Title of Invention

AN ARM FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE INDEPENDENT SUSPENSION AND MOTOR VEHICLE INDEPENDENT SUSPENSION COMPRISING THE SAME

Abstract

Abstract AN ARM FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE INDEPENDENT SUSPENSION AND MOTOR VEHICLE INDEPENDENT SUSPENSION COMPRISING THE SAME The arm (14) comprises a first transversc connecting clement (18). articulated al its transversely outer end to a wheel-carrier (10) by means of a pair of bushes (22. 24) and at its transversely inner end to the vehicle body by means of a bush (20). a second transverse connecting element (28), articulated at its transversely outer end to the wheel-carrier (10) by means of a bush (32) and at its transversely inner end to the vehicle body by means of a bush (30). and a longitudinal interconnecting element (34) which connects the first and the second connecting element (18. 28) to each other at transversely inner portions thereof. The first and the second connecting elements (18, 28) converge towards the outside of the vehicle. The first connecting element (18) is stiff in torsion, whereas the second connecting element (28) and the interconnecting element (34) have cross-sections such that the vertical stiffness of the arm (14) at the point of articulation'of the second connecting element (28) to the wheel-carrier (10) is negligible with respect to the vertical stiffness at the point of articulation of the first connecting element (18) to the wheel-carrier (10). Torques acting on the wheel-carrier (10) around a transverse axis (ESAy) are thus only reacted by the first connecting element (18).

Full Text

.\n arm for a motor vehicle independent suspension and motor vehicle independent sus¬pension comprising the same The present invention relates to a suspension arm for connecting a wheel-carrier to the body of a motor vehicle in an independent suspension system, as specified in the preamble of claim 1. A suspension arm of the above-identified type is known from unpubLisbed Italian Patent Application N. TO2006A000246 in the Applicant's name. According to this known solu¬tion, the suspension ann comprises a pair of transverse links articulated at their outer ends to the wheel-carrier of a vehicle wheel and at their inner ends to the vehicle body, and at least one pair of connecting elements vjkich connect the links to each other and are pref¬erably made in the shape of a blade or plate, in such a manner that they exhibit a bending stiffness in a plane which is higher than the bending stiffiiess in a direction perpendicular to that plane. The suspension arm is able to control two translational degrees of freedom along the axes of the links and, thanks to the geometry and to the torsional stiffness of the links, as well as to the geometry and to the bending stif&ess of the connecting elements in their plane, a first rotational degree of freedom around a first axis of mainly transverse and horizontal direction. The two links converge, preferably towards the outside of the vehicle, in such a manner that the arm has a centre of stiffiiess located outside its own envelope and is thus able to control, thanks to the geometry' and to the bending stiffness of the Unks, as well as to the geometry and to the bending stiffness of the connecting elements in the di¬rection perpendicular to their plane, a second rotational degree of freedom around a second axis of mainly vertical dhectior. It is an object of the present invention to provide an arm for a motorcar independent sus¬pension which offers a higher level of decoupling of the degrees of freedom under control than in the above-discussed prior art and which therefore allows to simplify the prototype development stage of the arm aiming at meeting the elasto-kinematic requirements im¬posed. A further object of the present invention is to provide a suspension arm which has a smaller number of parts, a lower weight and reduced manufacturing costs than the known arrangement illustrated above. These and other objects are fully achieved according to the present invention by virtue of a suspension arm having the characteristics specified m the characterizing part of independ¬ent claim ■, Preferred embodiments of a suspension arm according to the invention are defined in the dependent claims. The characteristics and the advantages of the invention will become apparent {rem the fol¬lowing detailed description, given purely by way of non-hmiting example, with reference to the appended drawings, in which: Figure I is a perspective view of a motor vehicle independent suspension according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 is a perspective view of the lower arm of the suspension of Figure 1; Figure 3 schematically illustrates the forces acting on the wheel-carrier of a motor vehicle wheel and the two ESA axes defining the elastic behaviour of the suspension of Figure 1; Figure 4 schematically iilustrates the five degrees of freedom controlled by the sus¬pension of Figure 1; Figure 5 shows the arrangement of the two ESA axes of the suspension of Figure 1 in the transverse vertical plane of the vehicle; Figure 6 shows the arrangement of the two ESA axes of the suspension of Figure 1 in the longitudinal vertical plane of the vehicle; Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of the suspension of Figure 1, which specifically shows the points of articulation of the lower arm and of the upper link to the wheel-carrier and to the vehicle body; Figure 8 illustrates the behaviour of the lower arm of the suspension of Figure 1 as a result of a torque around the vertical ESA axis of the suspension; Figure 9 illustrates the behaviour of the lower arm of the suspension of Figure 1 as a result of a torque around the lateral ESA axis of the suspension; Figures 10 and II show two possible embodiments of the lower arm of the suspen¬sion of Figure 1, which differ from each other in the cross-sections of the various portions of the arm; Figures 12 and 13 show two further possible embodiments of the lower arm of the suspension of Figure 1, which are both obtained by stamping and welding and differ from each other in the cross-sections of the various portions of the arm; Figure 14 schematically shows a lower suspension arm according to the invention, in combination with a spring and a shock-absorber; and Figure 15 shows a variant of construction of a bwer suspension arm according to the invention, provided with points of attachment and/or support for a spring and a shock-absorber. In the description and the claims which follow, terms such as "longitudmal" and "trans¬verse", "inner" and "outer", "front" and "rear", "horizontal" and "vertical", "upper" and "lower" are to be intended as referred to the mounted condition on the vehicle. Moreover, according to the rule usually adopted in the automotive field, the longitudinal direction, the transverse direction and the vertical direction of the vehicle will be indicated x, y and z, re¬spectively. Furthermore, the term "vehicle body" is to be intended, both in the description and in the attached claims, as referred to any mounting structure which forms part of the vehicle frame or is made as an auxihary structure attached to the vehicle frame. With reference to Figure 1, a motor vehicle independent suspension accordmg to the inven¬tion, adapted to connect a wheel-carrier 10 of a wheel 12 (a rear wheel, in the illustrated example, although the suspension is clearly applicable also to a front wheel) of the motor vehicle to the body (not illustrated) of the motor vehicle, comprises a lower arm 14 and a upper camber control link 16. Both the lower arm 14 and the upper link 16 are oriented transversely and are articulated at their transversely outer ends to the wheel-carrier 10 and at their transversely inner ends to the vehicle body. The points of articulation of the lower arm 14 to the wheel-carrier 10 and to the vehicle body, as well as the points of articulation of the upper Imk 16, are located in a substantially horizontal plane. The lower arm 14, of which a prefeiTed embodimem according to the invention is illus-traicd in Figure 2, is arranged to control four degrees of freedom of the wheel-carrier 10, as does a conventionai rigid "H" arm. In this connection, it is to be taken into account that the expressions "controlling a degree of freedom" and "removing a degree of freedom" are not to be intended in the litsrarj' meaning of avoiding a displacement in the direction in ques¬tion or a rotation around the direction in question, but in the broader sense of allowing a displacement or a rotation significantly smaller than the displacements or rotations allowed in the other directions. However, unlike a conventional rigid "H" arm, the suspension arm 14 according to the invention exhibits an intrinsic flexibility, which is basically due to its geometry and makes it possible to project the centres of stifftiess of the arm outside the physical envelope thereof^ something which a rigid "H" arm can do to a limited extent and only with the use of special and expensive bushes. The lower arm 14 include a transverse link 18 stiff hi torsion, which is connected at its transversely inner end to the vehicle body through a bush 20 and at its transversely outer end to the wheel-carrier 10 through a pair of bushes 22 and 24, The axes both of the inner bush 20 and of the two outer bushes 22 and 24 are orientated substantially paraUet to the longitudinal direction of the vehicle (X direction). The two outer bushes 22 and 24 are fit¬ted in a cylindrical tube 26 secured, for instance by welding, to the outer end of the trans¬verse link 18. The Jower arm 14 further includes a substantially straight connecting element 28, which extends at an angle relative to the transverse dhection of the vehicle so as to converge out¬wardly towards the transverse link 18 and is articulated at its ends to the vehicle body through a vertical-axis bush 30 and to the wheel-carrier 10 through a horizontal-axis bush 32. The lower arm 14 also includes a substantially straight interconnecting element 34, which extends in an approximately longitudinal direction and is securely connected to the transverse link 18 and to the connecting element 28 at the transversely inner ends thereof Preferably, the two elements 28 and 34 are integrally formed as a single V-shaped sheet-metal piece. In this case, the vertical-axis bush 30 is located at the vertex of the V. As will be better explained in the following pari of the description, the connecting element 28 has a cross-section such that it exhibits a high bending stifBiess in the horizontal plane, but a low bending stiffness ui a direction perpendicular to that plane, vi^hereas the intercon¬necting element 34 has a cross-section such that it exhibits a tiigh bending stiffness both in the horizontal plane and in a vertical plane, but a low torsional stiffness, whereby the verti¬cal stiffness of the lower arm 14 at the bush 32 is reduced. In order to define the elastic characteristics of the suspension, the EEM (Ei-uivalent Elastic Mechanism) techmque developed by the Applicant and disclosed in SAE Paper 2005-01-1719 will be used. With reference to Figures 3 to 6, the stif&iess characteristics of the transverse link 18 and of the connecting element 28 of the lower arm 14 are selected in such a manner that the suspension has a first, substantially vertical elastic axis ESAz, arranged outwardly of and behind the wheel, and a second, substantially horizontal and transverse elastic axis ESAy, located at a height between the wheel centre and the contact patch with the ground. Figure 3, as well as Figures 5 and 6, shows the arrangement of the two elastic axes ESAz and ESAy, along with the direction and the point of application of each of the forces acting on the wheel 10, that is to say, the impact force IF, the braking force BF and the comeriDg force CF. Arrow F indicates the mrming direction of the vehicle, whereas dash-dot line M indicates the middle plane of the vehicle. The two elastic axes ESAy and ESAz are always perpendicular to each other, for the same reason why the principal axes of stiffness of an elastic system are. The orientation of the two elastic axes in the front vertical plane (YZ plane) is defined by the inclination of the lower arm 14 in that plane. The arm 14 may be, in fact, not arranged in the horizontal plane, but inclined relative thereto. The inclination of the ESAz axis in the lateral vertical plane (XZ plane) is defined by the intersection between the axes of the transverse Imk 18 and of the connecting element 28 of the lower arm 14 and by the iongitudinal position of the upper camber control link 16. By reasoning in lemis of degrees of freedom, two of the three translational degrees of free¬dom of the wheel-carrier 10 are controlled by the bwcr arm 14 and one by the upper link 16. With reference to Figure 4, the two translational degrees of freedom DOFl and D0F2 controlled by the lower arm 14 correspond to the translation along the axis of the trans¬verse fink 18 and to the translation along the axis of the connecting element 28, while the third translational degree of freedom D0F3 corresponds to the translation along the axis passing through the points of articulation of the upper camber control link 16. The remam-ing two rotational degrees of freedom D0F4 and D0F5 of the wheel-carrier 10 correspond to the rotations around the two elastic axes ESAz and ESAy. The suspension is not con¬ceived to remove completely these two degrees of freedom, that is to offer an essentially infinite rotational stifftiess around the two above-mentioned axes, but rather to offer a cer¬tain rotational stifftiess properly calculated depending on the requirements imposed on the eiasto-kinematic behaviour of the suspension. As far as the rotational degree of freedom D0F4 around the approximately vertical axis ESAz is concerned, it is controlled by the bending stifftiess characteristics of the lower arm 14 in the horizontal plane. If the transverse link 18 and the connecting element 28 were simply two coimecting rods not cotmected to each other, each of them would only be able to control one translational degree of freedom along its own axis. The provision of a non-rigid but compliant connection between the transverse link 18 and the connecting element 28, which connection is represented by the interconnecting element 34, makes it possible for the lower arm 14 to be able not only to define a centre of rotation for the wheel-carrier 10, but also to impose a rotational stiffness around this centre. The higher is the rotational stiffness, the more the actual elastic centre of rotation of the wheel-carrier tends to move from its ideal geometric position (point of intersection of the axes of the transverse link 18 and of the connecting element 28) to the arm itself The rotational stiffeess around the axis ESAy, that is the stiffness associated to the rotational degree of freedom D0F4, is there¬fore depending on the combined effect of the bending stiffnesses of tlie transverse Imk 18 and of the arm elements 28 and 3A in the horizontal plane. .A.S far as the rotational stiffness around the approximately ti-ansverse axis ESAy is con- ceiT;.ed, it is responsible for tKe majority of the longitudinal compliance of the suspension at the wheel centre. Since one of the requirements of the suspension is to exhibit an in¬creasing stiffness at the extremes of the longimdinal wheel travel, the rotational stif&iess of the suspension around the axis ESAy will have to increase at the extremes of the longitudi¬nal wheel travel. It is therefore usually preferable that this rotational stiffiiess is not deter¬mined or affected by the structural flexibility of the control arm (the lower arm, in the pre¬sent invention), as this latter is substantiaUy constant up to the onset of plastic deforma¬tions. The easiest way to obtain a non-linear stiffiiess characteristic is the use of rubber bushes. Therefore, in order to prevent the bwer arm 14 from bending as a whole, one of the outer points of articulation of the arm is split into a pair of bushes, that is to say, the bushes 22 and 24 by means of which the transverse link 18 is articulated to the wheel-carrier 10, The transverse link 18 is thus able to react to a torque acting around a transverse axis (axis ESAy). To this end, the transverse link 18 is preferably orientated along an essentially trans\ erse direction, and not inclined with respect to this latter in the plan view. The torque acting around the axis ESAy is then transmitted to the vehicle body by the tor¬sional reaction of the only transverse link 18, which must therefore be stiff in torsion, as al¬ready mentioned above. Otherwise, it would not be possible to achieve a significant de¬gree of non-linearity in the rotational stiffness due to the excessive contribution provfded by the structural flexibility of the link. In order to transmit the torsional reaction of the transverse link IS to the vehicle body, the interconnecting element 34 is used, which there¬fore wilt be stiff in bending not only in the horizontal plane but also in a vertical plane to contribute to the rotational stiffriess around the approximately vertical axis ESAz. In order to ensure that the torques acting around the axis ESAy are reacted only by the transverse link 18 stiff in torsion, thereby achieving the desired non-linear stiffiiess charac¬teristic of the arm, it is necessary to make sure that the connecting element 28 has no con- tribution whatsoever to the reaction of these torques and that the vertical stiffness ortHe" lower arm 14 at the pomt of attachment of the connecting element 28 to the wheel-carrier 10 is thus ver\' low. To this end, (he connecting element 28 is made so as to exhibit a low bending stiffness in a vertical plane. Since the connecting element 28 must exhibit at the same time a high bending stiffiiess in the horizontal plane, as explained above in connec¬tion with the rotational behaviour of the arm around the approximately vertical elastic axii ESAZ, the connecting element 28 has preferably a blade-like cross-section. The vertical stiffiiess of the lower arm 14 at the point of attachment of the connecting ele¬ment 28 to the wheel-carrier 10, that is, at the bush 32, is actually given by the sum of the bending stiffiiesses of the link 18 and of the connecting element 28 and of the torsional stiffness of the interconnecting element 34, as these stiffnesses act in series. It is therefore possible to achieve the same object to reduce the vertical stiffiiess at the bush 30 with dif¬ferent combinations of cross-sections of the different portions of the lower arm 14. Two examples of different combinations of the cross-sections of the connecting element 28 and of the interconnecting element 34 are given in Figures 10 and 11. In Figure 10 the connecting element 28 has a blade-like shape lying in the horizontal plane, so as to be stiff in bending ii the horizontal plane but compliant both in torsion and in bendhig in a vertical plane, whereas the intercormecting element 34 has a cross-section in the shape of a T rotated ninety degrees, so as to be stiff in bending both in the horizontal plane and in a vertical plane, but compliant in torsion. In Figure 11, on the other hand, both the connecting element 28 and the interconnecting element 34 have a C-shaped cross-section, so as to be stiff in bending both in the horizon¬tal plane and in a vertical plane, but comphant in torsion. The fact that different combinations of cross-sections can be provided to obtain the same overall stiffiiess characteristics of the lower arm means that there exists a wide freedom of choice as how to make the arm itself. Since the connecting element 28 and the intercon¬necting element 34 may have open cross-sections, these two elements are conveniently produced as stamped pieces, either as a single piece (as in the example of construction shovm in Figure 2) or as Two separate pieces joined to each other by welding. The trans- verse link 18 may also be obtained by stamping and welding. Two examples of construction of a lower arm obtained by stamping and welding are shown in Figures 12 and 13. In both the examples of construction, the transverse link !8 is made as a tube having a rec¬tangular open cross-section, at the ends of which the cylindrical seat 26 adapted to receive the pair of bushes for connection to the wheel-carrier and a cylindrical seat 36 adapted to receive the bush for coimection to the vehicle body are secured by weldmg. In the arm of Figure 12, the connecting element 28 has a C-ahaped cross-section with a vertical blade-like portioti, at the ends of which there are provided horizontal-axis cylindri¬cal seats 38 and 40 for the bushes for connectioD to the wheel-carrier and to the vehicle body, respectively, and with a pair of upper and lower tabs which extend from the opposite edges of the vertical blade-like portion and have an increasing width towards the intercon¬necting ele^iient 34. The interconnecting element 34 has a substantially constant C-shaped cross-sectLon. The coimecting element 28 and the interconnecting element 34 are made as separate pieces, both advantageously obtained by stamping, and are joined to each other by welding. In the arm of Figure 13, the connecting element 28 has a horizontal blade-like configura¬tion, whereas the interconnecting element 34 has a I-shaped cross-sectioa In this case, the two elements 28 and 34 form a single V-shaped piece, at the vertex of which a cylin¬drical seat 40 is provided for the bush for connection to the vehicle body. Figure 14 schematically shows how the bwer arm 14 can be used for attachment and/or mountuig of a spring 42 and of a shock-absorber 44 of the suspension. Advantageously, both the spring 42 and the shock-absorber 44 are mounted on the torsionally stiff part of the arm, that is, on the transverse link 18. In this connection, as shown in Figure 15, the transverse Hnk 18 is provided with a support element 46 for the spring 42 and has a pair of aligned holes 48 for iasertion of a pin (not shown) for attachrocnJ of the lower end of the shock-absorber 44, !n order to keep the ability lo project the centre of stiffness of the lower arm 14 outside the physical envelope thereof, ihe four points of attachment of the arm 14 to the wheei-carrieT 10 and lo the vehicle body must have each a high stiffiiess along the axis of the respective connecting element (link 18 or element 34). This stiffness requirement involves that all the bushes tend to be stiff, and therefore simple and durable, with beneficial effects in terms of cost of the suspension. It is however preferable that one of the two paired bushes 22 and 24 through which the transverse link 18 is connected to the wheel-carrier 10 is significantly softer than the other bush. The combination of a stiff bush and of a soft bush suitably spaced from each other does not prevent to maintain the required stiffness along the axis of the transverse link 18 (the two bushes are in fact arranged in parallel, and therefore the effect of the stifferbush is not diminished by the presence of the softer bush) and further allows to concentrate In a single bush (the soft bush) the control of the rotational stiffeess around the elastic ny-is ESAy and hence of the longitudinal compliance at the wheel centre. This results to be par¬ticularly useful when it comes to tuning the suspension during the prototype stage: in fact, if one of the two bushes is significantly softer than the other bush, then changes made to the bngitudinal compliance at the wheel centre, both in the linear region and in the non¬linear region, will have a minimal effect on the tJther elasto-kinematic characteristics of the suspension. The main advantages of the mvention can be identified in the following points. a) The incorporation of all the compliance characteristics of the suspension in the physical shape of the lower control arm resuUs in a suspension architecture which is ex¬tremely simple and therefore less expensive than comphcated multi-link suspensions which offer comparable elasto-kinematic performances, b) The suspension has a smaller number of parts and a lower weight. c) The suspension has independent load paths and hence a greater decoupling between the elasto-kinematic behai'iourji in the longitudinal direction and in the transverse diTeciion than the prior art discussed in the introductory part of the description. Naturally, the principle of the invention remaining unchanged, the embodiments and de¬tails of construction may vary widely with respect to those described and illustrated purely by way of a non-limiting example. For example, the torsionaliy stiff part of the lower arm 14, namely the transverse link 18, can be arranged either frontwards or rearwards. Accordingly, also the pair of bushes 22 and 24 for connection to the wheel-carrier can be arranged either in the frontward or in the rearward part of the arm. Moreover, the cross-section of the torsionaliy stiff part of the lower arm 14 (link 18) may have different shapes and may also be open, even though a closed shape is preferable. This part may be conveniently obtained by welded connection of two stamped pieces or from a pre-formed tube. Alternatively, this part may be formed as a single piece with the inter¬connecting element 34 or both with the interconnecting element 34 and with the connect¬ing element 28. In both these cases, the part 18 might be conveniently produced as a stamped piece of open cross-section and then finished by addition of a closing piece to form a closed cross-section. This closing piece can be constituted for example by the piece 46 (Figure 15) used as mounting for the spring 42. The cross-section of the torsionaliy stiff part of the lower arm 14, that is to say, of the con¬necting element 28, as well as that of the interconnecting element 34, need not falfil par¬ticular requirements and can therefore take different shapes, provided the sum of their compliances results in a very low vertical stiffness at the point of attachment of the con¬necting element 28 to the wheel-carrier. Also the orientation of the bushes is not subject to particular constraints, even though the orientation proposed in the embodiment of Figures I and 2, where each bush is arranged with its axis perpendicular to the aKis of the element to which it is secured, apart from^ one of the bushes for connection to the vehicle body, that is io say, the vcrtical-axis hush 30 mounted on the torsionally compliant part of the arm, is preferable. The axes of the torsionally stiff part (transverse link IS) and of the torsionally compHani part (connecting element 28) of the lower arm must not necessarily lie in the same plane. They are only required to converge towards the outside of the vehicle. Even though it is preferable that one of the two paired bushes for connection to the wheel-carrier is significantly less stiff than the other in order to control the longitudinal compli¬ance of the suspeniion at (he wheel centre, this is not essential for the invention. Finally, the essentially transverse orientation of the link 18, which constitutes the torsion¬ally stiff part of the lower arm 14, is preferable but not necessary. CLAIMS 1. Lower control arm (14) for a motor vehicle independent suspension, intended to connect a wheel-carrier (10) of a vehicle wheel (12) to the vehicle body so as to control four degrees of freedom (DOFl, D0F2, D0F4, D0F5) of the wheel-carrier (10), compris- mg a first elongated transverse connecting element (18), articulated at its transversely outer end (22, 24) to the wheel-carrier (10) and at its transversely inner end (20) to the vehicle body, a second elongated transverse connecting element (28), articulated at its transversely outer end (32) to the wheel-carrier (10) and at its transversely inner end (30) to the vehicle body, and a longitudinal interconnecting element (34) which coimects said first and second connecting elements (18, 28) to each other at transversely iimer portions thereof, wherein said first and second coimccting elements (18, 28) are orientated so that their axes con¬ verge towards the outside of the vehicle; characterized in that the first connecting element (18) is substantially stiff in torsion and is provided at its transversely outer end with a pair of bushes (22, 24) for connection to the wheel-carrier (10), and in that the second connecting element (28) and the interconnecting element (34) have cross-sections such that the vertical stiffness of the arm (14) at the point of articulation of the second connecting element (28) to the wheel-carrier (10) is negligible with respect to the vertical stiffness at the point of articulation of the first connecting element (18) to the wheel-carrier (10), whereby torques acting on the wheel-carrier (10) around a transverse axis (ESAy) are reacted only by first connecting element (18), 2. Suspension arm according to claim 1, wherein the axes of the first and second con¬necting elements (18, 28) are arranged in an approximately horizontal plane. 3. Suspension arm according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the axis of the first con¬necting element (18) is substantially orientated in the transverse direction (Y) of the vehi¬cle. 4. Suspension arm according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the frrst torsion- ally stiff connecting element (18) is arranged behind the second connecting element (28), 5. Suspension arm according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first coimect-ing element (IS) has a ciosed cross-section. 6. Suspension arm according to claim 5, wherein the first connecting element (18) is made up of two stamped pieces joined to each other by welding, 7. Suspension arm according to claim 5, wherein the first connecting element (18) is obtained from a pre-formed tube. 8. Suspension arm according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the second con¬necting element (28) is stiff in bending in die horizontal plane, but compliant in bendin;. in a vertical plane. 9. Suspension arm according to claim 8, wherein the second connecting element (18) has an open cross-section. 10. Suspension arm according to claim 9, wherein the second connecting element (18) has a C-shaped cross-section. 11. Suspension arm according to claim 8 or claim 9, wherein the second connecting element (18) is also compliant in bending in a vertical plane. 12. Suspension arm according to claim 11, wherein the second connecting element (18) has a blade-like shape. 13. Suspension arm according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the interconnect¬ing element (34) is stiff in bending both in the horizontal plane and in a vertical plane, hut compliant torsion. lA. Suspension arm according to claim 13, wherein the interconnecting eiement (34) has an open cross-section. 15. Suspension arm according to claim 14, wherein the interconnecting element (34) has a C-shaped cross-section. 16. Suspension arm according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the second con¬necting element (28) and the interconnecting element (34) are made as a sing[e piece. 17. Suspension arm according to any of claims 1 to 16, wherein the second connecting element (28) and the interconnecting element (34) are made each as a stamped piece and are securely connected to each other. 18. Suspension arm according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first connect¬ing element (18) and the interconnecting element (34) are made as a single piece. 19. Suspension arm according to claims 16 and 18, wherein the first connecting eie¬ment (18), the second connecting element (28) and the interconnecting element (34) are made as a single stamped piece of open cross-section. 20. Suspension arm according to claim 19, fiuther comprising a closing piece secured to the first connecting element (18) to forai a part having a closed cross-section. 21. Suspension arm according to any of the preceding claims, provided with mounting points (46) for a spring (42) and with attachment points (48) for a shock-absorber (44). 22. Suspension arm according to claims 20 and 21, wherein said closing piece is ar¬ranged to provide a mounting surface (46) for the spring (42). 23. Suspension arm according to any of the preceding claims, comprising a first bush seat (26) for the aforesaid pair of bushes (22, 24) intended to connect the first connecting 24. Suspension arm according to claim 23, wherein said first, second and third hush seats (26, 36, 38) have horizontal axes and said fourth bush seat (40) has a vertical axis. 25. Motor vehicle independent suspension comprising a lower control arm (14) accord¬ ing to any of the preceding claims and an upper camber control link (16).

Documents:

6753-CHENP-2008 AMENDED CLAIMS 02-12-2014.pdf

6753-CHENP-2008 EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECEIVED 02-12-2014.pdf

6753-CHENP-2008 FORM-3 02-12-2014.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 abstrcat.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 claims.pdf

6753-CHENP-2008 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 18-12-2013.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 correspondence-others.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 description (complete).pdf

6753-chenp-2008 drawings.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 form-1.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 form-18.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 form-3.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 form-5.pdf

6753-chenp-2008 pct.pdf