Title of Invention

" DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETECTING IONIZING RADIANT ENERGY, AND SYSTEM OF SUCH DEVICES"

Abstract There is disclosed a device for detecting ionizing radiant energy comprising a polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell that interacts with the radiant energy such that the transmissibility of the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is changed by the interaction with the radiant energy.
Full Text "DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETECTING IONIZING RADIANT
ENERGY, AND SYSTEM OF SUCH DEVICES"
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to device and method for detecting ionizing radiant energy,
and system of such devices, and more specifically to radiation detectors that use a polymer
dispersed liquid crystal cell.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This application claims priority from Provisional Patent Application Serial
No. 60/258,720, filed December 29, 2000.
[0003] Present radiation-detection technology is based on the fact that ionizing radiation, as it
passes through matter, creates electrical charges. These electrical charges can be collected by
applying an electrical field to the matter such that an electrical signal is derived. The type of
detector chosen will depend upon the nature of the radiation, e.g. neutral versus charged particles,
and the desired objective, e.g. the timing between events or the energy of a given event. For
example, thalium activated sodium iodide single crystals are suitable for the measurement of low
energy gamma-rays with low energy resolution, although it has poor timing measurement
characteristics. For high energy-resolution measurements, a solid state single-crystal detector
such as pure germanium can be used.
[0004] Currently available single crystal detectors must be kept at low temperatures during
operation, e.g. 77K, which makes the use of cryogenic materials a necessity. Geiger-Muller type
devices work at room temperature, but their applicability is limited. None of these radiation
detectors are sufficiently flexible in size or shape. Film-badge type radiation detectors indicate
exposure integrated over time, without providing any information about the energy of the incident
radiation.
[0005] For these and other reasons, there is a need for a radiation detector that operates at
ambient temperature and can be built simply and economically in a variety of sizes and shapes in
order to accommodate different measuring methodologies.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a device for
detecting ionizing radiant energy comprising a polymer dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) cell,
characterised in that the PDLC cell is non-transparent in the absence of applied electric field;
and in that the device comprises a light source that is optically oriented toward the cell; an
electrical signal generator that is connected to the (PDLC) cell such that an electric field can be
applied to the cell in order to increase the transmissibility of the cell; a light detector optically
aligned with the light source that is capable of capable of generating output; and a processor that
is connected to the electrical signal generator and analyzes the output from the light detector,
wherein the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell interacts with the ionizing radiant energy such
that the transmissibility of the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is transiently changed in
response to variations in the incident ionizing radiant energy.
[0007] According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a system of
devices for detecting ionizing radiation comprising two or more detection assemblies,
characterized in that each detection assembly comprises a device, as described hereinabove.
[0008] According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for
detecting ionizing radiation comprising a polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell, a light source, an
electrical signal generator, a light detector, and a processor, characterised in that the method
comprises the steps of obtaining a polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell that is non-transparent in
the absence of an electric field; optically orienting a light source toward the polymer dispersed
liquid crystal cell; connecting the electrical signal generator to the polymer dispersed liquid
crystal cell and generating an electric field such that the transmissibility of the PDLC cell is
increased; optically aligning a light detector capable of generating output, with the light source;
and attaching the processor to the light detector to analyze the output of the light detector,
wherein the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell interacts with the ionizing radiation such that
the transmissibility of the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is transiently changed by the
interaction with the ionizing radiation and in response to variations in the incident ionizing
radiation.
[0009] Other features and advantages of the present invention shall be apparent to those of
ordinary skill in the art upon reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
[0011] The above and further advantages of the invention may be better understood by
referring to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which
corresponding numerals in the different figures refer to corresponding parts in which :
FIGURE 1 depicts light transmission through a PDLC cell and its response following
the application of square wave pulses, wherein the upper portion of the figure shows data taken as
a function of the electrical field at a constant frequency of 1 kHz. and the lower portion of the
figure shows data collected for 1 kHz square wave pulses of fixed amplitude, giving 1 Mv/m.
FIGURE 2 is a plot of transmission of light through a PDLC cell as a function of time
following the application of a square pulse.
FIGURE 3 is a plot of the shape function (R) as a function of irradiation time.
FIGURE 4 is a schematic diagram of one form of a device for detecting radiation in
accordance with the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
While making and using various embodiments of the present invention are discussed herein in
terms of polymer dispersed liquid crystal radiation detectors, it should be appreciated that the
present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide
variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of
specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
Polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (hereinafter PDLC) films constitute an important class of
materials with applications in electrically switchable optical devices. A PDLC film comprises
sub-micron to micron-sized droplets of liquid-crystalline (lc) material dispersed in an optically
transparent polymer matrix. The optical transmission through a PDLC-based device depends on
several important parameters. These parameters include the local electric field inside each
droplet (which depends upon the dielectric properties of the lc and polymer and charge-
accumulation/dissipation at the lc-polymer interface), molecular director reorientation in each
droplet, and the geometry and reorientation of the droplet itself. The device may also comprise a
distribution of the sizes and shapes of the droplets. In the absence of an electric field and
depending upon a critical radius of spherical droplets, more than one possible configuration of
molecular orientations are possible within a droplet. Additionally, the directors of individual
droplets are randomly oriented. All of this results in strong scattering of light.
[0014] When an electric field is applied, a change may occur in the configurations of the
molecular directors in the droplet, orientation of the droplet's symmetry axis, and alignment of
the director of the droplet. For positive dielectric anisotropy (?e > 0), the molecular director
and the droplet's symmetry axis tend to align along the field and transmission through the film
increases. The composite nature of the PDLC and the dielectric anisotropy of the liquid crystal
make the effective electric field "seen" by the lc dipoles very different from externally applied
field.
[0015] One example of a PDLC cell in accordance with the present invention contains
liquid crystalline material, E8 in poly (methyl methacrylate) polymer [hereinafter PMMA].
Micron-sized droplets of E8 were dispersed in PMMA polymer matrix by using solvent-
induced phase separation technique. A cell was constructed by sandwiching this composite
material between two ITO-coated glass substrates separated by 20-µm thick insulators. The
average size of the LC droplets (= 1µm) was controlled by the cooling rate of the liquid crystal
from its isotropic phase. The time dependence of the response of the cells was measured by a
standard optical transmission measurement system using a He-Ne laser, a set of polarizers, a
photomultiplier-detector, a square wave electrical pulse generator, and computer-controlled
data collection and analysis software operating at 20 kHz.
[0016] FIGURE 1 depicts the light transmission through the PDLC cell and its response,
following application of square wave pulses. Square wave electrical pulses were applied so as
to produce a constant electric field of 1 MV/m at repetition rates ranging from 0.5 to 20 Hz.
Upon application of a pulse, transmission through the cell rises rapidly to a maximum (almost
sudden increase in transmission occurs whenever | dE/dt | > 0) and then decays via
exponentials during the width of the pulse. The rise in transmission occurs with a rise-time of
the order of 2 to 5 ms and represents rapid alignment of the molecular director within the
droplets. Additionally, a realignment of the director of the droplet along the field may also
contribute. This is a relatively slow process and it is not expected to contribute significantly to
the rapid switch-on of the cell. The applied electric field should also generate charges in the
polymer matrix. The diffusion of these charges through the composite material of the PDLC
leading to charge accumulation at the droplet-polymer interface, may add to the time
dependence of the cell response.
[0017] Additionally, from the electrical point of view, a certain time constant can be
assigned to the PDLC cell, which can be viewed as a circuit element with a complex
impedance, Zd = Zel + Zp. Here Zel is the electrode impedance containing electrical response
at the interface between the PDLC film and the electrodes and Zp is the impedance in the bulk
of the PDLC film. Zel represents charge transfer at the droplet/polymer interface, interfacial
capacitance resulting from ion buildup at the electrodes, and ITO resistance. The impedance
Zp results from the two-phase structure of the PDLC film. The theoretical model (discussed
below) predicts exponential decay with the same decay time within and outside the applied
pulse. Measurements in accordance with the present invention, however, show that a single
exponential cannot describe the cell response and the decay times of the cell response, within
and outside the applied pulse, are not the same. Furthermore, the present invention provides a
new feature in the cell response; a delayed component.
[0018] After the initial rise and while decaying rapidly during the pulse, the cell response
exhibits an increase in transmission followed by resumption of the exponential decay during
the remaining width of the applied pulse. Similar behavior is observed even outside the width
of the applied pulse, albeit, with significantly different decay times. The cell response can be
decomposed into two components that provide a better understanding of the result. The early
part of the cell response is well represented by an exponential and a constant background. The
results of this fit are then subtracted from the total response and the difference curve is labeled
as the delayed component. The cell responses, for both within and outside the width of the
applied pulse, can be analyzed by following this procedure.
[0019] The measured cell response is much more complex than a single exponential decay.
Following a rapid rise, the cell response decays exponentially with a decay time, tdecay1off =
(30±2) ms. Simultaneously, the delayed component builds up with a rise time, troff = (24±1)
ms. Having reached a maximum at t = tdelay2 the delayed component decays with a decay
time, tdecay2off = (40±2) ms. In the case of the 5 Hz data, tdelayl ~ 10 ms and tdelay2 ~ 50
ms. Similar results are obtained for electric fields applied at repetition rates of 0.5, 1, and 10
Hz. Since the decay times are different within and outside the width of the applied field, the
relaxation mechanisms operational within these time periods are influenced by the field and
they may be different. The result, tdelay2 > tdelay, is consistent with the fact that during
tdelay1 there is an externally applied electric field, whereas there is no such field during
tdelay2. Of course, there is still a residual field due to the interfacial charges.
[0020] As far as the physical process responsible for the delayed component is concerned,
there are two possible effects. These are: 1) realignment of the director of the non-spherical
droplets and 2) change in the electric field |dE/dt| due to accumulation of sufficient charges at
the droplet/polymer interface. The values of the time-delays, tdelay1 ~10 ms within the width
of the applied pulse and tdelay2 ~50 ms outside the width of the applied pulse, are two
important parameters. The time-delay represents an average time needed for either the
reorientation of the symmetry axis of non-spherical droplets along the applied field or buildup
of sufficient charges at the lc-polymer interface. The latter involves several different
processes, ie, generation of charges in the polymer matrix, diffusion of these charges under the
influence of the applied field, and their equilibrium arrangement at the lc-polymer interface.
An interplay between the decay rate t and delay time tdelay sets a limit on the repetition rate
of the applied electric field pulse (= tdelay -1) above which the delayed component is not
expected to be observed. In the case of the E8-PDLC, the upper limit on the repetition rate
turns out to be 100 Hz. No delayed component if observed for repetition rates higher than 20
Hz.
[0021] Several processes contribute to the cell response; dielectric properties of the lc
droplets, charge accumulation/dissipation at the lc-polymer interface, reorientation and
dynamics of non-spherical droplets, etc. The dielectric response of a film consisting of
spheroidal inclusions of type 1 material (liquid crystal droplets) randomly distributed in a
matrix of type 2 material (polymer) has been modeled by

where v1 is the volume fraction of type 1 material, and e1 and e2 are the dielectric
constants of the isotropic phases of the two materials in the film. The dielectric constants are
assumed to be complex to account for the dissipative mechanisms.
[0022] The main points of the theoretical model that are relevant are as follows. At low
frequencies of the applied field and when the conductivity of the lc is much greater than the
conductivity of the polymer (which is appropriate to the E8-PMMA PDLC), there can be
significant accumulation of charges at the lc-polymer interface. Thus the field "seen" by a
droplet can be significantly different from the applied field due to the shielding effects. At
higher frequencies there is hardly any charge accumulation at the lc-polymer interface. The
PDLC conductivity is then governed by the liquid crystal conductivity. For a square voltage
pulse of amplitude V0 and duration t0, applied at t=0, this model provides the following
equations for the field inside a droplet (Ein),

where E0 and E are electric fields at low and high frequencies, respectively.
Whereas, the model predicts one decay rate for both 0 the response for the E8-PDLC cell is much more complex than a single exponential decay.
[0023] Theoretical considerations of additional processes may provide more realistic
description of the measurements. For example, eq (2) is derived by assuming that the lc
droplets are spherical in shape. The PDLC probably contains a distribution of sizes and shapes
of the lc droplets. This is supported by the scanning electron micrographs of the E8-PMMA
PDLC. This feature alone adds to complexity; the response of relatively small and highly
anisotropic droplets to applied fields could be very different from the response of large and
spherical droplets. With a distribution of sizes and shapes of lc droplets, it is reasonable to
expect that more than one relaxation-mechanism is operational in the cell. Furthermore, the
dynamics of the interfacial charges, both during and after the applied pulse, will have to be
taken into consideration. For an elongated droplet of semi-major and semi-minor axes a and b,
respectively, the relaxation times are given by,

where ?1 is the rotational viscosity, As is the dielectric anisotropy, E is the electric
field, K is an effective deformation constant, 1 = a/b is the aspect ratio for the droplet, and ?1
and ?2 are two angles such that when the electric field is removed, the droplet director returns
from an angle ?1 to ?2. These equations clearly show the effect of the non-spherical shape of
the droplet on the relaxation times involved. It is interesting to note that for reasonable values
of the parameters and slightly elongated droplets (aspect ratio, 1= 1.1), these equations provide
values of the relaxation times that are in good agreement with our measurements of ton ~ 25
ms and tdelay2 ~ 50 ms.
[0024] It is expected that the accumulation/dissipation of charges at the lc-polymer
interface depend largely on the polymer matrix in a PDLC cell. It is possible to intentionally
generate additional charges in the polymer matrix and observe their influence on the response
of a PDLC cell constructed with NF-100 lc material. For this purpose, the cell is irradiated
with gamma rays using ~ 5 µCi 207Bi radioactive source. This radioisotope produces gamma
rays of energies 0.57 and 1.06 MeV. The absorption of the gamma rays in the polymer of the
PDLC cell, albeit relatively small, produces additional charges. The cell response has been
measured as a function of time prior to, and following gamma irradiation.
[0025] A characteristic shape parameter (R) of the cell response as a function of irradiation
time is shown in FIGURE 3. Prior to irradiation, R remains time-independent within the
statistical uncertainties of the measurements. After irradiation for a period of an hour, we
observe a significant reduction in R. This decrease is attributed to the generation of additional
charges in the PDLC. Diffusion of these additional charges, leading to their accumulation at
the lc-polymer interface, reduces the effective electric field experienced by the molecular
dipoles. This results in a reduction of transmission through the cell and a lower value of R.
Thereafter R remains at this lower value during further irradiation for about 4 hrs. After
irradiation for a total of 5 hrs, the radioactive source was removed and the cell response was
measured after a "cooling-off" period of 1 hr. The resulting value of R (at time = 8 hrs) has
returned close to its pre-irradiation level. The measurements of R made for additional 3 hrs
without irradiation remain constant at this high value. The latter is close to the value of R
measured prior to irradiation. Whereas the drop in R (at time = 3 hrs) results from additional
charges at the lc-polymer interface, the rise in R at time = 8 hrs is due to dissipation of these
charges under the influence of the applied field. The data demonstrate the influence of
additional charges on light transmission (hence on the local electric field "seen" by molecular
dipoles) in a PDLC cell. The magnitude of the effect should depend on the charges produced
in the polymer matrix, diffusion of charges through the matrix, and their equilibrium
accumulation at and dissipation from the interface.
[0026] The present invention makes use of PDLC films synthesized from two different
different polymers, namely, poly (methyl methacrylate (PMMA) and poly (vinyl chloride;
vinyl acetate-17%) (PVA:VAC-17), obtained from M/s Polysciences Inc., USA and liquid
crystal mixture, E-8 from M/s B.D.H. England. The polymers PMMA and PVC:VAC-17 have
the refractive index, np =1.49 and 1.52 respectively at room temperature (23°C), which is
very close the refractive index, no, of the liquid crystal mixture, E-8 (no = 1.52 at 23°C). Each
polymer has low solubility of the liquid crystal mixture. The PDLC films were prepared using
the solvent induced phase separation technique. Appropriate quantities of the liquid crystal
mixture and of the polymer were dissolved in a common solvent (chloroform/acetone) in
various weight proportions. The homogeneous solution of each concentration was spread in
the form of a film in a suitable cast. On solvent evaporation a strongly scattering white film
was obtained. The thickness of the prepared film was measured by a Surfometer SF-200 (M/s
Planer industrial, UK). Films of various thicknesses ranging from 10-50 µ m were prepared.
The PDLC film was peeled-off from the substrate and was sandwiched between two
transparent conducting glass plates under simultaneous application of heat and pressure.
[0027] The scattering and electro-optic characteristics of the PDLC films depended
strongly on the thermal history of the films. The electro-opic transmission properties were
measured by a simple set-up in a normal transmission geometry using a He-Ne laser light
source (A = 632.8 nm) along with a RCA-931A photomultiplier tube. The temperature of the
cell was controlled by a water circulator (Julabo HC-40, W. Germany) to an accuracy of
±0.1°C. The refractive index measurements were carried out using an Abbe refractometer. It
was ensured that the polymer films were completely solvent-free before making the refractive
index measurements.
[0028] FIGURE 4 shows one form of the present invention. The PDLC 100 is shown
between two windows 102 and together they form a PDLC cell 103. The only limitation on the
window material is that it be substantially transparent to the wavelength of the light source 110
(vide infra). An electrical signal generator 104 is connected to the cell 103 to provide a
constant electrical field to the cell 103. The waveform generated by the electrical signal
generator can be any alternating current waveform, with nonlimiting examples being square
and sinusoidal waves. The cell 103 is housed in a light-tight box 106 that is fitted with an
aperture 108. Also contained within the light-tight box 106 are a light source 110 and a light
detector 112. The light source 110 and light detector 112 can be any of variety of specific
components that are known to those of skill in the art. Nonlimiting examples of light sources
110 include both broadband and monochromatic lamps and lasers. Similarly, the light detector
112 can be chosen for the specific application that is envisioned. It can be a silicon photo
detector, an array detector or a photomultiplier tube. The light source 110 is oriented so that it
points to the cell 103 from one side while the light detector 112 is positioned on the opposite
side. The application of the signal from the electrical signal generator orients the liquid crystal
to produce a base level of transmission of light from the light source 110 to the light detector
112.
[0029] Incident photons 114 of ionizing radiation can then impinge on the cell. The
photons generate charges locally in the PDLC and thus alter the electrical field that is seen by
the liquid crystals dispersed near the site where the charge is created. This change in the
electrical field is reflected in a change in the orientation of the liquid crystals and/ or the
droplets and thus the amount of light that is transmitted through the cell form the light source
to the light detector changes. It is the measurement of this change through the parameter R that
constitutes the detection of the incident photon.
[0030] While specific alternatives to steps of the invention have been described herein,
additional alternatives not specifically disclosed but known in the art are intended to fall within
the scope of the invention. Thus, it is understood that other applications of the present
invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the described embodiment
and after consideration of the appended claims and drawing.
WE CLAIM:
1. A device for detecting ionizing radiant energy comprising:
a polymer dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) cell, characterised in that:
the PDLC cell is non-transparent in the absence of an applied electric field;
and in that the device comprises:
a light source that is optically oriented toward the cell;
an electrical signal generator that is connected to the (PDLC) cell such that an electric
field can be applied to the cell in order to increase the transmissibility of the cell;
a light detector optically aligned with the light source that is capable of capable of
generating output; and
a processor that is connected to the electrical signal generator and analyzes the output
from the light detector, wherein the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell interacts
with the ionizing radiant energy such that the transmissibility of the polymer dispersed
liquid crystal cell is transiently changed in response to variations in the incident ionizing
radiant energy.
2. A system of devices for detecting ionizing radiation comprising two or more detection
assemblies, characterized in that each detection assembly comprises a device as claimed
in claim 1.
3. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is comprised of poly (methyl methacrylate) and
liquid crystal E-8.
4. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is comprised of poly (vinyl chloride: vinyl acetate-
17%) and liquid crystal E-8.
5. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is comprised of poly (methyl methacrylate) and a
cholesteric liquid crystal.
6. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is comprised of poly (vinyl chloride: vinyl acetate-
17%) and a cholesteric liquid crystal.
7. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 2, wherein the
polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell has a refractive index of between 1.49 and
1.52.
8. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the device
is housed in a light-tight box with an aperture.
9. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
electrical signal generator produces an alternating current waveform.
10. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
electrical signal generator produces a square waveform.
11. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in in claim 1, wherein the
electrical signal generator produces a sinusoidal waveform.
12. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
frequency of the waveform generated by the electrical signal generator is between .5 Hz
and 20 Hz.
13. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the light
detector is silicon photo detector.
14. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the light
detector is a photomultiplier tube.
15. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the light
detector is a photo array detector.
16. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the light
source is monochromatic.
17. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the light
source is a laser.
18. The device for detecting ionizing radiant energy as claimed in claim 1, wherein the light
source has a wavelength of 633 nm.
19. A method for detecting ionizing radiation comprising a polymer dispersed liquid crystal
cell, a light source, an electrical signal generator, a light detector, and a processor,
characterised in that the method comprises the steps of:
obtaining a polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell that is non-transparent in the absence of
an electric field;
optically orienting a light source toward the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell;
connecting the electrical signal generator to the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell and
generating an electric field such that the transmissibility of the PDLC cell is increased;
optically aligning a light source detector capable of generating output, with the light
source; and
attaching the processor to the light detector to analyze the output of the light detector,
wherein the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell interacts with the ionizing radiation such
that the transmissibility of the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is transiently changed
by the interaction with the ionizing radiation and in response to variations in the incident
ionizing radiation.
There is disclosed a device for detecting ionizing radiant energy comprising a polymer
dispersed liquid crystal cell that interacts with the radiant energy such that the transmissibility of
the polymer dispersed liquid crystal cell is changed by the interaction with the radiant energy.

Documents:

838-KOLNP-2003-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

838-KOLNP-2003-FORM 27.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-abstract.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-assignment.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-claims.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-correspondence.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-description (complete).pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-drawings.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-examination report.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-form 1.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-form 18.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-form 3.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-form 5.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-gpa.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-reply to examination report.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-specification.pdf

838-kolnp-2003-granted-translated copy of priority document.pdf


Patent Number 222740
Indian Patent Application Number 838/KOLNP/2003
PG Journal Number 34/2008
Publication Date 22-Aug-2008
Grant Date 21-Aug-2008
Date of Filing 27-Jun-2003
Name of Patentee BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEMS
Applicant Address 201 WEST SEVENTH STREET, AUSTIN, TX
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 SURESH C SHARMA 3503 RUIDOSO DRIVE ARLINGTON, TX 76017
PCT International Classification Number G02F 1/13
PCT International Application Number PCT/US01/49810
PCT International Filing date 2001-12-21
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 60/258,720 2000-12-28 U.S.A.