Title of Invention

A METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE OXYGEN CONTENT OF A METAL POWDER

Abstract A method of reducing the oxygen content of a powder is provided. A canister is prepared with a getter, filled with the powder to be densified, sealed and evacuated. The canister is subjected to a hydrogen atmosphere at an elevated temperature whereby hydrogen diffuses into the canister through the walls thereof. The hydrogen forms moisture when reacted with the oxygen of the powder and the moisture in the reacted with the getter in order to remove oxygen from the powder to the getter. The atmosphere outside the canister is then altered to an inert atmosphere or cacuum, whereby hydrogen diffuses out of the canister. A dense body having a controlled amount of oxygen can thereafter be produced by conventional powder metallurgy techniques.
Full Text The present disclosure relates to a method of reducing the oxygen content of a
powder, for example a metallic powder, in a controlled manner, the powder being
located in an enclosed canister. The present disclosure also relates the manufacturing
of dense bodies and to a dense product produced by the method. Especially it relates
to a method of reducing the oxygen content of metallic powders having high
chromium content and low carbon content.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION AND PRIOR ART
When producing powders, especially metallic powders, there is often an unintentional
oxidation of the surfaces of the powders during production. Furthermore, oxygen
might be present inside the powder itself, either in solution or as oxide particles. In
this latter case the oxygen is usually generated during the melting process due to
equilibrium with the dross and the lining of the furnace.
The oxides, especially the oxides of the powder surfaces, might lead to deteriorated
mechanical properties of a component produced to near-net-shape (NNS) of a powder
by densification. In the case of surface oxides, a network of oxide inclusions will form
where the surfaces of the powder were located before densification.
One example of a powder that suffers from the above stated problems is powder of
super duplex stainless steels (SDSS). Dense bodies of SDSS can be used in various
different environments. One application is in the oil and gas industry. However, dense
bodies of SDSS produced by powder metallurgy generally suffer from low impact
strength. One theory of the reason for this problem is that intermetallics precipitate at
oxide inclusions. Another theory is that intermetallics and oxide precipitates both
decrease the impact strength, however separately. In either case, there is a need of
reduced oxygen content of the powder.
However, even other powder materials, such as metallic powders or hard materials,
might have a too high content of oxygen to achieve good mechanical strength, such as

impact strength, after compacted to a dense body. This is especially important for
materials that easily oxidise during powder formation even if precautionary
measurements have been taken.
It is previously known to utilise a getter to minimise the oxygen content when
producing dense products by powder metallurgy technique. For example, US
3,992,200 discloses the use of a getter consisting of Ti, Zr, Hf and mixtures thereof to
prevent oxide formation in the final compacted article. This method is for example
utilised on high-speed steels and superalloys. Furthermore, US 6,328,927 discloses
the use of a getter when manufacturing dense bodies of tungsten. In this case the
powder capsule is made of the getter material, such as titanium or alloys thereof.
However, merely utilising a getter material does not sufficiently reduce the oxygen
content to the desired low levels of all powders, especially of all powders of steels.
This is especially difficult in powders wherein the carbon content is low, such as %. The time for reduction, and hence the result, is difficult to accomplish in a
controlled manner and in a cost-effective way.
Consequently, there is a need for a method of reducing the oxygen content of a
powder in a controlled manner before densification, especially for low oxygen
contents.
Also, there is a need for reducing the oxygen, content of low carbon steels, having a
high Cr content, to very low levels, such as less than 100 ppm.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A method of reducing the oxygen content of a powder is provided. A canister is
prepared with a getter, filled with the powder to be densified, evacuated and sealed.
The canister is subjected to a hydrogen atmosphere at a temperature of 900-1200 °C,
which results in a diffusion of hydrogen into the canister through the walls thereof.
The hydrogen forms moisture when reacted with the oxygen of the powder and the
moisture in then reacted with the getter in order to remove oxygen from the powder to

the getter. The atmosphere outside the canister is then altered to an inert atmosphere
or vacuum, whereby hydrogen diffuses out of the canister.
The powder having a reduced oxygen content can thereafter be subjected to
conventional near-net-shaping powder metallurgy technologies, such as Hot Isostatic
Pressure (HIP) or Cold Isostatic Pressure (CEP), whereby a dense product having a
controlled content of oxide inclusions is accomplished.
BREIF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS

Figure 1 shows the oxygen content profile of a densified body of stainless steel.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The problems stated above have now been solved by a new method utilising selective
hydrogen diffusion through the walls of the canister in combination with a getter to
achieve a controlled reduction of oxygen inside an enclosed canister.
Firstly, a canister, preferably of a mild steel, is provided with a getter material. The
getter material can be introduced into the canister for example by providing the
canister walls with a thin foil of the getter material. However, any method of
introduction of the getter material into the canister may be utilised, such as for
example forming the canister of the getter material. The getter is preferably selected
from the group of Ti, Zr, Hf, Ta, REM or an alloy or compound based on any of these
elements. More preferably, the getter is Ti or Zr. It is important that the getter has
such a high melting temperature that it does not melt during the procedure and that it
is distributed so that the distance for diffusion to the getter is not too long. Preferably,
the getter is distributed along at least the longest wall of the canister, more preferably
the getter is distributed along all of the canister walls.
In some cases it might be desirable to produce a dense body wherein different parts of
the body have different properties. In such a case, the getter is naturally placed in the
canister at locations where a lower oxygen content of the final product is desired. This

might for example be applicable when producing larger dense bodies, since the
distance of diffusion to the getter might be very long.
Thereafter, the canister is filled with a powder. This is the powder, which should be
reduced in oxygen content and thereafter densified to near-net-shape (NNS) by
conventional powder metallurgy techniques, such as HIP or OP. The canister is
thereafter evacuated and sealed according to conventional procedure.
The canister is heated up to a temperature of 900-1200 °C in a hydrogen atmosphere.
Preferably the canister is heated up to a temperature of 1000-1150 °C. By subjecting
the canister to this heat treatment, hydrogen is allowed to diffuse into the canister
through the walls thereof. Preferably, the heating is performed at a rate of 0.5-5
°C/min, more preferred at a rate of 1-3 °C/min. Both the heating rate and the
temperature are preferably adjusted to the powder material and naturally also the
desired result. The hydrogen will diffuse into the canister until the hydrogen partial
pressure on both sides of the walls of the canister has been substantially equilibrated,
which means approximately 1 bar inside the canister. Hydrogen and oxide of the
powder will react and thereby establishing a moisture partial pressure inside the
canister.
The reduction of oxygen is performed by the moisture inside the canister reacting with
the getter material according to the following formula:

wherein M is the getter material or the active part thereof. Thereby, oxygen is
transferred from the powder bulk to the getter.
Reduction of the oxygen content of the powder may be performed during the heating
process. However, it can also be performed during a holding time at a constant
temperature or a stepwise increasing temperature using a holding time at each
temperature step.
The time for oxygen reduction with aid of the heat treatment described above is
adjusted to the powder material, the size of the canister, i.e. the amount of powder,

and the oxygen level to be achieved. Furthermore, the time may in some cases
preferably be adapted to the selected getter material. Preferably, in the cases wherein
holding times are used, the total time for reduction is at least one hour, more
preferably 3-15 hours, and most preferably 5-10 hours. However, the total reduction
time must be adapted to temperature as well as the size of the canister, i.e. the
maximum distance of diffusion of oxygen and/or moisture to the getter.
After the reduction of oxygen is performed, the environment outside the canister is
altered to an inert atmosphere or vacuum. Preferably, the inert atmosphere is
accomplished by flowing gas, such as Ar or N2. The hydrogen will as a result of the
altered environment diffuse out of the canister trough the walls thereof in order to
establish substantially a state of equilibrium between the inside and the outside of the
canister, i.e. the partial pressure of hydrogen inside the canister is approximately zero.
The canister is after the diffusion of hydrogen in and out of the canister optionally
allowed to cool down to room temperature. Preferably, this cooling procedure is slow.
It may be performed at the same time as the canister is subjected to the inert
atmosphere in order to diffuse hydrogen out of the canister. However, according to a
preferred embodiment of the invention, the densifying process, such as for example
HIP, is performed while the canister is still hot, i.e. the densifying process is
performed directly after the diffusion of hydrogen in and out of the canister.
The powder is then ready to be densified by conventional powder metallurgy
techniques, such as HIP or CIP, to a near net shape. Additionally, the above-described
method can also be used when attaching densified powders to a substrate.
Parameters that are considered to influence the result of the above-described method
are time to fill the canister with hydrogen, temperature and time for the reduction of
oxygen and time to evacuate hydrogen from the canister after the reduction. Naturally,
all parameters must be adjusted to the composition of the powder material and the
result to be achieved.
The time to fill the canister is naturally affected by the thickness of the canister walls
as well as temperature. In some cases it might be applicable to provide a canister that

has some parts of the walls that facilitates the diffusion of hydrogen as well. This can
be accomplished for example by providing thinner canister walls at those parts or
select a different material with a higher diffusivity of hydrogen for those parts of the
canister walls. On the other way around, some parts of the walls might need to be
thicker in order to resist dimensional distortion due to thermal softening.
By utilisation of the method, the oxygen level of the powder can be reduced in a
controlled manner at least to levels below 100 ppm. This results in that a dense body
can be manufactured, which has good mechanical properties, especially good impact
strength and a low ductile-to-brittle-temperature.
One advantage of the method described above is that the presence of hydrogen gas
inside the canister increases the heating rate compared to if it would be a vacuum
inside the canister. This is due to that the hydrogen conducts heat better than a
vacuum does. Another advantage of the method is that the nitrogen content of the
powder after the oxygen reduction is substantially the same as in the originally
provided powder. Consequently, the method is advantageously used on powders
wherein the nitrogen content is important for the properties.
Moreover, another advantage is that the method enables the use of powders, which
would not be able to use before due to too high oxygen content For example, powders
produced by water-atomisation can be used for production of dense products instead
of more expensive inert gas atomised powders, while still achieving good properties.
Consequently, cheaper materials can be used resulting in a more cost-effective final
dense product.
Furthermore, a person skilled in the art realises that the method described above also
generates a bonus effect since oxidation of the canister walls is inhibited, especially
the outside of the canister walls. Thereby, the risk for the canister to leak during for
example a subsequent HIP process is minimised. Furthermore, the risk for damage or
wear out of certain furnaces, such as graphite or Mo furnaces, due to oxides on the
canisters is reduced.

The method according to the present disclosure is particularly developed to be used
for powder materials of stainless steels, especially super duplex stainless steels
(SSDS) and 316L. However, it is also possible to utilise this method on other powder
materials when the content of oxygen has to be reduced and also when producing hard
materials.
Optionally, the reduction of oxygen inside the canister can further be promoted by the
usage of additional reducing agents above the hydrogen. Such reducing agents are
preferably carbon based. The carbon might be introduced by for example providing a
carbon surface on the powder, mixing graphite with the powder or even utilising the
carbon content of the powder itself. In this case it is important that the getter also may
reduce the carbon content. Therefore, suitable materials as getters are in this case Ti,
Zr or Ta.
The present disclosure will now be described in more detail with the aid of some
illustrative examples.
Example 1
Two powders produced by nitrogen-gas atonisation were tested. The composition of
the powders are listed in Table 1, all in weight percent except oxygen which is in parts
per million.

2-mm mild steel canisters with a dimension of 92x26x150 mm were utilised. The
interior of the 92x150 mm walls of the canisters were attached with 0.125 mm metal
foils of Ti by spot-welding.

All canisters were filled with powder, evacuated and sealed according to standard
procedure. Canisters with Ti-foil getter were treated according to the method
described above. First, the heating was carried out rapidly up to 500 °C, subsequently
at a rate of 5 °C/min up to a, in advance, chosen reduction temperature with a holding
time of 60 minutes. Thereafter, the temperature was set to 900 °C and the environment
outside the canisters was changed from hydrogen to argon. After 1 hour, the furnace
heating was switched off and the canisters were allowed to cool down to room
temperature inside the furnace. Subsequently, the powders were subjected to HIP.
Table 2 illustrates the different compositions of metallic powder of the canisters and
the parameters for which the canisters were subjected.
Slices with a thickness of 3 mm were cut out in the middle of the canisters through the
small cross section (92x26 before HIP) and samples for chemical analysis were cut
out from these slices. The foil-attached walls were not included in the samples. The
results are also presented in Table 2, wherein the oxygen values represent the median
of double samples, except for triple samples for Canister A.

Example 2
Two large canisters of 2 mm mild steel plate were produced with a diameter of 133
mm and a height of 206 mm. In this case, a 0.125 mm thick titanium foil and a 0.025

mm zirconium foil were attached to the inside of the envelope walls, respectively. The
canisters were filled with Alloy 1 of Table 1, evacuated and sealed according to
standard procedure. The canisters were subjected to the method described above with
the following parameters: heating at 1.4 °C/min in hydrogen up to 1100 °C; holding at
1100 °C during 9 hours; changing to argon flow and slow cooling down to room
temperature (The cooling rate was 1.3-1.7 °C/min down to 700 °C). Thereafter, HIP
was performed at 1150 °C and 100 MPa during 3 hours.
Slices of 5 mm were cut out from the densified canisters approximately 4 cm from the
top. Thereafter, eight double samples were cut out in the radial direction from the
surface to the centre of the slices. The results, for the canister with Zr getter, are
presented in Table 3 and the results, for the canister with Ti getter, are presented in
Table 4. Sample 1 is closest to the surface and consequently, sample 8 is the centre.
Furthermore, the oxygen distribution is shown in Figure 1, wherein the dotted line
illustrates the oxygen content of the powder before utilising the method.

Apparently, the use of different getters results different oxygen distributions and
overall oxygen reduction after the selective hydrogen diffusion procedure. Zr
performed better than titanium with regard to overall oxygen reduction. However,
there is an increase of oxygen close to the surface and in vicinity to the getter. This is
believed to be a result of the surface attaining a lower temperature than the core

during cooling, whereby a shift from reducing to oxidative condition appear in the
cold regions.
Furthermore, the nitrogen content of the samples was analysed. The nitrogen loss was
rather low and the Zr getter performed slightly better than the Ti getter. This is a result
of the thin Zr-foil becoming saturated with nitrogen while continuating to reduce the
oxygen content, i.e. act as a getter material.
Example 3
The impact strength of the different specimens from Examples 1 and 2 was tested
along with two comparative specimens where the method was not executed.
Specimens of 10x10x55 were cut out from the produced test materials. From the
canister of Example 2 with Zr-foil, specimens were cut out in the radial region having
approximately zero ppm oxygen.
The specimens of Alloy 2 were annealed at 1050 °C for 60 minutes and then quenched
in water. Specimens of Alloy 1 were annealed at 1080 °C for 60 minutes. Some of
these specimens were quenched in water and others were cooled with controlled rate
of 1-2.3 °C/second through the temperature interval 900-700 °C.
Notch cutting and Charpy notch impact test was performed. For the specimens of
Alloy 2 the temperature of the impact tests was -196 °C and the temperature for Alloy
1 was -50 °C. The results are presented in Table 5, wherein the Charpy notch impact
energy is presented as an average of two specimens and Q stands for quenching and
CCT stands for controlled cooling rate.
Clearly, Alloy 1 shows a transition from ductile to brittle at increasing oxygen
content, similar to a transition with regard to temperature. The transition for quenched
Alloy 1 is within the oxygen content interval 100-150 ppm.
The results show that the oxygen content should be reduced down to 100 ppm or less
in order to obtain a ductile behaviour for Alloys 1 and 2.



WE CLAIM,
1. A method of producing a metal powder having controlled oxygen content comprising
introducing a getter into a canister
introducing a metal powder into the canister and then evacuating
and sealing the canister
reducing the oxygen content in the metal powder by subjecting
the canister to a heat treatment in an environment of gaseous
hydrogen
providing diffusion through the walls thereof until the hydrogen
partial pressure on both sides of the walls of the canister is
substantially equilibrated and
after the oxygen reduction in the metal powder subjecting the
canister to an inert atmosphere or a vacuum so as to provide
hydrogen diffusion out of the canister through the walls thereof.
2. Method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the powder is stainless steel.
3. Method as claimed in claims 1 or 2 wherein the getter is Ti, Zr, Hf, Ta, REM or an
alloy or compound based on any of these elements, preferably Zr or Ti, or alloy or
compound thereof.
4. Method as claimed in any of the preceding claims wherein the temperature of the heat
treatment in hydrogen environment is 900- 1200°C, preferably 1000-1150°C.
5. Method as claimed in any of the preceding claims wherein the getter is
homogeneously distributed along at least one wall of the canister, wherein said wall has
an elongation that is equal or longer than the other walls of the canister.
6 Method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the getter is homogeneously distributed along
at least one wall of the canister, wherein said wall has an elongation that is equal or
longer than the other walls of the canister and has an area equal of bigger than the other
walls of the canister.

7. Method as claimed in any of the preceding claims wherein carbon is introduced into
the canister in order to further improve the reduction of oxygen.
8 Method of manufacturing a dense body by powder metallurgy techniques
characterised in subjecting a powder to the method according to any of the preceding
claims and thereafter densifying the powder in a canister.
9. Method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the densifying is a HIP or a CIP process and
performed in the same canister as the reduction of oxygen.


ABSTRACT

METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE OXYGEN CONTENT OF A POWDER
A method of reducing the oxygen content of a powder is provided.
A canister is prepared with a getter, filled with the powder to
be densified, sealed and evacuated. The canister is subjected to
a hydrogen atmosphere at an elevated temperature whereby
hydrogen diffuses into the canister through the walls thereof.
The hydrogen forms moisture when reacted with the oxygen of the
powder and the moisture in the reacted with the getter in order
to remove oxygen from the powder to the getter. The atmosphere
outside the canister is then altered to an inert atmosphere or
cacuum, whereby hydrogen diffuses out of the canister. A dense
body having a controlled amount of oxygen can thereafter be
produced by conventional powder metallurgy techniques.

Documents:

01540-kolnp-2007-abstract.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-claims.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-correspondence others 1.1.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-correspondence others 1.2.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-correspondence others.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-description complete.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-drawings.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-form 1 1.1.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-form 1.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-form 2.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-form 3.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-form 5.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-gpa.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-international exm report.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-international publication.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-international search report.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-pct others.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-pct request.pdf

01540-kolnp-2007-priority document.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-(11-05-2012)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-(11-05-2012)-FORM-3.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-(18-10-2011)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-(18-10-2011)-OTHERS.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-ABSTRACT 1.1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-AMANDED CLAIMS.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE 1.1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE 1.3.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE 1.4.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE) 1.1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-DRAWINGS 1.1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECIEVED.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-FORM 1 1.2.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-FORM 13 1.1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-FORM 13.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-FORM 18 1.1.pdf

1540-kolnp-2007-form 18.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-FORM 2 1.1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-FORM 3 1.1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-FORM 3 1.2.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-FORM 5.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-ABSTRACT.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-CLAIMS.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-DRAWINGS.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-FORM 1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-FORM 2.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-SPECIFICATION.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-OTHERS 1.1.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-OTHERS 1.2.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-OTHERS 1.3.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-PA.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

1540-KOLNP-2007-TRANSLATED COPY OF PRIORITY DOCUMENT.pdf

abstract-01540-kolnp-2007.jpg


Patent Number 253296
Indian Patent Application Number 1540/KOLNP/2007
PG Journal Number 28/2012
Publication Date 13-Jul-2012
Grant Date 11-Jul-2012
Date of Filing 30-Apr-2007
Name of Patentee CRS HOLDINGS INC.
Applicant Address 209F BAYNARD BUILDING, 3411 SILVERSIDE ROAD, WILMINGTON, DE
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 BERGLUND, ROGER; MALMABERGSVÄGEN 33C, S-723 38 VÄSTERÅS
2 SUNDSTRÖM, JOHAN DOCENTBACKEN 13, 1TR., S-104 05 STOCKHOLM
3 ARVIDSSON, PER NORSVÄGEN 6, S-640 45 KVICKSUND
4 ERIKSSON, HANS VALSVERKSVÄGEN 15, S-737 44 FAGERSTA
PCT International Classification Number B22F 1/00, 3/12
PCT International Application Number PCT/SE2005/001486
PCT International Filing date 2005-10-06
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 0402439-4 2004-10-07 Sweden