sulfated
glycosaminoglycans (sGAG) present in the culture media (at day 0, 3, and 6) using
a di-methyl-methylene blue ("DMMB") calorimetric assay.
For quantification of Aggrecan and BMP-2 mRNA, cells were harvested at
day 6 and the mRNA extracted by the Trizol technique. The mRNA was converted
to cDNA using reverse-transcriptase and used for real-time PCR, which allowed
the relative abundance of Aggrecan and BMP-2 message to be determined. Real
time primers were designed and tested for Aggrecan and BMP-2 in previous
experiments. The Cybergreen technique was used. Standardization curves were
used to quantitate mRNA abundance.
For transfected cells, cell morphology was documented with a light
microscope. Cells became more rounded with AdHLMP-1 (MOI 1000) treatment,
but not with AdLacZ treatment. AdLacZ infection did not significantly change cell
morphology.
FACS analysis of rat disc cells infected with ADGFP at MOI of 1000
showed the highest percentage cells infected (45%).
There was a dose dependent increase between sGAG production and
AdhLMP-1 MOI. These data are seen in FIG. 1, which shows the production of
sGAG after over-expressing HLMP-1 at different MOIs in rat disc cells in
monolayer cultures. The results have been normalized to day 0 untreated cells.
Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. As shown in FIG. 1, the sGAG
production observed at day 3 was relatively minor, indicating a lag time between

transfection and cellular production of GAG. Treatment with AdLacZ did not
significantly change the sGAG production. As also shown in FIG. 1, the optimal
dose of AdhLMP-1 was at a MOI of 1000, resulting in a 260% enhancement of
sGAG production over the untreated controls at day 6. Higher or lower doses of
AdhLMP-1 lead to a diminished response.
The effect of AdhLMP-1 dosage (MOI) on sGAG production is further
illustrated in FIG. 2. FIG. 2 is a chart showing rat disc sGAG levels at day 6 after
treatment with AdhLMP-1 at different MOIs. As can be seen from FIG. 2, the
optimal dose of AdhLMP-1 was at a MOI of 1000.
Aggrecan and BMP-2 mRNA production is seen in FIG. 3. This figure
demonstrates the increase in Aggrecan and BMP-2 mRNA after over-expression of
HLMP-1. Real-time PCR of mRNA extracted from rat disc cells at day 6 was
performed comparing the no-treatment ("NT") cells with cells treated with
ADhLMP-1 at a MOI of 250. The data in FIG. 3 are represented as a percentage
increase over the untreated sample. As illustrated in FIG. 3, a significant increase
in Aggrecan and BMP-2 mRNA was noted following AdhLMP-1 treatment. The
increase in BMP-2 expression suggests that BMP-2 is a down-stream gene that
mediates HLMP-1 stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis.
These data demonstrate that transfection with AdhLMP-1 is effective in
increasing proteoglycan synthesis of intervertebral disc cells. The dose of virus
leading to the highest transgene expression (MOI 1000) also leads to the highest
induction of sGAG, suggesting a correlation between HLMP-1 expression and
sGAG induction. These data indicate that HLMP-1 gene therapy is a method of
increasing proteoglycan synthesis in the intervertebral disc, and that HLMP-1 is a
agent for treating disc disease.
FIG. 4A is a chart showing HLMP-1 mRNA expression 12 hours after
infection with Ad-hLMP-1 at different MOIs. In FIG. 4A, exogenous LMP-1
expression was induced with different doses (MOI) of the Ad-hLMP-1 virus and
quantitated with realtime PCR. The data is normalized to HLMP-1 mRNA levels
from Ad-LMP-1 MOI 5 for comparison purposes. No HLMP-1 was detected in
negative control groups, the no-treatment ("NT") or Ad-LacZ treatment ("LacZ").

HLMP-1 mRNA levels in a dose dependent fashion to reach a plateau of
approximately 8 fold with a MOI of 25 and 50.
FIG. 4B is a chart showing the production of sGAG in medium from 3 to 6
days after infection. DMMB assay was used to quantitate total sGAG production
between days 3 to 6 after infection. The data in FIG. 4B is normalized to the
control (i.e., no treatment) group. As can be seen from FIG. 4B, there was a dose
dependent increase in sGAG. with the peak of approximately three fold increase
above control reached with a MOI of 25 and 50. The negative control, Ad-LacZ at
a MOI of 25, lead to no increase in sGAG. In FIG. 4B, each result is expressed as
mean with SD for three samples.
FIG. 5 is a chart showing time course changes of the production of sGAG.
As can be seen from FIG. 5, on day 3 sGAG production increased significantly at a
MOI of 25 and 50. On day 6 there was a dose dependent increase in sGAG
production in response to AdLMP-1. The plateau level of sGAG increase was
achieved at a MOI of 25. As can also be seen from FIG. 5, treatment with AdLacZ
("LacZ") did not significantly change the sGAG production. Each result is
expressed as mean with SD for six to nine samples. In FIG. 5, "**" indicates data
points for which the P value is FIGS. 6A and 6B are charts showing gene response to LMP-1 over-
expression in rat annulus fibrosus cells for aggrecan and BMP-2, respectively.
Quantitative realtime PCR was performed on day 3 after infection with Ad-LMP-1
("LMP-1") at a MOI of 25. As can be seen from FIGS. 6A and 6B, the gene
expression of aggrecan and BMP-2 increased significantly after infection with Ad-
LMP-1 compared to the untreated control ("NT"). Further, treatment with AdLacZ
("LacZ") at a MOI of 25 did not significantly change the gene expression of either
aggrecan or BMP-2 compared to the untreated control. In FIGS. 6A and 6B, each
result is expressed as mean with SD for six samples. In FIGS. 6A and 6B, "**"
indicates data points for which the P value is P FIG. 7 is a graph showing the time course of HLMP-1 mRNA levels in rat
annulus fibrosus cells after infection with AdLMP-1 at a MOI of 25. The data is
expressed as a fold increase above a MOI of 5 of AdLMP-1 after standardization

using 18S and replication coefficient of over-expression LMP-1 primer. As can be
seen from FIG 7, HLMP-1 mRNA was upregulated significantly as early as 12
hours after infection. Further, there was a marked increase of expression levels
between day 1 and day 3. Each result in FIG 7 is expressed as mean with SD for
six samples.
FIG 8 is a chart showing changes in mRNA levels of BMPs and aggrecan
in response to HLMP-1 over-expression. The mRNA levels of BMP-2, BMP-4,
BMP-6, BMP7, and aggrecan were determined with realtime-PCR at different time
points after infection with Ad-hLMP-1 at a MOI of 25. As can be seen from
FIG 8, BMP-2 mRNA was upregulated significantly as early as 12 hours after
infection with AdLMP-1. On the other hand, Aggrecan mRNA was not
upregulated until 3 day after infection. Each result is expressed as mean with SD
for six samples. In FIG. 8, "**" indicates data points for which the P value is 0.01 for infection with AdLMP-1 versus an untreated control.
FIG 9 is a graph showing the time course of sGAG production
enhancement in response to HLMP-1 expression. For the data in FIG 9, rat
annulus cells were infected with Ad-hLMP-1 at a MOI of 25. The media was
changed every three days after infection and assayed for sGAG with the DMMB
assay. This data shows that sGAG production reaches a plateau at day 6 and is
substantially maintained at day 9.
FIG. 10 is a chart showing the effect of noggin (a BMP antagonist) on
LMP-1 mediated increase in sGAG production. As seen in FIG. 10, infection of rat
annulus cells with Ad-LMP-1 at a MOI of 25 led to a three fold increase in sGAG
produced between day 3 and day 6. This increase was blocked by the addition of
noggin (a BMP antagonist) at concentration of 3200 ng/ml and 800 ng/m. As
shown in FIG. 10, however, noggin did not significantly alter sGAG production in
uninfected cells. As can also be seen in FIG. 10, stimulation with rhBMP-2 at 100
ng/ml led to a 3 fold increase in sGAG production between day 3 and day 6 after
addition of BMP-2. Noggin at 800 ng/ml also blocked this increase.
FIG. 11 is a chart showing the effect of LMP-1 on sGAG in media after day
6 of culture in monolayer. The data points are represented as fold increase above

untreated cells. As shown in FIG. 11, LMP-1 with the CMV promoter when
delivered by the AAV vector is also effective in stimulating glycosaminoglycan
synthesis by rat disc cells in monolayer.
TABLE 2: Primer Sequences for RT-PCR & Real-time PCR of SYBR Green


TaqMan® Ribosomal RNA Control Reagents (Part number 4308329, Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, CA, U.S.A.) were used for the forward primer, reverse
primer and probe of 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene.
All cited publications and patents are hereby incorporated by reference in
their entirety.
While the foregoing specification teaches the principles of the present
invention, with examples provided for the purpose of illustration, it will be
appreciated by one skilled in the art from reading this disclosure that various
changes in form and detail can be made without departing from the true scope of
the invention.

WE CLAIM:
1. A method of expressing a LIM mineralization protein in a non-osseous
mammalian cell, comprising:
transferring the cell with an isolated nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide
sequence encoding the LIM mineralization protein operably linked to a promoter.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the cell is capable of producing
proteoglycan and/or collagen and wherein expression of the LIM mineralization protein
stimulates proteoglycan and/or collagen synthesis in the cell.
3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the isolated nucleic acid :
hybridizes under standard conditions to a nucleic acid molecule complementary to
the full length of SEQ. ID NO: 25; and/or
hybridizes under highly stringent conditions to a nucleic acid molecule
complementary to the full length of SEQ. ID NO: 26.
4. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the cell is a stem cell, an intervertebral
disc cell, a cell of the nucleus pulposus, or a cell of the annulus fibrosus.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the cell is trasfected ex vivo.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the cell is transfected in vivo.
7. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the cell is trasfected in vivo by direct
injection of the nucleic acid into an intervertebral disc of a mammal.
8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the nucleic acid is in a vector.
9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the vector is an expression vector.
10. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the expression vector is a plasmid.
11. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the vector is a virus.
12. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the virus is an adenovirus.
13. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the virus is a retro virus.
14. The method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the adenovirus is AdHLMP-1.
15. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the promoter is a cytomegalovirus
promoter.
16. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the proteoglycan is sulfated
glycosaminoglycan.

17. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the LIM mineralization protein is
RLMP, HLMP-1, HLMP-ls, HLMP-2, or HLMP-3.
18. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the LIM mineralization protein is
HLMP-1.
19. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein expression of the LIM mineralization
protein increases the expression of one or more bone morphogenetic proteins in the cell.
20. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a recombinant non-osseous
mammalian cell transfected with an isolated nucleic acid encoding a LIM mineralization
protein and a carrier.
21. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the non-osseous mammalian cell
is a stem cell, a cell of the annulus fibrosus, a cell of the nucleus pulposus or an
intervertebral disc cell.
22. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the non-osseous mammalian cell
is capable of producing proteoglycan and/or collagen.
23. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the nucleotide sequence is
operably linked to a promoter
24. The composition as claimed in claim 22, wherein the expression of the LIM
mineralization protein stimulates proteoglycan and/or collagen synthesis in the cell.
25. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the composition is for treating
intervertebral disc injury or disease in a mammal.
26. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the composition reverses,
prevents or retards disc degeneration.
27. The composition as claimed in claim 25, wherein the disc disease is degenerative
disc disease, lower back pain, disc herniation, or spinal stenosis.
28. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the isolated nucleic acid is in a
vector.
29. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the isolated nucleic acid is in an
expression vector.
30. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the isolated nucleic acid is in a
plasmid.

31. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the isolated nucleic acid is in a
virus.
32. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the isolated nucleic acid is in an
adenovirus.
33. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the isolated nucleic acid is in a
retrovirus.
34. The composition as claimed in claim 32, wherein the adenovirus is AdHLMP-1.
35. The composition as claimed in claim 23, wherein the promoter is a
cytomegalovirus promoter.
36. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the LIM mineralization protein
is RLMP, HLMP-1, HLMP-1s, HLMP-2, or HLMP-3.
37. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the LIM mineralization protein
is HLMP-1.
38. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the isolated nucleic acid
hybridizes under standard conditions to a nucleic acid molecule complementary to the full
length of SEQ.ID NO: 25; and/or hybridizes under highly stringent conditions to a nucleic
acid molecule complementary to the full length of SEQ.ID NO: 26.
39. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the composition is to be
implanted into an intervertebral disc.
40. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the carrier comprises a porous
matrix.
41. The composition as claimed in claim 20, wherein the carrier comprises a synthetic
polymer or collagen matrix.
42. An artificial intervertebral disc implant comprising: a carrier material; and a
plurality of mammalian cells comprising an isolated nucleic acid sequence encoding a
LIM mineralization protein; wherein the carrier material comprises a porous matrix of
biocompatible material and wherein the mammalian cells are incorporated into the
carrier.

43. The implant as claimed in claim 42, wherein the mammalian cells are selected
from the group consisting of stem cells, cells of the annulus fibrosus, cells of the nucleus
pulposus, intervertebral disc cells and combinations thereof.
44. The implant as claimed in claim 42, wherein the biocompatible material
comprises a synthetic polymer or a protein.
45. The implant as claimed in claim 42, wherein the biocompatible material comprises
collagen.
SEQUENCE LISTING
McKay, William F.
Boden M.D., Scott D
Yoon, Sangwook T.
Methods of Expressing LIM Mineralization Protein in
Intervertebral Disc Cells
3819-002-53


US 60/331,321
2001-11-14
42
PatentIn Ver. 2.1
1
457
PRT
Rattus norvegicus



2
1696
DNA
Rattus norvegicus
2
gcacgaggat cccagcgcgg ctcctggagg ccgccaggca gccgcccagc cgggcattca 60
ggagcaggta ccatggattc cttcaaggta gtgctggagg gacctgcccc ttggggcttc 120











































The invention relates generally to methods for expressing LIM mineralization proteins in non-osseous
cells to treat intervertebral disk degeneration. The methods involve transfecting the cells with
an isolated nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a LIM mineralization protein
operably linked to a promoter. Transfection may be accomplished ex vivo or in vivo by direct injection
of virus or naked DNA, or by a nonviral vector such as a plasmid. Expression of the LIM mineralization
protein can stimulate proteoglycan and/or collagen production in cells capable of producing
proteoglycan and/or collagen. The invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition for treating
intervertebral disc injury or disease in a mammal comprising a recombinant non-osseous mammalian
cell transfected with an isolated nucleic acid encoding a LIM mineralization protein and an artificial
intervertebral disc implant comprising a carrier material and mammalian cells including an isolated
nucleic acid sequence encoding a LIM mineralization protein.

Documents:

763-kolnp-2004-granted-abstract.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-assignment.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-claims.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-correspondence.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-description (complete).pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-drawings.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-form 1.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-form 18.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-form 3.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-form 5.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-form 6.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-gpa.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-letter patent.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-reply to examination report.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-sequence listing.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-specification.pdf

763-kolnp-2004-granted-translated copy of priority document.pdf


Patent Number 217407
Indian Patent Application Number 00763/KOLNP/2004
PG Journal Number 13/2008
Publication Date 28-Mar-2008
Grant Date 26-Mar-2008
Date of Filing 04-Jun-2004
Name of Patentee WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC,INC
Applicant Address 2500 SILVEUS CROSSING WARSAW INDIANA 46581 USA.
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 MCKAY WILLIAM F 3870 MCELRIE COVE MEMPHIS TN 38133 USA.
2 BODEN SCOTT D 2842 CRAVEY DRIVE ATLANTA TN30345 USA.
3 YOON SAN GWOOK T 2431 VALHALLA DRIVE, ATLANTA GA 30345 USA.
PCT International Classification Number C12N
PCT International Application Number PCT/US02/36465
PCT International Filing date 2002-11-14
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 60/331, 321 2001-11-14 U.S.A.